Home Blog Page 47

Céline Sciamma talks ‘Portrait of a Lady on Fire’ Cannes reception to possible Palme d’Or

Quentin Tarantino’s “Once Upon A Time in…Hollywood” made quite a splash at the 72nd Cannes Film Festival, but the one film that has stayed with me is French filmmaker Céline Sciamma’s “Portrait of a Lady on Fire.” I’m not alone as it’s the one that people keep talking about days after seeing it.

The closest film I can remember doing that to me at a film festival was Jane Campion’s “The Piano” way back in the 90’s. This film is a romance set in late 18th century France, and it works on just so many levels without trying to hit you over the head with a message. It just seeps into your being via a tender but rather complex love story.

Not only is a gorgeous to look at, it’s a great example of how a well-told story with well developed characters and enter your life and stay with you whether you like it or not. It’s that rare film that makes you feel something wonderful while watching it, taking in all the beautiful imagery. This is the type of film I long for at festivals, and having it take me by surprise makes these long nights and days (although I can’t complain, I’m at Cannes) pure heaven.

“Portrait of a Lady on Fire” literally premiered to overwhelming rapturous acclaim at the Cannes Film Festival, its director Céline Sciamma has had some time to consider the passionate response. She’s not the only one. Everyone I talk to since that night has mentioned it. No other film is getting this much word of mouth attention, even with Brad Pitt and Leonardo DiCaprio running around with Tarantino giving us all insightful interviews.

“I think it’s because it’s a love story,” Sciamma said in an interview on a sunny terrace in Cannes. “You can get some love back. It’s kind of beautiful, actually.”

The French filmmaker’s movie has arguably provoked more ardor than anything else in Cannes. “Portrait of a Lady on Fire” has been hailed as a masterpiece not just for the tender relationship it depicts between the young painter Marianne (Noémie Merlant) and her portrait subject, Heloise (Adéle Haenel), in 18th century France, but for its resonate and acutely contemporary portrait of female identity as reflected in art.

In the film, Marianne has been hired by Heloise’s mother to paint her daughter’s portrait for her marriage to a Milanese man she’s never met. Heloise, a fiercely independent young woman, resents both the wedding and the portrait, so Marianne, posing as a companion, must steal glances to capture her. It’s a movie built subversively through looks and glimpses. A love develops, one seen and rendered through a woman’s eyes.

Sciamma was inspired to make the film by forgotten women who painted, mostly other women, in the 1700s. For her, “Portrait of a Lady on Fire” is about reclaiming the past lives and art of women.

“There was no transmission of our memory, and art is about portraying life,” she says. “We’ve been cut off of our intimacy because we’ve not been told our story. I’ve missed those images. They’ve been missing from my life.”

portrait of a lday on fire movie images 2019

“Portrait of a Lady on Fire” is likewise a movie that had been missing. Like Marianne and Heloise, Sciamma, 40, is seeking new imagery of women’s lives.

“It’s an opportunity for new sensations in the theaters, a new excitement, new journeys,” says Sciamma. “It’s a reservoir of emotions, new buttons that will be pushed.”

Sciamma is a founder of the collective 50/50×2020, the French sister group to Time’s Up, which has pressed the French film industry and Cannes to improve gender equality. Sciamma has been coming to Cannes since 2007 when her debut, “Water Lilies,” also a coming-of-age tale where paintings plays a role, screened in the festival’s Un Certain Regard section.

But she was last here to help 50/50×2020 organize a demonstration in 2018 on the Cannes red-carpet steps and to get Cannes artistic director Thierry Frémaux to sign a pledge for parity and transparency in its selection process. The festival this year for the first time released gender statistics on its submissions. “Portrait of a Lady on Fire” is one of four out of 21 films in Cannes’ main lineup directed by a woman, a number that ties Cannes’ previous high.

Asked whether her art and activism are linked, Sciamma responds: “I have no choice. To me, life and activism are connected.”

In the 72 years of Cannes, female directors have seldom appeared in competition, and no female filmmaker has ever outright won the festival’s prestigious top honor, the Palme d’Or. In 1993, Jane Campion’s “The Piano” won the Palme in a tie with Chen Kaige’s “Farewell My Concubine.”

celine sciamma mttg interview at cannes 2019 portrait of a lady

This year, Sciamma could go from protester to a well deserved Palme d’Or winner.

“It’s not about what it means to me. It would mean a lot for a lot of people. That would be the most important,” she says. “It wouldn’t belong to me that much.”

The Palme will be decided by the jury presided over by Alejandro Iñárritu in an awards ceremony Saturday. “Portrait of a Lady on Fire” is already riding high, though. On Wednesday, it was acquired by Neon and Hulu, with plans for a fall release in North America and a robust awards campaign. Even one of the other filmmakers in competition in Cannes, the Canadian filmmaker Xavier Dolan, hailed the film as “magnificent.”

NEON and Hulu remarked, “From the moment we saw this beautiful and captivating love story, we knew we had to release this film. From Céline’s writing and directing, to the absolutely absorbing performances, we couldn’t be more excited for audiences to experience this sensationally moving piece of cinema on the big screen.”

Mk2 added, “We are thrilled by how audiences and buyers from around the world have responded to the ground breaking and emotionally gripping Portrait Of A Lady On Fire. It is sure to cement Céline Sciamma’s reputation as one of the most exciting directors of her time. We are thrilled to be partnering with NEON to bring this progressive and potent piece of cinema to the big screen across the country. They are one of the most dedicated and passionate distribution teams in North America.”

“Portrait of a Lady on Fire” was made with a female producer, cinematographer, first-assistant director, costume designer, make-up artist and others. Walking the red carpet, they collectively cut a seldom, if ever, seen image in Cannes. Sciamma calls “Portrait of a Lady on Fire” a kind of culmination.

“In a way, it sums it all,” she says. “It feels full. It feels like home.”

Donald Trump, China prepare for a long trade war: Farmers get $16 billion bailout

As the Dow had dropped around 400 points Thursday, Donald Trump is scrambling knowing that his trade war with China has no end in sight. China has got some worried that they could weaponize US Treasuries in this battle.

Trump is worried as he just put through a $16 billion aid package for farmers who are being hurt by this fight. He knows he needs their vote, so he’ll be sending them plenty of help while fighting to keep Puerto Rico from getting much needed disaster aid.

With negotiations on hold and tariffs piling up, the United States and China appear to be bracing for a prolonged standoff over trade.

Beijing is airing Korean War movies (antagonist: America) to arouse patriotic feelings in the Chinese public and offering tax cuts to software and chip companies as U.S. export controls threaten Chinese tech companies.

In Washington, Treasury Secretary Steven Mnuchin is talking to Walmart and other companies about finding ways to ease the pain if President Donald Trump goes ahead with plans to extend import taxes to the $300 billion in Chinese products that haven’t already been hit with tariffs.

And the Trump administration is working on an aid package for American farmers hurt by China’s retaliatory tariffs on soybeans and other U.S. agricultural products — on top of last year’s $11 billion farm bailout. That aid package will give farmers $16 billion in aid as even the president knows this fight will go on for quite some time.

Mnuchin and U.S. Trade Representative Robert Lighthizer wrapped up an 11th round of talks with the Chinese earlier this month without reaching an agreement to resolve a dispute over Beijing’s aggressive efforts to challenge American technological dominance. The U.S. charges that China is stealing technology, unfairly subsidizing its own companies and forcing U.S. companies to hand over trade secrets if they want access to the Chinese market.

“It’s really hard to identify whether this the beginning of a prolonged conflict or just negotiating tactics,” said David Dollar, senior fellow at the Brookings Institution and a former official at the World Bank and U.S. Treasury. “I increasingly think that this is going to turn into a long-term trade conflict. We have to entertain the possibility that there is no deal.”

Dollar points to the airing of Korean War movies and comments by President Xi Jinping suggesting that the Chinese people need to steel themselves for another “Long March” — a reference to the legendary and arduous trek Mao Zedong’s Communists made to escape pursuers from China’s ruling Nationalist government in 1934-1935.

The world’s two biggest economies are already locked in the costliest trade combat since the 1930s.

The United States has imposed 25% tariffs on $250 billion in Chinese imports and is planning to target another $300 billion — a move that would cover everything China ships to the United States.

China has targeted $110 billion in U.S. products in retaliation.

China is also looking at other ways to pressure the United States.

President Xi made it a point to visit a Chinese factory this week that processes rare earths — minerals used in things like mobile phones and electric cars. The unspoken message: The United States needs China to supply the exotic minerals.

China also turned up the heat on Boeing Co.: On Wednesday, two of China’s three major state-owned airlines — Air China Ltd. and China Southern Airlines Ltd. — demanded compensation for the grounding of the plane maker’s 737 Max jetliners after fatal crashes in Ethiopia and Indonesia. The third state-owned carrier — China Eastern Airlines Ltd. — made a similar request last month.

Meantime, the Chinese government took steps to protect tech companies from becoming collateral damage in the U.S.-China conflict.

Under the new measure, most software and integrated circuit companies can skip paying income taxes for two years and will see their tax bills cut by half for three years after that, the Finance Ministry said.

Most smartphones, tablet computers and other electronics are assembled in China. But Chinese manufacturers typically use U.S., Japanese or Taiwanese microchips and other components.

The United States has squeezed Chinese companies by threatening to shut off supplies of those key components. The Trump administration issued an order last week that will curb or end Chinese telecom giant Huawei Technologies Ltd.’s access to American chips and to Google, which provides the Android operating system and services for Huawei smartphones.

A similar export ban almost put the Chinese telecom firm ZTE Corp. out of business last year. The U.S. charged that the company had violated sanctions by selling equipment to Iran and North Korea. Eventually, ZTE escaped the export ban by agreeing to pay a $1 billion fine and to replace its management team.

In Washington, members of the House Financial Services Committee pressed Mnuchin Wednesday on the costs of the trade war with China. Mnuchin said he’d spoken to Walmart and other firms about how to limit the effect of higher tariffs on American consumers. “I don’t expect there will be significant costs on American families,” he said.

But many American businesses are not so sanguine.

Nearly 200 footwear retailers and brands including Adidas and Shoe Carnival wrote a letter to Trump on Monday, calling on him not to slap tariffs on footwear imported from China.

The group, the Footwear Distributors and Retailers of America, estimates that Trump’s proposed actions will add $7 billion in additional costs for customers every year.

Can the United States and China break the impasse?

No talks have been scheduled, and many analysts suspect a breakthrough will require an intervention at the top before the Group of 20 major economies meets next month in Osaka, Japan.

“For a deal, there needs to be a Trump-Xi call, which would enable a useful Lighthizer visit to Beijing,” said Derek Scissors, a China specialist at the conservative American Enterprise Institute. “Then the two leaders could meet in Osaka and compromise on at least one major issue: reinvigorating the talks.”

Biggest Winners, Losers of 2018-2019 TV Season plus top 100 watched

NBC may have lost both the Super Bowl and Olympics, but it was able to hold onto that ever important 18-49 demographic. It even slipped by 27 percent in that demo along with 19 percent in total viewers, but that was still a major win for network tv. CBS was the winner in total viewers. That says a lot of how shaky the network TV market has become without any sign of leveling out.

TV ratings continue to be in a steady decline as programming gets better on so many other channels. It’s nothing to have your DVR recording four shows at the same time, but this doesn’t help the traditional networks. This year’s television upfronts were more about ‘reach’ than ratings since the landscape is continually shifting.

Now, rather than just saying we’re number 1, some are touting live plus 7 day stats to include the every important viewing on demand or through DVRs. That’s a lot of combos which is forcing advertisers to continually reassess their budgets.

“We went from households to demos and now we’re going from demos to more data-driven decisions,” said CBS Entertainment president Kelly Kahl. “The business has always been more complex than melting a network’s health down to an 18-49 number. This is the industry saying, yeah, there’s something more than just boiling things down to one number.”

Fox executive vice president/head of research Will Somers said as ratings diminish, he still sees them as “part of what’s an increasingly fragmented puzzle, but an incomplete one. What you’re seeing is continued progression away from conventional metrics.”

“Reach” is one way to guide advertisers, he added, but it’s not a perfect stat either.

HBO Game of Thrones big winner for 2019 season.

WINNERS

The Masked Singer: The season’s biggest breakout hit, Fox’s costumed singing competition is the No. 1 new series in adults 18-49 by a wide margin: Its 3.8 rating in the demo, including a week of delayed viewing, is a full point ahead of NBC’s Manifest. It is tied with This Is Us and The Big Bang Theory for the top entertainment series overall. Fox is betting big on the show next season, with two cycles and a post-Super Bowl premiere for the second.

The Big Bang Theory: Although it declined in its 12th and final season, the CBS comedy is going out as network TV’s most-watched series, averaging 17.5 million viewers. The series finale clocked in with 18.5 million viewers, growing to a massive 23.44 million after three days.

The Oscars: After four straight years of declining audiences and an all-time low in 2018, the host-less awards show bounced back some, growing by double digits in both viewers (29.56 million, +11.5 percent over 2018) and the 18-49 demographic (7.7, +13 percent).

The Chicago franchise: Stacking Dick Wolf’s Windy City-set shows on Wednesday nights proved to be a boon for NBC: All three are steady in adults 18-49 — no small thing in a season when the vast majority of broadcast shows declined — and Chicago Med, Fire and PD are also having their most-watched seasons ever, averaging better than 11 million viewers apiece.

The CW’s Sunday night: Supergirl and a remake of Charmed didn’t make the Big Four sweat, but they accomplished their goal for The CW in providing a starting point for more original programming across its linear and digital platforms.

The NFL: Despite a down Super Bowl, the safest bet on broadcast TV improved across the board in 2018-19. Every regular-season broadcast window and all three rounds of the pre-Super Bowl playoffs improved on the prior year.

Game of Thrones: Plenty has been written about the success of the final season of HBO’s juggernaut, but nonetheless it’s remarkable to see a show available to a fraction of TV households — about 35 to 40 percent of the country — rank No. 1 among adults 18-49, and beat all but two broadcast shows (available in nearly 100 percent of the country) in total viewers.

LOSERS

The Voice and American Idol: While The Masked Singer took off, these two veteran singing competitions took it on the chin. The Voice‘s two weekly shows declined by double digits in adults 18-49 (16 percent on Mondays, 13 percent on Tuesdays in live-plus-7 ratings). Idol fell by 19 percent on Sundays and 25 percent on Mondays.

Will & Grace and The Gifted: In a season where most shows were down, the NBC sitcom and Fox’s Marvel drama were the most down: Will & Grace declined by a massive 46 percent in adults 18-49 (2.8 to 1.5 in live-plus-7), and The Gifted fell by 45 percent (2.0 to 1.1). The former will return in the back half of 2019-20 thanks to a very early renewal, while The Gifted was axed after two seasons.

CBS’ 9:30 p.m. Thursday time slot: The network went 0-for-3 with the last piece of its Thursday comedy block: The Murphy Brown revival arrived with a lot of hype and not enough viewers, ending after its initial 13 episodes and getting canceled in May. Midseason entry Fam came and went with scarcely a blip, despite marketable young stars Nina Dobrev and Tone Bell. Now Life in Pieces is a dead show walking.

Marginal second-year series: Some eyebrows rose a year ago when the likes of ABC’s For the People and Splitting Up Together and NBC’s AP Bio were renewed despite mediocre-to-poor ratings. It was possible to make a case for all three — For the People (Shonda Rhimes) and AP Bio (Lorne Michaels) were backed by big-name producers, Splitting Up Together put up OK numbers thanks to the Roseanne halo. As these things tend to go, however, all three suffered sizable declines their second time out: For the People and Splitting Up Together were canceled superb, and AP Bio, while still playing out its season, is the longest of shots.

Superheroes: In addition to the aforementioned The Gifted, the five DC Comics shows on The CW were down a collective 25 percent in adults 18-49 vs. last season. The final run for Gotham on Fox declined by 15 percent year to year. Agents of SHIELD‘s future is safe on ABC, as it received an early seventh-season pickup, but it’s likely to come in below last season as it runs into the summer.

Comedy: As TV’s No. 1 comedy, CBS’ The Big Bang Theory, goes away, the networks are finding it difficult to make viewers laugh. Among adults 18-49, CBS’ Young Sheldon and ABC’s Modern Family and The Conners are the only other sitcoms in the top 25, while the total viewers top 25 only features Big Bang, Young Sheldon and Mom in the top 25. Perhaps it’s another example of audiences shifting to other platforms: At the upfronts, NBC proclaimed that The Good Place is actually its most-viewed series — thanks to non-linear viewership. In the traditional total viewers ranker, which does feature seven days of time shifting, the comedy barely squeaks into the top 100.

“Comedy is something we’re all trying to figure out,” said one network exec. “That’s been a recurring theme for a long time. We’re trying to break the comedy code, and we’re all going to give it a shot in our own way next season. Hopefully someone finds the right DNA for a comedy hit.”

The remake trend: Last year’s No. 1 show, Roseanne, didn’t return — for reasons everyone’s pretty familiar with by now. Its replacement, The Conners, did very well, all things considered: It’s broadcast TV’s top-rated new comedy, if you consider it a brand-new show, averaging a solid 2.3 rating in the demo — justifying ABC’s desire to bring the show back even without star Roseanne Barr. But it’s no Roseanne, which ended the 2017-2018 TV season with a 6.2 rating.

Still, that number was destined to come back to earth, similar to NBC’s high-flying launch of its Will & Grace reunion, followed by that show’s sharp downward turn. Will & Grace averaged a 1.5 rating in the demo, vs. 2.8 last year. Meanwhile, CBS’ Murphy Brown return never got off the ground, averaging a 1.3.

“The Passage” and “Life in Pieces”: The Fox drama The Passage was this season’s highest-rated series in adults 18-49 not to secure a renewal, while CBS’ comedy Life in Pieces is so far the most-watched series to be canceled. (Some shows, however, remain on the bubble, as the networks haven’t announced the fates of several late-season series.)

R. Kelly: The disgraced pop crooner is finally getting his due in the court of public opinion. Accused by multiple women of sexual assault and statutory rape, Kelly was the subject of Lifetime’s Surviving R. Kelly, a six-part series that told the story of his victims and was a smash for the channel. Surviving R. Kelly was the No. 3 non-sports series on cable this season among adults 18-49, behind just AMC’s The Walking Dead and FX’s American Horror Story.

Appointment TV: It might sound harsh, but it is a sign of the times that two of linear TV’s biggest hits, Game of Thrones and The Big Bang Theory, are both departing in the same year. In other words, this ranker will look much different next season.

“I don’t believe this is the end of mass appeal shows,” Kahl said. “There are still plenty of shows in the top 20 that are getting tens of millions of viewers every week. Perhaps this opens the door for the kind of next cultural phenomenon show to step up and get some traction. Is it harder these days with so many choices? Yeah, it probably is. But I don’t think by any means it’s the end of an era.”

tv 2019 biggest losers and winners series

TOP 102 SHOWS OF 2018-2019, ADULTS 18-49

America’s most-watched series of the 2018-2019 season in the key advertising demographic (measured in ratings points)

RANK TITLE (NETWORK) RATING/SHARE
1. Game of Thrones (HBO) 6.4/25
2. NFL Sunday Night Football (NBC) 6.1/24
3. NFL Thursday Night Football 
(Fox/NFL Network)
4.4/19
4. NFL Monday Night Football (ESPN) 4.0/17
5. This Is Us (NBC) 3.8/16
6. The Masked Singer (Fox) 3.8/16
7. The Big Bang Theory (CBS) 3.7/17
8. The Walking Dead (AMC) 3.2/12
9. Grey’s Anatomy (ABC) 2.9/13
10. Manifest (NBC) 2.8/12
11. Young Sheldon (CBS) 2.6/11
12. 9-1-1 (Fox) 2.5/10
13. The Good Doctor (ABC) 2.5/11
14. The Bachelor (ABC) 2.4/10
15. American Horror Story (FX) 2.4/11
16. Modern Family (ABC) 2.4/10
17. The Conners (ABC) 2.3/10
18. New Amsterdam (NBC) 2.2/10
19. America’s Got Talent: Champions (NBC) 2.2/9
20. Survivor (CBS) 2.2/10
21. Chicago PD (NBC) 2.1/10
22. Chicago Fire (NBC) 2.1/9
23. The Voice — Monday (NBC) 2.1/9
24. Empire (Fox) 2.0/9
25. A Million Little Things (ABC) 2.0/9
26. Chicago Med (NBC) 1.9/9
27. NCIS (CBS) 1.9/9
28. The Voice — Tuesday (NBC) 1.9/8
29. Law & Order: SVU (NBC) 1.8/9
30. Surviving R. Kelly (Lifetime) 1.8/8
31. Mom (CBS) 1.8/8
32. The Goldbergs (ABC) 1.7/8
33. Last Man Standing (Fox) 1.7/9
34. The Passage (Fox) 1.7/7
35. Criminal Minds (Fox) 1.7/8
36. Titan Games (NBC) 1.7/7
37. American Idol — Sunday (ABC) 1.7/7
38. Ellen’s Game of Games (NBC) 1.7/7
39. Station 19 (ABC) 1.6/7
40. FBI (CBS) 1.6/7
41. The Good Place (NBC) 1.6/7
42. Mayans M.C. (FX) 1.6/8
43. The Amazing Race (CBS) 1.6/7
44. The Resident (Fox) 1.6/7
45. The Neighborhood (CBS) 1.5/7
46. Star (Fox) 1.5/7
47. Family Guy (Fox) 1.5/6
48. The Rookie (ABC) 1.5/7
49. How to Get Away With Murder 
(ABC)
1.5/7
50. S.W.A.T. (CBS) 1.5/7
51. The Orville (Fox) 1.5/7
52. Will & Grace (NBC) 1.5/6
53. Bull (CBS) 1.5/7
54. American Idol — Monday (ABC) 1.5/6
55. The Simpsons (Fox) 1.4/6
56. Bob’s Burgers (Fox) 1.4/5
57. Seal Team (CBS) 1.4/6
58. The World’s Best (CBS) 1.4/6
59. Blue Bloods (CBS) 1.4/7
60. 24 Hours to Hell & Back (Fox) 1.4/6
61. Saturday Night Football (ABC) 1.4/7
62. American Housewife (ABC) 1.4/6
63. NCIS: Los Angeles (CBS) 1.4/5
64. Single Parents (ABC) 1.4/6
65. Superstore (NBC) 1.4/7
66. NCIS: New Orleans (CBS) 1.4/6
67. Schooled (ABC) 1.4/6
68. The Enemy Within (NBC) 1.3/6
69. 60 Minutes (CBS) 1.3/6
70. Hawai’i Five-0 (CBS) 1.3/6
71. America’s Funniest Home Videos 
(ABC)
1.3/5
72. Hell’s Kitchen (Fox) 1.3/6
73. Love & Hip-Hop Atlanta (VH1) 1.3/6
74. Magnum P.I. (CBS) 1.3/5
75. Murphy Brown (CBS) 1.3/5
76. Real Housewives of Atlanta (Bravo) 1.3/5
77. Lethal Weapon (Fox) 1.2/5
78. Black-ish (ABC) 1.2/5
79. Teen Mom II (MTV) 1.2/5
80. The Blacklist (NBC) 1.2/6
81. Life in Pieces (CBS) 1.2/6
82. Whiskey Cavalier (ABC) 1.2/6
83. Dancing with the Stars (ABC) 1.2/5
84. God Friended Me (CBS) 1.2/4
85. World of Dance (NBC) 1.2/5
86. The Real Housewives of Beverly
Hills (Bravo)
1.2/5
87. The Cool Kids (Fox) 1.2/6
88. The Flash (The CW) 1.2/5
89. The Curse of Oak Island (History) 1.2/5
90. Fam (CBS) 1.2/5
91. Brooklyn Nine-Nine (NBC) 1.2/5
92. Shark Tank (ABC) 1.1/4
93. Bless This Mess (ABC) 1.1/5
94. The Kids Are Alright (ABC) 1.1/5
95. Good Girls (NBC) 1.1/5
96. Teen Mom (MTV) 1.1/4
97. Splitting Up Together (ABC) 1.1/5
98. Masterchef Junior (Fox) 1.1/5
99. Man With a Plan (CBS) 1.1/5
100. Gotham (Fox) 1.1/5
101. NBA Saturday Primetime (ABC) 1.1/5
102. The Gifted (Fox) 1.1/5
PRELIMINARY LIVE+7 DAYS, PRIME, ORIGINAL TELECASTS ONLY. INCLUDES: CABLE PROGRAMS THAT PREMIERED ON OR AFTER 8/27/18 (THROUGH TOP 200, A18-49); EXCLUDES: SPECIALS, MOVIES, AND PRE/POST SPORTS.
masked singer big bang theory biggest winners american idol loses
Masked Singer, Big Bang Theory, American Idol

TOP 100 SHOWS OF 2018-2019, TOTAL VIEWERS

America’s most-watched series of the 2018-2019 season

RANK TITLE (NETWORK) VIEWERS (000)
1. NFL Sunday Night Football (NBC) 19,276
2. The Big Bang Theory (CBS) 17,436
3. NCIS (CBS) 15,914
4. Game of Thrones (HBO) 15,319
5. Young Sheldon (CBS) 14,572
6. NFL Thursday Night Football 
(Fox/NFL Network)
14,428
7. This Is Us (NBC) 13,798
8. Blue Bloods (CBS) 12,833
9. FBI (CBS) 12,713
10. The Good Doctor (ABC) 12,642
11. Manifest (NBC) 12,607
12. America’s Got Talent: Champions (NBC) 12,394
13. NFL Monday Night Football (ESPN) 11,935
14. Chicago Fire (NBC) 11,708
15. The Masked Singer (Fox) 11,566
16. Bull (CBS) 11,351
17. Chicago Med (NBC) 11,325
18. Chicago PD (NBC) 11,181
19. New Amsterdam (NBC) 11,096
20. The Voice — Monday (NBC) 10,894
21. NCIS: New Orleans (CBS) 10,864
22. 60 Minutes (CBS) 10,839
23. The Voice — Tuesday (NBC) 10,338
24. Mom (CBS) 10,321
25. 9-1-1 (Fox) 10,300
26. Grey’s Anatomy (ABC) 10,160
27. NCIS: Los Angeles (NET) 10,181
28. Hawai’i Five-0 (CBS) 10,126
29. The Conners (ABC) 9,963
30. Survivor (CBS) 9,708
31. God Friended Me (CBS) 9,618
32. American Idol — Sunday (ABC) 9,015
33. Dancing With the Stars (ABC) 8,681
34. S.W.A.T.  (CBS) 8,592
35. Murphy Brown (CBS) 8,472
36. Seal Team (CBS) 8,461
37. Magnum P.I. (CBS) 8,361
38. Last Man Standing (Fox) 8,333
39. The Rookie (ABC) 8,314
40. Criminal Minds (CBS) 8,217
41. Madam Secretary (CBS) 8,117
42. American Idol — Monday (ABC) 7,998
43. The Neighborhood (CBS) 7,991
44. The Walking Dead (AMC) 7,928
45. The Bachelor (ABC) 7,923
46. Modern Family (ABC) 7,825
47. A Million Little Things (ABC) 7,779
48. The Resident (Fox) 7,738
49. MacGyver (CBS) 7,697
50. Station 19 (ABC) 7,686
51. Law & Order: SVU (NBC) 7,412
52. The Enemy Within (NBC) 7,359
53. The Code (CBS) 7,271
54. The Blacklist (NBC) 7,168
55. Life In Pieces (CBS) 7,068
56. Ellen’s Game of Games (NBC) 6,965
57. The Amazing Race (CBS) 6,862
58. Fam (CBS) 6,670
59. The Passage (Fox) 6,622
60. Whiskey Cavalier (ABC) 6,448
61. Man With a Plan (CBS) 6,421
62. The World’s Best (CBS) 6,409
63. The Goldbergs (ABC) 6,375
64. Empire (Fox) 6,370
65. America’s Funniest Home Videos (8pm) (ABC) 6,350
66. The Village (NBC) 6,136
67. Titan Games (NBC) 6,048
68. America’s Funniest Home Videos (7pm) (ABC) 5,855
69. The Orville (Fox) 5,789
70. Bless This Mess (ABC) 5,713
71. The Cool Kids (Fox) 5,709
72. The Fix (ABC) 5,581
73. American Housewife (ABC) 5,530
74. Lethal Weapon (Fox) 5,395
75. Will & Grace (NBC) 5,313
76. Happy Together (CBS) 5,263
77. Dancing With the Stars: Juniors 
(ABC)
5,219
78. How to Get Away With Murder 
(ABC)
5,145
79. Saturday Night Football (ABC) 5,121
80. The Kids Are Alright (ABC) 5,057
81. Schooled (ABC) 5,046
82. The Red Line (CBS) 5,027
83. American Horror Story (FX) 4,893
84. 20/20 (ABC) 4,892
85. Star (Fox) 4,804
86. World of Dance (NBC) 4,773
87. The Great Christmas Light Fight 
(ABC)
4,743
88. Dateline Friday (NBC) 4,722
89. For the People (ABC) 4,703
90. Shark Tank (ABC) 4,692
91. Single Parents (ABC) 4,670
92. Curse of Oak Island (History) 4,664
93. Black-ish (ABC) 4,571
94. The Good Place (NBC) 4,565
95. 24 Hours to Hell & Back (Fox) 4,502
96. 48 Hours (CBS) 4,475
97. Dateline Sunday (NBC) 4,402
98. Superstore (NBC) 4,345
99. Blindspot (NBC) 4,341
100. Hell’s Kitchen (Fox) 4,138
PRELIMINARY LIVE+7 DAYS, PRIME, ORIGINAL TELECASTS ONLY. INCLUDES: CABLE PROGRAMS THAT PREMIERED ON OR AFTER 8/27/18 (THROUGH TOP 200, P2+); EXCLUDES: SPECIALS, MOVIES, AND PRE/POST SPORTS.

Brad Pitt, Leonardo DiCaprio talk ‘Once Upon A Time in Hollywood’ and Quentin Tarantino

Tuesday saw Quentin Tarantino return to Cannes with quite a bang followed quickly by adoration after the screening of his latest film “Once Upon a Time a Time … in Hollywood.” This is easily one of his best films in years. Yes, I wasn’t so big on “The Hateful Eight,” but prolific filmmakers are forgiven a mistake or two. This time he has Brad Pitt and Leonardo DiCaprio on board with Margot Robbie.

His latest has a dreamlike feel as it follows a handful of Hollywood types living in smoggy, starry Los Angeles in 1969, the year the Manson family went on a frenzied murder spree. Among the victims was the actress Sharon Tate, then married to Roman Polanski. In Tarantino’s Hollywoodland, Tate and Polanski live next door to Rick Dalton (Leonardo DiCaprio), a struggling, self-doubting TV actor. His best friend is Cliff Booth (Brad Pitt), a stuntman whose glory days are probably behind him. Rick could be another Clint Eastwood; Cliff should have been another Steve McQueen.

Brad Pitt and Leonardo DiCaprio said they forged a “cinematic bond” making Quentin Tarantino’s “Once Upon a Time a Time … in Hollywood,” while Tarantino bristled at the suggestion at the Cannes Film Festival on Wednesday that Margot Robbie’s Sharon Tate isn’t primary enough in the film. Someone will always wind up complaining no matter how great the film is. Tarantino did bristle at this, but he’s learned his lesson about clapping back.

“Once Upon a Time … in Hollywood” made its splashy premiere Tuesday evening at Cannes, 25 years after Tarantino’s “Pulp Fiction” debuted at the French Riviera festival, where it went on to win the Palme d’Or. Tarantino’s latest is about an actor (DiCaprio) in TV Westerns and his stunt double (Pitt) in 1960s Los Angeles, set against the backdrop of the Manson family murders.

It’s the first time DiCaprio and Pitt have made a feature together, though the two co-starred in a 2015 short directed by Martin Scorsese. They both suggested it might not be the last.

“There was an incredible ease and comfort getting to work alongside Brad. We kind of grew up in the same generation, got our start around the same time,” said DiCaprio. “We together forged, hopefully, a great cinematic bond in a film about our industry together.”

Pitt concurred. “It’s that thing of knowing you’ve got the best-of-the-best on the opposite side of the table holding up the scene with you,” he said. “I hope we get to do it again.”

The anticipation and glamour of “Once Upon a Time … in Hollywood” brought a frenzy unlike anything else has to this year’s Cannes. Festival artistic director Thierry Fremaux had desperately sought its inclusion. The film was a late addition after Tarantino was able to finish post-production work in time.

The stakes have been high for Sony Pictures, which gave Tarantino a $95 million budget to make what DiCaprio called “his love letter to the industry.” On Wednesday, Sony Pictures chief Tom Rothman sat front row as Tarantino and his cast spoke to reporters.

Tarantino was made a free agent in Hollywood after the downfall of his regular producer, Harvey Weinstein. The director has previously acknowledged knowing about some of the accusations against Weinstein for years, saying: “I knew enough to do more than I did.”

Tarantino made no mention on Wednesday of Weinstein or the controversy last year involving Uma Thurman. The actress said an unsafe stunt on “Kill Bill” left her neck and knees permanently damaged. Tarantino later apologized, calling the incident “the biggest regret of my life.”

He was, though, asked about his feelings toward director Roman Polanski, who was Tate’s husband at the time of the Manson family murders. Played by Rafal Zawierucha, Polanski is seen only sparingly in “Once Upon a Time … in Hollywood.” Tarantino previously defended Polanski for having sexing with a 13-year-old girl, telling Howard Stern in 2003 that she “wanted to have it.”

On Wednesday, Tarantino said only that he’s a deep admirer of Polanski’s “Rosemary’s Baby.” He said he didn’t consult Polanski on the new film.

The tensest moment for Tarantino came when a New York Times reporter asked why an actress as talented as Robbie had relatively few lines in the film. Robbie’s Tate is largely a side narrative in the movie, which focuses on her fictional neighbors (DiCaprio and Pitt).

“I just reject your hypotheses,” Tarantino retorted curtly. Robbie gave a fuller defense, calling her Tate “a ray of light.” She said Tarantino referred to her character as “the heartbeat of the story.”

“The moments that I got gave the opportunity to honor Sharon,” she said. “I did feel like I got a lot of time to explore the character even without dialogue, specifically.”

When another reporter asked Tarantino if he ever had any hesitation about turning a real-life tragedy into a movie, he replied, simply: “Um, no.”

“Once Upon a Time … in Hollywood,” which opens in U.S. theaters on July 26, has been met with largely good reviews in Cannes, with critics calling it a nostalgic ode to a bygone Hollywood.

Asked if he would have rather made movies in 1969 than now, Tarantino said: “I prefer any time before cell phones.”

leonardo dicaprio smiles with brad pitt at cannes once upon a time

To prepare for your roles, did Tarantino show you movies or give you a watch list?

BRAD PITT [to DiCaprio] More you than me.

LEONARDO DICAPRIO We had a screening of a multitude of B films that I had never heard of, a lot of 1960s television with actors like Ralph Meeker and Ty Hardin. These guys could have been McQueen-esque, but didn’t make the transition from black and white television, especially westerns, to career-makers like “The Great Escape.” So it was almost like a love story to them. Did they get that one opportunity? No, that may have passed them by. So let’s start talking about your character, what he might have been, what he’s struggling with as a working-class guy in the industry who has been playing the heavy from television show to television show. What that does to his psyche and his confidence?

PITT I [remember] a lot of that television. In fact [Tarantino] reminded me of much of it that I had forgotten. We did watch “Billy Jack,” some Tom Laughlin, just for fun. We were pretty much weaned on the same television and film. We talked a lot about the stuntman-actor relationship. I got to meet Bud Ekens, who was Steve McQueen’s. This was a legendary relationship. He did the jump for “The Great Escape,” got Steve McQueen into motorcycles. And, then, Burt Reynolds and Hal Needham. We got to talk to Burt. Originally he was going to play George Spahn. We had rehearsals before he passed. I was surprised what a joy that was and how giving he was, and I was really moved by it. But then I realized that so much of my childhood was watching Burt Reynolds — he was the biggest thing around in the late 1970s.

Did you spend more time together so you could develop your flow?

DICAPRIO You come to Hollywood and you’re basically isolated and left to your own devices. [Rick and Cliff] rely on this friendship for everything. We immediately fell into those shoes. We understood that relationship [laughs] so quickly that on the first day, we were those guys.

PITT It was pretty automatic. We both came on the scene around the same time, we have crossed paths many times, we have the same reference points. I’ve always felt that you don’t understand the deal you’re making when suddenly you’re that lone gazelle on the plain and the herd’s gone, so to speak. And, you know, my friend here [he gestures toward DiCaprio] has been the same. So there’s automatic comfort in having experienced the same thing in that way. That’s not a complaint in any way, I say that merely as fact. We have mutual respect and I know when an actor elevates a scene, so we carry that respect.

brad pitt tips glasses with quentin tarantino cannes

The way Tarantino’s movies are written, his voice is very strong. Did it take some time to replace his voice with yours?

DICAPRIO And hear your own, is that what you’re saying? [Laughs] I suppose so. He is such an absolute powerhouse of a personality, of course, and an artist as well. But, look, he gives you real ownership. [There are] beats that you need to hit. But there are plenty of opportunities where once you get into the groove, there can be a completely improvisational scene. And you’re almost making reference points from his dialogue and his voice and the multitude of talks that you’ve had with him about who this character is and what kind of movie he wants to make. They sort of bloom sometimes, and that’s happened quite a few times.

PITT You know when you have an altercation in public or you put your foot in your mouth, and you’re driving home and you think of that witty thing that you wished you would have said? His dialogue is that witty thing.

Rick Dalton is kind of like the Clint Eastwood who doesn’t happen.

DICAPRIO He is the guy who almost got that shot — and that’s what’s torturing my character. I grew up in this industry, I have a lot of friends who are actors, and there’s so much talent out there. But it really boils down to being at the right place at the right time.

PITT We talk about this with streaming. With streaming, we see so much talent that was always there. There are so many more opportunities. We’re seeing this wealth of actors, writers and directors. And it just reminds us how lucky we were to land where we landed.

DICAPRIO Mm-hmm.

Did it worry you that so much seems disposable.

PITT It may be. I’ve been really interested in younger generations that cannot just sit in a chair for the length of a movie. They want their information quicker. That may just be the changing of the times. I don’t know.

DICAPRIO I see positives in the fact that things and ideas and story lines that normally studios might not take a chance on, through these new streaming services, will see the light of day. So cream may rise to the top. What were people saying about the transition from silent films to talkies and the advent of television? There were all these changes, but great art is going to be spoken about and, hopefully, we don’t get so inundated that we become confused.

leonardo dicaprio margot robbie with brad pitt at cannes 2019

I actually found “Once Upon a Time” rather moving. That was a surprise to me with a Tarantino movie.

PITT Absolutely, you can see it in the script, you can feel it.

DICAPRIO The only thing I’ll say is that I know what the Manson murders sort of represented, being a native of Los Angeles and having parents who are still hippies to this day.

Like real hippies?

PITT I met his dad on set and said, “How nice, he’s going to be an extra in the film.” And he goes “No, that’s him every day.”

DICAPRIO They talked about this loss of innocence, this real turning point where they had these ideals about what the future could be. And then all of a sudden this one longhaired guy — and how he manipulated these kids to do what they did — it changed the world forever.

PITT I walk away [from the film] with a hopeful reminder of what it can be, what we can be.

What was the hopeful part?

PITT Taking care of each other, that’s what I feel at the end. It really endears me to Quentin. I could be projecting, but I see a kid who was home by himself a lot and found his —

DICAPRIO — solace —

PITT — solace and direction in these heroes on the screen, big and small. I find that in his dialogue. I find that in the scenarios. I find this one really endearing. He’s exposing his own self-doubts. [DiCaprio starts mm-hmming.] I just see this real innocent kid who wishes life could be this way. Maybe it’s because I know Quentin I find it hopeful and endearing. I was really, really moved at the end.

brad pitt poses with quentin tarantino at cannes once upon a time in hollywood

It’s interesting that he’s gone back to the past again.

PITT He’s going back to his childhood.

DICAPRIO Yeah, I agree. What Brad said is very pertinent because cinema and television and all this stuff, it’s in [Tarantino’s] DNA. He puts things in historical context but he also creates a fairy tale. This whole idea of him recreating history — like what he did in “Inglourious Basterds” with Hitler — much like Scorsese, too, where in their childhood, cinema became part of their DNA and their language and their ability to converse with others —

PITT — their spiritual grounding —

DICAPRIO — yeah, it’s embedded in who they are as human beings. You rarely find people like that. Like Brad was saying, this is his homage and his reminiscence of 1969 where everything changed culturally and cinematically. It’s incredibly imaginative.

Gael Garcia Bernal talks ‘Chicuarotes’ and Cannes through a director’s vision

Ever since Gael Garcia Bernal hit the screen with “Y Tu Mamá También,” he’s continually chosen film projects that he wants to do. Rather than worry about what would get his career kicking into high gear the fastest, he’s followed his heart and passion which has given him more longevity in the business than most of his peers.

Now, Bernal is finding it’s a lot more relaxing being at the Cannes Film Festival as a director than as an actor.

“As a director everything is done,” says Garcia Bernal, whose film “Chicuarotes” is playing as an official selection but out of competition at Cannes.

“There’s nothing else to do. So, I just, I don’t know, let myself go. And I love the movie, I like it a lot. I like what we all did, all the collaborators did a wonderful job. And I’m proud of them and I’m happy,” he said.

Thankfully, his being more relaxed made for a much more fun interview without feeling so rushed.

gael garcia bernal with chicuarotes leidi gutierrez and benny emmanuel cannes

“Chicuarotes” follows two teenage friends in a town within Mexico City who turn to crime in an attempt to change their lives. The Mexican star says the lives of the characters are completely foreign to what he experienced growing up.

“What’s so striking about the world they live in is they grew up in something that I am so far away from,” he told MTTG in an interview this week. “I grew up in a very loving family and these kids (have) not. They don’t have it. And I just can’t understand how anyone grows up like that.

“It’s like ‘how do you do it?’ I don’t know there’s something about wanting to know a person … (and) the consequences of this cycle of violence that they go through.”

gael garcia bernal sexy time movie tv tech geeks interview

This is not the directorial debut for Garcia Bernal, but he is better known for his acting projects, including “The Motorcycle Diaries,” “Bad Education” and “Mozart in the Jungle.”

Garcia Bernal first considered making the film a decade ago but decided to put things on hold following the birth of his son.

“I had to get out from it a little bit. So, I’ve been revisiting it constantly and now I’ve ended up making it,” he says.

The film stars Daniel Giménez Cacho and Dolores Heredia, along with Benny Emmanuel, Gabriel Carbajal and Leidi Gutiérrez.

Gael Garcia said the casting was among the more complicated aspects of getting the movie done, particularly casting Emmanuel as the main character Cagalera.

“We had to find him, or rather he had to find us — rather he had to discover us because that’s more or less what ended up happening,” he said.

He added: “We did workshops for two years with actors and yes, it was really nice. It was wonderful.”

gael garcia bernal talks chicuarotes with mttg at cannes

“Chicarotes” comes back time and again to the question posed by the opening scene, whether violence is the on ly way to get things done in Mexico. It suggests, however, that violence just engenders violence and maybe there are other ways for Mexicans to live together. Could you comment?

One of the main issues or ways into the film is the open question of where violence comes from. It’s hard to answer that without being too on the nose, but the film does ask how you manage to create a loving family, love within a family. Its absence is definitely one factor that makes Cagalera dead inside, someone who could end up as a petty contract killer.

In “Chicarotes,” if you talk about absence, Cagalera’s father is often under the influence, beats his wife Tochi and and near kills his son, Cagalera.

Yes, and the mother channels his violence through her passivity, by refusing to take action, try to change anything.

Even so, the film still gives the feeling that there is hope for Mexico, it comes from its women. Sugehili gives a sense of a younger generation that’s not going to walk away from the country’s problems but try to make things better.  Do you see this as reflecting  contemporary reality?

Absolutely, in terms of making the film, it was interesting that half of the crew were women, which came about naturally. Regarding the film itself, having a son meant I disconnected, took me to another place. When I came back to engage with the film, I wanted to find some sense of light in the narrative. That meant making the character of Sugelili more prominent, for her to be the hope. We don’t know what she’ll end up doing at the end of the film, but she’s definitely a hope. Having seen the film recently, I think there’s a sense of Greek tragedy about some of it, but at the same tome it also has a strong connection with an anti-hero Western. We root for Cagalera. The trouble with, say, the Peckinpah movies is that they don’t turn anything around to offer a sense of hope [that we need nowadays]. The film combines things we’ve thought of and things which are consequences of the times we live in and make complete sense.

Did you write the screenplay with Augusto Mendoza? 

The script was written over 10 years ago.It was a very different script. It’s changed a lot but there were three things that haven’t changed.First of all, Augusto’s wonderful mixture of comedy and drama which you see in the opening scene. The film goes to really dark places, but with  a lot of humor, rooted in day-to-day things. Then there’s the context. Augusto, his family, is from San Gregorio, so you can see that in the nicknames the characters have: Cagalera, Moletco, and Chillamil, a d the way they speak. And the first scene remains. Augusto started off writing a short film about clowns that rob a bus, that why he wanted to write this script.

In terms of direction, you often move the camera around in a  continuous shot rather than cutting on movement. This gives a sense of a common space, and claustrophobia, and also a clearer idea of the district, what places are where….

Yes! exactly! We wanted to create a map of the town so that we always knew where we were: the waterfront, the places around it, the mainland, and also, for example, with the kidnapping plan, to be very precise in terms of, O.K., they are doing this-and-at this time this is going to happen, and if this happens, they’re going to change plans, and do this. The discipline of logic, however arbitrary, helped a lot when writing.

chicuarotes movie images from cannes 2019

“Chicuarotes” comes back to a fish tank inhabited by some axolotls. They seem symbolic, amphibians which can change, raising the question as to whether Mexico itself can change as much.

Axolotls regenerate. They can live for 18 years, but never grow old, stay young and die young. They’re always in a constant sort of evolution. But only one out of 100 or something gets to be a salamander.

Qualcomm antitrust slap plus Amazon moves ahead with face recognition

Qualcomm might not be a name many recognize, but it’s the most important tech company, and getting hit with an antitrust violation could truly change the smartphone landscape for years to come. Naturally, the company says it will appeal, but the sting will remain.

A federal judge has ruled that Qualcomm unlawfully squeezed out cellphone chip rivals and charged excessive royalties to manufacturers such as Apple in a decision that undercuts a key part of its business.

The decision vindicates the U.S. Federal Trade Commission two years after it filed its antitrust lawsuit against the San Diego chipmaker. It’s a potentially costly setback for Qualcomm, as the decision could slash its ability to extract big royalties from phone makers.

Qualcomm said Wednesday that it would appeal, suggesting the case could still take a few years to resolve.

“We strongly disagree with the judge’s conclusions, her interpretation of the facts and her application of the law,” Qualcomm General Counsel Don Rosenberg said in a statement.

The outcome seems likely to reduce the licensing fees paid to Qualcomm, but it’s unclear if device makers will pass on any of their savings and lower their prices. The royalties represent a relatively small portion of smartphone prices that now top $1,000 for some premium models.

U.S. District Judge Lucy Koh in San Jose, California, ruled Tuesday that Qualcomm Inc. must renegotiate licensing deals with customers. It must license its patents to rival chipmakers at fair prices and can’t sign exclusive agreements that block competitors from also selling chips to smartphone makers like Apple. Qualcomm must submit to FTC monitoring for seven years.

The case has geopolitical ramifications. If Qualcomm suffered a big hit to its profitability, that could mean less spending on research and development — a knock to an American tech icon as the U.S. embarks on a politically sensitive race with China to update to 5G, a new wireless technology.

“The Trump administration views Qualcomm as almost the crown jewel for the U.S. in terms of U.S. technology development. Similar to the way China views Huawei,” said Angelo Zine, CFRA analyst. “It will be interesting to see if this gets revisited.”

Qualcomm’s rivals are mostly Asian companies, including Huawei, Zine said. The Trump administration has set bruising sanctions against Huawei and pushed European allies not to use the Chinese company’s technology due to national-security concerns of China spying. The U.S. government is also in a spiraling trade war with China.

The Trump administration’s attitude to Qualcomm can be seen in a case from last year, when it blocked a Singapore company, Broadcom, from buying Qualcomm over concerns about national security and who would dominate 5G technology.

Trade group Computer & Communications Industry Association said Tuesday’s ruling was a win for wireless technology, as it would mean more competition.

Qualcomm has justified its “no license, no chips” system as a repayment system for the $40 billion it has spent through several decades working on wireless technology essential to smartphones.

Last month Apple and Qualcomm settled a bitter financial dispute centered on some of the technology that enables iPhones to connect to the internet. The deal requires Apple to pay Qualcomm an undisclosed amount. It also includes a six-year licensing agreement that likely involves recurring payments to the mobile chipmaker.

Apple had already lost an earlier battle with Qualcomm in March when a federal court jury in San Diego decided the iPhone maker owed Qualcomm $31 million for infringing on three of its patents.

Qualcomm shares dropped 12% to $68.18 in afternoon trading.

Amazon facial recognition program continues despite protests.

Amazon Moves Ahead With Facial Recognition

Despite pressure from civil rights groups, activist investors and its own employees, Amazon said Wednesday that shareholders at an annual meeting in Seattle voted against proposals related to two major social issues: climate change and facial recognition technology.

The two proposals on facial recognition had asked Amazon to stop selling its technology to government agencies, saying that it could be used to invade people’s privacy and target minorities.

Earlier this month, San Francisco banned the use of facial recognition software by police and other city departments. Amazon has defended its facial recognition technology, saying that it helps law enforcement catch criminals, find missing people and prevent crime.

The climate change proposal, backed by more than 7,600 Amazon employees, pushed the company to release a detailed plan on how it will curb its use of fossil fuels that power its data centers and planes that ship its packages.

After the shareholding meeting in Seattle Wednesday, the employees said that they plan to continue to put pressure on Amazon to do more to reduce its impact on climate change. Amazon said it already has plans to release its carbon footprint later this year and has been working to cut shipping emissions.

Amazon did not release shareholder vote totals on

‘Game of Thrones’ fans still fired up over series finale

“Game of Thrones” fans have always been vocal, but none more than in the final season with some even creating a petition for HBO to redo the entire final season. Naturally with the series finale on Sunday, many fans are still being kept up late at night pondering it all. We wanted to wait a few days to see how fans felt after the initial jolt of the show ending hit them.

As expected, GoT ended with Fire raining down and heads rolling. Of course, there was plenty of punishment, banishment and retribution. And that was just from the fans.

“Game of Thrones” aired its 73rd and final episode Sunday night, showing its gift for drawing record-setting numbers of viewers and for leaving those viewers deeply divided about the results, as they have been for finales from “Seinfeld” to “The Sopranos” to “Lost.”

The final episode of “Game of Thrones” at least brought some clear winners, at least one clear loser and a major upset.

Be Warned: There Are Spoilers Ahead

emilia clarke game of thrones series finale scene

Brandon Stark, who until recently appeared happy to remain a mystic philosopher forever, instead becomes philosopher-king, Bran the Broken. 

Yet he doesn’t get to sit on the Iron Throne (a dragon melted that) or rule the Seven Kingdoms (his sister Sansa broke one off to become queen of an independent North.)

And Daenerys Targaryen became the last of the show’s many, many major character deaths, given a Shakespearean send-off by Jon Snow, who watched her burn thousands of innocents and believed she had become a mad tyrant.  

“You are my queen, now and always,” Jon says to Daenerys as he shoves a dagger into her, giving her what may have been the shortest reign of any monarch in Westeros.

It was the endgame of a heel-turn from a week earlier that brought more fan outrage than any other moment in the always provocative show.

Actress Emilia Clarke, who plays the role of Daenerys, told Entertainment Weekly that she cried when she first read the script in 2017 but defended the arc in the end, saying it was true to the character and she found her final moments “beautiful and touching.”

“Hopefully, what you’ll see in that last moment as she’s dying is: There’s the vulnerability — there’s the little girl you met in season 1,” Clarke said.

The negative reaction spilled into the finale, with fans on Twitter in particular expressing outrage about the outcome, even if many agreed it was reflective of the way the unjust real world works.

“Good morning to everybody except Bran,” columnist Jemele Hill tweeted Monday, “who despite being a wack archer, sending Hodor and Theon to their deaths and chilling next to a fire while everybody was fighting, got to the king.”

The episode’s leaps from big event to big event to tie up its many plot threads did nothing to quiet criticism that the show that made its name on carefully meandering storytelling had given that up in the final two seasons in favor of attempts to please.

“Like most of Season 8, it felt like a Wikipedia summary more than a full story being told,” Gina Carbone of CinemaBlend wrote.

Critics were genuinely divided. The episode had a 57 percent fresh score among reviewers on Rotten Tomatoes, and even positive reviews acknowledged the impossibility of pulling off an ending that would be broadly satisfying.

“It was everything nobody wanted, but it was still quite a thing: adequately just, narratively symmetrical and sufficiently poignant,” Hank Stuever wrote in the Washington Post.

Regardless of how fans felt about the final season, they never stopped watching.

The finale brought in 19.3 million viewers across HBO’s platforms, topping the previous episode’s 18.4 million to make it the most-viewed episode of any kind in the channel’s history.

game of thrones finale maisie williams with isaac wright sophie turner hbo

Just after it aired on the East Coast, nine of Twitter’s top 10 trending topics were related to the show.

Fans also noticed another gaffe, a plastic water bottle at the feet of Samwell Tarly, like the paper coffee cup clearly visible on a table next to Daenerys earlier in the season.

The show had a full-circle ending of sorts. Bran’s surprise ascent to the throne would have been no shock at all to viewers just after the show’s first episode — where he is clearly marked as a chosen figure, forced to witness a beheading by a father teaching him the ways of the world, and pushed from a high window only to survive, paralyzed.

He then over several seasons, while missing from the story for long stretches, became a mystical seer known as the Three-eyed Raven, with an essential role but distant presence and personality.

In the finale, a council of the remaining nobles of Westeros votes for Bran after a suggestion and major speech from Tyrion Lannister.  

“People love stories,” Tyrion says. “Who has a better story than Bran the Broken?”

(His sisters, just to name two, many fans thought.)

Bran actor Isaac Hempstead Wright was, unsurprisingly, thrilled with his characters ending.

“I find it an extraordinary character arc to see him go from a vulnerable character totally dependent on others to the one person who holds all the keys to understanding the world,” he wrote Monday in The Hollywood Reporter.

Jon Snow also came full circle on the show. As punishment for becoming a queen slayer, he returns to the great northern Wall, the same journey he made when the series began, and is reunited with his dire wolf Ghost, whom he met in episode one. He also finds a spot again among the Wildlings, or “free folk,” as they head north beyond the wall.    

Sansa’s crowning as queen of the North was as predictable as the finale got — she’d clearly been headed for the role for a while.

While the night brought a big end for “Thrones” fans, its universe was far from over.

Author George R.R. Martin still intends to finish and release two more books in the series after the show passed him by years ago.

And spin-offs are in the planning stages. One pilot in production takes place in the same realm thousands of years earlier, and the finale might have hinted at another possibility.

Arya Stark, who saved humanity early in the season, decides to sail on to unknown lands, and her departure on a ship is among the series’ final images.

“What’s west of Westeros?” she asks her Stark siblings. “No one knows. It’s where all the maps stop. It’s where I’m going.” 

TV comedy writer Bess Kalb expressed a common response to this idea on Twitter: “Will watch Arya the Explorya.”

Now, will fans be ready to jump on to the “Game of Thrones” prequels now?

Roland Garros 2019: Women to watch plus Caroline Garcia advances

0

Serena Williams is finally back at the French Open, but she’s got plenty of competition. We’ve compiled the list of the best women to watch at this years Roland Garros.

Fourth-seeded Caroline Garcia earned two wins Wednesday to reach the quarterfinals of the Internationaux de Strasbourg clay-court tournament.

The Frenchwoman first finished off her first-round match with Shelby Rogers, which had been suspended on Monday, then beat Rebecca Peterson of Sweden 6-2, 6-3 in the afternoon.

“I feel good. This morning, I was ready for a long day,” Garcia said. “I was just focused on my first match, my last set, actually. I’m very happy with the way we managed the day at the office today.”

Garcia will face teenager Marta Kostyuk for a semifinal spot.

Top-seeded Aryna Sabalenka also advanced with a 6-4, 6-3 win over qualifier Laura Siegemund.

NAOMI OSAKA top ranked woman tennis 2019 french open

French Open 2019 Women To Watch

NAOMI OSAKA

Ranked: 1

Country: Japan

Age: 21

2019 Match Record: 19-5

2019 Singles Titles: 1

Career Singles Titles: 3

Grand Slam Singles Titles: 2 — Australian Open (2019), U.S. Open (2018)

Last 5 French Opens: 2018-Lost in 3rd Round, 2017-1st, 2016-3rd, 2015-Did Not Play, 2014-DNP

Aces: After going only 5-4 on clay last year, heads to Paris with a 7-1 mark on the surface in 2019. … Withdrew with injuries from tournaments in Stuttgart (abdominal muscle) and Rome (thumb).

Topspin: Big hitting carried her to two Grand Slam titles in a row on hard courts. Clay presents different challenges.

SIMONA HALEP

Ranked: 3

Country: Romania

Age: 27

2019 Match Record: 23-8

2019 Singles Titles: 0

Career Singles Titles: 18

Grand Slam Singles Titles: 1 — French Open (2018)

Last 5 French Opens: 2018-Won Championship, 2017-Runner-Up, 2016-4th, 2015-2nd, 2014-RU

Aces: Among the WTA’s top 10 in break points converted and first-serve percentage in 2019. … Pulled out of Italian Open with hamstring problem, but said she was sure she’d be OK for Paris.

Topspin: Tries to defend a Grand Slam title for the first time. Her movement and defense-to-offense skills have carried her to three of the past five finals at Roland Garros.

KIKI BERTENS

Ranked: 4

Country: Netherlands

Age: 27

2019 Match Record: 26-10

2019 Singles Titles: 2

Career Singles Titles: 9

Grand Slam Singles Titles: 0 — Best: SF, French Open (2016)

Last 5 French Opens: 2018-3rd, 2017-2nd, 2016-SF, 2015-1st, 2014-4th

Aces: Ranks in the tour’s top two in aces and service points won this season. … Hit 20 aces in one match. … At past three clay events, went semifinals-title-semifinals.

Topspin: Has the game and the confidence to go far in Paris. Many in tennis think she is ready to play well deep into the second week at a major tournament.

She’s also the odds on favorite to win.

PETRA KVITOVA

Ranked: 6

Country: Czech Republic

Age: 29

2019 Match Record: 28-8

2019 Singles Titles: 2

Career Singles Titles: 27

Grand Slam Singles Titles: 2 — Wimbledon (2011, 2014)

Last 5 French Opens: 2018-3rd, 2017-2nd, 2016-3rd, 2015-4th, 2014-3rd

Aces: Pulled out of Rome with a left calf issue. … Is third on tour in aces this year, but also has hit by far the most double-faults.

Topspin: Since getting to the 2012 semifinals at Roland Garros, only has been past the third round once. Her strong lefty strokes and recent form on clay could mean that changes this year.

SLOANE STEPHENS

Ranked: 7

Country: United States

Age: 26

2019 Match Record: 14-9

2019 Singles Titles: 0

Career Singles Titles: 6

Grand Slam Singles Titles: 1 — U.S. Open (2017)

Last 5 French Opens: 2018-RU, 2017-DNP, 2016-3rd, 2015-4th, 2014-4th

Aces: Recently hired coach Sven Groeneveld, who has worked with such past French Open champions as Maria Sharapova and Ana Ivanovic.

Topspin: Run to last year’s final in Paris showed that Stephens is capable of winning a Grand Slam championship on clay to go with her hard-court title from the U.S. Open.

ASH BARTY

Ranked: 8

Country: Australia

Age: 23

2019 Match Record: 24-5

2019 Singles Titles: 1

Career Singles Titles: 4

Grand Slam Singles Titles: 0 — Best: QF, Australian Open (2019)

Last 5 French Opens: 2018-2nd, 2017-1st, 2016-DNP, 2015-DNP, 2014-1st

Aces: After going 1-6 against top-10 opponents in 2018, she is 6-4 in those matches in 2019. … Played cricket while away from the tour for nearly two years after the 2014 U.S. Open.

Topspin: After major breakthroughs at the Australian Open in January and when she collected the title at the Miami Open in March, seems poised to show big improvement on her 2-5 career record at the French Open.

SERENA WILLIAMS

Ranked: 10

Country: United States

Age: 37

2019 Match Record: 7-2

2019 Singles Titles: 0

Career Singles Titles: 72

Grand Slam Singles Titles: 23 — French Open (2002, 2013, 2015), Australian Open (2003, 2005, 2007, 2009, 2010, 2015, 2017), Wimbledon (2002, 2003, 2009, 2010, 2012, 2015, 2016), U.S. Open (1999, 2002, 2008, 2012, 2013, 2014)

Last 5 French Opens: 2018-4th, 2017-DNP, 2016-RU, 2015-W, 2014-2nd

Aces: Back in the top 10 this year after dropping out of the top 400 while away from the tour to have a baby. … After missing about 1½ years of majors, reached two Grand Slam finals in 2018. … Pulled out of last two tournaments because of injured left knee.

Topspin: Comes to Paris with only one clay-court match since last year’s French Open. There’s also uncertainty about the status of her knee. So while she’s always considered a favorite, no matter the site or surface, when she is healthy, it is hard to know what to expect from her this time around.

Djokovic, Nadal, Federer still ruling tennis plus 2019 French Open men to watch

Novak Djokovic, Rafael Nadal, and Roger Federer. The holy trinity of tennis are still very much around and still rising to the challenge. They’re still leading the rankings, still collecting the biggest trophies. Yes, they’re still the dominant figures in men’s tennis, responsible for the main storylines when the French Open starts Sunday.

Roger Federer returns to Roland Garros for the first time since 2015 — and a decade after he completed the career Grand Slam by winning his only trophy there. Rafael Nadal seeks a record-extending — and hard-to-fathom — 12th title in Paris. Novak Djokovic bids to win his fourth major championship in a row for the second time in his career, something neither of his two great rivals ever did even once.

They occupy the top three spots in the rankings, with Djokovic followed by Nadal, then Federer. They occupy the top three slots on the list of most men’s Grand Slam titles, with Federer’s 20 followed by Nadal’s 17 and Djokovic’s 15. And they have combined to win the past nine major tournaments, with three apiece.

“Nadal’s reign is never over. Just like Federer’s reign isn’t ending,” said Riccardo Piatti, who coached Djokovic when the Serb was a teen and has worked with other top-10 players. “As long as they play, they’re always very dangerous. But let’s not forget that Djokovic is No. 1.”

Might seem silly now, but there was a stretch when some wondered whether this group might be done with all of that winning.

Federer, who’s now 37, went 4½ years without adding to his Slam count. He dealt with knee surgery and recurring back problems. He sat out the 2016 French Open, ending a streak of 65 straight major appearances, then missed the U.S. Open and Rio Olympics that year, too. He skipped the entire clay-court circuit each of the last two years, before finally coming back this season and reaching the quarterfinals in Madrid and Rome, where he withdrew, citing an injured right leg.

“In practice in Switzerland, I felt good right away,” Federer said about what it initially was like for him on the slow surface, which requires extra footwork and lengthy, grind-it-out exchanges. “Very happy where I’m at, to be quite honest. I was a bit surprised that it went as easy as it did.”

Nadal, who turns 33 during the French Open, did not win a title all season until last week at the Italian Open, which is mainly surprising because it means he kept faltering on his beloved clay.

He’s been sidelined by hand and knee injuries in 2019, and his play hasn’t always been up to his usual standards.

“Been some low moments for me,” he said.

But Nadal looked a lot more like himself in Rome, where he handed opponents a total of four 6-0 sets, including one against Djokovic in the final.

Asked to look ahead to Paris after that three-set loss, Djokovic said: “Nadal, No. 1 favorite, without a doubt. Then everyone else.”

“He’s one of the greatest champions this game has ever seen,” Djokovic said. “His mentality, his approach, his resilience, ability to fight back after long absence from the tour, injuries, surgeries. He’s had it all. He keeps on showing to the world why he’s one of the biggest legends of tennis history.”

Djokovic, who turned 32 on Wednesday, missed the last half of 2017 with a bad right elbow; he eventually had surgery last year, which he began with a 6-6 record and losses in the Australian Open’s fourth round and French Open’s quarterfinals. He was so bothered by the latter, which stretched his major title drought to two years, that he left Roland Garros in a huff, declaring he might skip Wimbledon.

So much for that.

Not only did he play at the All England Club, he won the trophy. Then he did the same at the U.S. Open and the Australian Open, making him the only man in tennis history with three separate streaks of three consecutive majors. Now Djokovic has a shot at a non-calendar Grand Slam, something he already accomplished in 2015-16 — and can set his sights on a true Grand Slam, winning all four majors in the same season, which only has been done by two men: Donald Budge in 1938, Rod Laver in 1962 and 1969.

And Djokovic has looked good on clay lately, winning the title in Madrid before losing to Nadal in Rome.

So now, really, the question is: How much longer can this terrific trio continue to thrive and hold off talented up-and-coming players such as 25-year-old Dominic Thiem, who lost to Nadal in last year’s French Open final, or 20-year-old Stefanos Tsitsipas, who beat Federer in Australia in January before losing his first Grand Slam semifinal to Nadal?

“Time is undefeated and these guys are doing a hell of a job of fighting it off, but it has to come at some point,” said International Tennis Hall of Fame member Andy Roddick, the 2003 U.S. Open champion. “Once these guys are gone, there’s a serious vacuum. … Roger, Rafa and Novak — they’re arguably the three best of all time.”

novak djokovic rafael nadal roger federer big 3 still rule french open 2019 images

Men To Watch At 2019 French Open

NOVAK DJOKOVIC

Ranked: 1

Country: Serbia

Age: 32

2019 Match Record: 23-5

2019 Singles Titles: 2

Career Singles Titles: 74

Grand Slam Singles Titles: 15 — French Open (2016), Australian Open (2008, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2015, 2016, 2019), Wimbledon (2011, 2014, 2015, 2018), U.S. Open (2011, 2015, 2018)

Last 5 French Opens: 2018-Lost in Quarterfinals, 2017-QF, 2016-Won Championship, 2015-Runner-Up, 2014-RU

Aces: Eyes fourth consecutive major title, which also would move him closer to the only men with more career Slam titles, Roger Federer and Rafael Nadal. … Seven career victories on clay against Nadal are three more than any other player has.

Topspin: His 21-match Grand Slam winning streak and recent form on clay — won Madrid Open without dropping a set; reached Italian Open final before losing to Nadal — make for an imposing presence in Paris.

RAFAEL NADAL

Ranked: 2

Country: Spain

Age: 32 (Turns 33 on June 3)

2019 Match Record: 25-5

2019 Singles Titles: 1

Career Singles Titles: 81

Grand Slam Singles Titles: 17 — French Open (2005, 2006, 2007, 2008, 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014, 2017, 2018), Australian Open (2009), Wimbledon (2008, 2010), U.S. Open (2010, 2013, 2017)

Last 5 French Opens: 2018-W, 2017-W, 2016-3rd, 2015-QF, 2014-W

Aces: 86-2 at Roland Garros with 11 titles. Losses: 2009 against Robin Soderling, 2015 against Novak Djokovic. … Overall mark of 429-39 on clay, a .917 winning percentage. … Capturing tour-leading 37.5 percent of return games in 2019.

Topspin: Maybe hold off on those predictions of Nadal’s demise? He is playing well on clay right when it matters the most.

ROGER FEDERER

Ranked: 3

Country: Switzerland

Age: 37

2019 Match Record: 22-3

2019 Singles Titles: 2

Career Singles Titles: 101

Grand Slam Singles Titles: 20 — French Open (2009), Australian Open (2004, 2006, 2007, 2010, 2017, 2018), Wimbledon (2003, 2004, 2005, 2006, 2007, 2009, 2012, 2017), U.S. Open (2004, 2005, 2006, 2007, 2008)

Last 5 French Opens: 2018-Did Not Play, 2017-DNP, 2016-DNP, 2015-QF, 2014-4th

Aces: How good was Federer on clay in his prime? In 100 matches from 2005-09, he went 2-9 against Nadal, 84-5 against anyone else. … Collected 101st career title and 1,200th match victory this season, joining Jimmy Connors as the only men in the professional era with that many in each category.

Topspin: Returns to Roland Garros after sitting it out each of the past three years — his absence in 2016 ended his then-record streak of 65 consecutive appearances at majors — and there’s no reason to think he couldn’t stick around until the last weekend.

DOMINIC THIEM

Ranked: 4

Country: Austria

Age: 25

2019 Match Record: 17-8

2019 Singles Titles: 2

Career Singles Titles: 13

Grand Slam Singles Titles: 0 — Best: RU, French Open (2018)

Last 5 French Opens: 2018-RU, 2017-SF, 2016-SF, 2015-2nd, 2014-2nd

Aces: Nine career titles came on clay … Teamed up with 2004 Olympic gold medalist Nicolas Massu for coaching ahead of the clay circuit.

Topspin: Profiles as a title contender, with his sturdy frame and powerful groundstrokes, four wins over Nadal on clay and a 16-3 French Open record the past three years.

ALEXANDER ZVEREV

Ranked: 5

Country: Germany

Age: 22

2019 Match Record: 15-10

2019 Singles Titles: 0

Career Singles Titles: 10

Grand Slam Singles Titles: 0 — Best: QF, French Open (2018)

Last 5 French Opens: 2018-QF, 2017-1st, 2016-3rd, 2015-DNP, 2014-DNP

Aces: Has half as many match wins and only a fourth as many final appearances so far in 2019 as he did a year ago at this time. … Went through a recent 4-8 stretch.

Topspin: Zverev contends, “I always have felt that I’m one of the best players in the world on clay,” but he hasn’t played that way this season. Certainly possesses the talent to turn it around.

STEFANOS TSITSIPAS

Ranked: 6

Country: Greece

Age: 20

2019 Match Record: 27-10

2019 Singles Titles: 2

Career Singles Titles: 3

Grand Slam Singles Titles: 0 — Best: SF, Australian Open (2019)

Last 5 French Opens: 2018-2nd, 2017-1st, 2016-DNP, 2015-DNP, 2014-DNP

Aces: Career-high ranking. … Youngest player to own victories over Novak Djokovic, Rafael Nadal (on clay, no less) and Roger Federer.

Topspin: Run in Australia and recent showings on clay (title in Estoril, final in Madrid, semifinal in Rome) showed he’s starting to realize his potential, with a big forehand and slick volleys set up by good movement for a 6-foot-4 (1.93-meter) guy.

KEI NISHIKORI

Ranked: 7

Country: Japan

Age: 29

2019 Match Record: 19-9

2019 Singles Titles: 1

Career Singles Titles: 12

Grand Slam Singles Titles: 0 — Best: RU, U.S. Open (2014)

Last 5 French Opens: 2018-4th, 2017-QF, 2016-4th, 2015-QF, 2014-1st

Aces: Struggled on his preferred hard courts more than usual this season, but a semifinal run at the Barcelona Open showed he still can contend on clay when healthy.

Topspin: Needs to avoid running himself ragged in the early rounds, the way he did at the Australian Open, leading to retirement in the quarterfinals.

Stanley Cup 2019: Bruins vs Blues took nearly 50 years

In the first three years of being in the NHL, the St. Louis Blues earned their way to the Stanley Cup only to see the Boston Bruins knock down those dreams. They never imagined it would take nearly another 50 years before they would feel that dream come back alive. Now, they have to rewrite history facing the same team.

Seeing the famous photo of Bobby Orr scoring the 1970 Stanley Cup-winning goal to beat his St. Louis Blues doesn’t bring back bad memories for Scotty Bowman.

“Not really,” the legendary coach said. “Because we didn’t have a big opportunity to win that series.”

Orr and the big, bad Boston Bruins swept Bowman’s overmatched, expansion-era Blues in that series. Now 49 years later, Boston is in its third final in nine seasons and St. Louis is back for the first time since 1970, but this Bruins-Blues rematch is a showdown between two of the NHL’s best teams since Jan. 1.

“Now it’s more level,” Bowman said. ”(The Blues) don’t give a lot of room in their end, and of course their goalie’s been lights out.”

Coming off a sweep of Carolina in the Eastern Conference final, the Bruins are favored in the series that begins Monday in Boston. Goaltender Tuukka Rask is the front-runner to win the Conn Smythe Trophy as playoff MVP. Brad Marchand is playing some of the best hockey of his career with 18 points in 17 games, and there’s a mix of veterans from the 2011 Stanley Cup-winning team and fresh players eager to get their names etched on the trophy.

“I think as you get older, you appreciate it even more, and you realize how hard it is to get to this point and advance and be thankful and stay in the moment,” center Patrice Bergeron said. “But then it’s back to work, and there’s a lot of work in front of us.”

Unlike in 1970, when the Bruins essentially just had to step on the ice to take the final, these Blues won’t go away. They woke up last in the league on Jan. 3 before winning 30 of their final 45 games to roll into the playoffs, where they beat the Winnipeg Jets, Dallas Stars and San Jose Sharks.

Craig Berube, who replaced Mike Yeo as Blues coach in November, said teams would rather avoid those tough times. But they’ve made his players stronger.

“We were trying to get on the right track,” Berube said after the Western Conference final-clinching Game 6 victory Tuesday. “Once we got going in January and February, I knew we had a good hockey team. Once you get in the playoffs, anything can happen. We’re here and we did. They believed they were going to make the playoffs, and we’re here.”

The Blues are still here in large part because of rookie goaltender Jordan Binnington, whose first start in January coincided with the turnaround. They adopted Laura Branigan’s catchy 1980s pop hit “Gloria” as their victory song, rallied in the playoffs around young fan Laila Anderson, who has a life-threatening immune disease, and became the NHL’s latest surprise story.

“The last couple months in the city have been crazy,” star winger Vladimir Tarasenko said. “The support is amazing. They give us a lot of power. Unbelievable.”

St. Louis is the oldest franchise not to win the Stanley Cup, and its drought is the second longest behind the Toronto Maple Leafs’. The Leafs won the season before the Blues came into the league. To finish this improbable run, the Blues have to go through the Bruins, who finished tied for the second-most points this season.

“They are a hard team to play against, a really skilled team,” Tarasenko said. “But we have a hard team, too. It will be some interesting games.”

Bowman’s first thought about the series was that he couldn’t believe how long the Bruins will have to sit out. Boston will have a week and a half between finishing off Carolina and Game 1, and even St. Louis will go six days without playing.

One benefit for the Bruins is they should get captain Zdeno Chara back for the final after he missed Game 4 against Carolina.

The Road To: Bruins vs. Blues matchup in the 2019 Stanley Cup Final.

How they got here:

The Bruins beat the Leafs in a seven-game first-round series, then dispatched the Columbus Blue Jackets in a six-game second-round matchup before sweeping the Carolina Hurricanes in the Eastern Conference Final. The Blues upset the Winnipeg Jets in a six-game first-round series, then defeated the Dallas Stars in a seven-game second-round series before eliminating the San Jose Sharks in six games during the Western Conference Final.

Home cooking:

The Bruins will have home ice advantage in the Stanley Cup Final for the first time since 1990. They went 3-0 at home in the 2011 Cup Final and 1-2 in the 2013 series. Boston is 6-3 at home in the 2019 playoffs. The Blues are 7-2 on the road this postseason and went 21-13-7 away from home during the regular season.

Head-to-head:

The B’s and Blues met twice in the regular season.

Thursday, Jan. 17 in Boston: Bruins won 5-2
Saturday, Feb 23. in St. Louis: Blues won 2-1 in a shootout

Goaltender matchup:

Bruins goalie Tuukka Rask is 6-2-4 with a .924 save percentage and a 2.12 GAA in 13 career games against the Blues. He’s the leading Conn Smythe Trophy candidate through the first three rounds with a 12-5 record, a .942 save percentage and a 1.84 GAA. He went 1-0-1 and stopped 56 of the 59 shots he faced in two games versus St. Louis this season.

Blues netminder Jordan Binnington enjoyed a fantastic rookie campaign and has taken that success into the postseason. He was 11-7 with a .912 save percentage and a 2.44 GAA entering Tuesday night’s Game 6 versus the Sharks. Binnington stopped 31 of 32 shots in a 2-1 shootout win over the B’s on Feb. 23, which is his only career appearance against Boston.

Breaking It Down

Stat breakdown:

Here’s how these teams compare in notable stats from the regular season (NHL rank in parenthesis).

GOALS
BOS: 3.13 (11th)
STL: 2.98 (15th)

GAA
BOS: 2.59 (3rd)
STL: 2.68 (T-5th)

PP%
BOS: 25.9 (3rd)
STL: 21.1 (10th)

PK%
BOS: 79.9 (16th)
STL: 81.5 (9th)

Here’s how they compare through three rounds of the Stanley Cup playoffs:

GOALS/G
BOS: 3.35
STL: 3.00

GAA
BOS: 1.94
STL: 2.52

PP%
BOS: 34.0
STL: 19.3

PK%
BOS: 86.3
STL: 78.0

Donald Trump’s tax return anxiety just got worse

Media pundits are trying to figure out what caused Donald Trump to rush to the Rose Garden on Wednesday to claim he’s being victimized by House Speaker Nancy Pelosi. Tuesday, one federal judge denied his legal teams push to block a subpoena to have Congress get his taxes could be one reason.

Now, another federal judge has done the same while New York is passing a bill to allow Congress to see his state taxes. This has been something the president has fought long and hard for so expect more erratic behavior as things progress.

William Barr Blinks For Congress

Easing some of the escalating tension between Congress and the White House, the House intelligence committee postponed efforts to enforce a subpoena against the Justice Department on Wednesday after officials agreed to hand over a cache of documents related to special counsel Robert Mueller’s Trump-Russia report.

The agreement came a day after the department said it would be willing to provide documents from Mueller’s investigation but only if the committee didn’t take action against Attorney General William Barr. The panel had been expected to vote at Wednesday’s meeting — now postponed — on an unspecified “enforcement action” against Barr or the department after they refused to hand over an unredacted version of Mueller’s report and other documents related to the Russia probe.

Democrats have accused President Donald Trump and Barr of trying to stonewall and block their constitutional oversight duties. A separate House panel voted earlier this month to hold Barr in contempt after he failed to comply with a similar subpoena.

The Justice Department will begin turning over 12 categories of “counterintelligence and foreign intelligence materials as part of an initial rolling production,” and that process should be completed by the end of next week, Rep. Adam Schiff, the intelligence committee’s chairman, said in a statement.

Schiff, a California Democrat, warned that the subpoena would remain in effect and “will be enforced should the Department fail to comply with the full document request.”

Assistant Attorney General Stephen Boyd told Schiff in a letter Tuesday that the Justice Department would be willing to make less-redacted portions of the report available to members of the committee and that officials were reviewing troves of investigative documents that were also requested by the committee.

“We appreciate the continued dialogue with the Committee and look forward to working toward appropriately accommodating their requests,” department spokeswoman Kerri Kupec said Wednesday.

Attorney General Bill Barr should resign over his conduct before Congress, House Intelligence Committee Chairman Adam Schiff said Wednesday, calling the attorney general a “personal attorney” for President Donald Trump.

The California Democrat said he hesitates to “call Bill Barr the Attorney General.”

“I think Bill Barr has all the duplicity of Rudy Giuliani without all the good looks and general likability of Rudy Guliani,” Schiff said during the Center for American Progress 2019 Ideas Conference Wednesday. “The most dangerous thing, I think, that Bill Barr has done is basically say that a president under investigation can make the investigation go away if he thinks its unfair which, by the way, means the other 14 investigations firmed up through other offices he can also make go away.”

Second Federal Judge Denies Donald Trump Tax Block

A federal judge in New York refused Wednesday to block congressional subpoenas seeking financial records from two banks that did business with President Donald Trump.

U.S. District Judge Edgardo Ramos said in a ruling delivered from the bench that Trump and his company were unlikely to succeed in a lawsuit arguing that the subpoenas seeking records from Deutsche Bank and Capital One were unlawful and unconstitutional.

Ramos also concluded that the subpoenas have “a legitimate legislative purpose.”

The lawyers for the House Financial Services and Intelligence committees say they need access to documents from the banks to investigate possible “foreign influence in the U.S. political process.”

Deutsche Bank has lent Trump’s real estate company millions of dollars over the years.

The hearing falls two days after a federal judge in Washington ruled against Trump in a similar case, finding that the president cannot block a House subpoena for information from a financial services firm that had done accounting work for him and the Trump Organization.

And it comes a day after Trump blocked his former White House lawyer, Don McGahn, from testifying before the House Judiciary Committee.

In a written submission prior to Wednesday’s hearing, lawyers for two congressional committees wrote that Trump’s effort to block the subpoenas was “flatly inconsistent with nearly a century of Supreme Court precedent.”

The lawyers said the House’s Committee on Financial Services and Permanent Select Committee on Intelligence sought the information as it investigates “serious and urgent questions concerning the safety of banking practices, money laundering in the financial sector, foreign influence in the U.S. political process, and the threat of foreign financial leverage, including over the president, his family and his business.”

Lawyers for Trump responded in writing that accepting the view of the committees would mean “Congress can issue a subpoena on any matter, at any time, for any reason, to any person, and there is basically nothing a federal court can do about it.”

Trump’s lawyers had asked the judge to temporarily block Congress from obtaining the records.

The banks took no position in the dispute.

The ruling is the second blow in New York on Wednesday to the privacy of Trump’s financial details. State lawmakers earlier passed a measure that would allow the president’s tax returns to be released to congressional committees.

New York Puts Pressure On Donald Trump Tax Anxiety

New York lawmakers gave final passage to legislation Wednesday that would allow President Donald Trump’s state tax returns to be released to congressional committees that have, so far, been barred from getting the president’s federal filings.

The Democrat-led Senate and Assembly both approved the measures Wednesday, sending them to Gov. Andrew Cuomo, a Democrat. A spokesman has said the governor supports the principle behind the legislation but will review the bill carefully before deciding whether to sign it.

The legislation doesn’t target Trump by name, but it would allow the leaders of the U.S. House Ways and Means Committee, the Senate Finance Committee or the Joint Committee on Taxation to get access to any New York state tax returns filed by elected officials and top appointed officials. The legislation would apply to personal income tax returns, as well as business taxes paid in New York.

An earlier version of the proposal passed the state Senate two weeks ago that would have allowed congressional committees to get any New Yorker’s returns, regardless of whether they held public office. Lawmakers later narrowed the legislation to address concerns that it went too far, prompting the Senate to hold a second vote on the new language Wednesday.

New York Republicans have railed against the bill. John Flanagan, who leads the Senate GOP, called the legislation “troubling” and “bad public policy.”

Fellow GOP lawmakers said the new proposal’s narrower focus shows Democrats went too far with their first proposal, which would have required state tax officials to hand over any New Yorker’s state tax returns.

“This bill is nothing more than political showmanship, and we all know it,” said Assembly Andrew Goodell, who represents a mostly rural western New York district.

Republicans also blasted Democrats for going after the president instead of focusing on challenges closer to home.

“The fact that we’re talking about taxes in this house is ironic because we’re not talking about the taxes that New Yorkers pay, which are the highest in the nation,” said Rob Ortt, a senator from the Buffalo area.

But the proposals’ Democratic sponsors — Sen. Hoylman, of Manhattan, and Assemblyman David Buchwald, of Westchester County — said the legislation promotes government transparency at a time when Americans need to know whether their elected leaders are putting the public’s interest first.

“We are affirming Congress’ role as a co-equal branch of government and the sacred constitutional principle that nobody is above the law, not even the highest elected official in the land,” Hoylman said.

The proposed changes to state law were made amid a battle going on in Washington over Trump’s federal returns.

Treasury Secretary Steven Mnuchin has said he wouldn’t comply with a congressional subpoena seeking six years of Trump’s tax returns, in part because the request “lacks a legitimate legislative purpose.” U.S. Rep. Richard Neal, D-Mass., chairman of the House Ways and Means Committee, has threatened to go to court to get the administration to comply.

Democrats are seeking six years of Trump’s personal and business tax returns to aid a committee investigation into whether the IRS is doing its job properly to audit a sitting president and whether the law governing such audits needs to be strengthened.

With New York being Trump’s home state and headquarters of many of his business enterprises, the legislation could give Democrats access to the president’s state tax returns at a time when the White House and Democrats who control the House continue to wrangle over the president’s federal tax returns.

Much of the information on Trump’s state returns would mirror the information included on a federal return, giving the Democrats a potential end run around the IRS if they wished to take it.

If Congress does request and obtain Trump’s state tax returns, that doesn’t mean the public gets to see them. Under federal law, the confidential information in the returns is supposed to be for the committee’s eyes only.

The New York bills have no time limitation on the tax filings that could be shared with Congress. They require that the returns be requested “for a specified and legitimate legislative purpose,” wording that could ostensibly give state officials the ability to refuse some requests they felt were primarily political in nature.

The New York bills would become law immediately upon being signed by Cuomo, though it could be delayed by a court challenge.

Why China sucks as a tech trading partner

It’s no secret that China loves taking American made technology whether the maker wants them to or not. Donald Trump has decided to step up pressure on their tactics which go much further than most people realize.

For four decades, Beijing has cajoled or pressured foreign companies to hand over technology. And its trading partners say if that didn’t work, China stole what it wanted.

Communist leaders deflected demands for change until foreign frustration erupted into a showdown with President Donald Trump. He sent shockwaves through their export industries by slapping punitive tariffs of up to 25% on Chinese goods.

Europe, Japan and other trading partners object to Trump’s tactics but echo American complaints. They say Beijing’s tactics violate its market-opening commitments under the World Trade Organization.

American prosecutors go further. They say the Communist Party is the ringleader of a global industrial spying operation.

Chinese leaders have promised stronger patent protections and other legal changes. Foreign experts say that will make little difference if the party won’t enforce them.

The share of companies in a survey by the European Union Chamber of Commerce that said they felt compelled to hand over technology doubled from two years ago to 20 percent.

“It is unacceptable that this practice continues,” a chamber vice president, Charlotte Roule, said Monday. “Ending its persistence needs to be a priority.”

Here are some tactics Beijing’s trading partners complain it uses to improperly obtain foreign technology.

JOINT VENTURES

The strongest tool in Beijing’s arsenal is the longstanding requirement for companies in most industries to work through state-owned local partners.

The goal is for the Chinese partner to learn and eventually displace its foreign competitor.

Some balked but thousands of companies cooperated as the price of admission to the most populous global market.

Many companies say Chinese partners abide by promises not to abuse their access to technology. But some say partners have copied chemical formulas, industrial processes and other secrets for their own operations, sometimes with local government support.

Beijing denies it forces foreign companies to hand over technology, but joint ventures won’t work without foreign technology and manufacturing expertise.

In the auto industry, China has promised to lift requirements for joint ventures and allow full foreign ownership by 2023. Experts say that suggests they believe Chinese automakers no longer need foreign tutors.

LEGAL PRESSURE

Pressure to hand over technology pervades Chinese law and action by regulators.

Beijing promised when it joined the WTO in 2001 to treat Chinese and foreign companies equally. But 18 years later, business groups and governments say foreign companies still face special burdens, including sharing technology.

The European Union filed a WTO challenge last June to Chinese laws on technology licensing it says discriminate against foreign companies. It said China’s own companies are free to negotiate licensing terms, but Beijing dictates terms for foreign companies.

A law approved in March bans using “administrative measures” to compel foreign companies to hand over technology. Business groups welcomed that but said Chinese officials can still use other pressure tactics.

Business groups say Chinese regulators misuse a 2008 Anti-Monopoly Law to pressure foreign companies in negotiations on technology licensing.

The law includes an unusual provision prohibiting “abuse of intellectual property right.” Lawyers say that runs counter to the spirit of patents and copyrights, which are meant to encourage technology creation by giving the owner a temporary monopoly and the right to charge others for using it.

Lawyers said Chinese regulators sometimes intervene in contract negotiations and push foreign companies to accept lower fees by threatening to launch an anti-monopoly investigation.

REGULATORY PRESSURE

Authorities also use “window guidance,” or verbal orders given in secret, to compel companies to support Chinese technology development in ways the government doesn’t publicly acknowledge.

A decade ago, for example, global automakers agreed to help Chinese partners create new local brands.

That injected foreign expertise into fledgling brands the Communist Party hoped eventually will compete in global markets in a way joint venture vehicles made under foreign brand names cannot.

It made life harder for automakers by spreading their resources more thinly and adding to competition in a glutted market. Despite that, global automakers said they had commercial motivations and regulators denied they applied any pressure.

The real reason? Industry researchers say regulators told automakers in private they had to cooperate if they wanted permission to expand production of their own brands.

MORE REGULATORY PRESSURE

Regulators also pressure foreign companies to help potential Chinese rivals develop technology.

Global companies in engineering, software, pharmaceuticals and other fields have set up research centers with Chinese partners. Many say they are to take advantage of China’s scientific talent pool, but such arrangements benefit potential Chinese competitors and are unusual abroad.

This month, Microsoft Corp. opened an artificial intelligence research lab in Shanghai with the state-owned Zhangjiang Group.

Other prominent examples include General Motors Co.’s Pan-Asia Technical Automotive Center with state-owned SAIC Motor. SAIC is the main Chinese manufacturing partner for GM and Volkswagen AG but also sells its own auto brands.

AND MORE REGULATORY PRESSURE

Companies complain regulators use patent, safety and other official examinations to learn about technology, often including employees of Chinese rivals in review panels.

Companies are required to provide what they say is an unusually large amount of information about products and industrial processes, including competitive secrets, to obtain patents or approval for operations.

The Wall Street Journal in September cited an employee of a foreign automaker as saying there was “clear evidence of collusion” between regulators and Chinese automakers.

The employee said regulators asked for blueprints of components the company was trying to prevent its Chinese partner from seeing but ignored other parts of the vehicle.

 “LOCALIZING TECHNOLOGY”

For decades, the ruling party has rewarded businesspeople, academics and others who “localize technology” — a euphemism for unauthorized copying of foreign know-how — with promotions, research grants, money and public praise.

Security researchers say the government operates a network of research institutes and business parks to turn stolen technology into commercial products.

In 2013, three Chinese scientists at New York University were charged with sending U.S. taxpayer-financed research on magnetic resonance imaging to a Chinese government-run institute.

Other Chinese-born researchers in the United States have been charged with stealing chemical, seed, turbine and other technologies. Prosecutors say some had partners waiting in China to turn them into products.

OUTRIGHT THEFT

American prosecutors say when all else fails, top-level state companies steal foreign secrets.

Pangang Group, a steelmaker owned by China’s Cabinet, was indicted in 2014 on U.S. charges it paid industrial spies to steal a process from DuPont for making titanium dioxide, a white pigment widely used in toothpaste, Oreo cookies and other products.

Defendants including an industry consultant and a retired DuPont employee admitted working for Pangang. But the case stalled because prosecutors had no access to Pangang Group and Chinese authorities took no action.

MILITARY SPYING

U.S. prosecutors say the Communist Party uses its military wing’s cyber warfare skills to steal commercial secrets.

The People’s Liberation Army is regarded as, along with the U.S. and Russian militaries, a leader in research on breaking into or disabling an enemy’s computer networks.

Security experts say hackers believed to be Chinese soldiers or military contractors have stolen secrets including product designs, chemical processes and details of commercial negotiations.

In 2014, five members of China’s military cyber warfare unit were indicted on U.S. industrial spying charges.

The following year, President Xi Jinping agreed with President Barack Obama to avoid using military resources to steal commercial secrets. But the U.S. National Security Agency said in November that Beijing appeared to be violating its pledge.

In October, an employee of China’s main spy agency was charged with trying to steal trade secrets from U.S. aviation and aerospace companies.