Home Blog Page 62

Samsung Galaxy Fold: What you need to know

Back in February, Samsung announced the revolutionary Galaxy Fold smartphone aka phablet, but we weren’t able to get our hands on it. Now, right before the company unleashes it for $1,980, we were able to get our hands on it to put it through its paces.

When Samsung said this year it would launch a smartphone with a folding screen, the big question was whether the innovation was something people actually wanted or needed.

Samsung Galaxy Fold phone folded up.
See the fold?

Is the Galaxy Fold a gimmick to help sell more smartphones in a slowing market or a true breakthrough that will change how we use our devices?

Major manufacturers have in recent years been largely updating smartphones with marginal improvements like better cameras and face scanning technology, so skepticism has been high.

The South Korean electronics company this week offered the media a hands-on preview ahead of the release in the U.S. this month, and the first impression is that a folding screen in some circumstances might be a useful innovation — but at a cost of almost $2,000 it won’t be a mass market product anytime soon.

samsung galaxy fold being held in folded position in London.

WHY A FOLDABLE SCREEN?

As people increasingly use their phones to do data-hungry tasks like view photos on Instagram and watch movies or TV shows on YouTube or Netflix, Samsung says the case for a folding phone has become clear: People want bigger screens but they also want a phone they can carry around in their pocket.

Skeptics might say that folding phones are a sign that the smartphone industry has run out of good ideas and fallen into an innovation malaise. Samsung isn’t alone. Little known Royole started selling its FlexPai in China last year while Chinese tech giant Huawei announced its own folding phone, the Mate X, days after Samsung’s announcement.

Buying the first iteration of any new kind of gadget is fraught with risk. And the Fold is a first: it’s a phone with a 4.6-inch screen that folds out to reveal a 7.3-inch tablet inside. That’s how we’ve all thought of it, anyway: as a folding phone. But after using the Galaxy Fold for about an hour today, I’ve started to come around to thinking of it as a small tablet that happens to fold up.

That change in perspective makes a big difference in terms of the physicality of the Fold. If you think of it as a phone, it’s ridiculous. It’s super tall and much thicker than any phone out there when it’s closed. There’s a little gap when you fold it up because the screen can’t be fully folded flat. The front screen is tiny. Even though it’s 4.6 inches, it feels much smaller because it’s so narrow and because it sits inside such a tall phone.

But if you think of it as a small tablet that happens to fold, all of those foibles start to feel less like foibles. Instead, it’s like you have an iPad mini that can be packed down to become more pocketable. I say “more pocketable” intentionally. It’s large enough that it’ll stick out of any but the deepest pants pockets. This is a device designed for a purse or a coat pocket.

The hinge mechanism is really solid, too. It closes with a satisfying snick, and it has a springiness to it when you open it up. There are some magnets that hold it firmly closed, and, try as I might, I haven’t been able to open it up one-handed. But I have been able to hold it one-handed, even when open. It really does feel like an itty-bitty tablet, which is not a form factor I expected to want, but it feels more useful the longer I hold it.

Samsung Galaxy Fold open in tablet mode and folded for reading mode.

OPEN AND SHUT

Closed, the Galaxy Fold is about 6.3 centimeters wide and 16 centimeters long (2.5 by 6.3 inches). It felt like holding a TV remote control, but heavier. The phone’s two panels are held shut by magnets, so a bit of force is needed to get it open. With a little practice I was able to do it one-handed by jamming my thumb between the two sections to pop them apart.

Samsung spent nearly five years working on the hinge, which went through more than 1,000 prototypes. It uses cogs and gears to give it a smooth feel and has two open positions. First, it unfolds to 140 degrees — handy if you want to put it down on your desk but still need to angle part of the screen for a video call, for example. Bend it further and the screen silently and solidly opens to a flat position. To close the phone, you click it out of the open position and snap the sides shut.

Samsung Galaxy Fold phone fully open four quadrants.

SCREEN TIME

Fully open, there’s plenty of real estate on the Galaxy Fold’s main screen, which measures 7.3 inches (18.5 centimeters) diagonally. It’s great if you want to take and review photos, watch videos or read e-books without squinting. Multi-tasking is also possible with up to three apps open at the same time. Wide open, the Fold felt more like a small tablet than a smartphone, which suggests that one possible market is people who want both kinds of devices but don’t want to buy two.

As with anything that folds, there’s a crease. It runs down the center of the screen and is visible at certain angles, though I didn’t really notice it when using the apps. Samsung developed a new adhesive to glue the composite polymer screen together, and promises it can withstand being opened and closed 200,000 times, or 100 times a day for five years.

The Fold has a second screen, a long, narrow display, on one of its outer panels, so you can continue using apps while it’s closed. I tried out a few — YouTube and car racing game “Asphalt” — that transitioned seamlessly between both screens. It could, for example, be useful to consult Google Maps in detail on the big screen before setting off, then put it in your pocket and quickly check the directions en route. But I’m still not convinced that “app continuity” is something I need.

The phone’s specs have been available to app makers for a while and the company says most should only need a few tweaks to run properly on its Android operating system. Hundreds of apps have already been “optimized” for the Fold but Samsung won’t say how many until it’s released.

That brings me back to that screen: it’s 7.3 inches in a nearly 4:3 aspect ratio. It gets plenty bright, and you can use it fully flat or with the Fold sort of half-open like a paperback book. As I said above, you can see the crease from an angle, but it mostly disappears when you are looking at it head-on. You can also feel the crease, which is a little disconcerting. But you get over it soon enough. It’s easy to be picky when you first try it out, but after some use, it just becomes natural.

Samsung Galaxy Fold cameras images.

CAMERAS AND MORE

The Galaxy Fold has no less than six cameras. Three lenses on the rear, another on the cover next to the second screen, and two more inside, including a selfie camera. There’s a fingerprint scanner on the right side, which can be used when it’s both open and closed. Inside, the battery is split in two, one in each panel, and it has enough juice to wirelessly charge another device, such as the wireless earphones included. It’s not clear if the bigger screen needs more power — Samsung hasn’t given any battery life estimates, saying only that it may vary.

There’s also that notch in the upper right corner, which houses the two cameras and various proximity and light sensors that every phone needs. That notch does get in the way sometimes. YouTube, for example, was cut off on full-screen videos, although Samsung will allow you to hide the notch with a black bar across the top of the display, similar to its current Galaxy devices. Samsung also had to do some extra work to make the screen flexible that you might not have thought of. For example, the adhesive that holds the different screen layers together had to be completely redone.

In terms of software, things are in a range I’d call “surprisingly acceptable.” That’s faint praise for any software, but here, I don’t mean it as an insult. Android has historically been awful on tablets, but the screen on the Fold is small enough that it doesn’t make a big difference. There’s “App Continuity,” Samsung’s branding for a Google Android feature that allows the app you’re looking at on the smaller front screen to automatically open up on the inside, properly resized.

On the back, you’ll find a three-camera array: one regular, one telephoto, and one wide angle. When the phone is closed, there’s a single front-facing 10-megapixel lens. When you have it opened to tablet mode, there’s a giant notch that houses yet another camera plus an RGB depth-sensing camera.

That’s technically six cameras, which is probably too many cameras. I would have preferred it if Samsung had chosen to just put a single small webcam inside for tablet mode and put the dual cameras on the outside, if only because it would reduce the size of the notch.

App Continuity

Properly resizing apps has been an Android bugbear since forever, but Samsung and Google have worked together to fix that for a lot of apps. A side effect of that work is that Samsung is able to let you do two- or three-tiled, split-screen apps. You slide over from the right edge of the screen to pull up a dock of the recently used apps and tap one to open it up in a split view. Then you can do it again to open up a third one, which is split on the right.

Active windows are indicated by little lozenge-shaped bars at the top of each app, and you can tap on them to slide apps to different positions or open up yet more windowing options. You can open up literal windows if you really want to, dragging them around the screen and resizing them.

All of this should be familiar to Samsung fans, as these features are based on a lot of the popover and windows work the company has introduced with its One UI software. But for everybody else, it could be a little confusing. Finally, there’s no getting around the blunt fact that Android apps are not as good on big screens as iPad apps. But, again, it’s not so offensive since this screen is a bit smaller.

And if you’re a Samsung fan, you might be interested to hear that the fingerprint sensor button is also the Bixby button. Above that is where you’ll find the traditional power and volume buttons. It’s not a big deal, but I’m so used to the concept of a fingerprint sensor button also being the power button that I got tripped up a little.

In terms of specs, the Galaxy Fold is very similar to a Galaxy S10 Plus. It has the same Snapdragon 855 processor, 12GB of RAM, and 512GB of storage. The cameras are similar to what you’d find on that phone, too, but there are more of them. The battery is 4,380mAh, with cells on both sides of the fold. Whether that’s enough for Samsung’s claimed full-day of use on a screen this large is anybody’s guess. The S10 tech that it’s based on has comported itself fairly well in terms of battery life, so there’s some reason to be optimistic.

WHEN

The Galaxy Fold is set for release in the U.S. on April 26, priced at $1,980. It goes on sale in some Europe markets on May 3.

Should You Get It?

Yes, there are rough edges in the software, and the folding screen doesn’t feel as premium as other screens in this price category. There are still plenty of reasons to turn your nose up at the Galaxy Fold, especially at a price of $1,980.

But you shouldn’t turn your nose up at the whole idea. Samsung has accomplished something special here, even though there’s more work to be done.

It’s a totally working folding phone. That’s amazing. Whatever turning your nose up you want to feel about its issues, you won’t be so snarky when you open it up for the first time. If you recall, I was a little snarky in my February overview, but Samsung has made me a believer again! Let the folding wars begin as Huawei has a really great one too.

HBO readies ‘Game of Thrones’ prequel and beyond

Like with most hugely popular shows, “Game of Thrones” ending with Season 8 will leave many fans knowing a huge void is coming to their lives. This is similar to how “Supernatural” fans felt when Jensen Ackles, Jared Padalecki, and Misha Collins announced that their long-running CW show was ending with Season 15.

Naturally, HBO has already gotten started on more GoT related things like a prequel, but they’re not just relying solely on one franchise. They talked about more things coming down the pike you might be interested in.

When the last drop — or gallon — of blood is shed and an exultant victor has ascended to the Iron Throne, viewers may be split over how HBO’s fantasy saga ended but they’ll be joined in deprivation.

“What do you do without ‘Game of Thrones?’” will be the lament heard after the May 19 finale, said media industry analyst Larry Gerbrandt. The question is even more critical to the pay-cable channel, which soared on dragon’s wings with its hugely popular, eight-season adaptation of George R.R. Martin’s novels. If you’ve not watched “Game of Thrones” and are wondering what all the fuss is about, check out our GOT primer and see who survives Season 8, and who doesn’t.

Keeping subscribers on board means more than another hit, even one as globally dazzling as “Game of Thrones” proved to be. But it’s where HBO can start to protect its brand and position, observers say, an effort both demanded and compounded by an increasingly congested small-screen landscape and the expectations of the channel’s corporate owner since 2016, AT&T.

“I think they need a prestige show on this level to remain HBO,” Bill Carter, a media analyst for CNN and former reporter for The New York Times. But “more than ever, it’s really hard to find a hit show and to break through in this marketplace.”

Sunday’s season premiere underscored the point, with “Game of Thrones” drawing a series-high record of 17.4 million viewers on TV and streaming. It set a streaming record for HBO and reinforced its standing as one of television’s most popular shows.

The channel is well into the hunt for a worthy successor, with one possibility an untitled prequel to “Game of Thrones” created by Martin and Jane Goldman and starring Naomi Watts. Set to begin shooting a pilot in June, it’s among several potential “Thrones” spinoffs being weighed, with discussions at HBO about “how many is too many,” said programming chief Casey Bloys.

“We have high hopes” for the pilot, he said. “But I want to be clear, nobody is going into this thinking that we’re going to do a prequel and all of a sudden everybody who automatically watched ‘Game of Thrones’ is going to watch this. … It’ll have a different feel and different rhythm. We’re not trying to do the same show again.”

That begs the question of what more HBO has to offer, he said. During a period in which “Game of Thrones” was off the air for scheduling reasons, series including “Westworld,” ″Sharp Objects” and “Barry” proved strong draws, Bloys said.

“I’m not going to argue that we won’t miss ‘Game of Thrones.’ It’s been a fantastic show for us, but life does go on,” he said. He points to a deep bench of returnees, including Nicole Kidman and Reese Witherspoon’s “Big Little Lies,” and newcomers including the graphic novel-based “Watchmen” from “Lost” producer Damon Lindelof. One marquee series that’s also in its final season: the much-admired comedy “Veep,” with Julia Louis-Dreyfus.

HBO, which launched in 1972 and whose cachet has long justified the boastful slogan, “It’s not TV. It’s HBO,” has reached this crossroads before. At the turn of the century, pop-culture sensations “The Sopranos” and “Sex and the City” boosted the channel’s visibility and subscribers and made it a serious player for prestige awards — including cable’s first-ever Emmys for best drama and comedy series. After the shows wrapped, the channel moved nimbly on with audience-pleasers including “Six Feet Under” and “True Blood.”

But that was then, and this is the time of streaming — or, in shorthand, Netflix, along with a growing host of others including Amazon and Hulu — and a shoulder-bumping rush for stars and showmakers to churn out more and more fare for outlets already awash in programming.

HBO, no longer a singular alternative to staid broadcast networks, also got new corporate ownership when AT&T bought its parent company, Time Warner. HBO recently saw the exit of its chief executive, Richard Plepler, who had been with the channel for nearly 30 years and guided it to “Game of Thrones” glory.

With AT&T’s resources, HBO has stepped up production and will see a 50% increase in the number of original program hours this year, Bloys said, arguing that volume doesn’t preclude high quality: “There’s nothing in 2019 that we’re putting on the air because we’re trying to hit an hour count. … We haven’t lowered any of our standards to reach a certain level of programming” and there is no pressure to do otherwise from WarnerMedia CEO John Stankey, he said.

Subscribers ultimately will decide whether the shows are what they want. But expanding the pipeline is unavoidable, said Tuna Amobi, a media and entertainment analyst with investment firm CFRA.

“It’s a very different competitive landscape for HBO than it was when they launched ‘Game of Thrones,’ and they realize that. That’s why you see them ratcheting up their investments in their programming,” Amobi said. Also key is how HBO’s online platform is integrated with planned WarnerMedia streaming offerings to reach the broadest audience possible and make full use of its content, he added.

HBO “cannot rely on the old ways of doing things and hope that being a premium channel will bail you out,” he said.

“Game of Thrones,” which debuted in 2011, has flourished despite the confounding number of small-screen choices. From its first-season average weekly tally of 9.3 million cumulative viewers, the series rose to a seventh-season high of 32.8 million across all HBO platforms, including the channel itself and streaming services HBO Go and HBO Now and over a period extending 30 days beyond the season’s end.

It benefited from the devoted following for Martin’s “A Song of Ice and Fire” clutch of novels. It was richly and painstakingly produced, filmed in 10 countries including Northern Ireland, the Republic of Ireland, Morocco, Iceland and Canada. Its appealing cast became household names, and the female characters that grew in stature and strength as the drama unfolded are routinely namechecked as part of the female-empowerment zeitgeist.

“Game of Thrones” could boast of its Emmy dominance as well, with 47 trophies to date including three best drama series awards. Last year, it denied a second consecutive win to a worthy opponent, Hulu’s “The Handmaid’s Tale,” but HBO itself lost valuable Emmy bragging rights: It was surpassed in total nominations for the first time in 17 years and by relative newcomer Netflix, and the streamer tied HBO in wins.

Analyst Gerbrandt, of Media Valuation Partners, isn’t counting the channel out. Many viewers still like so-called “curated” TV delivered to them, as opposed to searching online through dozens or hundreds of offerings, he said. There’s also the power of perception at work.

“If there’s a brand that survives strictly on name, it’s probably HBO,” he said.

Game of Thrones prequel timeline may change for HBO.

Game of Thrones Prequel: What You Need To Know

What’s it about? 

Taking place thousands of years before the events of Game of Thrones, the series chronicles the world’s descent from the golden Age of Heroes into its darkest hour. From the horrifying secrets of Westeros’s history to the true origin of the White Walkers, the mysteries of the East to the Starks of legend, only one thing is for sure: It’s not the story we think we know.

Who will it star? 

New casting includes: Miranda Richardson (Rita Skeeter from the Harry Potter films), Marquis Rodriquez (Manifest), John Simm (Strangers), Richard McCabe (Philip K. Dick’s Electric Dreams), John Heffernan (Dracula), and Dixie Egerickx (Summerland).

Game of Thrones prequel main cast HBO Richard McCabe, Marquis Rodriquez, John Heffernan, John Simm, Dixie Egerickx.

Richard McCabe, Marquis Rodriquez, John Heffernan, John Simm, Dixie Egerickx

They join Oscar-nominee Naomi Watts (21 Grams), who headlines as a charismatic socialite hiding a dark secret, Josh Whitehouse (Poldark), Naomi Ackie (Lady Macbeth), Denise Gough (Monday), Jamie Campbell Bower (Sweeney Todd: The Demon Barber of Fleet Street, Fantastic Beasts: The Crimes of Grindelwald), Sheila Atim (Harlots), Ivanno Jeremiah (Humans), Georgie Henley (The Chronicles of Narnia films), Alex Sharp (How to Talk to Girls at Parties) and Toby Regbo (The Last KingdomFantastic Beasts: The Crimes of Grindelwald).

Game of Thrones main cast stars for prequel HBO Naomi Ackie, Jamie Campbell Bower.

Who is behind it? 

Jane Goldman and GoT author George R.R. Martin are the creators of this new series, with Goldman serving as the showrunner. Both will executive produce, alongside SJ Clarkson (The DefendersJessica Jones, HBO’s Succession and the upcoming Star Trek installment), who will also be directing the pilot episode; James Farrell; Jim Danger Gray; Vince Gerardis; Daniel Zelman and co-executive producer Chris Symes. Martin was also an executive producer on Game of Thrones and contributed to several episode scripts.

Why Simple Games Remain Popular at Online Gaming Sites

0

Anyone who has played at an online casino in the last, say, decade, will be acutely aware that there is no limit to the ambitions of games developers. From super-charged video slots to the immersive experience of live dealer tables, the online casino experience is bolder and brighter than ever before.

However, despite all the theatrics of the big, blockbuster games that offer dazzling graphics and special features, there is still some love reserved for the simple, old-fashioned games. Yet, it’s not just a pursuit of retro fun – although that’s part of it – there are some tangible reasons for simple games to remain part of the fabric of an online casino site.

First of all, what do we mean by simple games? Essentially, we are speaking about games that may have appeared at a casino 20 years ago, and which are very easy to play, normally with a win or lose outcome. The likes of video poker, heads or tails, Hi-Lo and classic ‘fruit machine’ slots fit the bill. Most popular online casinos will keep a good stock of these games in the arcade games section although they don’t always get prominent billing.

Lower overheads can equate to better returns for players

Anyway, from a player’s point of view what would make you want to eschew the main games and choose some simple games instead? Well, let’s look at some basic math. If a game developer was to create a complicated flashy game, It’s going to take a lot of effort (money) to get it together. Moreover, many games now are themed on movies, tv shows and so on, which means there are merchandising fees involved.

The casino has to make a profit, right? For virtual games, this is represented in a term called RTP (Return to Player), which is effectively a built-in house-edge. Naturally, we can conclude that having lower overheads enables the casino to have finer margins when it comes to this RTP figure. It’s not always the case, but the argument holds up when comparing, say, video poker, which often have RTP rates around 99%, and modern video slots, with RTP averaging somewhere around 95%. Crucially, experienced casino players know this fact, and that few percent increase makes a difference.

Video poker screen images.

Simple games can hold a timeless charm

There is, of course, another argument; namely, we enjoy playing simple games from our childhood. The likes of Rock, Paper, Scissors is a popular choice, but not found at every online casino. You can find it as well as classic arcade games like Bonus Bowling, Heads or Tails, Jackpot Darts and Derby Day. Most of the games involve a simple win or lose outcome, yet there is a misconception that they will not have big prizes. That’s not the case, nor is the assumption that there isn’t any strategy is involved.

The point is that these games often get overlooked by players, but they are certainly not overlooked by all players. Some go in search of games with the highest RTP, whereas others simply prefer easy-to-play games that aren’t as in your face as modern slots. It’s a matter of taste and strategy, of course, but these games look like they will continue to form part of the casino landscape for years to come, despite competition from flashier, more complicated games.  

FCC, Donald Trump 5G push plus Facebook, Instagram recover

5G is the next big thing in tech, and Donald Trump has decided that the United States is in a must win race to build it. Don’t get too excited though, as it will take years to really happen and forget about it in rural areas.

The U.S. government will hold a massive auction later this year to bolster 5G service, the next generation of mobile networks. President Donald Trump showcased the announcement Friday, declaring that the race to stand up these faster, more powerful networks is a competition “America must win.”

“We cannot allow any other country to outcompete the United States in this powerful industry of the future,” Trump said at the White House. “We are leading by so much in so many different industries of that type, and we just can’t let that happen.”

Trump also announced a $20 billion plan to expand broadband access to rural areas currently without it, a decadelong extension of an existing program.

5G will mean faster wireless speeds and has implications for technologies like self-driving cars and augmented reality. Trump said it will transform the way people work, learn, communicate and travel, making farms more productive, manufacturers more competitive and health care better and more accessible. But experts say it’s hard to know now how much life will actually change because of the much-hyped network upgrade.

It will take years to roll out, and the highest data speeds and capacities may not reach rural areas at all.

The rollout started last week in the U.S. and South Korea but will take years.

The Federal Communications Commission said Friday that it would hold the largest auction in U.S. history to boost wireless companies’ networks. The auction is set for Dec. 10, and will be the agency’s third for 5G, said FCC Chairman Ajit Pai, who joined Trump for the announcement.

“We want Americans to be the first to benefit from this new digital revolution,” Pai said.

The U.S. is jockeying for position with China over 5G. It has effectively banned Chinese telecom equipment maker Huawei from most U.S. networks due to concerns that it might enable Chinese government spying, which Huawei denies. The U.S. has pushed its allies to do the same, with mixed results. Huawei is the world’s largest maker of such equipment.

FCC Commissioner Jessica Rosenworcel, a Democrat, criticized the agency’s approach to 5G Friday. She said the U.S. has not auctioned off “midband” spectrum that is better suited to serve rural areas because of how far it can carry signals, and that the Trump administration’s actions on 5G have “set us back.” She cited tariffs on telecom equipment that have raised costs and said the administration has been “alienating allies” on the 5G security issue.

The FCC also said Friday that it will be renewing an existing $2 billion broadband subsidy program, for 10 years. It will provide about $20.4 billion over a decade to providers, with the goal of connecting up to 4 million rural homes and small businesses to high-speed internet.

The agency spent $34.5 billion on rural-broadband network subsidy programs from 2010 to 2017, according to the Government Accountability Office.

It’s more expensive for telecom companies to serve spread-out rural areas than cities and suburbs, so the government provides grants to encourage them to build internet networks in rural parts of the country. Some 24 million Americans lacked access to high-speed internet as of the end of 2016, by the FCC’s count.

Facebook Instagram Whatsapp outage hits again.

Facebook, Instagram, WhatsApp Go Dark

Facebook, Instagram and WhatsApp were temporarily down early Sunday.

All three social media platforms, including Facebook Messenger, were affected by the outage.

Downdetector.com, a site that monitors site outages, shows Facebook had been down since 6:30 a.m. EST in much of the world, with thousands of reported outages concentrated in the northeastern U.S., Europe and the Philippines.

It appeared to be back up and running for most users by 9 a.m. EST.

A Facebook spokesman declined to give a reason for the outage, but said the issue has since been resolved and the company apologized for any inconvenience.

#FacebookDown, #instagramdown and #whatsappdown were all trending on Twitter globally.

Facebook acquired Instagram in 2012 and WhatsApp in 2014.

There are more than 1.52 billion daily active Facebook users, according to the social media network’s website.

Europe rewrites copyright rules; it will affect everyone

If you like sharing on the internet or create user generated content, the European Union’s refreshed copyright law will affect you. Especially since the controversial “Article 13” change has been approved which will be applied over the next two years. YouTube, Facebook, Twitter and other social media may be forced to overhaul the platform and what you want to share with your friends and colleagues.

The European Union has approved a copyright overhaul that aims to give more protection to artists and news organizations but which critics say will stifle freedom of speech and online creativity and punish smaller web companies.

Artists, celebrities and tech experts have spoken out both in favor and against the EU directive, which the 28 member states are required to adopt as law and got final approval from the European Council Monday.

A closer look at key issues.

WHAT IS THE LEGISLATION ABOUT?

The most vigorously debated part of the legislation is a section that makes companies responsible for making sure that copyrighted material isn’t uploaded to their platforms without permission from the original creator. It puts the legal onus on platforms to prevent copyright infringement but critics say it will end up having a chilling effect on freedom of expression on the internet and could result in censorship.

Another section of the bill that caused concern requires search engines and social media sites to pay for linking to or offering up snippets of news articles.

THE EFFECT ON INTERNET PLATFORMS?

Some sites would be forced to license music or videos. If not, sites would have to make sure they don’t have unauthorized copyrighted material. Critics worry that could lead to costly automatic filtering. And paying for links could create further costs.

That could give tech giants an edge over smaller companies. Google said last year it spent more than $100 million on Content ID, its copyright management system for approved users on YouTube, where more than 400 hours of content is uploaded every minute. The figure includes both staffing and computing resources.

HOW WILL IT AFFECT INTERNET CONTENT?

Critics say it could act as censorship and change internet culture.

They say the automatic filters are blunt instruments, deleting some material that should be allowed online. YouTube has warned of unintended consequences, saying that in cases where copyright is uncertain, it would have to block videos to avoid liability.

Some consumers worry that the new rules would bring an end to parodies and viral internet “memes” that have powered online culture and are often based on or inspired by existing songs or movies or other content. The EU denies this.

“The new law makes everyone a loser,” said Julia Reda, a lawmaker with the Pirate Party, which campaigns for freedom of information online. “Artists, authors and small publishers will not get their fair remuneration and internet users will have to live with limited freedoms. Artistic diversity has made the Internet colorful, but unfortunately the copyright directive will make the Internet duller.”

WILL THIS HELP OR HURT CONTENT CREATORS?

It depends on whom you ask. The music industry and other groups that collect royalties say the revamp will help give writers, artists and creators more protection of their rights and incomes, by requiring tech giants such as Apple, Facebook and Google to pay them more for their work.

Some authors and artists fear they won’t earn significantly more money but their creativity will be stifled. Google estimates it has paid out more than $3 billion to rights holders through its Content ID system, which was created in 2007.

PEOPLE’S REACTION

Some high profile artists have spoken out in favor. Former Beatles member Paul McCartney wrote an open letter to EU lawmakers encouraging them to adopt the new rules.

But many appear worried it will change the internet as we know it. More than 5.2 million people signed an online petition against them. Internet luminaries such as Tim Berners-Lee, the inventor of the World Wide Web, and Wikipedia co-founder Jimmy Wales have spoken out against it. So has the former frontman for the band Fugees, Wyclef Jean, who has said he is better off financially because fans can freely share his music on internet platforms.

Germany wants the rules to be implemented in such a way “that upload filters be averted if possible, and that user rights — freedom of opinion, about which there has been a lot of discussion here — be preserved,” government spokesman Steffen Seibert said Monday. Last month, tens of thousands of people marched in cities across Germany to protest against the directive. Poland’s leader has said his country will not implement it, arguing it threatens freedom of speech.

IMPACT ON GAMING

Comparitech did a survey with 1500 video game streamers about how they would respond to the proposed filtering of copyrighted material before it is posted online.

  • 45.6% of streamers would be dissuaded from streaming gameplay if they could be held liable for copyright violations.
  • 44.8% of respondents would switch to a different streaming platform if their current one prohibited viewers from Europe and the alternative did not.
  • Only 36.6% said they would continue streaming/uploading if European viewers were barred from watching

WHAT THE FUTURE HOLDS NEXT?

The EU’s member countries have two years to comply by drafting their own national laws. Six countries — Italy, Sweden, Poland, Finland, the Netherlands and Luxembourg — voted against it, so implementation is likely to be uneven, setting the stage for possible legal challenges.

‘Game of Thrones’ primer plus who dies next in Season 8

0

HBO’s “Game of Thrones” began as a fantasy drama and quickly turned into a worldwide phenomenon literally causing many to call out sick at work to binge-watch entire seasons. I hadn’t seen the first two seasons, but I relished spending a long weekend here at the Movie TV Tech Geeks screening room watching it in 4K splendor!

I’m not a big fantasy fan (although I loved “Lord of the Rings,” but something about “Game of Thrones” was different. It felt like I was watching an epic movie every week or back to back in my case. I always wound up letting them pile up so I could watch them like that as I get impatient watching one week at a time.

While HBO keeps all things GOT under wraps tightly since filming wrapped last summer, the cast have been doing interviews and dropping little hints along the way. We break those things down further if you want to avoid spoilers.

For seven seasons, you’ve ignored the lure of “Game of Thrones.” The multiple awards didn’t draw you in. Your friends debating plot twists each Sunday on social media didn’t move you. The “Is Jon Snow really dead?” storyline wasn’t enough; not even the “Hold the door!” memes sparked enough interest.

But now, here you are, with the final season days away from kicking off, finally ready to delve in. Since you don’t have the time (or probably the stamina) to binge watch the past 67 episodes, here’s what you need to know to follow along with a modicum of understanding when the eighth season gets underway on HBO on Sunday.

THE FAMILIES:

“Game of Thrones” is a family affair, with several Great Houses that love, fight, plot and conspire for the Iron Throne, ultimate power in Westeros. (Some love a little more than normal — the twisted affair between siblings Jaime and Cersei Lannister, for example).

The three families at the heart of GOT:

Games of Thrones House of Stark family.
House of Stark

THE STARKS

The series began with Ned Stark, Warden of the North, at his home, Winterfell. He and his family — wife Catelyn; sons, Robb, Rickon and Bran; daughters Sansa and Arya; and oh yeah, the bastard, Jon Snow — are living relatively quietly until they receive a visit from Ned’s old friend Robert Baratheon, now the king. Reluctantly, Ned agrees to become the hand of the king, kind of a ceremonial vice president position, and travels south with some of his family. Things don’t go so well, he loses his head and the family is scattered.

Shamed by his origins, Jon Snow joins and soon becomes a leader of the Night’s Watch. Think of them as a combination of border patrol agents and celibate monks who stand guard at the Wall, which runs across the north of Westeros and kept out the Wildlings, a fierce nation that doesn’t recognize the kings and princes of Westeros. Eventually though, the Night’s Watch and the Wildlings join forces against something far more terrifying: the Night King and his White Walkers, an army of the frozen undead, who when last seen have come crashing through the Wall.

By season eight, the other surviving Starks are: Sansa, who went from horrible engagement to horrendous marriages to, now, becoming the mistress of Winterfell; Arya, who survived on the run, picking up some deadly skills along the way; and a disabled Bran, a man with a mystical vision.

Game of Thrones Lannister family.
The purely dysfunction Lannister family.

THE LANNISTERS

The gold-obsessed family you love to hate. Twins Cersei and Jamie have been lovers since they were kids, becoming the not-so proud parents of Joffrey, who was briefly king, and two others, none of whom survived the show’s run.

Cersei was married to the king, Robert Baratheon, and has remained in charge in the capital, King’s Landing.

The youngest and wittiest Lannister sibling, Tyrion, a dwarf, is the black sheep of the family. Seems his sister still blames him for the death of their mother while giving birth to him. After killing his father and fleeing Kings Landing, Tyrion finds a second act as hand to a different queen, Daenerys of …

Game of Thrones Targaryen family tree chart.

HOUSE OF TARGARYEN

The Targaryens ruled Westeros before Robert Baratheon, Ned Stark and others brought them down. Daenerys, the only surviving member of the family, more or less, was sold into marriage with Dothraki leader Khal Drogo (later killed). She receives an interesting wedding gift: three dragon eggs. Before they hatched, making her the “Mother of Dragons,” the Dothraki queen learned she can stand close to the fire — correction, she can stand in the fire, without getting burned.

Daenerys decides to sail across the Narrow Sea and reclaim the Iron Throne held by her father, the mad king. He too had a penchant for fire, though it was more about burning people alive.

Her brother Rhaegar is also crucial to the story for allegedly kidnapping Ned Stark’s sister, Lyanna, before he and his family were killed.

Game of Thrones feudal England mixed with Middle Earth.

TIME AND PLACE:

Martin has created a world that’s make-believe but feels somewhat real. It’s like a mashup of feudal England and Tolkien’s Middle Earth with a healthy dose of sex, violence, conniving, power-grabbing, more sex, more violence and lots of full-frontal nudity.

Some other prominent places:

Dragonstone:

Former home of House Targaryen, an island where the dragons of the past resided with the family.

Essos:

A continent lying across the Narrow Sea from Westeros. It’s where Daenerys was hiding in the beginning, and where the horse-loving Dothraki roam.

Braavos:

A free city in Essos, home to the Iron Bank — to which the Lannisters owe some gold. Also home to the Faceless — religious types and assassins who worship the Many-Faced God of death, and collect faces of the dead from all over the world. Arya came up through the ranks here.

Iron Islands:

Home to a naval fleet of warriors led by House Greyjoy, who son Theon was a ward of the Starks and has been through some rough times since then.

WHAT TO EXPECT NEXT

As the final season approaches, the three houses have pledged to unite their armies — along with the Wildlings— to fight their common enemy: the White Walkers. The zombie-like creatures have broken through the Wall and they now include one of Daenerys’ dragons among their ranks.

Game of Thrones Season 8 Deaths and Survivors
Game of Thrones Season 8 Deaths and Survivors

Curious As To Who Dies Next On Game of Thrones and Who Will Survive Season 8?

Spoiler alert: Computer science students at the Technical University of Munich have developed an application that scours the internet for data on the popular Game of Thrones series, and uses an algorithm to predict which characters are most likely to survive to the end of its final season.

Project supervisor Guy Yachdav said Friday survival rates are predicted using longevity analysis similar to scientific studies used to examine the effects of medical treatments.

He says although the analysis “relies on data taken from the world of fantasy, the exact same artificial intelligence techniques are used in the real world.”

The results? Daenerys Targaryen has the highest chance of survival, at 99 percent, and Bronn is the most likely to die next.

Only time will tell, but the series is notoriously unpredictable.

Game of Thrones Season 8 spoilers and secrets revealed.

GOT Cast Interview Hints and Spoilers

Jaime Lannister — Nikolaj Coster-Waldau

There’s no character who’s had a more drastic arc on Game of Thrones than Jamie Lannister. He began as the show’s nastiest villain and gradually transformed into perhaps the single most unlikely anti-hero.

What about the ending? Harpers Bazaar reports that Coster-Waldau appears in all six episodes of Season 8, but we don’t know for sure if he survives. (Jaime could die, and Arya could wear his face to kill Cersei, for instance.)

“It was the perfect ending,” he told E! Online. “I shot in this beautiful location. Obviously, I have to be careful here — it was the most beautiful place in northern Ireland. We had this amazing scene we’d been shooting for a couple days. It ended. The sun was setting. It was really spectacular.”

Does that mean Jaime has a touching final scene? Is it surprising?

“To me, [the end] was very satisfying but also very surprising and all the things that I was hoping for,” he told Huffington Post. “It still made sense. It wasn’t like one of those where the killer is suddenly revealed in the last act and you go, ‘Oh! I didn’t see that coming.’ Here, they’ve done a really, really good job.”

Arya Stark — Maisie Williams

Arya Stark actress Maisie Williams was only 12 years old when Game of Thrones began, playing a young girl who eventually grew into a badass Faceless woman.

In a cover story with S Magazine, she reflected on her work on the final season. “This whole season was really, really emotional,” she said. “When I came to shoot my final scene, I had already watched a lot of people wrap and seen all the tears and heard all the speeches.”

“It was just a really beautiful day, and a really great final scene for me,” Williams said. “It felt like the right time to say goodbye to Arya.”

“I ended on the perfect scene,” Williams told The Guardian. “I was alone — shocker! Arya’s always bloody alone.”

“I went back into my trailer after we wrapped,” Williams told Rolling Stone. “I took a shower, ’cause I was dirty. Arya is always dirty.” She talked of “really glorious sunshine” on “the nicest day” in Northern Ireland, and the whole production wrapped right after her final scene. (Could that lightly confirm a theory about her stealing Jaime’s face?)

Sansa Stark — Sophie Turner

On April 11, Turner hinted to Entertainment Weekly that in Season 8, Sansa “risks tearing apart her family” and notes a “huge amount of fighting between Sansa and Jon,” mainly because of his relationship with Daenerys Targaryen

“Sansa this season is very much enjoying becoming a leader in her own right and the leader of Winterfell,” she said, “and this year there are certain challenges of people who come into her life that threaten that. She has to go behind a few backs.”

In a Rolling Stone cover story focused on Turner and Maisie Williams, it was revealed that the Game of Thrones showrunners’ favorite Sansa scene was her last. “I feel very satisfied with the ending of the entire show,” she said. “Every story arc came to a really good close.”

More specifically, what was her last day of filming like?

“My last day was in Spain,” Turner told Games Radar. “We’d been shooting this really long scene for five days in the heat. And I was like, ‘Please just wrap me, so that I can be over and done with it.’ And I didn’t really feel emotional up to that point. I was like, ‘I don’t think I’m going to have a reaction. I don’t feel sad yet.’” Like many cast members, she did wind up crying.

Spain, however, is where scenes set in Dorne on Game of Thrones were filmed, which could be an indication that Sansa retreats as far south as possible at the end of Season 8. Do the Starks spread out across all of Westeros and each take control over a region?

Cersei Lannister — Lena Headey

Queen Cersei Lannister began the series as a wicked antagonist whose cutthroat aspirations increased as part of her descent into madness and full-on evil. By Season 8, she’s a full-on villain that could outlast even the Night King.

In February, actress Lena Headey told ET Live, “I think people will be surprised at every turn this season.”

Despite playing a cold-hearted villain, Headey herself still dealt with the emotional fallout of working on the series. “I didn’t think I was going to be emotional,” she told Huffington Post. “I thought I wasn’t going to let myself get to that point because I had the last day to get through. And then when I left and I got in the car, I broke down in tears and I was … yeah, devastated.”

What was her actual last scene?

“My last day on set was really, weirdly tedious, because I just had to shoot going up and down these stairs,” she told Variety in January during Sundance. She echoed the same sentiment to The Wrap, saying, “I can’t tell you anything apart from I descend some stairs and ascend some stairs.” This one’s a bit confusing, but it’s possible that Headey filmed her last scene out of chronological order. We sincerely doubt Cersei’s actual last scene in Game of Thrones is that mundane.

iain glen peter dinklage game of thrones 506 unbowed recaap 2015

Tyrion Lannister — Peter Dinklage

 Even a small person can cast a big shadow, and this kind of imagery follows Tyrion Lannister in both the books and the HBO series. A drunken lecher eventually became one of Westeros’ greatest political minds. What’s in store for the end of his story?

In an October 2018 conversation with Vulture, Tyrion actor Peter Dinklage remarked on how odd it is that scenes are often filmed out of order, so sometimes the last scene an actor films on a production is nothing more than a simple transition sequence.

“It’s always anticlimactic for the character’s last day,” he said. “Nothing is shot chronologically, so you don’t get some big mountaintop scene or anything. It’s just, ‘That’s a wrap on Peter Dinklage.’” Dinklage called his last day on set “beautifully bittersweet.”

“I feel very, very — I’m trying to find the right word,” Dinklage said. “I think he was given a very good conclusion. No matter what that is — death can be a great way out.”

Wait … does Tyrion die!?

“I had all these ideas in my head and a version of one of them is how it ends up [for Tyrion],” Dinklage told Entertainment Weekly days before the Season 8 premiere. “David and Dan have a brilliant version of what I had. If I use any adjectives it will give it away. But I love how it ended up. And how it ends up for everybody. They had a beautiful gentle touch with some and a hard touch with others.”

Will Tyrion get that “gentle touch” or the harder one? Could he be a secret Targaryen? Is he the prophesized valonqar who kills Cersei?

Daenerys Targaryen game of thrones killed off season 8

Daenerys Targaryen — Daenerys Targaryen — Emilia Clarke

Game of Thrones showrunners David Benioff and D.B. Weiss have compared the show’s ending to that of The Sopranos in terms of a controversial finale. Based on Emilia Clarke’s comments about her characters role in the story, it seems like Daenerys’ might have a central part to play in making the end so divisive.

Speaking to the Press Association, Emilia Clarke admitted to walking around London for “three hours aimlessly” after she was handed the scripts for Season 8. “It might as well have been raining and I would’ve just walked in it not knowing what to do,” she said, adding that when she filmed her final scenes for the show, there were “loads of tears.”

What of Dany’s final scene? It doesn’t sound good.

In a May 2018 cover story with Vanity Fair, Clarke hinted that Dany’s final actions might prove controversial. “It fucked me up,” she said. “Knowing that is going to be a lasting flavor in someone’s mouth of what Daenerys is …” Whatever happens in the last scene featuring Daenerys Targaryen, it will leave a bad taste in everyone’s mouth about the Dragon Queen.

Dany burning Randyll and Dickon Tarly alive in Season 7 might be just the beginning. Maybe they defeat the Night King early in Season 8 and the rest of the season follows Dany’s descent into insanity until we have a bonafide Mad Queen on our hands?

jon snow stabbed to death game of thrones finale 2015
Would Game of Thrones kill Jon Snow again?

Jon Snow — Kit Harrington

Jon Snow began the series as the frustrated bastard of Ned Stark, but these days he’s the King in the North and the rightful heir to the Iron Throne, son to Rhaegar Targaryen and Lyanna Stark.

In a March appearance on The Late Show With Stephen Colbert he described the experience of learning how Game of Thrones Season 8 ended:

“We had a table read through and I was the only one who hadn’t read the episode. I think I told everyone I didn’t want to know what happened, but really it was just laziness. The writers used me as a litmus test to see my reaction to things as the events unfolded, and they got some pretty good reactions.”

One key detail from this experience is frightening: “At the very end I was very shocked and surprised at certain events, and then I blubbed my eyes out. I cried.”

Like many Game of Thrones actors, the last scene Harrington filmed doesn’t seem like his last in chronological order.

“I think I got my final day changed about 18 times, to the point where I didn’t know when it was,” he said to InStyle. “I was like, ‘Just don’t tell me.’ Then it came, and I had that final scene, which was very average. I was just walking somewhere with [Davos Seaworth] and [Grey Worm]. It couldn’t have been more of a wet fart of a scene. But I completely broke down after it. I’d seen Peter Dinklage do his last scene earlier in the day, and he broke down.”

As for the ending of the entire series, Harrington suspects that not even he knows what actually happens. “I still don’t trust that the ending that was written down is the actual ending,” he told InStyle. “I think they kept it from all of us. The secrecy this year was just huge. No one I’ve spoken to has guessed the actual ending. No one has got it right yet.”

Best bets on TV streaming services

Just as more people are cutting the cords from Comcast Xfinity and DirecTV for TV streaming services, prices have begun rising. While everyone is declaring the economy is doing great, most middle-income Americans are finding it harder than ever to make ends meet. Figuring out which streaming service will satisfy all your needs without breaking the bank has gotten harder with so many choices like Disney Plus and Netflix.

Americans have, on average, three streaming video subscription services, according to a recent study of digital media trends by Deloitte. While some have dropped cable and its average bill of around $100 a month altogether, about 43% have both pay TV and streaming subscriptions.

Yet patching together a variety of services to get just what one wants isn’t always seamless. Families and individuals can still find themselves with service that doesn’t perfectly suit their viewing habits. And those monthly subscriptions can add up fast.

“It doesn’t make sense to pay for a bunch of content you have no interest in watching,” said Bruce McClary, vice president of marketing for the National Foundation for Credit Counseling. “Finding a service that lets you scale your channel lineup based on your interests can also help you avoid paying for things you don’t need.”

A little research on which services are best for you can help save big bucks.

FAMILY CENTRIC WATCHING

Disney is making the biggest play for family viewership. The owner of Disney Channel, the Star Wars franchise and most recently Fox’s entertainment business is betting its mix of family-friendly franchises and beloved animated classics, along with original programming, will make the Disney Plus service irresistible to families, even if they already subscribe to other services. The service, launching Nov. 12, will cost $7 a month initially.

For some kids, there may be no substitute for watching Disney’s “Frozen” over and over again. But other services that families might already subscribe to have a lot of family-friendly programming too. Amazon Prime ($119 per year or $13 per month for Prime loyalty program membership; Prime Video alone costs $9 a month), Hulu ($6 to $12 per month), and Netflix ($9 to $16 per month) all offer kids programming.

Another choice for parents: HBO Now ($15 a month) is the home for the classic kids TV show “Sesame Street.” And for spendthrifts, YouTube’s free Kids channel offers an endless stream of kid-friendly fare, although quality varies widely.

FILM BUFF CHOICES

Movie fans will soon have to work a bit harder to find movies to stream. As Disney, Fox, Universal and Warner Brothers and others offer their own streaming services, they will all eventually pull their content from Netflix. But niche services are there to fill the void.

Classic movies can be difficult to find streaming. Movie fans suffered a loss when AT&T, which bought Time Warner last year, decided to discontinue FilmStruck, a streaming service that was a collaboration between Turner Classic Movies and the Criterion Collection. But a similar service called The Criterion Channel that offers 1,000 classic and contemporary films is stepping up to fill the void. It costs $11 a month or $99 for a year.

Other movie-centric streaming services include Fandor ($6 per month or $50 per year) or Mubi ($11 per month). Both offer a curated selection of movies.

Those on a budget can try Kanopy, a streaming service that works with public libraries and universities to offer library card holders streaming movies for free.

SPORTS FANS CHOICES

Sports fans do have streaming options, but they cost more since sports must be watched live. Basic live TV options are cheaper but may not include sports channels. Which service you choose depends on which sport or which team you want to watch.

There are a variety of live TV streaming services that offer a wide range of sports, but they’ve recently been raising their prices. Fubo TV offers more than 85 channels including ones that broadcast football, baseball, soccer, and other sports. It costs $45 for the first month, then $55 a month after that. DirecTV Now costs $50 a month for the cheapest tier. Sling TV costs $25 to $40 a month.

Hulu raised the price for its live-TV service in February, by $5, to $45. Sony’s PlayStation Vue costs $45 to $80 a month. Google’s YouTube TV is increasing its monthly fee to $50. It launched at $35 and has raised prices as it added more channels. Most of the live TV services offer the major sports channels such as Fox Sports and NBC Sports Network, as well as games broadcast on network TV. But ESPN, for example, is on Hulu Live and YouTube TV but not Fubo TV, so fans of a specific team or sport should examine the channel listings for each service.

There’s no budget offering for watching high profile sporting events. But Disney’s ESPN Plus costs $5 a month or $50 for the year. It offers some live games, including some hockey, soccer and baseball games, as well as content about sports like ESPN’s “30 for 30” documentary series. But you can’t watch most major league sports games on the service.

COMBINING EVERYONE’S CHOICES

If you’re a sports fan who also loves movies and has a family, you’ll have to mix and match services while trying to stay within your budget. It is still possible to stay below the monthly cost of cable, says the NFCC’s McClary.

“The acceptable threshold for spending is up to each household, but most ‘live’ and ‘on demand’ streaming services would be on the low end of the scale compared to traditional cable packages,” he said. “One good measuring stick is to compare the monthly rate to your monthly content consumption patterns and what it would cost if you paid movie rental rates each time you watch a program.”

‘Shazam!’ tops box office again while ‘Hellboy’ fizzles without del Toro

It was the tale of two superheroes, “Shazam!” and “Hellboy;” both lighthearted but each took very different paths at the box office this weekend.

A rush of newcomers couldn’t shake “Shazam!” from the top spot, as the superhero comedy led the box office for the second straight weekend with $25.1 million in ticket sales, according to studio estimates Sunday.

Lionsgate’s “Hellboy” reboot, the animated Laika Studios release “Missing Link,” the college romance “After” and even the long-delayed “Mary Magdalene,” originally to be released by the Weinstein Co., all opened in theaters. But the strongest new release of them all was, predictably, the Will Packer-produced one: “Little.”

The body-swap comedy “Little” came in second with $15.5 million for Universal Pictures. Made for just $20 million, “Little” is just the most recent profit-maker for Packer, the “Girls Trip” producer.

The film, directed by Tina Gordon Chism, stars 14-year-old Marsai Martin as the child an abusive tech executive (Regina Hall) reverts to after a magical spell is cast on her. Martin, the “black-ish” star, also executive produced the film, the youngest ever so credited in Hollywood history. It’s like “Shazam!” in reverse.

“Little” drew a largely female (65 and African American (43%) audience. Jim Orr, Universal Pictures distribution chief, credited the cast, Chism’s direction and Packer’s overall know-how.

“He’s done it with different kinds of films. ‘Breaking In’ was a thriller, ‘Girls Trip’ was an R-rated comedy. ‘Little’ is kind of an all-ages film, PG-13 rated,’” said Orr, whose studio signed a first-look deal with Packer in 2013. “He’s a brand. And he has a great idea of what is going to be successful at the box office.”

It was an out-of-body weekend at the box office. The body-swap comic-book adaptation “Shazam!” — about a teenage boy (Asher Angel) who can turn into an adult-sized superhero (Zachary Levi) with a simple command — held solidly in its second week. Capitalizing on good reviews and word-of-mouth, “Shazam!” is Warner Bros.′ New Line’s latest DC Comics success. It has grossed $94.9 million through Sunday with a worldwide total of $258.8 million.

Lionsgate and Millennium’s “Hellboy” had been expected by many to vie with “Shazam!” on the weekend. But on the heels of terrible reviews (just 15% “fresh” on Rotten Tomatoes), it flopped with $12 million against a $50 million budget. It proved that a mix of wisecracks and superpowers were not a guarantee of success. Plus the absence of Guillermo del Toro and Ron Perlman, more than likely resulted in the less than stellar results.

That’s significantly less than the 2004 original ($23 million opening) and the 2008 sequel ($34.5 million opening). Those films were directed by Guillermo de Toro and starred Ron Perlman; the new “Hellboy” stars David Harbour (“Stranger Things”) and is directed by Neil Marshall.

Males accounted for 56% of opening weekend crowds for “Hellboy,” while 64% of moviegoers were over the age of 25. Lionsgate acquired U.S. and U.K. rights to “Hellboy” from Millennium Media, which financed the film. Guillermo del Toro, who directed the original two “Hellboy” movies starring Ron Perlman, was not involved with the most recent adaptation.

“Missing Link” also missed. It opened with a disappointing $5.8 million, marking a new low for Laika, the maker of eccentric animated tales such as “Coraline,” ″ParaNorman” and “Kubo and the Two Strings.” ″Missing Link,” distributed by United Artists Releasing, is about the discovery of a creature in the Pacific Northwest. Its voice cast includes Zach Galifianakis, Hugh Jackman and Zoe Saldana.

Expectations had varied widely for Aviron Pictures’ “After,” an adaption of Anna Todd’s 2014 best-seller. The young-adult drama fared well with $6.2 million in 2,138 theatres.

And “Mary Magdalene,” starring Rooney Mara as Mary and Joaquin Phoenix as Jesus, finally opened, more than three years after production. Harvey Weinstein had once conceived of the film, directed by Garth Davis (“Lion”) as his next Oscar contender.

After the fallout of Weinstein and the bankruptcy of the Weinstein Co., IFC Films acquired the biblical biopic. Critics dismissed it (44% fresh on Rotten Tomatoes) and audiences mostly did, too. It grossed about $62,000 on 62 screens.

Box office report for Shazam! Little and Hellboy which bombed.

North American Box Office

Estimated ticket sales for Friday through Sunday at U.S. and Canadian theaters, according to Comscore. Where available, the latest international numbers for Friday through Sunday are also included.

1. “Shazam!” $25.1 million.

2. “Little,” $15.5 million.

3. “Hellboy,” $12 million.

4. “Pet Sematary,” $10 million.

5. “Dumbo,” $9.2 million.

6. “Captain Marvel,” $8.6 million.

7. “Us,” $6.9 million.

8. “After,” $6.2 million.

9. “Missing Link,” $5.8 million.

10. “The Best of Enemies,” $2 million.

Worldwide Box Office

Estimated ticket sales for Friday through Sunday at U.S. and Canadian theaters, according to Comscore. Where available, the latest international numbers for Friday through Sunday are also included.

1. “Shazam!” $35.9 million.

2. “Dumbo,” $22 million.

3. “P Storm,” $19.6 million.

4. “Pet Sematary,” $12.6 million.

5. “After,” $11.7 million.

6. “Wonder Park,” $11.2 million.

7. “Andhadhun,” $10.4 million.

8. “Hellboy,” $10.1 million.

9. “Captain Marvel,” $8 million.

10. “The Crimes That Bind,” $4.4 million.

rami malek bohemian rhapsody tops box office weekend 2018 images
Rami Malek as Queen frontman Freddie Mercury

‘Bohemian Rhapsody’ Clears $900 Million Box Office With Surprise China Release Green Light

Bohemian Rhapsody” is the champion that keeps on giving five months after first hitting theaters. In February, China cleared the landing for it to hit theaters there much to the studios surprise.

The Queen biopic cleared the $900 million mark at the worldwide box office over the April 12-14 weekend to become the No. 4 title of all time for 20th Century Fox, not adjusted for inflation.

Fox made “Bohemian Rhapsody,” starring Rami Malek as the late Freddie Mercury, with New Regency and producer Graham King.

Through Sunday, the award-winning film has earned $216.2 million in North America and $685.2 million overseas, where a late run in China ($13.9 million) pushed its worldwide total past $900 million. It also continues to play in Japan, where it has earned a stellar $115.9 million to date

“Bohemian Rhapsody,” which first hit theaters in early November, had already become the top-earning music biopic of all time before achieving its latest milestone. And it had already defied expectations in even crossing $800 million. 

Last week, Disney’s 2019 Investor Day prominently featured music from the film following its recent acquisition of much of 21st Century Fox, including the 20th Century Fox film empire.

“Bohemian Rhapsody” won four Academy Awards, including a best actor win for Malek. And at the Golden Globes, it won for best drama and best actor in a drama.

In terms of Fox titles, it only ranks behind “Avatar,” “Titanic,” “Star Wars: Episode I: Phantom Menace” after passing up the 2009 “Ice Age: Dawn of the Dinosaurs”($886.7 million).

Captain Marvel Crosses $1 Billion Plus Marvel Cinematic Universe Numbers

Marvel Cinematic Universe MCU Captain Marvel US Worldwide box office chart.
MCU, Captain Marvel US Worldwide Box Office Chart April 4, 2019. Courtesy Ishan.

‘Game of Thrones’ stars talk best deaths

HBO’s mega-hit “Game of Thrones” had its final season premiere at Radio City Music Hall on April 3, and we were able to talk to the stars about their favorite scenes that made many of us squirm, look away, but then watch again. Yes, those death scenes that GOT was famous for.

game of thrones tommen baratheon jumping to death scene 2019

“Game of Thrones” has shocked and pleased viewers with the way they have killed off its characters — from the jaw-dropping “Red Wedding” episode to the explosive green wildfire that eliminated most of the cast, which then led to the epic way Tommen Baratheon essentially said, “You know what everyone, I’m over this,” and took a dive from a high window, killing himself.

game of thrones catelyn stark red wedding throat slashed scene 2019

Some of the show’s top stars, including Sophie Turner (Sansa Stark), Maisie Williams (Arya Stark) and Kristian Nairn (Hodor) talk about their favorite death scenes in interviews with media outlets. “Game of Thrones” premieres its eighth and final season Sunday on HBO.

Game of Thrones Oberyn Martell head crushing death.

THAT CRUSHING BLOW

Defending Tyrion Lannister, Oberyn Martell battles the giant known as Ser Gregor Clegane and nearly kills him, but Martell (Pedro Pascal) proved to be too cocky and celebrated too early. Clegane then crushed Martell’s skull and the scene became one of the show’s most memorable. It was so popular that Pascal said when he meets fans, they will imitate how Clegane gouged his character’s eyes before his head exploded.

Turner: “The skull crushing — that was pretty spectacular.”

Williams: “When Oberyn Martell got his head squished …. loved that scene. So sad, though, because I miss Pedro.”

pedro pascal jams fingers in eye at game of thrones final season premiere 2019

Isaac Hempstead Wright (Bran Stark): “It was so, so shocking. Not only in terms of the brutality of it, but because I didn’t see it coming. I hadn’t read the script for the episode. It was one of those classic ‘Game of Thrones’ where you think the underdog’s winning. Oh, no, no, no. He’s (got) his head squished.”

Eugene Simon (Lancel Lannister): “Just as things are about to turn around, you’re suddenly blown to pieces and you’re a goner. It’s just unbelievable. I could not believe it. I was utterly shocked. It happened so quickly as well. His skull just gets crushed and he’s done.”

game of thrones eddard stark head being chopped off 2019

NED GETS SOME HEAD

“Game of Thrones” proved no character was safe from being killed off when Ned Stark, played by Sean Bean, died in season one when his head was chopped off, orchestrated by Joffrey Baratheon.

Turner: “Sean’s was amazing because it was just so shocking — because no one knew that they were going to kill off main characters.”

Conleth Hill (Varys): “Even while we were filming I kept thinking, ‘Oh someone will save him.’”

game of thrones tyrion lannister toilet death scene

TOILET HITS

One of the most uncomfortable ways to die? On the toilet. Hit with three arrows. By your own son. That’s what happened to Tywin Lannister (Charles Dance) when Tyrion Lannister went full blown savage on his dad.

Gwendoline Christie (Brienne of Tarth): “Charles Dance on the toilet — thank you.”

game of thrones hodor killed by winter beasts

A GENTLEMAN TILL THE END

Hodor became a fan favorite on “Thrones,” and his death was touching and memorable: As Hodor, played by Nairn, tries to keep holding the door to give Meera time to escape with Bran Stark, who is unconscious, he sacrifices his life as the White Walkers’ minions tear him apart.

Nairn: “I definitely cried the first time I watched it. It’s very different watching it back than it is doing it at the time. Yeah, I still get teary when I watch it sometimes. …I watched a lot of people’s reactions to Hodor dying. That actually moved me.”

Hill: “I never saw that coming either. I was like, ‘What?’”

Kerry Ingram (Shireen Baratheon): “The one that hit me the most is probably Hodor’s death. …When that happened I was just so shocked because I didn’t know what was going to happen. …The acting, the way that it was presented was just incredible. It’s just such an amazing piece of television. It’s heartbreaking, but amazing.”

game of thrones ramsay bolton killed eaten by dog

DOG FOOD

Ramsey Bolton, played by Iwan Rheon, had his fun when he brutally tortured Theon Greyjoy and Sansa Stark, and killed his own father and pregnant stepmother. So, it was only appropriate that the favor was returned when Ramsay’s drooling dog — who hadn’t eaten for some time — was let loose on his master, and had his way with him.

Pilou Asbaek (Euron Greyjoy): “I like the way Ramsay died. He got eaten by his own dogs. That’s a very Scandinavian death. I like that … because it’s brutal. And it’s poetic.”

Joffrey chokes to death on Game of Thrones.

JOFFREY GOES SILENT

When you’re Olenna Tyrell and you don’t approve of your granddaughter’s husband, you’ll poison him on their wedding day. That’s what happened to former king Joffrey Baratheon, who died in front of family, friends and foes after drinking poison.

Iain Glen (Ser Jorah Mormont): “Those eyes, you know, the strangulation, the going red … I thought it was just a brilliantly acted death and it was a surprise, like all good ‘Thrones’ deaths are; just the way it manifested itself. It had captured everything that’s great about ‘Thrones’ I think.”

princess shireen baratheon game of thrones sacrificed for gods 2019

ALL FIRED UP FOR LIGHT

Princess Shireen Baratheon’s death scene — she was burned alive as a sacrifice to R’hllor, known as the Lord of Light — was a hard one to watch. Her parents OK’d the death, though her mother later regretted it and tried in vain to save her daughter.

Liam Cunningham (Davos Seaworth): “My little girl Shireen. That was heartbreaking. I cried when I read that in my little room at home, when I had the pages open. … I hoped it was a joke. A horrible thing to happen but incredibly dramatic as regards to storytelling.”

Facebook tackles hate speech again while Democrats go AI

Mark Zuckerberg’s Facebook continues trying to prove that his social media giant can change with the times even though a new scandal hits them every week. After saying time and again that they will be fighting fake news, this time they’re really sure they’ve got the solution.

Facebook said Wednesday it is rolling out a wide range of updates aimed at combatting the spread of false and harmful information on the social media site — stepping up the company’s fight against misinformation and hate speech as it faces growing outside pressure.

The updates will limit the visibility of links found to be significantly more prominent on Facebook than across the web as a whole, suggesting they may be clickbait or misleading. The company is also expanding its fact-checking program with outside expert sources, to vet videos and other material posted on Facebook.

Facebook groups — the online communities that many point to as lightning rods for the spread of fake information — will also be more closely monitored. If they are found to be spreading misinformation, their visibility in users’ news feeds will be limited.

Lawmakers and human rights groups have been critical of the company for the spread of extremism and misinformation on its flagship site and on Instagram.

During a hearing Tuesday on the spread of white nationalism, congress members questioned a company representative about how Facebook prevents violent material from being uploaded and shared on the site.

In a separate Senate subcommittee hearing Wednesday, the company was asked about allegations that social media companies are biased against conservatives.

The dual hearings illustrate the tricky line that Facebook, and other social media sites such as Twitter and YouTube, are walking as they work to weed out problematic and harmful materials while also avoiding what could be construed as censorship.

CEO Mark Zuckerberg’s latest vision for Facebook, with an emphasis on private, encrypted messaging, is sure to pose a challenge for the company when it comes to removing problematic material.

Guy Rosen, Facebook’s vice president of integrity, acknowledged the challenge in a meeting with reporters at Facebook’s Menlo Park, California, headquarters Wednesday. He said striking a balance between protecting people’s privacy and public safety is “something societies have been grappling for centuries.”

Rosen said the company is focused on making sure it does the best job possible “as Facebook evolves toward private communications.” But he offered no specifics.

“This is something we are going to be working on, working with experts outside the company,” he said, adding that the aim is “to make sure we make really informed decisions as we go into this process.”

Facebook already has teams in place to monitor the site for material that breaks the company’s policies against information that is overtly sexual, incites violence or is hate speech.

Karen Courington, who works on product-support operations at Facebook, said half of the 30,000 workers in the company’s “safety and security” teams are focused on content review. She said those content moderators are a mix of Facebook employees and contractors, but she declined to give a percentage breakdown.

Facebook has received criticism for the environment the content reviewers work in. They are exposed to posts, photos and videos that represent the worst of humanity and have to decide what to take down and what to leave up in minutes, if not seconds.

Courington said these workers receive 80 hours of training before they start their jobs and “additional support,” including psychological resources. She also said they are paid above the “industry standard” for these jobs but did not give numbers.

It’s also not clear if the workers have options to move into other jobs if the content-review work proves psychologically difficult or damaging.

Democrats want AI face recognition checked out 2019.

Democrats Delve Into AI Face Recognition

Congress is starting to show interest in prying open the “black box” of tech companies’ artificial intelligence with oversight that parallels how the federal government checks under car hoods and audits banks.

One proposal introduced Wednesday and co-sponsored by a Democratic presidential candidate, Sen. Cory Booker, would require big companies to test the “algorithmic accountability” of their high-risk AI systems, such as technology that detects faces or makes important decisions based on your most sensitive personal data.

“Computers are increasingly involved in so many of the key decisions Americans make with respect to their daily lives — whether somebody can buy a home, get a job or even go to jail,” Sen. Ron Wyden said in an interview with media outlets. The Oregon Democrat is co-sponsoring the bill.

“When the companies really go into this, they’re going to be looking for bias in their systems,” Wyden said. “I think they’re going to be finding a lot.”

The Democrats’ proposal is the first of its kind, and may face an uphill battle in the Republican-led Senate. But it reflects growing — and bipartisan — scrutiny of the largely unregulated data economy — everything from social media feeds, online data brokerages, financial algorithms and self-driving software that are increasingly impacting daily life. A bipartisan Senate bill introduced last month would require companies to notify people before using facial recognition software on them, while also requiring third-party testing to check for bias problems.

Academic studies and real-life examples have unearthed facial recognition systems that misidentify darker-skinned women, computerized lending tools that charge higher interest rates to Latino and black borrowers, and job recruitment tools that favor men in industries where they already dominate.

“There’s this myth that algorithms are these neutral, objective things,” said Aaron Rieke, managing director at advocacy group Upturn. “Machine learning picks up patterns in society — who does what, who buys what, or who has what job. Those are patterns shaped by issues we’ve been struggling with for decades.”

President Donald Trump’s administration is also taking notice and has made the development of “safe and trustworthy” algorithms a major objective of the White House’s new AI initiative. But it would do so mostly by strengthening an existing industry-driven process of creating technological standards.

“There’s a need for greater transparency and data comparability,” and for detecting and reducing bias in these systems, said Commerce Undersecretary Walter Copan, who directs the National Institute of Standards and Technology. “Consumers are essentially flying blind.”

Dozens of facial recognition developers, including brand-name companies like Microsoft, last year submitted their proprietary algorithms to Copan’s agency so that they could be evaluated and compared against each other. The results showed significant gains in accuracy over previous years.

But Wyden said the voluntary standards are not enough.

“Self-regulation clearly has failed here,” he said.

In a bolder move from the Trump administration, the federal Department of Housing and Urban Development has charged Facebook with allowing landlords and real estate brokers to systematically exclude groups such as non-Christians, immigrants and minorities from seeing ads for houses and apartments.

Booker, in a statement about his bill, said that while HUD’s Facebook action is an important step, it’s necessary to dig deeper to address the “pernicious ways” discrimination operates on tech platforms, sometimes unintentionally.

Booker said biased algorithms are causing the same kind of discriminatory real estate practices that sought to steer his New Jersey parents and other black couples away from certain U.S. neighborhoods in the late 1960s. This time, he said, it’s harder to detect and fight.

The bill he and Wyden have introduced would enable the Federal Trade Commission to set and enforce new rules for companies to check for accuracy, bias and potential privacy or security concerns in their automated systems, and correct them if problems are found. It exempts smaller companies that make less than $50 million a year, unless they are data brokers with information on at least 1 million consumers.

New York Democratic Rep. Yvette Clarke, who is introducing a companion bill in the House, said the goal is to fix problems, not just to assess them. She said it makes sense to give the FTC authority to regularly monitor how these systems are performing because it “has the finger on the pulse of what’s happening to consumers.”

Net Neutrality passes house while live online tv prices jump

Democrats were able to pass the controversial “net neutrality” bill through Congress, but that joy will be short lived as Republicans will kill it in the Senate.

The House has passed bill Wednesday to restore Obama-era “net neutrality” rules, but the legislation faces slim odds of making it through the Republican-controlled Senate.

The Save the Internet Act passed the Democrat-controlled House 232-190 Wednesday, with only one Republican vote in favor. But top Senate Republican Mitch McConnell said Tuesday that net neutrality is “dead on arrival in the Senate.” The Trump administration also opposes the bill. Still, the effort to restore net neutrality could give Democrats political points on consumer protections.

Net neutrality history chart 2018.

The 2015 net neutrality regulations barred internet service providers like Comcast, Verizon and AT&T from blocking or slowing online traffic or from charging companies for faster lanes for consumers. They were highly partisan in Washington and came after a decade of telecom-industry resistance.

They were upheld by a federal appeals court, but the Federal Communications Commission scrapped the rules after the Trump administration installed a Republican majority there. That meant there was nothing stopping ISPs from interfering with internet traffic so long as they disclosed it.

The net-neutrality saga continued as tech companies and nearly two dozen U.S. states sued to undo the 2017 repeal and restore the 2015 measure. A decision by a federal appeals court on that is pending. California also has a net-neutrality law which is on hold until the appeals court decision.

Pros and cons of net neutrality argument.

In Congress, Republicans have introduced three other bills that net-neutrality advocates say are too weak because they don’t give the FCC the power to go after potential bad behavior by ISPs aside from blocking, throttling and charging internet companies for zippier access to users.

If you’re wondering what all the fuss is about over net neutrality, here is an article that breaks it all down and why you should care about it.

Google YouTube TV online prices jump up.

Live Online TV Prices Jump

If you signed up to stream live TV in hopes of saving money over traditional cable, you may be in for a rude surprise.

Live online-TV providers like YouTube TV, DirecTV Now and Hulu with Live TV lured users with digital “skinny bundles” that were cheaper than cable. Now, many are raising prices. The latest is Google’s YouTube TV, which is increasing its monthly fee to $50. It launched at $35 and has raised prices as it added more channels.

The first of this crop of TV services was Dish Networks’ Sling TV in 2015. Its most attractive feature was price, since it offered a handful of popular, live TV channels for $20 a month. A string of other companies announced similar services in the years that followed, many priced from $30-$40 a month. YouTube TV, Hulu Live, AT&T’s DirecTV Now and others were far cheaper than a traditional cable bundle, which costs about $100.

Cable executives derided the online TV packages as unrealistically cheap, but they have grown in popularity as cord-cutting picked up. They have racked up more than 7 million users, according to MoffettNathanson Research, helping offset the declines in traditional TV customers for entertainment companies like Disney, Comcast’s NBCUniversal and Viacom.

But that bump may be petering out. DirecTV Now lost customers for the first time in the fourth quarter after AT&T canned big discounts. MoffettNathanson noted that growth slowed for the online-TV providers overall.

Price increases starting last year — just like you get with your cable package — may be to blame. This year has brought another round of price hikes, often as the bundles fatten up and more closely resemble traditional TV packages.

That could turn still more people off, particularly as subscriber fatigue sets in with a slew of new streaming services coming from Disney, AT&T, Comcast and others.

But the problem for the TV services is that programming costs go up every year, so they’re passing those on. “At the end of the day, they have no choice but to keep raising prices,” said MoffettNathanson’s Craig Moffett. If that means a steep drop-off in demand from users, the entertainment companies could eventually feel the bite.

AT&T, intent on profitability, announced a $10 price increase for DirecTV Now in March; it’s now $50 a month for the cheapest tier, even after it dropped some popular networks that it didn’t own. (Some of them, including MTV, BET and Comedy Central, returned a few weeks later after AT&T resolved a dispute with Viacom.) It also raised prices in 2018. Hulu raised the price for its live-TV service in February, by $5, to $45. Sony’s PlayStation Vue raised prices by $5 last year.

“Pretty much all of them have come to market from day one saying we’re cheap cheap cheap,” said Frost & Sullivan analyst Dan Rayburn. “It’s no longer that much cheaper than cable.”

Dish has been more of a holdout. Last year, it raised the price of Sling’s cheapest package by $5 to $25, leaving its fatter bundle alone at $40. It’s also currently offering a big promotion.

30 Movies You Have To Watch More Than Once

Ever had that non-movie geek friend or other half who asks you why bother wasting another 90 minutes to three hours of your life rewatching your favorite movie when you could have done something else or be watching something new? Yes, they might have a point, but the answer quickly gets buried in denial since that something else or something new just hasn’t come to mind at the time. So we watch and rewatch, wanting to get entertained and somehow feeling good or accomplished after doing so. It’s like an addiction, wanting to get some endorphins and great memories from the films we love. 

Of course, the films we love vary from person to person, and they may be good for some and bad for others. I have a list here that many folks probably would agree with. Some may have Oscars, some don’t but we don’t care much about that stuff because again, people’s sense of entertainment can be quite relative. Oscar winner or not, if a film causes me to cry from joy or sadness, the film has my vote and a place on this list.

The films in this list I either consciously play or watch through on cable whenever I see them on.  If a film is fun enough it will be here. If your list is similar to mine, you’re my kind of movie geek. If not, let me know your favorites in case I missed them. So, without further ado, here are the top thirty films I can’t stop watching over and over again. Yes, thirty, but that’s not bad considering the thousands of old and new films to choose from. Rather than drive myself crazy putting them in order of favorites, I just put them in alphabetical order. I’ll let you all decide how they should be listed.

friday night lights lucas black with jay hernandez holding each other
Friday Night Lights – Jay Hernandez, Lucas Black

Also, this list is of big budget films (mostly) so if you’re wondering why I didn’t put classics like “House of Yes,” “Spanking the Monkey,” or “Friday Night Lights,” that is the reason. Those three alone, I must have watched over 20 times each. “Friday Night Lights” is my favorite Billy Bob Thornton and Peter Berg film.

If you haven’t seen them, I highly suggest, pulling up your Netflix, Amazon Prime or Hulu and get watching!

2012 top 30 movies roland emmerich

2012

This is technically the mother of all disaster films.  I love watching disaster films like “The Day After Tomorrow,” “Twister” and “San Andreas,” but a film about the end of the world that shows death and destruction in detail. It’s the story of the struggle of a handful of survivors and how the governments of the world handled the situation should the Mayan end-of-the-world prophecy come to pass. This film got criticized for bad science as well as some of the other films included in this list but it’s entertaining just the same. For some reason, I keep hoping Roland Emmerich and Dean Devlin can get back together to make just one more kick ass disaster movie. They are much better together than apart.

Armageddon

Similar to Roland Emmerich’s “2012,” this film got slammed for its bad science. I don’t know why Michael Bay apologized for it but it keeps going back on cable for a reason, and I watch it every time my schedule allows it, especially on weekends. I think it’s one of Michael Bay’s greats and one of Bruce Willis’ greatest films. Mr. Bay should apologize instead for all his Transformers films except for 1 and 3. I also really liked “Deep Impact,” but it felt a little more like a soap opera compared to “Armageddon,” plus it didn’t have the hummable closing credit Aerosmith song.

Avengers

I get complaints from other half whenever I watch this on cable, but I just can’t get enough of this epic undertaking by Marvel Studios. Unlike DC, Marvel really took its time carefully introducing its heroes one at a time to the general public before going gung-ho, leading to an epic gathering of the heroes in one great battle. If you’re not a fan of Marvel, at least see Phase 1 and appreciate their shared universe concept which every other studio is trying and failing to copy. 

Bram Stoker’s Dracula

I appreciate a good horror film every now and then but will all due respect to the late great Sir Christopher Lee, this is the best Dracula film so far because except for the included love story between Dracula and Mina Murray, this film followed the source material very closely, and I love its source material as I’ve read the unabridged version of “Bram Stoker’s Dracula” several times. It, actually got me into reading. I will admit that the first time I saw it on the big screen was in Leicester Square in London, and it didn’t get me as excited as watching it later on the small screen.

Con Air

This film never gets old like Nicolas Cage wanted to be in “Kiss of the Vampire.” This is a fun entertaining action-packed film during Crazy Cage’s heyday. If “Face-Off” didn’t feel so dated, that film would also be on this list. If you’re a bit young, this is about a special forces guy convicted for self-defense. He later gets paroled but had to be shipped with a group of violent hardened convicts who hijack the plane. Of course, what’s a nice guy like him to do?

bruce willis wife beater in die hard 2019 images

Die Hard

Like “Con Air,” this is the story of what happens when someone is at the wrong place at the wrong time. It’s also a pretty violent Christmas cult classic like “Home Alone” along with being the film that catapulted Bruce Willis into Hollywood’s A-list. One can never get tired of the attitude and one-liners of 80s action films. It’s also one of the late Alan Rickman’s best films. “Die Hard” is shown every holiday season so do we have to describe it? Its sequels Die Hard 2 and 4 are also among my favorites. For those that remember the late 80’s, the film’s success also marked the end of the tv show that made Willis a star in the first place, “Moonlighting.”

Disney’s Beauty and the Beast

Perhaps one of my most watched films on this list. I never realized that I have a love for musicals after seeing this film. IMHO, Disney hasn’t matched this film’s musical quality until “Frozen.” I love its take on the classic story as well as its characters, and the animation is as fluid as only Disney can provide.

Fifth Element

A truly visual masterpiece space opera by director Luc Besson and another great Bruce Willis starrer. I have yet to see “Valerian” to make a comparison, but this film is wildly entertaining and one of Chris Tucker’s best films before “Rush Hour.” Plus those Jean Paul Gaultier costumes are really kick ass. For some reason it makes me think of that 90s Peter Greenway classic “The Cook, The Thief, His Wife and Her Lover.” If you’ve not seen that one, you are in for a truly visual surprise.

Ghostbusters

This one was quite unique for its time.  No one else has ever thought of a team of paranormal pest exterminators before, except maybe for that similarly named 70s TV show with the talking gorilla. It’s never been done on the big screen before, the effects were amazing and the chemistry of its four male leads just made it work. The show was quite funny and the actors weren’t even trying. “Ghostbusters” is a classic example of good things coming together at just the right time.

Ghost Rider

Speaking of ghosts, this film may be bad for many but not as bad as the second installment. Ghost Rider is my favorite superhero comic book character, even more than Spider-Man, Superman or Batman. His looks alone kick ass and he also literally kicks ass when he looks at you. This may seem like a bias choice but I also watch through this film whenever available not because I’m a fan, but because it grows on you. If the former were the case, I’d also include Ghost Rider: Spirit of Vengeance in this list, but no.

Godzilla 1985

This is the film that introduced yours truly to the Godzilla franchise. The first thing I noticed was the Japanese cast with English dialogue. Then the massive monster shows up tearing up a city with almost realistic destruction. The Japanese military attacks it to no effect. It was awesome. It even becomes more awesome when Japan’s super weapon the Super-X, a ship that can probably take on a US naval fleet, fights the monster and loses. Despite its many sequels and reboots, I always go back to this film and its sequel Godzilla vs. Biollante. 

russell crowe screaming in gladiator movie images

Gladiator

Are you all entertained yet? Yes, we are. It had been a while since Hollywood captured the glory of Rome and its gladiatorial battles since Spartacus. This film has great action, drama, realism and a well-executed plot. Thanks to director Ridley Scott and a great performance by actor Russel Crowe when he was in prime shape and before becoming famous for throwing phones at people like Naomi Campbell.

Happy Gilmore

This film is the reason why I still love Adam Sandler despite Jack and Jill. Hopefully he gets back from his slump makes a real effort at a good comedic film which is where he’s good at. It’s a fine example of a fish out of water story except the fish evolves and walks on land. If you’re not familiar with the film, it’s about a professed hockey player who actually finds his real talent in golf and takes the brusque attitude and violence of hockey to the quiet and more refined atmosphere of the golf course. Imagine the chaos.

Home Alone

Who hasn’t watched “Home Alone?” Seriously, who hasn’t? I uust have seen it dozens of times whether or not it’s the holiday season. Set on Christmas Day this hilarious film has evolved into a holiday staple catching up with “It’s a Wonderful Life.” The jokes here never get old probably due to the performances of actors Joe Pesci, Daniel Stern and young Macaulay Culkin. That seen with the old man in the church always gets me choked up no matter how many times I see it. 

Independence Day

Of the mostly re-watched films in this list, “Independence Day” belongs to the top 5. This film successfully combines a disaster film with alien encounters. It’s also an ambitious film that showed what would happen if aliens truly invaded. Not individually or covertly but actually invaded with an army in live action on the silver screen. This film is full of action, it has a cool plot and is quite funny thanks to the tandem of Will Smith and Jeff Goldblum. That speech by Bill Pullman remains inspiring to this day.

Iron Man

Despite having his own comic book title, Iron Man was a B-lister in Marvel comics before this movie came out. I already liked his character when I saw Marvel’s 60s cartoons and after reading some comics. When the film came out starring Robert Downey Jr., it just worked. It worked because RDJ was Tony Stark and because Tony Stark was RDJ. Besides, people were starting to get fatigued with Batman. The public needed some iron in their diet. The character, the acting, the grounded realism, and the action combine to make a very re-watchable film. I also re-watch “Iron Man 2” and don’t judge me, “Iron Man 3.”

Joe Dirt

Probably the least popular among the films in this list but I like this feel good film just the same. “Joe Dirt” starring David Spade is about a kid abandoned by his parents but managed to make it on his own through determination, street smarts and hard work. His character is rough around the edges but he managed to endear himself to a set of weird characters and is put in funny situations throughout his journey to find his parents. It’s a funny but feel good comedy.

Jurassic Park

Need we say more? The moment I picked up the book in a bookstore and read Michael Crichton’s synopsis, I knew this would be a plot for a great film. And it is. Despite being over 20 years old, its special effects hold up very well. The effects, the action, and the suspense blend well together plus, it’s a film about dinosaurs. It never gets old. What got old is seeing the T-Rex guest star in a ton of other films afterwards. Whatever the film, a T-rex has to appear in it. When it came out, it set a whole new standard for CGI.

Lord of the Rings Trilogy

This is more of an undertaking than just a simple past time but re-watching “The Lord of the Rings” Trilogy is a satisfying experience. It’s a rite of passage for every nerd. It’s not enough to watch just one of the films, you’d have to be there throughout the extended editions. Think of it as spending the whole day within Middle-Earth. The films are over a decade old but its effects and story remain captivating. This is best done during the long holidays if you don’t feel like leaving home. Don’t bother asking me which of the three is my favorite, as I just can’t decide.

hugh jackman real steel movie with son 2019

Real Steel

This Hugh Jackman starrer is a fairly recent entry to my list. Forget about it being based on the Rock’em Sock’em Robots kids toy and think about it as more of a futuristic boxing film. Besides, Hugh Jackman is in it right? No. What makes this film special aside from good effects is the estranged father-son bonding story reminiscent of Sylvester Stallone’s “Over the Top,” plus the added magic of the first Rocky film, and of course, robots.  It’s a feel-good experience every time I see Jackman’s deadbeat character happily reliving his heyday beating his much more powerful opponent.

Star Trek: First Contact

While “Star Trek” (2009) and “Star Trek: Beyond” may be good films, there are two Star Trek films that many agree are actually the best. “Star Trek: First Contact” and “Star Trek: The Wrath of Khan.” The latter, while great, is not in this list but more on that later. “Star Trek: First Contact” is arguably the best of the TNG Timeline of films, not just because of the Borg, but it shows us a conflicted and imperfect Picard. Like the film suggests, it’s an Ahab/Moby Dick story of the future.

Star Trek: The Voyage Home

Another favorite Star Trek film of mine, even though I wasn’t a Trekkie until years later. This film follows the original cast in their quest to save the Earth of the future by going back to the past. It’s actually a lighthearted adventure film. Quite entertaining but it has two prerequisites before it can be much appreciated by the uninitiated.

Star Wars: Original Trilogy

Some readers would probably crucify me if I didn’t include Star Wars in this list. Who hasn’t watched and loved the original trilogy? Like “Lord of the Rings,” you can’t watch one without seeing the others. Many would agree that “Empire Strikes Back” is the best of the three. While I’m more of a Trekkie, I also re-watch these films every time they’re shown on cable. Who doesn’t appreciate a great legendary space opera like Star Wars?

heath ledger joker stealing scenes in the dark knight movie

The Dark Knight

Easily one of the best Batman films out there. Forget about the hype generated by the death of Heath Ledger. His performance as The Joker is what really mattered. It’s the most dramatic, thought-provoking Batman film I’ve seen. The Joker has no interest in money but is instead interested in spreading out his insanity and questioning the people’s morality. Let’s just say the film is quite deep, witty and action-packed. This was the film Ledger was born to be in, and he easily stole every scene he was in.

The Incredibles

Perhaps the most-watched Pixar film second to “Toy Story.” If “Galaxy Quest” is considered a good Star Trek film, “The Incredibles” is what a good Fantastic Four film should be like. Despite being more than a decade old, the animation still holds up and even if it doesn’t in today’s 4K TVs, it’s great story continues to captivate many of its viewers. The long-awaited sequel will be with us soon. Pixar had to do another “Cars” film first to sell more Hotwheels with eyes.

The Mummy  

For me, “The Mummy” is perhaps Brendan Fraser’s finest since “Encino Man,” “With Honors” and “Airheads.” It’s a fine mix of action, horror and comedy kind of like “Army of Darkness” and “Tremors”. I’d go so far as call it the 90s equivalent of Indiana Jones. The effects are great, the action is fast-paced, and laced with a good dose of humor. I also have to mention Fraser’s performance with Ian McKellan in “Gods and Monsters.” I know many people say he’s an awful actor, but given the right movie, director and editing, he comes across very well in some films.

The Ten Commandments

Speaking of Ancient Egypt, the oldest film in this list, Cecil B. DeMille’s masterpiece is as timeless as its source material. Like “Home Alone,” it’s a seasonal film shown mostly during Lenten Season and even though I have a wide collection of films available during the extended vacation period, me and the family can’t help but sit through this film. The sheer epicness, for lack of a better word, of this 1956 film, plus the great performances of Charlton Heston, Yul Brenner and Anna Baxter continue to sway audiences up to this day. It’s not about the biblical message but the spectacle of it all.

Transformers: The Animated Movie

Perhaps the top one of my re-watchables list. You could say I’m addicted to this film’s visuals and soundtrack and as any Transformers fan would say, tops all of Michael Bay’s movies combined.  It’s not like I want to see Optimus Prime die over and over again, but his action scenes and his final battle with Megatron are priceless. I still have The Touch and Dare in my music playlist and the concept of Unicron was just amazing. Critics call it a 90-minute toy commercial but 80s cartoon fans don’t consider them as such do we? It’s a cool 90-minute space epic.

Tremors  

This is my favorite monster series after “Godzilla.” This is probably not the best known in this list but it has developed its own cult following and spawning several sequels and a one-season TV series. This film starring Kevin Bacon and Fred Ward is about the struggle for survival of a handful of townspeople against a group of giant man-eating underground worms. Mr. Bacon considered this film as a low point of his career but we fans beg to differ. It’s simple, comedic and suspenseful.

White Chicks  

The Wayans are great when it comes to comedy. The Scary Movies are fun but “White Chicks” is the film I watch most. The family really enjoys this as well. It’s also a pretty old film about two black cops going undercover as two VIP white chicks. Terry Crews is funny as hell in this film. 

how to train your dragon movie images

Honorable Mentions:

There are many other films that didn’t make it onto this list but I have great love for, notably The Harry Potter films, “Sister Act,” “Face Off,” “The Rock,” “Army of Darkness,” “Galaxy Quest,” Sam Raimi’s Spider-Man Trilogy, “There’s Something About Mary,” “Troop Beverly Hills,” “Kingdom of Heaven,” “Macross: Do You Remember Love,” and “How to Train Your Dragon (that one still brings tears to my eyes).” I haven’t re-watched these as many times, but I felt they deserve some talking about.

Those are my happy re-watchers and guilty pleasure. It was going to be just my favorite twenty, but just like a great back of chips, you have to have more.