Home Blog Page 91

Intellivision, Playstation 1 Classic consoles keep retro video games alive

While remaining clueless on what the upcoming Atari VCS has to offer, another old console is about to re-enter the retro gaming market—the Intellivision, formerly from Mattel Electronics. There seems to be no end in sight for the retro-video game market as nostalgia continues to play a big part in the consumption of entertainment.

It’s like hearing the cool soothing voice of Karen Carpenter amidst all the musical noise of the early 80s. The return to simple, out-of-the-box gameplay is the key to the success of the NES and SNES Classic Editions and the old Atari Flashback joysticks that plug directly into the TV. It’s a welcome departure even to some hardcore gamers that deal with the complicated concepts of gaming today.

Playing on the success of the SNES and NES Classic Editions (which will soon be available again), old names are coming out of the woodwork, among them is Intellivision. Now I have never played nor seen the Intellivision console, but its numeric keypad controller gives me fond memories of my first video game console, the Colecovision, which I wouldn’t be surprised if it made a comeback itself.

It once did with its own Flashback gamepad-sized console that had six games (which I regret not having purchased). Since my memories as a kid is somewhat hazy, I tried to remember whether I had the Colecovision or the Intellivision until I found the box art for the Coleco through Google Images. Like the Intellivision, the Colecovision’s controller was difficult to work with as some games required the use of the numeric keypad, its overlays and having to read the game’s manual. It was truly a satisfying experience once you get the hang of it.

Anyway, the Intellivision has a good loyal following in the US, and it’s the market that the new president of Intellivision Entertainment is banking on apart from the growing community of retro-gamers and video game collectors. There’s also the holiday shoppers of cheaper gaming consoles that Nintendo should have catered to with the initial release of the NES Classic Edition. I, however, understand Nintendo’s underestimation of the market as they really meant for the retro-console to be more of a novelty, to celebrate the thirty years of the NES.

Intellivision Entertainment hopes to set the Intellivision apart from other retro consoles by offering up new games aside from the existing library which they are currently acquiring licenses for. The new games should be interesting as what defines both the Intellivision and Colecovision are their controllers. Current gamers should have no problem making sense of overlaid numeric keypads. Intellivision Entertainment also promises that the console’s appearance would be customizable. Nothing really new as modern consoles and their controllers are often ‘skinned’ by their owners. As for providing the Intellivision a modernized controller like the Atari VCS would, they could copy the Atari Jaguar’s.

What would be fun for these new old consoles is if they can license new games and give them a retro feel? Interested in a pixelated God of War, Overwatch, and Fallout? Or they can correct the failings of older games such as the infamous E.T. and the Atari Pac-Man? Some homebrew developers have apparently done so. Another thing these guys could do is to enhance older games for online play. Imagine playing Combat with another forty-something from another state.

sony playstation 1 classic model coming retro game market
Sony PlayStation 1 Classic console

Another player planning on entering the retro market is Sony amidst news that they’ll soon be retiring the PlayStation 4. Sony seems to be planning to release a PlayStation Classic. Should they do so, it’s another console I would like to snap up should its library be desirable enough. There’s no reason why Sony cannot enter the market with their own retro console as a way to sell inexpensive hardware and simpler games that kids and adults can enjoy. Another Sony rumor is that they intend to take a page from Nintendo’s playbook by making their upcoming PlayStation 5 as portable as the Nintendo Switch.

Even though I grew up playing some Atari and Colecovision, I tried my hand in emulating them for a while. Playing another round of Combat, Space Invaders, and CatTrax is okay, but I don’t envision myself playing them that often. A PlayStation Classic on the other hand…

Star Wars ‘Solo’ plummets but keeps ‘Deadpool 2’ in second box office spot

All kinds of theories hit last week when Disney’s “Solo: A Star Wars Story” underperformed at the box office, but now that it has plummeted 65 percent, more opinions are coming. The biggest is this could be a bad sign for upcoming “Star Wars” films, but also that Disney needs to rethink the rollout strategy for the next one. Having two come out in less than a year might have been too much for fans.

“Solo: A Star Wars Story” is losing momentum quickly at the box office, even with a relatively quiet weekend free of any new blockbuster competition. After an underwhelming launch, the space saga fell 65 percent in weekend two with $29.3 million from North American theaters, according to studio estimates on Sunday.

“Solo” has now earned $148.9 million domestically, which is still shy of “Rogue One’s” December 2016 opening weekend of $155.1 million and over $135 million short of where “Rogue One” was in its second weekend. “Rogue One” made $96 million then.

The 65 percent drop off is one of the highest in recent “Star Wars” history, although it is less steep than the second week fall of the franchise’s last film, “Star Wars: The Last Jedi,” which slid 67.5 percent in weekend two this past December — but, that was also after a $220 million debut.

Internationally, “Solo” added $30.3 million, and globally the film has netted $264.2 million.

Paul Dergarabedian, the senior media analyst for comScore, thinks that all the media attention given to “Solo’s” less-than-impressive opening weekend numbers could have actually negatively affected its second weekend earnings.

“Box office got conflated with perceived value of the movie, and that might have affected its second weekend,” Dergarabedian said. “Sometimes news of the box office can impact a movie’s bottom line.”

He noted that in comScore’s audience survey, most of the over 1,000 people polled “really liked” the movie.

“Solo’s” tumble brought it even closer to “Deadpool 2,” which is now in its third weekend in theaters and still managed to reel in an estimated $23.3 million to take second place. With a domestic total of $254.7 million and a crowded marketplace with both “Solo” and “Avengers: Infinity War” surrounding it, “Deadpool 2” is still only about $30 million behind where the first film was in its third weekend and is approaching $600 million worldwide.

The results may make Disney reconsider its ambitious “Star Wars” rollout strategy over the next few years, with at least nine more films in the works. “Solo” came out just five months after “The Last Jedi,” whereas previous installments had always arrived with at least a year’s worth of space.

The film also continues an underwhelming string of box-office performances for the director Ron Howard. This is his fifth domestic flop in a row, following “In the Heart of the Sea,” “Rush,” “The Dilemma” and “Inferno.” But Mr. Howard was brought on just a year ago to salvage the project after Philip Lord and Christopher Miller, the directors behind “The Lego Movie,” were ousted; “Solo” was roiled in turmoil for much of its production.

Disney’s other blockbuster “Avengers: Infinity War” picked up another $10.4 million in week six, and it’s looking to hit $2 billion worldwide. It would be a bizarre thing if Disney wound up having to write off a “Star Wars” film as a loss for 2018.

Shailene Woodley’s lost-at-sea drama “Adrift” fared the best of the three newcomers with a reported $35 million budget, which included the horror pic “Upgrade” and a Johnny Knoxville comedy “Action Point.” ″Adrift,” from STX Entertainment, washed up in third place with $11.5 million, while the others struggled to make a significant impact. “Action Point” truly bombed at $2.3 million showing that the “Jackass” audience has grown up or just lost interest.

“Upgrade” opened In sixth place with $4.5 million, behind both “Avengers: Infinity War” ($10.4 million) and “Book Club” ($6.8 million), and “Action Point,” which was not screened for critics, landed in ninth place with a dismal $2.3 million.

This weekend also saw a few smaller studio landmarks for Magnolia Pictures, whose Ruth Bader Ginsburg documentary “RBG” became its highest-grossing film ever with $7.9 million, and Pantelion Films, which scored a similar feat with “Overboard,” which is now up to $45.5 million. “RBG” pulled in another $1.1 million in 432 locations.

Even with “Solo’s” stumble, the year-to-date box office is still up 6.2 percent as June kicks into gear with some big movies on the horizon, including “Ocean’s 8,” ″Incredibles 2″ and “Jurassic World.”

Estimated ticket sales for Friday through Sunday at U.S. and Canadian theaters, according to comScore. Where available, the latest international numbers for Friday through Sunday are also included. Final domestic figures will be released Monday.

deadpool 2 vs solo a star wars story box office

  1. “Solo: A Star Wars Story,” $29.3 million ($30.3 million international).
  2. “Deadpool 2,” $23.3 million ($41.6 million international).
  3. “Adrift,” $11.5 million.
  4. “Avengers: Infinity War,” $10.4 million ($24.3 million international).
  5. “Book Club,” $6.8 million ($1.1 million international).
  6. “Upgrade,” $4.5 million.
  7. “Life of the Party,” $3.5 million.
  8. “Breaking In,” $2.8 million ($300,000 international).
  9. “Action Point,” $2.3 million.
  10. “Overboard,” $2 million ($1.5 million international).

Estimated ticket sales for Friday through Sunday at international theaters (excluding the U.S. and Canada), according to comScore:

  1. “Deadpool 2,” $41.6 million.
  2. “Solo: A Star Wars Story,” $30.3 million.
  3. “Avengers: Infinity War,” $24.3 million.
  4. “Doraemon the Movie: Nobita’s Treasure Island,” $23.7 million.
  5. “How Long Will I Love U,” $15.8 million.
  6. “Believer,” $9.2 million.
  7. “Happy Little Submarine 20000 Leagues,” $8.9 million.
  8. “Sherlock Gnomes,” $3.3 million.
  9. “Truth or Dare,” $2.5 million.
  10. “A Quiet Place,” $2.4 million.

Can Zack Snyder top King Vidor’s ‘Fountainhead’ with Brad Pitt, Henry Cavill or Michael Shannon?

Rather than take the easy way out after a series of movie bombs, director Zack Snyder has chosen to remake Ayn Rand’s “The Fountainhead” film directed by King Vidor in 1949. Starring Gary Cooper (whom Rand heavily lobbied for the role of architect Howard Rourke), Patricia Neal and Raymond Massey, the controversial author was not happy with the studio film feeling it stripped much of the message of her book out.

zack snyder goes from dc comics to ayn rand fountainhead

Even though she wrote the script, Rand was hoping to get architect Frank Lloyd Wright (who Rourke was inspired by), but that never happened, and the author found that the collaborative nature of Hollywood filmmaking wasn’t for her. Many scenes were toned down, including the famous rape scene which will surely be a point of controversy for Snyder.

As we all know in entertainment, the book is usually just the jumping off point when it’s turned into a film, but Snyder appears to want to be more loyal to Rand’s words. While some were confused by his choice, it should come as no surprise as he mentioned it back in 2016 to The Hollywood Reporter when asked about upcoming projects.

I have been working on The Fountainhead. I’ve always felt like The Fountainhead was such a thesis on the creative process and what it is to create something. Warner Bros. owns [Ayn Rand’s] script and I’ve just been working on that a little bit.

Many people expected him to head into his Afghanistan war film “The Photograph,” (about a war correspondent and a special ops soldier who team up after an attack) but “The Fountainhead” is taking precedence. He’ll at least have people like Speaker of the House Paul Ryan ready to watch as he’s an ardent ‘Randian.’ President Donald Trump has identified with Howard Rourk, but as anyone who has read the 1943 book, he shares no traits and Rand would find his words and actions reprehensible.

Snyder’s last directorial project “Justice League” had to bring in Joss Whedon to complete after the death of the filmmaker’s daughter.

ayn rand with gary cooper patricia neal on fountainhead set
Ayn Rand with The Fountainhead stars Garry Cooper and Patricia Neal

“The Fountainhead” centers on the young architect Howard Roark, whose dream of constructing modernist buildings puts him in opposition with the architectural establishment. The project has been a passing fancy with other directors such as Michael Cimino (The Deerhunter) and Oliver Stone.

Three big names have already been thrown into the mix to play the controversial architect; Brad Pitt (who Oliver Stone envisioned also playing the role for him), Michael Shannon and Henry Cavill. Sadly Philip Seymour Hoffman is no longer with us as he would be the perfect Ellsworth Toohey.

Pitt was also lined up as a top name in 2004 when Rand’s other bestseller “Atlas Shrugged” was getting close to a green light to play John Galt with Angelina Jolie co-starring as Dagny Taggart. That project wound up being turned into a trilogy that would have made Rand even more upset than with how her Fountainhead turned out on the big screen. Pitt is also a big fan of Rand’s works so don’t be surprised if he winds up landing Howard Rourk.

Snyder has kept quiet on whether his “Fountainhead” will be a contemporary remake or in that same time period that Rand wrote the bestseller.

Hottest 3 future proof computer motherboards for any budget

It used to be that computer motherboards could be very confusing, and the thought of building your own PC was something only the most hardcore of tech geeks could do. Times have changed, and motherboards have been revolutionized so that even the least computer savvy person can create their own PC from the ground up.

How many times have you gone computer shopping and found that no single one had every little thing you wanted? Then when you shop online, you find that the places that allow you to build your own computer require you to mortgage your home just to afford it.

The motherboard is the part of the computer that holds everything together, but it also determines the compatibility and upgradeability of your PC. That’s where many manufacturers get you as they know that the motherboard is usually one area consumers don’t pay attention to. As long as the computer runs quickly and looks great, most people are happy. Now that most people keep their computers for longer periods of time, it only makes sense to make sure that they’re future-proofed.

computer building starts with motherboard

It’s not much different with buying 4K televisions now (check here for some amazing deals). People are realizing that it’s smarter to do their research before buying a cheap TV that will be out of date within two or three years. Buying a brand that will continue updating your purchase for a decade is the smarter choice and best investment.

This is the same with computers. I have had the same computer since 2010, and the reason why it’s lasted over seven years is that I made sure that the motherboard could handle being upgraded. I spent $1,400 on the desktop, and in the past seven years have only spent an additional $400 with graphics cards, and an SSD hard drive. Not a bad investment for a computer that runs faster now than when I first purchased it.

Smart shoppers can get exactly what they want in their PC without having to break the bank. It all depends on what you’re looking for, and that’s where we come in. We’ve found the best motherboards to fit every scenario you might be looking for. Whether it’s gaming or just straight-ahead business computing, these motherboards will fit any budget. Save that money for some special treats which you can find in one of the many other articles we’ve written. Don’t forget to also check out our article on graphics cards as it can be a crucial piece of great information when choosing the right one for these motherboards.

ASUS Maximus IX Hero best motherboards gaming 2017

ASUS MAXIMUS VIII HERO

ASUS has named this motherboard Hero for a very good reason. This is truly the hero your computer needs, and it will give you a good decade of solid computer performance and upgrades.

It supports up to 64 GB of DDR4 RAM with blazing speeds up to 3400 MHz. This is one motherboard that allows for overclocking potential, which means you can get the most speed out of your computer possible without worrying about frying it.

In the past, many wannabe tech geeks would overclock their computer only to notice a metallic smell begin and then a sudden blackout of their screen with a little smoldering for good effect.

asus maximus viii hero close up motherboard

While also looking quite nice, it allows you to boot up your computer with 3600 MHz XMP so none of that waiting for a few minutes for your computer to turn on completely. Now it’s literally just seconds.

Years ago, I remember going for a cup of coffee and hoping that the computer would be on when I got back. Now, I can’t even open a Twix bar fast enough.

The prices have dropped considerably for this motherboard so check here for a great steal for a super amped gaming system.

ASRock Fatal1ty Z170 Professional Gaming i7

ASRock Fatal1ty Z170 is perfect for those that have their mouth watering at the ASUS MAXIMUS VIII HERO, but it’s just a little out of their budget range. This one shares a lot of the same attributes, but it’s much cheaper. It also makes the bold claim of being the “highest performance gaming motherboard available.”

That’s a big claim, but it comes loaded with three display outlets for DVI-D, HDMI, and DisplayPort. It also has four PCIe 3.0 x16 slots. These are very important for better graphics cards and SSD drives.

Storage will never be a problem as it has ten, count them, ten, SATA 3 connectors, three SATA Express connectors, and another three M.2 slots for those craving even more speed.

If you want speed at a budget, this is your winner, and you can check here to find them well under $200.

Asus M5A78L-M USB3 motherboard images

ASUS M5A78L-M/USB3

The ASUS M5A78L-M/USB3 is the perfect motherboard for the very budget conscious. If you’re not a serious gamer and mainly just want a great stable computer for your everyday needs, this is the one for you. Plus, those shades of blue are just so soothing.

asus m5a78l motherboard inputs

The price hovers around $50 (you can price check right here) on this and it has an ATI Radeon HD 3000 graphics card already built in so that’s one less thing you have to worry about.

Click here to check out all the best motherboards to fit all of your needs.

‘King of Kong’ Losing a Fistful of Dollars plus top arcade games of all time

Documentaries often come and go quickly, but some are lucky enough to get a rebirth when history brings them back to life. Such has been the case with cult fave King of Kong: A Fistful of Dollars. The film had the perfect story formula with a hero and villain in Steve Weibe and Billy Mitchell, but recently things changed which made the long-suffering hero see vindication, bringing renewed interest to the arcade game rivalry doc.

Even if you don’t like video games, the story behind King of Kong is a riveting mystery. Yes, it does have a weird mystery to it which has only recently been brought to a decade-long conclusion.

Video games back in the 80s and 90s were mostly about scoring. Getting the highest number of points in the local arcade earns a good player some level of prestige and popularity; because arcade games allow players to enter their initials on the game’s leaderboard. And people flock to see how good you are. Back then, the number of points is actually proportional to a player’s skill level.

This is not Candy Crush where you win a random number of bonus points for completing a level. In the arcade, you become an entertainer in your own right and go from spending a fortune worth of quarters to spending hours on a game using just one and earning a healthy dose of respect at the same time. It was very important to some gamers in the arcade’s more social landscape. One has to say that games back then may be repetitive but it often took great skill to beat them and get a high score with just three one-hit lives. Like playing Konami’s Contra without the Konami code.

Fast forward to 2018, and you’d be surprised to know that an arcade game’s leaderboard remains important to many of those very same kids that frequented the now derelict arcades. You’d be surprised to know that people still keep track of who has the highest score in Pac-Man, Millipede, Galaga and Donkey Kong through an institution known as Twin Galaxies. Lately, Twin Galaxies is at the center of a gaming controversy that involves two players and Donkey Kong. A story that Adam Sandler’s Pixels got its inspiration from. The news is that Twin Galaxies just stripped the world’s best-known arcade player Billy Mitchell of his title as the world’s best player of Donkey Kong.

Billy Mitchell stripped of his Donkey Kong title.

Billy Mitchell wasn’t on drugs or anything like Lance Armstrong. He allegedly broke the rules of Twin Galaxies that submitted high scores must be from genuine, original arcade cabinets or boards of a certain game.

His submitted Donkey Kong scores allegedly came from custom cabinets that housed a MAME (Multiple Arcade Machine Emulator) emulator which, despite emulating an authentic arcade feel, right down to generating scanlines, is against the rules of Twin Galaxies. Now Billy has spoken up about the controversy and wishes to clear his name by conducting another investigation through a third party.

king of kong black man getting tazed arcade game

I first heard the name Billy Mitchell in a YouTube video of The Angry Video Game Nerd when the Nerd tried to complete the impossibly difficult Transformers: Mystery of Convoy Nintendo Famicom game. The Nerd took inspiration from Billy Mitchell and got doped on Billy Mitchell’s signature hot sauce to heighten his senses in order to beat the game. Billy Mitchell is a now restaurateur who also produces his brand of hot sauce. Billy’s foremost achievement, also mentioned by the Nerd, is his perfect score on the original Pac-Man which unfortunately is included in his stricken records.

Billy is a man of imposing stature which was mocked in Adam Sandler’s film Pixels by casting Peter Dinklage as a character based on him. Before this current issue, Mitchell was already the subject of controversy due to a feud between him and retro-gamer Steve Wiebe over the title of best Donkey-Kong player. This controversy was discussed in the 2007 documentary titled The King of Kong: A Fistful of Quarters which I had the pleasure of watching. That documentary I could say was the basis for Adam Sandler’s and Peter Dinklage’s characters in Pixels.

peter dinklage arcade hero in pixels atari 2018

In the documentary, Steve Weibe sought to become the world’s best Donkey Kong player by scoring over a million points and beating Mitchell’s existing top score in Twin Galaxies. Mitchell, however, beat him at every turn by submitting recorded videos of higher scores and refusing to participate in live matches. Mitchell’s behavior comes off as questionable in the documentary but couldn’t be proven until now. Now that Mitchell’s scores have been invalidated, Weibe now holds the distinction of the first player reaching over a million points in Donkey Kong past the game’s kill screen. The current highest score belongs to a guy named Robbie Lakeman with a score of 1,247,700.

king of kong steve wiebe wins over billy mitchell
Steve Weibe (left) with Tony Hawk

Why is this news? Many of us in the previous gaming generation look fondly on our arcade experiences, and some may even have their own treasured scores. Thanks to YouTube and other video sharing sites, the retro-gaming community continues to grow as more and more gamers relive their arcade years. Even before the internet, some old school gamers of the era even kept track on elite gamers and had their respective gaming heroes like Billy Mitchell. Seeing heroes fall from grace is definitely big news.

best arcade games ever joust smash tv and defender
Best Arcade Games Ever According To Marius

While we’re on the subject, here are the ten favorite arcade games of yours truly. Most of them I played as a kid. Games I still play on MAME.

  • Rally X – is sort of a race to catch all the flags in a maze track before your suicidal opponents take you with them.
  • Galaxian – very simple and noisy space shooter.
  • Galaga – a modified version of Galaxian where your ship can get captured, but when rescued doubles your firepower.
  • Exerion – one of the first shooters with a behind-ship perspective and the ship is allowed to circle the screen.
  • BWings – a difficult top-down shooter where getting special wings from your enemy gives your ship special abilities.
  • Phoenix – a simple space shooter where your ship fights bird-like aliens, thus the name phoenix.
  • Pac-Man/Ms. Pac-Man – games no 80s gamer has never touched. Practically timeless.
  • Vastar – One of the first side-scrollers that features a robot shooting aliens. Very tough game.
  • Finalizer – a beautiful top-down shooter that also features a robot that progressively gets bigger after each power-up.
  • X-Men – the most recent entry and perhaps a predecessor to the X-Men fighting game. This game allows four to six players at the same time starring classic Chris Claremont X-Men and based on the little-known Pryde of the X-Men cartoon.

Share your thoughts. What are your favorite arcade games and were you your town’s arcade hero?

Cartoon Network’s ‘Thundercats Roar’ Uproar Has Many Valid Points

Thundercats, the iconic 80s animated series is getting another reboot thanks to Cartoon Network, entitled Thundercats Roar. That should make a lot of 80s kids very happy, right? The answer is a resounding NO.

You see, my generation is currently powerless and can do nothing but frown upon the prevailing styles of animation today. Today’s styles of animation are so unlike the animation styles of 80s cartoons such as He-Man and the Masters of the Universe, Bravestarr, MASK, GI Joe, Bionic Six, Jayce and the Wheeled Warriors and Thundercats which call for realistic-looking muscle-bound humanoid characters, amazing backgrounds, great music and mostly fluid animation.

Many of them also include moral lessons and public safety announcements. We are oh so proud of them and still watch them as grown men and women in the mid-30s and 40s. That’s how much some of these shows hold up. The current prevailing style of animation is totally cartoon-like that lack detail, look goofy and are more colorful. If you’re familiar with cartoons like Steven Universe, Gravity Falls, Star and the Forces of Evil and Gumball, that is what kids can expect of Thundercats Roar.

Thundercats Roar is set to arrive in 2019. As soon as the series was announced and its trailer spread, the internet suddenly exploded the way Twitter did with Roseanne’s comment about Valerie Jarrett. Okay, maybe not big enough to force the Cartoon Network to cancel the show, but you get the point.

The reaction to the trailer was mostly negative. Cartoon Network received plenty of vitriol as to the approach to the reboot’s animation. Guess where and who the vicious amount of hate came from? Well, my generation, at least many of us, the same guys described in the previous paragraph. Yours truly included. Yes, I hated on it for a while, well until the dust settled.

One has to wonder why? What is it about Thundercats that resulted to such a reaction? The original Thundercats was an awesome piece of animation with an almost anime feel at a time when anime wasn’t mainstream. The series had a serious tone and was full of fast-paced action about a group of cat people who escaped their doomed planet and sought to live in peace on a version of Earth in the far distant future.

Peace wasn’t easy as they’re constantly besieged by the evil Mutants and the evil mystical entity Mumm-Ra as well as the various dangerous denizens of Third Earth. I loved Thundercats mostly because of its action and fantasy elements. It was on mostly during weekday afternoons, and would I rush home from school to watch the series. Thundercats also featured amazing toys and vehicles such as the iconic Thundertank. So, for most adults of the same opinion (key word adults), seeing the new direction the Thundercats was heading is a big letdown. So how or why would you go from A to B?

cartoon network thundercats roar meets spongebob squarepants

That was a question based on emotion and intense eye-melting visual stimuli because the 80s and 90s generation would call many 80s and 90s cartoons totally awesome. Again, allow me to enumerate the stuff available back then during Saturday mornings and weekday afternoons.

Thundercats, Silverhawks, Jayce and the Wheeled Warriors, Centurions, Inhumanoids, Visionaries, GI Joe, Transformers (G1), The Legend of Zorro, Sky Commanders, M.A.S.K., Bionic Six, BraveStarr, He-Man and the Masters of the Universe, She-Ra, Dino-Riders, Rambo (Yes, Rambo), Mr. T, Robocop (Yes, that too), Teenage Mutant Ninja Turtles and finally, The Real Ghostbusters; the list goes on. Yes, one has to admit that most, if not all those above were designed to sell toys. But the toys were equally awesome weren’t they?

We had a good run, didn’t we? And we perceive the current trends in animation as lazy, dumbed down as if the networks are under-estimating the intelligence of the current generation of kids who we feel deserve the same stuff we had and maybe even better. Thundercats was quite serious, but like Teen Titans Go, we can’t help but expect a lot of lunacy and fart jokes in Thundercats Roar.

But a simple analysis of the current situation is needed as to why Lion-O is now Steven-O. The first and foremost argument of the non-haters is that Thundercats Roar is not for us adults. The target demographic for Thundercats Roar are kids ages five to ten. These kids don’t know what Thundercats are nor would they care. What they’ll be seeing will be new to them, and they’ll just take what’s coming to them, farts and all and maybe they’ll like it.

Counter-argument, then why use the Thundercats name when they can easily just create a new silly-animated action property that kids would love anyway? Aren’t they worried that adults will be in an uproar for ‘dissin’ such a respectable franchise? Because putting a comedic spin on an already existing franchise with already thought-of concepts and characters and applying an easier style of animation is more cost-effective than thinking of something else. Because Cartoon Network is a corporation and they’re just doing their cost-effective corporate thing. Us adults are the least of their concerns because we should be busy doing our 9 to 5 thing. Not to mention it worked out well for Teen Titans Go. They’re having a feature-length film you know. The trailer has a nice fart joke too.

ryu kihyun rejected concept art for thundercats 2018
Ryu Kihyun’s unused concept art for Tigra.

In an aesthetic sense, cartoons may be going back to its roots. Mickey Mouse did it recently. Betty Boop wasn’t exactly oozing with sex appeal. Popeye was entertaining enough like most cartoons from the 30s to the 60s. Even the Cuphead game is now considered a fresh hit.

The current cartoony styles of animation deserve some credit with hits like Gravity Falls, Steven Universe, Adventure Time and Rick and Morty. Probably because they have great stories and writing and their brand of comedy kind of suits their animation style. Some styles really tend to be off-putting. I used to hate on the weird style of Jumanji the Animated Series but grew to like it. Plus, they’re originals, and they started out that way, unlike some reboots. Sometimes, animation style just doesn’t fit as I could never get behind the style of Jackie Chan the Animated Series but I loved The Batman created by the same team of animators.

Sometimes, switching animation styles just hurts the eyes as we tend to like what we’re used to. The original Ben 10 and Ben 10 Alien Force was great, but then they changed animation styles, and it just got worse with the Ben 10 reboot. The original Teen Titans was a solid, serious action series that kids and adults are into but then they gave us Teen Titans Go. As mentioned, The Batman was an awesome series which I liked because the villain redesigns were cool and they could go toe-to-toe close-combat with Batman. Then they cancelled it and switched to the campy Batman: The Brave and the Bold with stories that are so out there compared to the grounded and serious The Batman. Networks and their lousy cancellations.

Speaking of cancellations, Thundercats was previously rebooted in 2011 which is more of an anime style. The reboot was supposed to re-vitalize the series in a more modern setting of serious story-telling and a revival of toy sales. Sadly, it was prematurely cancelled because of poor viewership and toy sales. Where were we Thundercats fans? Me, admittedly I could never catch the 2011 reboot. It was in an odd timeslot and back then I never really had the time.

Anyway, the point here is, where does the hate for Thundercats Roar take our generation? At the end of the day, nowhere. All we can do is lament at the state of today’s kids’ entertainment and be good parents and watch the current crop with them. And the biggest point to this debacle is that we haven’t seen everything yet. It was just a trailer. We’re not supposed to judge nor are we supposed to in the first place. Who knows, we might get to like it like we did Spongebob. Yes, admit it, you like Spongebob.

How Marvel’s ‘Avengers’ cast stacks up to their stunt doubles

We know how many actors like to say that they perform ‘most’ of their own stunts, so we’ve always been curious to see how much their stunt doubles actually resemble them. We’ll use Marvel’s “Avengers” cast to give you an idea of how close the stunt double resembles the actor.

In some cases, they’ve got a perfect match, and it has to be an interesting and possibly fun narcissistic feel to have them around them all the time. Even the most beautiful people could use a little reminding of how hot they are, you know. It’s not like they have fanzines, celebrity photographers hounding them continuously, and all that stuff.

While it used to be something most people and movie fans knew nothing about, but now many celebs love showing off their alter image stunt doubles. While this is mainly about the “Avengers” cast stunt doubles, we’ve added some fun extras to check out too.

We’ve got quite a few of Chris Hemsworth with his alter ego Bobby Holland since Holland likes to share a lot of them plus they both look good.

Chris Hemsworth with his mighty Thor double Bobby Holland

bobby holland laying with chris hemsworth thor on set avengers

Marvel Avengers actors stunt doubles thor chris hemsworth bobby holland 2018 700x532 (3)chris hemsworth with stunt double touching face in thor 2 avengers Marvel Avengers actors stunt doubles chris hemsworth bobby holland 2018 700x532 (4) Marvel Avengers actors stunt doubles thor hemsworth bobby holland 2018 700x532 (5) Marvel Avengers actors stunt doubles chris thor hemsworth bobby holland 2018 700x532 (16)bobby holland crotch hand for chris hemsworth thor avengers set images chris hemsworth dirty up with bobby holland for avengersChris Evans working his Captain America with stunt double Sam Hargrave

Marvel Avengers actors stunt doubles mark ruffalo hulk 2018 700x532 (19) chris evans hot stunt double captain america Marvel Avengers actors stunt doubles chris evans sam hargrove 00x532 (11)

Sebastian Stan warms up his Winter Soldier with stunt double James Young

Marvel Avengers actors stunt doubles mark ruffalo hulk 2018 700x532 (18)

Tom Hiddleston with his Loki stunt double Paul Lacovara plus others

It takes a few men to tackle Tom Hiddleston's Loki
It takes a few good men to tackle Tom Hiddleston’s Loki

Marvel Avengers actors stunt doubles tom hiddleston loki 2018 700x532 (6)

Anthony Mackie gets his Falcon going with stunt double Aaron Toney

Marvel Avengers actors stunt doubles mark ruffalo hulk 2018 700x532 (13)

Scarlett Johansson dons her Black Widow action to stunt double Heidi Moneymaker

Marvel Avengers actors stunt doubles mark ruffalo hulk 2018 700x532 (12)

Chris Pratt sharing his Star-Lord turn with stunt double Tony McFarr plus “Jurassic Park” double

Marvel Avengers actors stunt doubles mark ruffalo hulk 2018 700x532 (15) chris pratt with jurassic park stunt double

Marvel Avengers actors stunt doubles chris pratt star lord 2018 700x532 (7)

Dave Bautista shares his Drax body paint with stunt double Rob de Groot

Marvel Avengers actors stunt doubles dave bautista drax 2018 700x532 (10)

Zoe Saldana gets her green going with stunt double

Marvel Avengers actors stunt doubles mark ruffalo hulk 2018 700x532 (21)

Clark Gregg SHIELDS up his Phil Coulson with stunt double Dane Farwell

Marvel Avengers actors stunt doubles mark ruffalo hulk 2018 700x532 (8)

Karen Gillan Nebula-izes with stunt double Kelly Richardson

Marvel Avengers actors stunt doubles mark ruffalo hulk 2018 700x532 (20)

Andrew Garfield gets his Spider-Man action on with stunt double William Spencer and others

Marvel Avengers actors stunt doubles andrew garfield spider man 2018 700x532 (14)

Ben Affleck works Movie #5 with Rich Cetrone

ben affleck stunt double rich cetrone movie

Jennifer Lopez “Shades of Blue” stunt double

jennifer lopez with shades of blue stunt double

Even Rebel Wilson needs a stunt double for “Isn’t It Romantic?”

rebel wilson stunt double isnt it romantic movie

Zac Efron finds a man to dirty up his “Dirty Grandpa” film

zac efron dirty grandpa stunt double bulge

Margot Robbie “Suicide Squad” stunt double

margot robbie suicide squad stunt double

Cameron Diaz “Knight and Day” stunt double

cameron diaz knight and day stunt double

Dwayne Johnson rocks it out with “Pain and Gain” stunt double

dwyane johnson pain and gain stunt double

Tom Cruise finds a wee man for his “Knight and Day” stunt double

tom cruise wee man knight and day stunt double

Taylor Lautner kicking off his remaining career in “Tracers”

taylor lautner kicks up bulge for tracers stunt double

Amazon Echo: Protect yourself from Alexa’s prying ears plus Uber fraud watch

We’ve written articles about people worrying that their smart devices could be spying on them, and now, conspiracy-minded folks can feel justified. This came recently with revelations that an Amazon Echo smart speaker inadvertently sent a family’s private conversation to someone on their contact list highlights some unexpected risks of new voice-enabled technologies.

According to Amazon, the fault was an “unlikely” series of inadvertent vocal cues that triggered the speaker, caused it to begin recording and then led it to interpret subsequent conversation as a “send message” request.

The Amazon Echo is very simple to set up which made it a top seller during the holiday season, but that simplicity is also something that users may wind up giving their privacy up for. Naturally, Amazon is claiming that this is a very ‘rare’ occurrence, but if it happens once, you know it could be happening without people even knowing.

One example I can share is how people are getting charged by Uber even if they aren’t customers. I had a similar experience where I hadn’t paid any attention to my bank account, and luckily, the fraud department at my bank contacted me about over $1K in charges I never made. Even more strange was that I’ve never used Uber or even downloaded their app. Heck, I’ve never even looked them up on the internet, but somehow they got me.

I still had my card on me, and no one else had access to it, but there’s a growing scheme that traps your card information with Uber being the happy and seemingly willing recipient of this money.

It appears that somehow the ‘often in trouble’ company has been charging A LOT of people all over the country who’ve never even used them, but you probably haven’t even heard about that, have you? It’s not been picked up by the media yet, but as we are reporting this to our Attorney General since the company seems to have chosen not to respond back to our e-mails, it will become more known. As can be seen on their Facebook page, this is a problem they are well aware of but don’t seem to be willing to fix as thousands of people are continually getting fraudulently charged by them on a daily basis.

Once it gets into the mainstream news cycle, companies like Uber seem to suddenly work to fix them. Remember Uber and all those of sexual harassment going on but it took a big media story before they finally did something, and now they’re running those ads saying how they’re changing their image.

Companies that make smart devices are going to have this to deal with as more people become dependent and make their houses into smart homes.

how to protect your privacy from amazon echo alexa

There’s no way to eliminate these sorts of privacy risks short of unplugging entirely. But you can minimize the odds of unpleasant privacy surprises with these tips:

KILL THE MIC

Most smart speakers have a physical button to disable the microphone, so a private conversation can’t be recorded to begin with. You can hit that when you’re having sensitive conversations. The button on the Echo will turn red; other devices have similar cues. It doesn’t make sense to keep the mic disabled throughout the day, though. If the Echo can’t hear you, it won’t be able to order you more toilet paper or play smooth jazz.

LIMIT THE MIC

Disabling the microphone isn’t practical on a smartphone, but you can limit what apps have access to it. Go to the settings and turn off mic access to all but essential apps such as voice recorders or video conferencing. Netflix doesn’t really need voice access; you can simply type the name of the show you’re searching for.

cover the amazon echo camera for privacy issues

ABOUT THAT CAMERA

Facebook CEO Mark Zuckerberg famously puts a piece of tape over his laptop’s camera to prevent spying if anyone were to hack his device. Buy yourself a roll. Or use bandages. If you have a home-security camera that’s connected to the internet, turn the camera to the wall when you’re home. Just remember to turn it back before you leave, or you defeat the point of having a security camera.

faraday bag to protect amazon echo alexa privacy

BLOCK THE SIGNALS

For smartphones and other gadgets you carry with you, a “Faraday bag” that blocks electromagnetic waves can help prevent unwanted spying. The good ones will block cellular and other signals, meaning privacy-compromising information such as your location won’t leak out either. Just remember, your phone won’t get any calls while it’s in the bag — that’s the whole point. You can find one here to suit your need.

BE INFORMED

Apple, Samsung, and other tech companies have worked over the years to ensure that their products work “out of the box,” without users having to pore through lengthy manuals and operating instructions. The downside is that users are often unaware of all the things their gadgets can do, good or bad. Checking reputable online reviews, how-to guides, and even instructional videos will help you get the most out of new technologies. They’ll also tell you about any known glitches and risks.

Of course, the safest approach is not to buy a new gadget in the first place. That might not be practical for smartphones these days, but do you really need a smart speaker or a television set that’s connected to the internet? (As it turns out, it’s actually difficult to buy a TV without “smart” capabilities these days, but nothing says you have to connect it at home.)

From toothbrushes to slow cookers to toys, if companies can dream it up, it’s out there. Companies often release smart gadgets without thinking through the risks and ensuring their security. This makes them easy targets for malicious hackers. This is especially true with manufacturers that aren’t well known or that specialize in toys and other non-tech businesses.

Now that you know how to protect your privacy check out the latest deals you can get on Amazon Echo and control Alexa the way you want.

GDPR: How new data policy rules affect you plus Samsung’s iPhone copy

You might have noticed that you are suddenly getting a deluge of e-mails from every site you may have subscribed to mentioning they have updated their privacy policy. It’s not just you, but everyone is getting this as nearly every website had to quickly adhere to Europe’s new data and privacy rules which took effect on Friday. Sites are now clarifying individual rights to the personal data collected by companies around the world for targeted advertising and other purposes.

Basically, if you run a website, you should make this change if you haven’t already. WordPress included a new update that made it easy to create a privacy policy if you didn’t have one. They also included in their Tools menu a way to show your readers how their information has been used or to remove it completely. So, if you’ve gotten e-mails from shysters trying to sell you a plugin that will do this for you, save your money as WordPress took care of that for you. Knowing this was coming long ago, we even updated our Privacy Policy to make sure we complied as nearly everything, including plugins, will track users who visit your site whether you know it or not.

Years in the making, the rules are prompting companies to rewrite their privacy policies and in some cases, apply the European Union’s tougher standards even in the U.S. and other regions where privacy laws are weak. Although they take effect as Facebook faces an enormous privacy crisis that timing is largely coincidental.

Not much will change for you, at least right away; companies will keep on collecting and analyzing personal data from your phone, the apps you use and the sites you visit. The big difference is that now, the companies will have to justify why they’re collecting and using that information. And they’re prevented from using data for a different purpose later.

So now companies have been flooding their users with notices that aim to better explain their practices and the privacy choices they offer. EU regulators have new powers to go after companies that get too grabby or that don’t tell you clearly what they’re doing with your data.

Here’s a look at what the rules say and what they mean for consumers in the EU and elsewhere.

THE BIG DEAL WITH MAY 25 AND WHY IT WAS IMPORTANT

That’s when the EU’s General Data Protection Regulation takes effect. Instead of separate rules in separate nations across Europe, there’s now a single set for the entire EU.

The new rules apply to all users in the 28-nation EU, regardless of where the companies collecting, analyzing and using their data are located. So the rules will affect giants such as Facebook and Google and small U.S. businesses with just one European client alike.

WHAT DO THE NEW RULES SAY?

Companies have to use plain language to explain how they collect and use data. While companies generally aren’t changing what they’re doing, they are revising privacy policies to eliminate legalese. Google is embedding video (from its YouTube service, of course) to further explain the concepts.

GDPR spells out six specific ways that companies can justify the “processing,” or use, of personal data. Some are obvious, such as to fulfill contractual obligations — for instance, when an insurer pays out a claim. For other uses, such as ad targeting, companies can seek your consent. Those that aren’t sure they got consent properly are now going back to users.

There’s also a somewhat vague category called “legitimate interests.” It’s a catch-all justification that companies can fall back on to keep using data, though the company must show that its needs outweigh potential impact on users’ privacy, said David Martin, senior legal officer for the European consumer group BEUC.

Companies are also required to give EU users the ability to access and delete data and to object to data use under one of the claimed reasons. Firms have to clarify how long they retain data.

And the rules force companies that suffer data breaches to disclose them within 72 hours. By contrast, it took Yahoo more than two years to reveal a breach that ultimately involved three billion users.

FOR COMPANIES OUTSIDE EUROPE

Facebook, Google, and their ilk may be headquartered in Silicon Valley, but they have millions of users in Europe — and so have to comply with the new rules. Violators face fines of up to 20 million euros ($24 million) or 4 percent of annual global revenue, whichever is greater. That’s an incentive for companies to take these rules seriously.

WHAT ABOUT USERS OUTSIDE THE EU?

Companies based in the EU have to offer these privacy protections to all their users, not just EU residents. Beyond that, the EU rules merely say they apply to “data subjects who are in the Union.”

But it’s an open question how the rules will affect visitors to Europe. Ailidh Callander of the London-based group Privacy International says many questions will be tested in courts and further rulemaking.

What’s clear is that companies won’t have to be as aggressive getting consent for data collection outside of Europe. (Absent regulation, companies typically assume consent unless a user says otherwise.) They can hold off seeking affirmative consent until you visit the EU, at which point you might confront a pop-up notice.

A GLOBAL DOUBLE STANDARD

Some companies are extending at least some EU-style protections to all users. Among leading tech companies, Microsoft made the strongest promise to offer EU rights to users everywhere. However, companies outside the EU won’t face legal repercussions or fines if they fail to follow through with users outside the EU.

So unless the U.S. and other countries adopt privacy rules similar to those in the EU— something that’s not likely any time soon — many companies are likely to maintain double privacy standards.

Facebook CEO Mark Zuckerberg, for instance, promised “global settings and controls” for users during his U.S. congressional testimony in April, but was otherwise vague on the subject. When asked if U.S. users would have the same rights Europeans have to object to the use of data, Zuckerberg said, “I’m not sure how we’re going to implement that yet.”

But segmenting EU customers from the rest of the world isn’t easy, especially for smaller companies without Facebook’s or Google’s technical prowess. “It might seem like a smart move, but in some cases, it’s more work,” said Larry Ponemon, founder of the privacy research firm Ponemon Institute.

samsung stung by copying apple iphone parts with galaxy

A jury has decided Samsung must pay Apple $539 million in damages for illegally copying some of the iPhone’s features to lure people into buying its competing products.

The verdict reached Thursday is the latest twist in a legal battle that began in 2011. Apple contends Samsung wouldn’t have emerged as the world’s leading seller of smartphones if it hadn’t ripped off the technology powering the pioneering iPhone in developing a line of similar devices running on Google’s Android software.

Previous rulings had already determined that Samsung infringed on some of Apple’s patents, but the amount of damages owed has been hanging in legal limbo. Another jury convened for a 2012 trial had determined Samsung should pay Apple $1.05 billion, but U.S. District Judge Lucy Koh reduced that amount to $548 million.

The issue escalated to the U.S. Supreme Court, which determined in 2016 that a lower court needed to re-examine $399 million of the $548 million. That ruling was based on the concept that the damages shouldn’t be based on all the profits that the South Korean electronics giant rung up from products that copied the iPhone because its infringement may only have violated a few patents.

Apple had argued it was owed more than $1 billon while Samsung contended the $399 million should be slashed to $28 million. The revised damages figure represents a victory for Apple, even though it isn’t as much as the Cupertino, California, company had sought.

“Today’s decision flies in the face of a unanimous Supreme Court ruling in favor of Samsung on the scope of design patent damages,” Samsung said in a statement. “We will consider all options to obtain an outcome that does not hinder creativity and fair competition for all companies and consumers.”

An eight-person jury came up with the new amount following a one-week trial and four days of deliberation in a San Jose, California, federal courthouse.

Apple expressed gratitude to the jury for agreeing “that Samsung should pay for copying our products.”

“This case has always been about more than money,” a company statement said. “Apple ignited the smartphone revolution with iPhone, and it is a fact that Samsung blatantly copied our design.”

‘Solo: A Star Wars Story’ hit by overcrowded May box office with ‘Deadpool 2’

Disney could be feeling a big disturbance in the force as “Solo: A Star Wars Story” was hit this Memorial Day weekend by an overcrowded May with many of their own films including “Deadpool 2” which dropped to a second place after a huge opening weekend. Yes, $83.3 million is a huge sum for any franchise film, but when you’re talking about “Star Wars,” that’s a whole other story. Even overseas markets turned a thumbs down with ticket sales stalling at $65 million.

In the largest disturbance yet in Disney’s otherwise lucrative reign over “Star Wars,” the Han Solo spinoff “Solo: A Star Wars Story” opened well below expectations with a franchise-low $83.3 million in ticket sales over the three-day weekend in North American theaters.

Disney estimated Sunday that “Solo” will gross $101 million over the four-day Memorial Day weekend, a figure below even the opening weekends of the much-derided “Star Wars” prequels. Last week, forecasts ran as high as $150 million for the four-day haul of “Solo.”

“Solo,” which cost Disney and its Lucasfilm division at least $400 million to make and market worldwide, will collect roughly $101 million over the entire Memorial Day weekend in North America, according to comScore. Disney had been hoping that the movie, focused on a young Han Solo and directed by Ron Howard, would take in closer to $140 million.

In comparison, “Rogue One: A Star Wars Story” generated $155 million over its first three days in theaters in 2016. “Star Wars: The Last Jedi” arrived to $220 million in December.

So what exactly happened?

Multiplex gridlock, for a start. “Solo” arrived in the shadow of the Death Star — “Avengers: Infinity War” — and hot on the heels of “Deadpool 2” (20th Century Fox – see our review here). “Deadpool 2” placed second over the weekend, taking in $42.7 million between Friday and Sunday, for a two-week domestic total of about $207.4 million. “Infinity War” (Disney) was third, collecting $16.5 million, for a five-week total of $622 million.

Overseas ticket sales were even worse. “Solo,” starring Alden Ehrenreich in the role made iconic by Harrison Ford, grossed $65 million internationally in its opening weekend, including a paltry $10.1 million in China.

“Of course we would have hoped for this to be a bit bigger,” said Dave Hollis, Disney’s distribution chief. “We’re encouraged by the response that people have had to the film. It got a good CinemaScore (A-minus). The exits are very encouraging.”

“Solo” came in with a Millennium Falcon’s worth of baggage following the mid-production firing of directors Phil Lord and Christopher Miller, who were replaced by Ron Howard. With the rejiggered production, the budget soared well past $250 million.

But the cause of the spinoff’s disappointing performance may have had as much to do with “Star Wars” fatigue (“The Last Jedi” exited theaters just last month) and the stiffer competition of a summer holiday weekend. While no major releases dared to open against “Solo,” Fox’s “Deadpool 2″ moved its release date up a week ahead of “Solo.”

The gambit may have hurt both releases. After debuting with $125 million last weekend, the R-rated Ryan Reynolds sequel dropped 66 percent to second place with $42.7 million and an estimated $53.5 million four-day haul.

“Solo” notched the biggest Memorial Day weekend opening in several years, but it also came on the heels of a pair of a summer-sized blockbusters — “Deadpool 2″ and Disney’s own “Avengers Infinity War” — making for an unusually crowded May. “Infinity War” added $16.5 million in its fifth weekend to bring its domestic total to $621.7 million and its global sales to $1.9 billion — both among the highest of all-time.

“It is a business that is built on momentum but also one where people probably are only able to get to theaters a certain number of weeks in a row,” said Hollis.

But there were also questions beyond the effect the calendar had on “Solo.” While reviews were generally positive (71 percent “fresh” on Rotten Tomatoes), there was little about “Solo” that made the movie a must-see event.

Fans were skeptical of Ehrenreich and uncertain about the dismissal of Lord and Miller (the popular filmmaking duo behind “21 Jump Street” and “The Lego Movie”). Unlike any “Star Wars” release before, “Solo” was deemed — gasp — skippable. Some fans went into meltdown mode with creative decisions that were made on “The Last Jedi.”

Disney is attempting to pull off a complicated generational handoff — trying to please older fans while paying keen attention to millennials and children in a bid to keep the property healthy over the long term.

As it arrived in theaters, Disney might have been wishing it had instead made a Lando Calrissian spinoff with the red-hot Donald Glover, the star of TV’s “Atlanta.” In the days ahead of release, Lucasfilm President Kathleen Kennedy said a Lando movie is a possibility.

While the original “Star Wars” films helped define the summer moviegoing experience, Disney released their previous three “Star Wars” films in December. What most hurt “Solo” was the “fatigue factor” of a May “Star Wars” film following a December one, said Paul Dergarabedian, senior media analyst for comScore.

“It’s the compressed timeframe between the two ‘Star Wars’ films and the highly competitive nature of this marketplace. It is summer, after all,” said Dergarabedian. “The good news is that the next film isn’t until December 2019. That’s plenty of breathing space. I think part of the allure of the ‘Star Wars’ brand in the past has been the long wait.”

That time might also be valuable for Lucasfilm and Disney to find a way to counter the diminishing returns of its multi-billion-dollar franchise. To help propel “Solo” internationally, Disney brought the film to Cannes Film Festival, flooding the French film festival’s red carpet with Storm Troopers.

“The Last Jedi” also flopped in China (it was pulled from theaters after a week), and Rian Johnson’s movie — even though it grossed $1.3 billion worldwide — showed relatively weak legs at the box office, while proving divisive among “Star Wars” die-hards.

The magic around a “Star Wars” film may be fading. To right the ship on Episode 9, Lucasfilm has turned to an old friend: “The Force Awakens” director J.J. Abrams. He, too, is replacing a fired director after Colin Trevorrow departed last fall.

Could it be ‘franchise fatigue?’ It doesn’t seem to be happening to Marvel’s Avengers MCU world, but as “The Last Jedi” hit big screens only five months ago closing the usual year-long gap between “Star Wars” films.

“‘Star Wars’ fans have an enormous sense of ownership, which works to the benefit of the movie company and to the detriment,” said Steve Sansweet, the president of Rancho Obi-Wan, a nonprofit “Star Wars” memorabilia museum, and the former head of fan relations for Lucasfilm. “There is a growing feeling among fans that the movies are starting to come out a little too frequently.”

As with the James Bond series, perhaps less is more?

Disney disagrees, noting that Marvel movies come out at even shorter intervals — “Thor: Ragnarok” in November, “Black Panther” in February, “Infinity War” in April.

“We’re going to judge ‘Solo’ by where we finish rather than where we start,” said Dave Hollis, Disney’s president of theatrical distribution. “The base is a little smaller than we had hoped for, but it’s very respectable, and there is no substantial competition for the next couple weekends.” Moviegoers gave “Solo” an A-minus grade in CinemaScore exit polls.

Some box office analysts said it was unfair to expect every “Star Wars” movie to be a juggernaut, especially now that pent-up demand has worn off: Disney bought Lucasfilm in 2012, and when it restarted the franchise with “The Force Awakens” in 2015, it was the first new live-action installment in a decade.

“Using the Marvel Cinematic Universe as an example, there will be films with box office returns like ‘Avengers: Infinity War,’ but there will also be films with returns like ‘Ant-Man,’” said Wade Holden, an analyst at S&P Global Market Intelligence. “Ant-Man” arrived to $57.2 million in initial ticket sales in 2015.

Lucasfilm has at least nine more “Star Wars” films in the works. The untitled follow-up to “The Last Jedi” is scheduled for December 2019. The director Rian Johnson is working on a trilogy focused on new characters. Another expected trilogy is moving ahead under the leadership of David Benioff and D.B. Weiss, the duo behind “Game of Thrones.”

At the same time, the director James Mangold (“Logan”) is pushing ahead with a stand-alone movie focused on Boba Fett, the bounty hunter who made his movie debut in “The Empire Strikes Back” in 1980. An Obi-Wan Kenobi movie has also been in development.

Disney is also spending billions to build “Star Wars” areas at Disneyland and Walt Disney World. The filmmaker Jon Favreau is working on a live-action “Star Wars” television series for Disney’s planned streaming service. Disney Channel, which has suffered ratings declines, has high hopes for “Star Wars Resistance,” an anime-inspired series that will arrive in the fall.

Despite the lower-than-expected debut of “Solo,” box office analysts predict that summer 2018 will generate roughly $4.3 billion in ticket sales, a 14 percent increase over last year.

Summer 2017 was terrible: Domestic ticket sales fell 16 percent, to $3.78 billion, compared to a year earlier, the result of a string of sputtering sequels — the fifth “Transformers,” the fifth “Pirates of the Caribbean,” the eighth “Alien” — and poorly made reboots like “The Mummy” and “Baywatch.”

It was the slowest summer since 1995 when “Pocahontas” was a top draw. After adjusting for inflation, the summer of 1995 had about $3.76 billion in ticket sales. Hollywood’s summer stretches from the first weekend in May to Labor Day and typically accounts for 40 percent of annual ticket sales.

“Jurassic World: Fallen Kingdom” is expected to lead this year’s comeback. “Fallen Kingdom” finds workers racing to save disobliging dinosaurs from an erupting volcano. (Some people in Hollywood have joked that the recent eruption of Kilauea on Hawaii was the handiwork of Michael Moses, Universal’s marketing chief.) “Jurassic World” took in about $652 million at domestic theaters in summer 2015.

Disney is expected to have two more blockbusters by the season’s end, with Pixar’s “Incredibles 2” and Marvel’s “Ant-Man and the Wasp” both generating strong advance interest. “The other major studios appear to have mostly ceded the summer to Disney,” Doug Creutz, a media analyst at Cowen and Company, wrote in an April report.

For the first time in years, Warner Bros. has a superhero-free summer. (Unless you count the animated “Teen Titans Go! To the Movies.”) Instead, Warner will rely on “Ocean’s 8,” which seeks to revive the “Ocean’s Eleven” heist series with an all-female leading cast. Warner has also teamed with a Chinese company on “The Meg,” a cheese-tastic monster shark movie scheduled for an Aug. 10 release.

“This may be short-term smart as it avoids having an expensive film crushed by Disney’s juggernauts,” Mr. Creutz added. “On the other hand, you can’t win if you don’t play.”

Sony Pictures appears to have three hit sequels on its schedule (“Hotel Transylvania 3,” “The Equalizer 2” and “Sicario: Day of the Soldado”), but there are questions about the viability of Paramount’s “Mission: Impossible — Fallout,” the sixth chapter in that 22-year-old Tom Cruise franchise.

As superhero movies have become more comedic, traditional comedies have had a harder time breaking through at the box office. That trend could continue. “Tag,” an R-rated guys-who-refuse-to-grow-up movie, is likely to get trampled by “Incredibles 2.” Both arrive on June 15.

crazy rich asians movie hits

Analysts have higher hopes for “Crazy Rich Asians,” an effort to breathe new life into the romantic-comedy genre by aiming at an underserved audience. The Warner film has an all-Asian leading cast.

Estimated ticket sales for Friday through Sunday at U.S. and Canadian theaters, according to comScore. Where available, the latest international numbers for Friday through Sunday are also included. Final domestic figures will be released Tuesday.

has star wars fatigue hit box office 2018

  1. “Solo: A Star Wars Story,” $83.3 million ($65 million international).
  2. “Deadpool 2,” $42.7 million ($57 million international).
  3. “Avengers: Infinity War,” $16.5 million ($32.5 million international).
  4. “Book Club,” $9.5 million.
  5. “Life of the Party,” $5.1 million.
  6. “Breaking In,” $4.1 million.
  7. “Show Dogs,” $3.1 million.
  8. “Overboard,” $3 million ($2.3 million international).
  9. “A Quiet Place,” $2.2 million ($4.7 million international).
  10. “RBG,” $1.2 million.

Estimated ticket sales for Friday through Sunday at international theaters (excluding the U.S. and Canada), according to comScore:

  1. “Solo: A Star Wars Story,” $65 million.
  2. “Deadpool 2,” $57 million.
  3. “Avengers: Infinity War,” $32.5 million.
  4. “How Long Will I Love U,” $24.3 million.
  5. “Believer,” $10.4 million.
  6. “A Quiet Place,” $4.7 million.
  7. “Blumhouse’s Truth Or Dare,” $3.3 million.
  8. “Perfetti Sconosciuti,” $2.8 million.
  9. “Peter Rabbit,” $2.4 million.
  10. “Overboard,” $2.3 million.

2018 NHL Stanley Cup Souvenirs every hockey fan must have

Finally, the Stanley Cup Finals have arrived. The one time a year when Canadians and Americans alike come together to bond over sports. This year, it is the Washington Capitals and the Vegas Golden Knights. Washington fans now have something to really be proud about in a town not known for much good going on.

The Stanley Cup is a 126-year-old hockey tradition. For me, it’s easily one of the best events in the sport. The Chicago Blackhawks and Pittsburgh Penguins have been dominant over the past several years, but fans of every team should enjoy this historic event. It’s like the Super Bowl stretched out over four to seven games. So it is like the Super Bowl without all the sometimes interesting commercials.

washington capitals win stanley cup 2018

So, as hockey fans everywhere celebrate the sport and the 2018 Stanley Cup Finals, here are a few things you can grab to help remember this year’s series, and maybe even start a collection for future years.

washington capitals alexander overchkin stanley cup finals jersey gifts

Stanley Cup Jerseys and Apparel

Just like any other sport, jerseys are the best way to show off your team loyalty. The best part about the Stanley Cup Finals is you can get special jerseys to commemorate the Cup.Snag yourself an Alexander Ovechkin jersey with the 2018 Stanley Cup Finals patch already ironed on which you can find a huge selection here. Or, if the Knights are more your team, grab a William Karlsson jersey with the patch ready to show off.

 

knights william karsson in action bulge hockey stanley cup

Jerseys can be expensive, however, so you can also look into Stanley Cup hats, shirts, and jackets. It gets pretty cold up in Pennsylvania, so why not throw on a Stanley Cup Finals Capitals jacket to show off your favorite team and stay warm at the same time?

2018 stanley cup finals shot glass gifts

Stanley Cup Shot Glasses

Okay, so hear me out here. Shot glasses are perfect whether you were cheering for the Washington Capitals or the Vegas Golden Knights. Use them to celebrate the big 2018 Stanley Cup win, or drown your sorrows from the crushing defeat.Or, if you’re a Tampa Bay Lightning fan and hate both teams, use them to get you through offseason and look forward to next year.

The best part is, they’re cheap, and this is the great start of a collection you can check out here. You can find shot glasses everywhere for just about anything, and never much more than $10 or so. Grab yourself one to remember this year’s Stanley Cup and then grab a few more for your favorite teams, players, and hockey events.

2018 stanley cup hockey puck ticket stub holder gift
2018 Stanley Cup Finals Hockey Puck Ticket Stub Holder

Commemorative Hockey Puck

There may be no better Stanley Cup souvenir out there than a commemorative hockey puck. You can even try to land one from 2017 as that marked the 100th anniversary of the National Hockey League and the 50th anniversary of the Penguins franchise (if you’re still celebrating their win and reigning championship), there are some great pucks out there to collect.

Get one to commemorate the Capitals, the Knights, or just the game in general. They can come ready in display cases and still cost less than $20. And hey, even if you hated this year’s championship, you can grab yourself a puck for your favorite team or player. You can never have enough of your favorite sport’s ball-equivalent. Heck, even a Marc-Andre Fleury Vegas Golden Knights deluxe tall hockey puck case (certified authentic) would make a hardcore NHL fan more than excited.

Pucks are easy to display, easy to carry around if you’re trying to collect signatures, and a cheap way to start a great collection of fun hockey collectibles that’s easy to grow every year.

warriors vs capitols in stanley cup finals 2018 gifts

Stanley Cup Finals Patch

So, maybe you already have your Alexander Ovechkin jersey, and you want to remember the 2018 Stanley Cup without breaking the bank, or you just like to collect patches. You can snag a nicely sewn one for less than $15.Iron it onto your favorite Predators jersey, get a nice little frame and display it proudly, or add it to your collection of Stanley Cup patches. These patches are a fantastic way to remember the Cup (or any other major sports championship), and if your team didn’t make it this year, you can always find a patch for them, so fret not Detroit Red Wings fans.

These patches are also perfect for big hockey fans in general. There have been quite a few Stanley Cups, and you can still find patches for many of them right here.

Start a collection of Stanley Cup patches. Get a big frame for them all, or just lay them out under some glass. Then you can easily add to them each season to update your collection.

marc andre fluery vegas golden knights bobblehead stanley cup finals

Stanley Cup Bobbleheads Or Figurines

Bobbleheads are a big deal in the NHL. They’re fantastic. Little miniat2018 sures of your favorite players. They’re perfect for display anywhere, and a great way to start a collection of relatively inexpensive pieces dedicated to your favorite team.So, imagine Alexander Ovechkin holding his Stanley Cup. Or snag a William Karlsson, or Alex Tuck to show off your love of the Knights. You can never have enough bobbleheads. Collect the whole team for your display case, and throw a Stanley Cup puck or some shot glasses and patches in there.

Again, even if you aren’t a big fan of the Capitals or Knights, you can find bobbleheads for your favorite players. So, whether you’re a Montreal Canadiens fan, cheering for the New York Rangers, or can’t get enough of the Boston Bruins, there’s a bobblehead with your name on it.

Click here to check out all the NHL 2018 Stanley Cup apparel and merchandise all in one place, where you’re guaranteed a great find and price.

The Tremors Franchise Goes to the Worms

It looks like Kevin Bacon’s name doesn’t carry as much weight on Earth compared to the entire galaxy. Thanks to Star Lord Peter Quill, Kevin Bacon’s reputation precedes him, but that’s just not enough for the folks at SyFy who opted not to pick up on the new Tremors TV series. Now the Tremors franchise doesn’t get as much media attention as it should have but it just did due to a good trailer that was ‘leaked’ on the internet. For those not familiar with this franchise, think of it as A Quiet Place except the aliens are giant worms. If you want to know why there’s a cult following, check out the franchise recap down here:

Tremors Recap:

Now for the new TV series trailer, you could see it down here:

Tremors New TV Series Trailer:

Now for the trailer. For what it is, is great. It catches the horror, the suspense, and the comedy and makes some nods to the original 1990 cult classic. Unfortunately, for the franchise’s fans who continue to hold out through the Tremors direct-to-DVD sequels, this new TV series erases everything that happened after the original film. Seems the producers, probably including Bacon, took a page out of the Godzilla franchise. Scrap everything that followed, except for the 1954 film.

As a good Tremors fan, I can probably overlook this and view the series in a Godzilla perspective. Though Tremors wouldn’t be the same without Burt Gummer (Michael Gross), who wasn’t involved with the project. What I can’t abide with, however, is the new Graboid design. It doesn’t look anything like the original Graboid. Now while we may never know the complete details if it’s a new subspecies or whatever, it’s just too different in case it turns out to be the graboid itself. The design is so different, and the trailer itself contradicts it, with the visuals of the original Graboid.

Or, given the benefit of the doubt, it could really be a new subspecies or another mutated creature like the other monsters featured in the original Tremors TV series that aired in 2003. Here’s the series’ trailer by the way…

Tremors 2003 Series Trailer:

While it’s not as good as some of the films, especially the non-graboid episodes, the series did capture the atmosphere of life in the fictional town of Perfection, Nevada. The new characters were great, and Michael Gross and Victor Browne really carried the show. It’s a shame the series was quite short, but you can only do so much with giant worms and a desert setting.

kevin bacon tremors syfy series killed off

Speaking of settings, the franchise changed things up a bit with the fifth film, Tremors: Bloodlines and set it in another continent — Africa. They also changed a few things by introducing another species of graboid and this time; it’s mostly CGI. The graboid is more monstrous-looking, and this time, the tongues separate from the main creature as if they’re symbiotic. There are no shriekers present, but instead, they seemed to have combined the shrieker and assblaster into one creature. Now Tremors 5 seems like a decent film which is more than I could say about the sequel.

Again, the sequel Tremors 6: A Cold Day in Hell tries to be different than the other Tremors films by giving us further evolutions to the graboid creature. In this film, while it tries to be different, it actually tries to be more of the same by actually making nods to the first film.

Even though both Bloodlines and A Cold Day in Hell were from the same director, I just didn’t like how the sixth film turned out. Watching Tremors 6 felt like going through the motions. Given they’re from the same director, I figure the culprit would be in the screenplay which tried to play with fans’ nostalgia (by including Val McKee’s daughter Valerie into the mix and trapping the cast in an inescapable bowl) but failed miserably, at least with me. I’m not a professional film critic, but this just didn’t resonate with me as much as the first five films had. Saying that the fifth film is okay is actually a stretch. When I’m bored out of my mind, I just pop in the first two films and enjoy them as if watching them for the first time.

We’re not sure how the Tremors franchise is being handled by Universal but Tremors: A Cold Day in Hell seems to be competing with the release of Kevin Bacon’s TV series, again by featuring Valentine’s daughter Valerie. But now with the TV series being cancelled, there’s word going around that a seventh film is in the works. Hoping that upcoming film would be good and might even recycle some elements of Bacon’s failed series. Otherwise, the franchise could end up six feet under with worms of a different kind.