Home Blog Page 44

Roger Federer’s smooth French Open ride vs Serena Williams frustrating one

Roger Federer entered Roland Garros after a several year absence like a rock star, and each round has seen him move smoothly into the next. He’s easily the odds on favorite for taking the title, but he still has Rafael Nadal who’s looking to break his own record with a 12. We can’t forget Dominic Thiem, who is also picking up steam, but the one who’s feeling the most frustration is Serena Williams who overcame injuries and illness only to lose in the third round.

Federer’s return to French Open clay is going so smoothly he still has not dropped a set in reaching the quarterfinals.

The 20-time Grand Slam winner eased through with a 6-2, 6-3, 6-3 win Sunday against unseeded Argentine Leonardo Mayer.

With temperatures reaching 88 Fahrenheit (31 Celsius) on a sun-soaked center court, the third-seeded Federer did not face a break point in beating Mayer for the fourth time in four meetings.

Federer won his only French Open in 2009 and remains on course for a semifinal showdown with Rafael Nadal, the defending champion at Roland Garros.

The 37-year-old Federer is now into a record-extending 54th Grand Slam quarterfinal overall. He also became the third oldest man to reach the last eight at Roland Garros.

“Of course the hope was to go deep and I’m in the quarters now, so I’m very, very happy at this point,” Federer said. “I served super well and Leonardo had trouble returning. I was able to put pressure on him and I’m very happy with my performance.”

Nadal was facing another unseeded Argentine, Juan Ignacio Londero, later on Sunday.

After dropping his serve to lose the second set, Mayer angrily swiped the ball away and was given a code violation warning for ball abuse.

Federer was looking so clinical and assured that the crowd at Philippe Chatrier groaned in disbelief when he missed an easy-looking forehand volley at the net, early in the third set.

It was the second time Federer has beaten Mayer at a Grand Slam — the other also coming in straight sets, in the first round of the U.S. Open in 2015. That was also the last year Federer played at Roland Garros, before skipping clay entirely until returning to the surface this year.

Four years ago, Federer lost in the quarterfinals to Swiss countryman Stan Wawrinka in straight sets.

He next faces either Wawrinka or rising star Stefanos Tsitsipas, who beat Federer in the fourth round at this year’s Australian Open.

They were playing their fourth-round match Sunday on neighboring Court Suzanne Lenglen.

Earlier Sunday, Petra Martic followed up her win over second-seeded Karolina Pliskova by rallying past Kaia Kanepi 5-7, 6-2, 6-4 on center court to reach her first Grand Slam quarterfinal.

The 31st-seeded Croat next faces Czech teenager Marketa Vondrousova, who reached her first quarterfinal at a major without dropping a set. The 19-year-old Vondrousova beat 12th-seeded Anastasija Sevastova of Latvia 6-2, 6-0 in just 59 minutes.

Also advancing to the last eight was 26th-seeded Briton Johanna Konta, who beat 23rd-seeded Donna Vekic 6-2, 6-4. Konta’s quarterfinal opponent will be either 2016 champion Garbiñe Muguruza or 2017 U.S. Open champion Sloane Stephens. Their match was following Nadal’s on center court.

serena williams frustrated at her performance with Roland garros 2019

Serena Williams Frustration At French Open

Serena Williams hadn’t played much all year. Hadn’t practiced much, either. She dealt with an injured ankle in January, a viral illness in March, then a bad left knee in March, April and May.

She wasn’t sure whether it even made sense to show up for the French Open at all.

So, a reporter wanted to know, given all of that, would the 37-year-old Williams have been satisfied ahead of time if someone had told her she would wind up making it to the third round?

Hahahahahaha. Are you kidding? This is Williams we’re talking about here, as talented and competitive an athlete as there is.

“I would have thought they were lying, because I wouldn’t expect to have gotten only to the third round,” came the reply Saturday evening, after Williams was beaten 6-2, 7-5 in that round by 20-year-old American Sofia Kenin. “So I would have been like, ‘That’s not true.’”

Here is the way Williams’ coach, Patrick Mouratoglou, summed up her mindset: “She doesn’t come here to do second round, third round, quarters or semis. She comes to win.”

But here’s the thing: Williams needs to be closer to her highest level than she was in Paris if she is going to do what she wants to do, which is raise her Grand Slam trophy count. Right now she’s at 23, more than anyone in the professional era. In the history of tennis, only Margaret Court has more, with 24, some won against amateur competition.

On Sunday, Williams already was looking ahead, writing on Instagram: “Yesterday was not my day. But it’s about getting up time and time again after you fall. Here’s to a multitude of tomorrows.”

It’s not as if Williams can’t still summon the elite strokes and strategy necessary to thrive. She demonstrated that by getting to the finals at Wimbledon and the U.S. Open last year, when she returned to the tour following the September 2017 birth of her daughter.

Williams, though, is no longer at the stage of her career, or perhaps an age, where she can get by purely on her considerable will or muscle memory or champion’s aura.

Especially when facing gutsy opponents like the 35th-ranked Kenin.

“When you play Serena, you’ve got to control all the points, you’ve got to dictate, because she’s going to take control of the points,” Kenin said. “She’s the best of the best.”

This was Williams’ earliest Grand Slam loss since 2014, and her performance was as shaky as can be. She lost eight of the initial 10 games, ended up with twice as many unforced errors as Kenin and often was left shaking her head or muttering to herself or gesticulating in despair after dropping a point.

Since twisting her ankle along the way to blowing four match points in the Australian Open quarterfinals, Williams had played only four matches in 2019, going 2-2.

She pulled out of Indian Wells because she was sick, then the Miami Open and the Italian Open because of her knee.

“She had such a short period of time to prepare,” Mouratoglou said after the loss to Kenin. “All I know is, she was not ready and it was obvious, I think. … She was fighting, but she’s not prepared enough to win those matches.”

Williams agreed with that assessment.

“I’m just pretty far away, but … the optimistic part is I haven’t been able to be on the court as much as I would have,” she said. “That’s OK. At least I can start trying to put the time in now.”

To that end, Williams did not rule out entering a grass-court tuneup tournament ahead of the next Grand Slam tournament on the calendar, Wimbledon.

She hasn’t done that since 2011.

“I’m definitely feeling short on matches, and just getting in the swing of things. I don’t really like playing out points when I practice,” she said. “I have some time on my hands, so maybe I’ll jump in and get a wild card on one of these grass-court events and see what happens.”

As usual, all eyes will be on Williams when play starts at the All England Club on July 1.

“I want her to be ready,” Mouratoglou said. “Whatever we need to do we will do.”

Is Dominic Thiem ready to win French Open plus Serena Williams loss to Kenin

Dominic Thiem has had quite the year in tennis, but his biggest goal right now at the 2019 French Open is to take it one step farther than last year’s experience at Roland Garros. He wants to not just reach the final, he wants it all.

That means possibly having to face off against one of the holy trinity: Roger Federer, Novak Djokovic or Rafael Nadal. Is he ready?

“Dominic has a chance to win the French Open for sure, one day,” his coach, Nicolas Massu, said in an interview. “I hope that this year it happens.”

While he dropped a set for the third straight match, Thiem showed more flashes of his dominant clay-court game in a 6-3, 4-6, 6-2, 7-5 win over Pablo Cuevas on Saturday to advance to the fourth round.

“It was my best match so far,” Thiem said. “Not at all perfect yet, but the best so far.”

For a spot in the quarterfinals, Thiem will face Gael Monfils and likely a partisan crowd, too, against the French player.

The other fourth-round matchups set Saturday: top-seeded Novak Djokovic vs. Jan-Lennard Struff; No. 5 Alexander Zverev vs. No. 9 Fabio Fognini; No. 8 Juan Martin del Potro vs. No. 10 Karen Khachanov; and No. 6 Stefanos Tsitsipas vs. No. 24 Stan Wawrinka, the 2015 champion.

All top 10 men’s seeds are in the fourth round of a Grand Slam tournament for the first time since the 1970 Australian Open.

When Massu looks at Thiem’s game it feels a bit like staring in the mirror. Massu used a similar style in winning gold medals in both singles and doubles at the 2004 Athens Olympics. There’s the big kick serve out wide, the heavy topspin, running around the backhand.

“Many of the things that Dominic does today I was doing also, years before,” said Massu, who started working with Thiem this year. “Same ideas. So I understand what he wants.”

Massu made an immediate impact on Thiem’s game when he guided him to his first Masters series title in Indian Wells, California, in March — which was surprising because until then Thiem’s best results had come on clay.

Thiem reached the semifinals at the French in 2016 and 2017 before losing to Rafael Nadal in last year’s final. He also has four career wins at other tournaments over Nadal, the 11-time Roland Garros champion.

Massu understands the expectations surrounding his pupil.

“It’s normal that they put the name of Dominic (as) one of the favorite players, because of the results that he had in the past,” Massu said.

Thiem, however, is becoming quite comfortable in Paris, where he also reached the final of the boys’ tournament in 2011.

“Eight years ago when I made the final of the juniors I fell in love with this tournament,” Thiem told the crowd after beating Cuevas.

Then Thiem, who is dating French player Kristina Mladenovic, entertained the crowd inside Court Suzanne Lenglen with a few words in French, apologizing for his beginners’ grasp of the language.

At 25, Thiem has plenty of time to learn.

“When you are 25 years old you are not even in the (halfway point) of your career,” Massu said. “The good thing about Dominic (is) he has the time.”

Already up to No. 4 in the rankings, Thiem sits behind only Djokovic and Nadal, who are both 32, and Roger Federer, who is 37.

“He knows that he has the chance one day to be No. 1 in the world,” Massu said. “You never know when — maybe soon, maybe later — but he works for that.”

A trophy in Paris would be a big step toward the top.

serena williams out of french open defeated by sofia kenin

Serena Williams Out Of French Open 2019

Maybe it was the daunting deficit Serena Williams faced in the French Open’s third round. Maybe it was the way her 20-year-old American opponent, Sofia Kenin, was questioning line calls.

Either way, as Williams attempted to start a comeback Saturday with a three-ace game, she followed those big serves with some serious stare downs.

Whether it was meant to get herself going or intimidate Kenin, it didn’t work. Outplayed from start to finish, Williams lost 6-2, 7-5 to the 35th-ranked Kenin, ending her latest bid for a 24th Grand Slam title with her earliest loss at a major tournament in five years.

“In that first set in particular, she hit pretty much inches from the line, and I haven’t played anyone like that in a long time,” the 37-year-old Williams said. “I just saw a player that was playing unbelievable.”

It was the second significant surprise in a matter of hours: Earlier in the day, No. 1 seed Naomi Osaka was eliminated 6-4, 6-2 by 42nd-ranked Katerina Siniakova of the Czech Republic. That ended Osaka’s 16-match Grand Slam winning streak, which included titles at the U.S. Open final in September — when she beat Williams in the final — and at the Australian Open in January.

Osaka was trying to become the first woman to win three consecutive major trophies since Williams grabbed four in a row in 2014-15, a run that was preceded by a second-round loss at Roland Garros and a third-round loss at Wimbledon.

Since those early-for-her defeats, Williams had won six of the 14 majors she entered to surpass Steffi Graf’s professional-era record of 22 Grand Slam singles championships. With 23, Williams stands one away from Margaret Court’s mark for the most in tennis history; Court played in both the professional and amateur eras.

“Serena is such a tough player. I’m still trying to process what just happened,” Kenin said, about an hour after the match ended with her covering her face with both hands. “She’s a true champion and an inspiration.”

Kenin was born in Moscow and is fluent in Russian. Her family moved to New York when she was a baby, and she now is based in Florida.

“I’m proud to be an American,” said Kenin, who wore a blue U.S. Fed Cup cap to her news conference. “I think it’s great we moved to America for a better life for me.”

She is appearing in the ninth major of her career and now is headed to her initial trip to the round of 16, where she’ll meet No. 8 seed Ash Barty. Other women’s fourth-round matchups established Saturday: defending champion Simona Halep vs. 18-year-old Iga Swiatek of Poland; No. 14 Madison Keys of the U.S. vs. Sinikiakova; 17-year-old Amanda Anisimova of the U.S. vs. qualifier Aliona Bolsova of Spain.

Williams sat out four Slams in 2017-18 while she was off the tour to have a baby. Her first major back was last year’s French Open, where she withdrew before a fourth-round match because of a chest muscle injury. She went on to reach the finals of Wimbledon and the U.S. Open before wasting match points during a quarterfinal loss at the Australian Open this January.

Williams came to Paris having played only four matches since then — she withdrew from two tournaments because of an injured left knee and another because of illness.

And she had said she considered not entering the French Open at all.

“I’m glad I came, at the end of the day,” she said, “but it’s been a really grueling season for me.”

Asked whether a third-round appearance was satisfactory, given her issues, Williams not surprisingly said it was not.

“I wouldn’t expect to have gotten only to the third round,” she replied.

Said her coach, Patrick Mouratoglou: “All I know is, she was not ready. And it was obvious, I think.”

Williams couldn’t control her shots, compiling 34 unforced errors, twice as many as Kenin’s 17. Another key statistic: Kenin won four of Williams’ 10 service games.

Kenin also was composed as can be, never getting rattled by Williams or by a Court Philippe Chatrier crowd that whistled and jeered her for repeatedly eyeing ball marks to see whether calls were correct.

“I didn’t care at that point,” Kenin said. “I was like, ‘I’m going to check the mark.’”

After Williams showed fight by going from 3-1 down to 4-3 ahead in the second set, Kenin hung in there. At 5-all, she got the last break she’d need with a forehand return winner off a 102 mph (164 kph) serve.

She ran to her sideline seat and pressed a towel against her face.

There was one last pivotal moment: Serving for the victory, Kenin faced a break point, but Williams’ miscue let it go by. One last error by Williams — a backhand that sailed long — ended things.

Kenin dealt so well with the stakes, the scene, the setting.

She’d never shared a court with Williams before, although Kenin did try to set up a practice session during the offseason by texting Mouratoglou.

Didn’t work out.

“Yeah, I tried to hit with her. It wasn’t possible, but I’ll take that,” Kenin said with a smile. “I’ll take the win over the hitting.”

Zach Sanford back in Blues play for Stanley Cup Game 3

St. Louis Blues fans will see a familiar face returning to action after being sidelined for more than six weeks as Zach Sanford is back in play. He’ll return for Game 3 of the Stanley Cup Final with the Blues hosting the Boston Bruins.

Sanford enters the Blues lineup for forward Oskar Sundqvist, who was suspended one game for boarding and concussing Boston defenseman Matt Grzelcyk and potentially knocking him out for the rest of the series. Sanford hasn’t played since Game 3 of the first round against Winnipeg on April 14.

Jordan Nolan, who hasn’t played an NHL game since January, says he’ll skate in warmups but doesn’t expect to play. After Robby Fabbri replaced injured forward Robert Thomas in Game 2, the Blues’ depth has been tested.

John Moore will replace Grzelcyk in Boston’s lineup, and center Patrice Bergeron will play after skipping practice Friday for maintenance. The same goes for St. Louis top-line wingers Jaden Schwartz and Vladimir Tarasenko.

The series is tied at 1-1.

stanley cup finals game 3 bruins vs blues 2019
May 29, 2019; Boston, MA, USA; Boston Bruins center Danton Heinen (43) and St. Louis Blues defenseman Alex Pietrangelo (27) watch a play during the third period in game two of the 2019 Stanley Cup Final at TD Garden. Mandatory Credit: Greg M. Cooper-USA TODAY Sports

Stanley Cup Finals Game 3 Prepping

Tyler Bozak witnessed the first NHL playoff game in Toronto after a seven-year drought. David Perron experienced the first Stanley Cup Final game in Las Vegas.

They ain’t seen nothin’ yet.

When the St. Louis Blues host the Boston Bruins in Game 3 on Saturday night, it’ll mark the first Stanley Cup Final game in the city in 49 years. That was May 5, 1970, a 6-2 loss to the Bruins in Game 2 of the series that Bobby Orr ended in four games with an overtime goal.

After winning a final game for the first time in franchise history to tie the series at 1-all, the Blues are trying to make their own history at home. To do so, the least-penalized team in the playoffs that went to the box 10 times in the two games in Boston will need to balance feeding off a raucous crowd and getting too overemotional in that charged atmosphere.

“It’s going to be extremely special, for sure, to play in front of the Blues fans that have been waiting for it for a long time,” Perron said Friday. “You’re trying to keep your sticks close to you so you don’t trip guys, you don’t high-stick guys and sometimes it’s just going to happen. It’s not a penalty you’re trying to take. It happened to me in the first game, and it’s very difficult to take. But you’ve got to be composed with the puck, you’ve got to be composed with your stick.”

Composure is the Blues’ calling card after rallying from the basement of the NHL standings in early January to within three victories of the first championship in franchise history. Their home arena was full for viewing parties for Games 1 and 2, so it’s tough for players not to get caught up in the excitement after watching videos of those scenes.

“We’re not even here and it’s sold out and it’s loud,” Bozak said. “We’re excited.”

Fans are certainly excited. NBC Sports reported the highest local rating on cable for a playoff game, StubHub said the price to get in is $725, the average ticket costs $1,068 and demand is outpacing Game 1 in Las Vegas from a year ago.

“This is a hockey town and they’ve been with us through the ups and downs,” center Ryan O’Reilly said. “I don’t think I’ll be able to describe what it’s going to be like. But from what I’ve seen I’ve been very impressed, and we’re excited to get home to show what this town’s about.”

To show them good hockey, the Blues must try to avoid the penalty problems that plagued them in Boston. They were whistled for high-sticking, hooking, cross-checking, interference and slashing and twice for tripping and goaltender.

Coach Craig Berube, seventh in NHL history with 3,149 penalty minutes mostly for fighting during his playing career, is not happy about his team’s lack of discipline so far in the series. St. Louis got here in part because it only took 55 penalties in the first 19 playoff games, and Berube chalks the difference up to too much emotion and harps on it with players because he knows what Saturday night will be like.

“We talk about that a lot,” Berube said. “You have to keep your emotions in check.”

That won’t be a problem for Bruins agitator extraordinaire Brad Marchand, who days ago made it clear he doesn’t care what Blues fans think of him. And that works in reverse, too.

“Every arena has roughly the same amount of people in it, so regardless of where you are in the NHL in the playoffs, you expect it to be loud,” Marchand said. “I expect the same tomorrow but not overly concerned about the fans. More concerned about the game.”

What can happen in the game when Boston’s playoff-leading power play goes to work is the main reason the Blues want to avoid penalties. The Bruins have only scored on two of their 10 power plays so far, but they’ve also used that time to generate momentum.

On the flipside, so much time down 5-on-4 also puts wear and tear on the Blues’ penalty killers and wreaks havoc on the flow of the game. They’d like to avoid that this time and give their long suffering fans something to cheer about.

“You try not to let the disruption of penalties and power plays affect you whether you’re short-handed or on the power play,” defenseman Robert Bortuzzo said. “As a player, you just go out and you may be skipped over five shifts because of the disruption or whatnot, but it’s easy to get emotionally invested and right back into it when that is the case.”

Roger Federer’s French Open rock star return

Roger Federer might not be French, but you wouldn’t have known that with the reception he got on his return to the 2019 French Open. Federer’s return to Roland Garros feels a bit like what happens when a wildly popular rock star goes back on tour after years away.

He plays his greatest hits: the no-look, back-to-the-net, over-the-shoulder volley winner; the sliced backhand returns; the aces to erase break points. He elicits “oohs” and “aahs” and raucous applause. His audience includes parents, familiar with his work in his younger days, bringing their kids to the show.

In Federer’s case, one father-child duo had the best seats in the house Friday at Court Suzanne Lenglen. That’s because Christian Ruud, a guy who happened to be in the French Open field himself when Federer made his Grand Slam debut all the way back in 1999, was in the front row, watching his 20-year-old son, Casper, lose to the 37-year-old Federer 6-3, 6-1, 7-6 (8) in the third round in 2019.

“That’s how unbelievable a champion he is, being to play on a high level for 20 years. I’ve been impressed with him my whole life — and I still (am),” said Christian Ruud, who coaches Casper.

Federer, the elder Ruud said, “cannot play forever, but he’s still playing at an amazing level.”

Certainly, good enough to reach the fourth round in Paris for the record 14th time, a mark that was equaled a few hours later when Federer’s longtime rival, Rafael Nadal, equaled it with his own victory.

While Federer raced through nine consecutive games in one stretch — “The first two sets went pretty quick,” Casper Ruud acknowledged — and hasn’t dropped a set this week, Nadal was pushed a bit by 27th-seeded David Goffin.

Still, Nadal recovered quickly after ceding a set, the first he’d lost to Goffin in their four matches on clay, before emerging to win 6-1, 6-3, 4-6, 6-3. Pursuing a 12th championship at the French Open, Nadal improved to 89-2 at the clay-court tournament; Friday marked exactly 10 years since his first defeat, against Robin Soderling in the fourth round in 2009 (the only year Federer won the title).

That setback came on a gray, rainy day. This victory was bathed in sunshine, which is far more to Nadal’s liking.

He and Federer are moving closer to a semifinal showdown. First they’ll need to get to the quarterfinals with victories Sunday, when each faces an Argentine opponent: Federer plays 68th-ranked Leonardo Mayer, and Nadal takes on 78th-ranked Juan Ignacio Londero, who is making his major tournament debut.

Another men’s fourth-round matchup was set when No. 7 Kei Nishikori and Benoit Paire advanced.

In the women’s draw, 2018 runner-up Sloane Stephens meets 2016 champion Garbiñe Muguruza in the fourth round, when other matches will include 12th-seeded Anastasija Sevastova against 19-year-old Marketa Vondrousova; and No. 31 Petra Martic — who upset No. 2 Karolina Pliskova — against Kaia Kanepi.

Federer hadn’t entered the French Open since 2015; he was injured the next year, then decided to skip the clay circuit in 2016-17 to focus on preparing for grass and hard courts. The owner of a men’s-record 20 Grand Slam titles and considered the “Greatest of All Time” by many already is popular, of course; his absence apparently made Parisian hearts grow fonder.

His matches have been packed. Practice sessions, too. Just walking across the grounds Friday was an adventure as a line of fans five people deep waved hats and tennis balls and other items at Federer in hopes of an autograph, while others filmed the scene with their camera phones.

And, yes, he is enjoying the nostalgia as much as they are.

“I feel that my 20 years on the tour went too fast, almost,” he said Friday.

But he also means business.

That’s why, as reporters asked questions about becoming the first man to appear in 400 Grand Slam matches (his record is 345-55, an .863 winning percentage) or what he predicts for Casper Ruud, Federer peeked to his right at a screen showing the scores of matches in progress. He was keeping tabs on Mayer’s third-round match.

“I’m still in the present,” Federer noted.

There was no way he could know how this comeback of sorts would go, whether he’d still be able to hit all the notes required for success on red clay.

So far, so good.

“He has all the shots in the book,” Casper Ruud said, “so it’s tough to know what kind of shot he will hit.”

On Friday, Federer had nearly twice as many winners, 52-28. Won 21 of 27 points when he went to the net. Saved 4 of 5 break points. And, most important to him, came through when things momentarily got tight in the tiebreaker, saving one set point with a serve-and-volley winner and converting his fourth match point with an overhead.

“A few months ago I didn’t know what to expect with anything, really,” Federer said. “At this point, now I know where my level’s at. I still don’t know exactly where my absolute best is, but I feel like it could be there. Maybe not. I’m happy to find out, either way.”

Joe Biden, Kamala Harris teach campaigning plus Roger Stone’s aide alert

Politics doesn’t have to get nasty and messy as former vice president Joe Biden and Senator Kamala Harris have shown. They have a deep connection through Biden’s son Beau, who passed away from brain cancer. Roger Stone is back in the headlines slightly as his former aide, who has fought for a long time to not testify, finally relented to be questioned about WikiLeaks.

Nearly a year his death, Kamala Harris was still grieving. Speaking at the California Democratic Party’s convention in 2016, Harris spoke of Biden’s family as one that “truly represents our nation’s highest ideals, a powerful belief in the nobility of public service.”

She then praised his father, Joe, saying the then-vice president “has given so much to our country and on top of everything he has accomplished, he gave to us my dear friend, Beau.” Joe Biden later took the stage, calling Harris among the “great friends” he and Beau had in California.

Harris and Beau Biden formed a close friendship during their time as state attorneys general — Harris in California and Biden in Delaware. It was that relationship that drew Harris closer to Joe Biden and has come into focus now that they’re both vying for the Democratic presidential nomination.

Most of the two dozen White House hopefuls have pre-existing friendships from their time on Capitol Hill or other Democratic circles. But few are as complex — and potentially awkward — as the tie between Harris and Joe Biden.

They’ve bonded over their deep love and admiration of Beau Biden and a sadness over his loss that lingers four years after his death. But signs of tension that could strain the relationship have already surfaced.

Her campaign, for instance, has resented talk that she would be a perfect running mate for Joe Biden. After a recent New Hampshire town hall, she pointedly joked that Joe Biden would be a great running mate because “as vice president, he’s proven he knows how to do the job.”

Yet while many candidates in the race have derided Joe Biden’s high-dollar fundraisers and past policy stances, Harris has largely refrained.

If they share the stage at one of the upcoming presidential debates, their approach to each other could be further tested. Given their past history, some Democrats doubt Harris and Joe Biden will swing too hard against each other — at least early on.

“In this instance, I have to believe that when you’re talking about someone having lost their child and someone who lost a friend and a colleague, I think that creates respect, not rancor,” said Democratic strategist Karen Finney.

Representatives for Harris and Joe Biden declined to comment for this story.

But those who worked closely with Beau Biden and Harris on a number of issues while they served as attorneys general said the two quickly developed a rapport and a level of trust. They came to rely on each other as sounding boards, according to the aides, who spoke on the condition of anonymity in order to candidly describe their relationship.

During negotiations with banks during the foreclosure crisis, one former Harris aide said she talked or texted with Beau Biden daily — and sometimes more frequently. The aide described a close partnership between not just Beau Biden and Harris themselves, but between the two staffs despite the fact that their offices were located on opposite ends of the country.

For a moment this week, Beau Biden’s memory seemed to suspend the rancor of politics. On Thursday, Harris marked the fourth anniversary of his death by tweeting a photo of herself with Beau Biden, saying “you couldn’t find a person who cared more deeply for his family, the nation he served, and the state of Delaware.”

“Four years after his passing, I still miss him,” she said.

Joe Biden responded on Twitter later in the day, thanking Harris for her “kind remembrance.”

Speaking earlier in the day at Delaware’s Memorial Day service, commemorating those who died in military service, Joe Biden noted the “bittersweet day.”

“You all know the loss of a loved one,” Biden said. “Somehow, the pain fades a little bit, but the moments you remember are bittersweet because those are the days when it comes back, the pride as well as the pain.”

roger stone peace signing with aids andrew miller 2019
Roger Stone with former aide, Andrew Miller

Former Roger Stone Aide Andrew Miller Finally Testifies

A former aide to Trump confidant Roger Stone testified about WikiLeaks before a federal grand jury Friday in an investigation related to special counsel Robert Mueller’s Russia probe.

Andrew Miller testified for about two hours after losing a months-long legal battle to have the subpoena thrown out.

Although the Russia investigation is over, the grand jury that worked with Mueller still hears testimony in cases that are tied to the investigation. Mueller’s team handed off several cases, including the one against Stone, to other federal prosecutors.

Prosecutors sought Miller’s testimony as they built a case against Stone, who was charged earlier this year with lying to Congress about his efforts to alert the Trump campaign to WikiLeaks’ plans to release damaging information on Hillary Clinton during the 2016 presidential campaign.

American intelligence agencies have concluded that WikiLeaks got the information from Russian agents.

Stone has pleaded not guilty.

Miller’s attorney, Paul Kamenar, said his client “doesn’t have any knowledge about what Roger Stone knew about WikiLeaks and Julian Assange.”

Prosecutors’ continued push for Miller’s testimony and documents could signal they are not finished investigating Stone, who is scheduled to go on trial in November.

Mueller officially concluded his Russia investigation when he issued his final report in March and has now left the Justice Department. Mueller found no criminal conspiracy between Donald Trump’s presidential campaign and Russia but left open the question of whether Trump acted in ways that were meant to obstruct the investigation.

Miller said he fought the subpoena for nearly a year because he is a “strong libertarian.”

“I believe that you’ve got to push back on our government when they’re trying to demand to travel across the country to sit with them on a whim, miss work and miss your family,” he said outside the courthouse.

On Aug. 21, 2016, two months before the mass release by WikiLeaks, Stone tweeted that “it will soon [be] Podesta’s time in the barrel.” In his testimony before a House Intelligence Committee in September 2017, he testified falsely that he had no advance notice, according to the indictment.
Miller refused the subpoena from the special counsel at the risk of being jailed for contempt, to wage an unsuccessful legal challenge to the validity of Mueller’s appointment in May 2017. He conceded after a U.S. appeals court rejected his argument and returned the matter to the trial court for further proceedings earlier this week. The government notified the judge that the contempt citation against Miller can be discharged.

Mueller formally announced he was stepping down from his post and leaving the Justice Department for private life on May 29.

“Roger has been a mentor of mine. I was a driver. I worked for him for 13 years,” Miller told reporters outside the courthouse on Friday. “He’s like ‘Uncle Roger.’ ”

Kamenar said his client hasn’t had “anything to do” with Stone since before the election.

Stone’s trial is set for Nov. 5.

Frustrated Donald Trump disappoints all but Stephen Miller with Mexico Tariff

Donald Trump was able to go to his standby when the media doesn’t go the way he wants so it’s back to immigration and tariffs after Robert Mueller sucked much of the attention from the president this week. Slapping a tariff on Mexico thinking it will help curtail immigration from the south is only making Trump’s right-hand man Stephen Miller happy.

No one in the business world or even Republicans are happy with this and fears are that this will only push America closer to a recession. The fact that the Dow has been slowly dropping day by day due to investors fears should be a sign, but for those that hoped Trump would run America like he ran his business are getting their wishes delivered. Now that financial papers are slowly leaking out showing that he did set a record for having the most business loses for a decade should send a chill down most people’s spines.

Business leaders have warned the president that forcing more losses on Mexico will only make it harder for them to keep immigration from stemming into America from the southern border. The President of Mexico will only fight back which means everyone loses in America.

stephen miller happy with donald trump mexico tariffs

Despite pushback from U.S. business, Mexico and Capitol Hill, President Donald Trump doubled down Friday on his threat to slap a 5% tariff on Mexican imports unless America’s southern neighbor cracks down on Central American migrants trying to cross the U.S. border.

U.S. manufacturers said the tariff, set to take effect June 10, would have devastating consequences on them and American consumers. U.S. stocks tumbled on Wall Street in response to Trump’s planned action.

“Imposing tariffs on goods from Mexico is exactly the wrong move,” said Neil Bradley, executive vice president of the U.S. Chamber of Commerce, which is exploring legal action in response to the tariffs. “These tariffs will be paid by American families and businesses without doing a thing to solve the very real problems at the border. Instead, Congress and the president need to work together to address the serious problems at the border.”

Mexican President Andrés Manuel López Obrador dispatched his foreign secretary to Washington to try to negotiate a solution. He said social problems are not solved with coercive measures, but also seemed convinced that Trump just needed to be informed about all the steps Mexico has taken to slow illegal migration.

Mexico has stepped up raids on migrant caravans traveling through the southern states of Chiapas and Oaxaca this year. It has deported thousands of migrants and frustrated thousands more who wait endlessly for permits that would allow them to travel legally through Mexico.

Administration officials told reporters in a briefing call Thursday evening that Mexico could prevent the tariffs from kicking in by securing its southern border with Guatemala, cracking down on criminal smuggling organizations, and entering into a “safe third country agreement” that would make it difficult for those who enter Mexico from other countries to claim asylum in the U.S.

“We fully believe they have the ability to stop people coming in from their southern border and if they’re able to do that, these tariffs will either not go into place or will be removed after they go into place,” said acting White House chief of staff Mick Mulvaney.

Trump said the percentage will gradually increase — up to 25% — until the migration problem is remedied.

“Mexico has taken advantage of the United States for decades,” Trump said in a tweet. “Because of the Dems, our Immigration Laws are BAD. Mexico makes a FORTUNE from the U.S., have for decades, they can easily fix this problem. Time for them to finally do what must be done!”

Trump’s decision showed the administration going to new lengths, and looking for new levers, to pressure Mexico to take action — even if those risk upending other policy priorities, like the United States-Mexico-Canada Agreement, a trade deal that is the cornerstone of Trump’s legislative agenda and seen as beneficial to his reelection effort.

Keeping the economy rolling also is critical to Trump’s reelection, and business was not happy with the president’s planned tariff on Mexican imports.

“These proposed tariffs would have devastating consequences on manufacturers in America and on American consumers,” said Jay Timmons, chief executive officer of the National Association of Manufacturers. “We have taken our concerns to the highest levels of the administration and strongly urge them to consider carefully the impact of this action on working families across this country.”

The stock market’s tumble on Friday all but guarantees that May will be the first monthly loss for the market in 2019. The news hit automakers particularly hard. Many of them import vehicles into the U.S. from Mexico.

“The auto sector – and the 10 million jobs it supports – relies upon the North American supply chain and cross border commerce to remain globally competitive,” said the Auto Alliance, which represents automakers that built 70% of all cars and light trucks sold in U.S. “Any barrier to the flow of commerce across the U.S.-Mexico border will have a cascading effect — harming U.S. consumers, threatening American jobs and investment and curtailing economic progress.”

Some of Trump’s fellow Republicans in Congress opposed the tariff. Republican senators have made almost weekly treks to the White House to nudge the president off his trade wars, and this latest move sent them scrambling again to signal their displeasure in hopes of reversing Trump’s actions.

Texas Republican Sen. John Cornyn supports the president’s commitment to securing the border, an aide said, but he opposes the across-the-board tariff, “which will disproportionately hurt Texas.”

Key trade senators also spoke up. Pennsylvania GOP Sen. Pat Toomey, who has questioned the administration’s ability to invoke national security threats for some other imports, called the tariffs a “blanket tax increase” on items Americans purchases from Mexico and “the wrong remedy.”

The tariff threat comes at a peculiar time, given how hard the administration has been pushing for passage of the USMCA, which would update the North American Free Trade Agreement.

Sen. Chuck Grassley, R-Iowa, a usual Trump ally and the chairman of the Senate Finance Committee, slammed the president’s action, saying it was a “misuse of presidential tariff authority” that would burden American consumers and “seriously jeopardize passage of USMCA.”

Sen. Joni Ernst, R-Iowa, said the livelihoods of farmers and producers from her state are at risk and so is the USMCA.

“If the president goes through with this, I’m afraid progress to get this trade agreement across the finish line will be stifled,” she said.

Rafael Nadal takes another step forward with Djokovic, Thiem at French Open 2019

0

Rafael Nadal is fighting hard for that 12th French Open title as he continues taking down all opponents including Friday’s match with David Goffin 6-1, 6-3, 4-6, 6-3. He had to fight hard for that one unlike Wednesday’s versus Yannick Maden. Novak Djokovic’s young son also proved to be a true Roland Garros gentleman.

Another German qualifier named Yannick, another easy win for Rafael Nadal.

Chasing a record-extending 12th title at the French Open, Nadal posted a 6-1, 6-2, 6-4 win over Yannick Maden on Wednesday to reach the third round of the clay-court Grand Slam.

Nadal lost only six games in the first round against Yannick Hanfmann. He was on the verge of doing even better on Wednesday but lost focus briefly in the third set and dropped his serve twice.

“That’s just about concentration,” Nadal said. “Because the feeling on the match has been positive. Positive thing is, every time that I (made) the mistake, then I had the break again, and that’s the good news.”

In the next round, Nadal will be up against 27th-seeded David Goffin.

Sixth-seeded Stefanos Tsitsipas also advanced, making it to the third round at Roland Garros for the first time. The Greek player overcame a slow start to beat Hugo Dellien of Bolivia 4-6, 6-0, 6-3, 7-5.

Also, seventh-seeded Kei Nishikori rallied to beat Jo-Wilfried Tsonga 4-6, 6-4, 6-4, 6-4.

In the women’s draw, former champion Garbine Muguruza and last year’s runner-up Sloane Stephens both posted straight-set wins to progress to the third round.

On a sunny morning in the French capital, Muguruza beat Johanna Larsson 6-4, 6-1 on Court Suzanne Lenglen.

Seeded 19th this year, Muguruza won the title at Roland Garros in 2016 when she upset Serena Williams in the final. The Spanish player is expected to face tougher opposition in her next match against ninth-seeded Elina Svitolina, who progressed to the third round without hitting a shot.

Svitolina was set to play 67th-ranked Kateryna Kozlova but organizers said the Ukrainian player withdrew with a virus.

Stephens, who lost to Simona Halep in last year’s final, needed a bit more time to defeat gritty but error-prone Sara Sorribes Tormo 6-1, 7-6 (3).

In a match that featured 11 breaks of serve, Stephens could not hold on to a 3-0 lead in the second set and Sorribes Tormo twice had the opportunity to level at 1-set apiece on her serve. A turning point came in the 11th game when the 22-year-old Spaniard hit two consecutive double-faults to drop serve.

The seventh-seeded Stephens hit a series of winners in the tiebreaker and sealed the match with a backhand down the line.

“Just decided to keep it exciting, to play a bit longer on that court,” Stephens joked. “I missed it from last year.”

Later, Roger Federer was facing 144th-ranked Oscar Otte. Federer is playing at Roland Garros after a four-year absence.

novak djokovic dominic thiem hit round 3 of french open 2019

Novak Djokovic, Dominic Thiem Head To Round 3

World number one Novak Djokovic claimed a routine win over ‘lucky loser’ Henri Laaksonen to move into the third round of the French Open at Roland Garros.

Djokovic who won the 2016 competition, secured a 6-1 6-4 6-3 victory on Court Suzanne Lenglen in Paris.

He is aiming for his second Grand Slam title of 2019 after winning the Australian Open in January.

All of the top 10 seeded players in the men’s singles are into the third round after wins for six of them on Thursday.

Laaksonen was beaten by Sweden’s Mikael Ymer in the third round of qualifying but took his place in the main draw after benefiting from withdrawals.

The Swiss, ranked 104th in the world, beat Spanish qualifier Pedro Martinez in the opening round to set up a first meeting with 15-time Grand Slam winner Djokovic.

The first set lasted only 23 minutes, but Laaksonen provided more resistance in the second, breaking Djokovic’s serve in the sixth game.

However, Djokovic twice broke Laaksonen’s serve in consecutive service games to take a two-set lead.

Djokovic, 32, will play unseeded Italian Salvatore Caruso, who knocked out France’s 26th seed Gilles Simon.

Thiem and Zverev safely through

Fourth seed Dominic Thiem, the runner-up last year, moved into round three with a 6-3 6-7 (6-8) 6-3 7-5 win over Kazakhstan’s Alexander Bublik.

Bublik three times opted to play underarm serves to disrupt Thiem’s rhythm, but could not beat the Austrian, who faces Uruguayan Pablo Cuevas after Britain’s Kyle Edmund pulled out with injury in the third set.

Asked about Bublik’s underarm serves, Thiem said: “It’s a good choice against players like us who are so far behind the baseline.

“For me it was tough. I had difficulties finding the right position. I didn’t practise [for] it but I just expect it from time to time. He won two out of three. Sometimes it’s quite a good tactic.”

novak djokovics son clapping stefan at french open 2019

Novak Djokovic’s Son A Perfect French Open Gentleman

In a career already full of milestones, Novak Djokovic passed another one in reaching the third round of the French Open: His young son watched him play for the first time.

Djokovic cruised into the last 32 for the 14th successive year, admitting it had been an emotional day playing for the first time in front of his four-year-old Stefan.

Djokovic, bidding to become just the second man to hold all four Slams at the same time twice, cruised to a 6-1 6-4 6-3 win over Swiss lucky loser Henri Laaksonen with Stefan watching from the player’s box on Court Suzanne Lenglen.

“It’s a very special day for me as it’s the first time in my life that I have played in front of my son,” said the 32-year-old Serb after a 23rd straight win at the Slams.

novak djokovic son stefan at french open perfect gentleman 2019

“He showed incredible patience to sit there for an hour and a half. Usually, he’s not that patient with tennis.”

Stefan joined in the celebrations on centre court when Djokovic claimed a fourth Wimbledon title last July, but he was banned from watching the match because children under the age of five are not permitted into show courts by the All England Club.

He will still be a few months short of his fifth birthday at this year’s tournament.

Djokovic, who also has an 18-month-old daughter, Tara, revealed his son had been the major factor driving him during his comeback from an injury-riddled 2018.

“Actually, I didn’t talk about it but it was one of, if not the biggest, motivation I’ve had for this Wimbledon this year,” he said, after winning Wimbledon.

“I was visualising, imagining this moment of him coming to the stands, cherishing this moment with my wife and me and everyone. It’s hard to describe.

“I never had him in the box watching the tennis match. I was hoping that Wimbledon can be that tournament because he’s big enough now I think to stay quiet maybe for 30 minutes or so

“There are special rules here so we have to respect them.

“Roger (Federer) had his girls and his boys as well, I think, last year and the years that he won at the trophy ceremony, so I was hoping I can have Stefan, too.”

“He was not there til the very moment when I was walking to get an interview. He walked in. So that was just a moment that I will carry inside of my heart forever.”

Djokovic goes on to face Italian qualifier Salvatore Caruso, ranked 147, for a place in the last 16 in Paris.

Thursday was a lot more enjoyable for Djokovic than his last visit to Court Suzanne Lenglen in 2018 when he was knocked out in the quarter-finals by Marco Cecchinato.

‘Godzilla: King of the Monsters’ all spectacle that forgot the story

It’s not surprising that “Godzilla: King of the Monsters” took the top spot at the box office, as well as the fact that many are questioning the franchise’s validity since it underperformed studio and industry expectations. It took in about $130 million internationally, well below it’s $200 million production and marketing budget. I wanted to wait a day to ruminate after seeing it with a theater full of regular moviegoers. I love being able to go to the movie premiere but seeing a big monster film with people who paid to see it can be much more fun.

So, after taking a day, my feelings haven’t changed about the latest Godzilla movie. When a movie is adapted from a book, cartoon, TV show or a comic book, it has to stay true to whatever it is that’s being adapted. The reason for the adaptation in the first place is because the source is popular. The source is popular because it has elements that made it popular. Take away those elements for whatever lousy reason, introduce something totally alien, chances are, the project will tank, will bomb, will fail. “Godzilla: King of the Monsters” is not that kind of movie. 

Thoughts

But we must remember that this is Hollywood, and oftentimes, the source is just that and nothing more. They bought the rights so they can slap the familiar name onto the title and hope people will come solely on that. This rarely works out well for a film like this, and the mixed reviews from critics and fans prove me out. I absolutely liked it for what it is. Legendary did a great job this time and listened to Godzilla fans who didn’t like “Godzilla 2014.” I’m a big Godzilla fan ever since I saw “Godzilla 1985” and “Godzilla vs Biollante” in the 90s and I have seen many of the Godzilla films. “Godzilla: King of the Monsters” is a love letter to Godzilla fans and a great follow-up to “Godzilla 2014.” This film I also a great popcorn flick for casual moviegoers. Why is that so?

Six Lousy Missiles

A lot of elements of Godzilla are in “Godzilla: King of the Monsters.” Godzilla is huge, Godzilla is powerful, Godzilla is almost indestructible. Godzilla is benevolent in this film and at the same time is a force of nature; much like the early Showa period Godzilla films. The fact that Godzilla is almost indestructible is an important element in Godzilla, something that the 1998 film threw out the window. Six missiles killed the monster in New York. Six lousy missiles! I was so disappointed and so were many fans. So was Toho, the owner of the Godzilla franchise that they revived their Godzilla in “Godzilla: 2000.”

Mothra

Thanks to the magic of CGI, Mothra’s look was updated into a more believable gigantic insect. The same goes for the monster Rodan. His new look is fantastic. I’ve always been annoyed with his body structure in the earlier films. You do have to accommodate a human in a body suit resulting in a weird human-looking bird. Now Rodan definitely looks like a prehistoric giant bird with flaming wings. He looks definitely menacing. Then finally there’s King Ghidrah or King Ghidorah. He’s a fan favorite in the old Godzilla films because he looks really cool. Much like how Boba Fett became a fan favorite in Star Wars simply because of his looks. There’s really not much to go on with Boba Fett’s character in “Empire Strikes Back” and “Return of the Jedi.” How Ghidorah was handled in this film was amazing. His moves were more natural than the random motions he has as a man-in-suit. 

Roots

While some fans have questioned whether or not this film were true to its Japanese roots, CGI would be used sparingly, and every monster would be featured as a combination of costumes, animatronics and other practical effects. But even Toho has gradually been moving from practical effects to CGI as we’ve seen in “Shin Godzilla” or “Godzilla: Resurgence.” The fights between the monsters were amazing. Speaking of fights, there are still the dark visuals though. What is it with Hollywood having to make everything dark? At least they’re not as dark as with the previous film. We get to see what’s going on this time.

Complaints

One of the biggest irritations about “Godzilla: 2014” was that there was less monster action and more human drama and BS. Legendary listened and went all out in this film. There is definitely more monster action in this film. There are more Godzilla appearances, more monster battles onscreen instead of fades to black and shifts to TV screen BS. There is still human drama but less than the first film. You might say it’s logical because there are more monsters in the film but I feel that “Godzilla: King of the Monsters” is more balanced.

The Score

The music in Godzilla is as iconic as the character and I am really happy that they used the Godzilla themes in this film. The theme goes well with the character and it really defines him. Something was missing in the 2014 film and it was the theme. It’s inclusion got me as excited as I was with the scoring of “Avengers: Endgame.” Bringing back the Godzilla theme in this film was one of the few saving graces.

Adaptations need to include iconic elements from the source material and there are many in this film. If you’re a Godzilla fan, you’d see these right away such as Doctor Serizawa himself, Doctor Chen and her sister, the Hollow Earth theory, and a certain powerful device (can’t spoil it yet). Then there’s the weird, quirky human plot. What’s a Godzilla film without it?

Main Cast: Vera Farmiga, Ken Watanabe, Sally Hawkins, Kyle Chandler, Millie Bobby Brown, Bradley Whitford

Director: Michael Dougherty

Written by: Michael Dougherty, Zack Shields

Studio: Warner Bros. Pictures

Conclusion

Overall, I wasn’t expecting much after hearing from some of the workers on the film not to get my hopes up. I usually avoid checking out early reviews on films, but I was curious. Surprisingly, it’s is a great improvement over “Godzilla 2014” and “Kong: Skull Island.” “Kong: Skull Island” itself was a good follow-up to “Godzilla 2014,” and I have to say that Brie Larson was much better in that than she was in “Captain Marvel.” I’ve always liked Larson since “The United States of Tara,” so it’s great to find another her continuing to grow.

The cost of fitness app development

To be healthy and fit is one of the most popular trends nowadays. The high demand stimulated the fast growth of the market that provides healthcare and fitness services. Startups projects offer a wide range of different fitness applications including workout apps, healthy eating programs, and fitness activity tracking apps. To launch your own fitness app and win the hearts of your target audience, you need to implement the key fitness app features such as steps counters, workout programs, diet plans, social media integration and more. But how much does it cost to add all this functionality to your app’s tech stack?

If you are a startup company, most likely that you are looking for a way to build a viable fitness app at a minimum cost. In this case, you should consider the following steps while planning your development budget.

Conduct market research

First, you have to conduct thorough research of the current market. Analyze the products of your future competitors and find out what unique solutions one can yet offer in order to make their mobile fitness service profitable. For this purpose, you can either perform self-dependent research or spend money on professional market research.

Build an MVP

The second step is to decide on features you would like your fitness app to have. The best option for a startup project is to create an MVP that will include the basic functionality, which you can expand later based on your users’ behavior.

App monetization

If you want to earn money with your app, think about ways how to monetize it from the start. You can choose among the standard types of monetization such as free app with ads, freemium or in-app purchases. For instance, freemium model will allow users to use your app for free. But if they want to try on special features they will have to pay.

Find the dedicated development team

To transform your business ideas into a working product, you need to find the team experienced in mobile app development. If you want to cut down expenses and yet build a user-friendly and competitive app, consider looking for an outsourcing development company from abroad.

If you need your fitness app to work on all devices, you should hire a development team that will build native apps for both iOS and Android platforms or to offer you a cross-platform solution.

Note that app development process also comprises such accompanying services as business analysis, quality assurance, and project management. Apart from that make sure to include costs on ongoing maintenance and yearly updates.

Include costs on UI/UX

Providing a user-friendly and appealing interface for your fitness app is also important. It’s better to forgo some advanced features but request a stylish design and ease navigation.

Promote your app

Once you launch your mobile fitness app on public app stores, make sure to promote your app. If you do not want to spend much money on advertising, use low-cost methods such as push notifications, social networks, special offers, and discounts.

Octavia Spencer talks ‘Ma,’ ORIT producing and bringing out the inner crazy

She might have built a career playing the supporting nurturing role, but Octavia Spencer got a chance to change all that with the over the top horror flick “Ma.” I’ll admit, it’s not a great horror movie, but Spencer truly keeps it together. Dare I say, she literally saves the film from the typical hackneyed Blumhouse treatment. Plus she kept the black person from getting killed in the first 15 minutes of the film. “Ma” opens on Friday in theaters.

A few of her intense ‘looks’ reminded me of her terrific co-star role on the tv show “Mom,” like when she went from smile to dead serious look. “Ma” is worth checking out just to see her obviously enjoying letting her inner crazy out. It’s like she was able to take Minny Jackson from “The Help” out on a rager.

octavia spencer ma drugged kids with adult movie

It’s easy to think of her as that woman we love to see in those roles, but truth be told, Octavia Spencer is a movie star. She has been for almost a decade since audiences and Oscar voters fell in love with her as Minnie in “The Help.” Since then she’s gotten two more supporting actress Oscar nominations, one of which was for a film that became another “surprise” blockbuster (“Hidden Figures”), ramped up her production company, acted consistently in film and television and written children’s books. She even executive produced this year’s best picture winner, “Green Book.”

But there was one thing she hadn’t yet done in her nearly 25 years in the business: Starred in her own film. She’d been a lead before, but she’d never been first on the call sheet. Until now.

The film that righted that wrong is “Ma,” a Blumhouse horror movie in which she plays a small town woman who buys beer for some local high school students and lets them party in her basement, before things take a sinister turn. It opens nationwide this weekend, and it’s unlike anything audiences have seen Spencer do before.

Spencer says her pre-established affinity for serial killer-themed material (Forensic Files, in particular) “decompresses my mind — I need to know if I can figure out who the killer is!” But, performing Sue Ann’s horrifying acts in Ma (like sewing a girl’s mouth shut, applying a scalding iron to a young man’s stomach, and running an unsuspecting woman over with a pickup truck) required a much deeper dig into malevolent psychology.

“There are only a couple of archetypes people are comfortable seeing me in. And for me, it’s like, you know you might only be comfortable seeing me this way, but there are so many colors in this crayon box,” Spencer, 47, said. “I want to play everything that you don’t think I can do.”

She’d found herself, despite all the success, being considered for only “nurturer” or “sage” roles. She wanted to stretch beyond that ‘supporting’ character.

The only reason “Ma” came to her was Tate Taylor, who wrote and directed “The Help,” but also has been Spencer’s friend since they were production assistants together on “A Time to Kill” in 1995, dreaming about a move to Los Angeles and a career in movies.

The script Taylor saw was written for a white woman, but he thought of Spencer nonetheless.

“She had expressed to me she was frustrated,” Taylor said. “She’s grateful for her career but she was being offered the same thing and never the lead. Women of color just don’t get the lead unless they’re a slave or a maid.”

So he called his former roommate (they lived together in a mid-city Los Angeles duplex for seven years), and proposed this semi-deranged film that would be a departure for both of them.

“I said, ‘Well, usually black people get killed in the first 15 minutes of a horror film,’” Spencer said. “And he said, ‘Not only do you not die within the first 15 minutes, but you actually do all the killing.’ I thought, ‘Well, okay, sign me up. I’m interested.’”

The script needed some work, though. Ma didn’t really have a motivation, she was just crazy, and Taylor changed that.

“The things that he changed weren’t based on race,” Spencer said. “It was just giving her a backstory, to give her a reason, in her mind, as to why she takes such a dark turn.”

“She’s a normal person when you first meet her, but underneath there’s a loneliness and sadness that I empathized with as a human,” Spencer says of the character, though she quickly closes the case on this killer: “If you don’t walk out of this movie feeling extremely disturbed…”

Spencer admits that she a ‘full-on blast’ making the movie and just bringing out the inner crazy.

“It was like, let your hair down and go crazy,” she says. “But the things I had to do as a character… there would be something seriously wrong with me if I found any pleasure!”

But ask Spencer what her dream role is and the answer might surprise you.

“I always say, the part of producer,” she said. “Not only do I get to create opportunities for myself but for other people. I still live by that. And if there is something that I’m dying to do, if it’s not written, as a producer, I have an option now to create it for myself.”

She’d been optioning books going back to her time on “The Help,” but her first executive producing credit actually came about by accident when Ryan Coogler’s “Fruitvale Station” lost $150,000 of its $900,000 budget.

“I put in some money and then I started making some calls to people… I don’t even know that I had the resources. I just knew that it was important for me to do,” Spencer said. “We were not going to let it die on the vine, and I had just worked with people who I knew had the resources and so I called.”

She got some nos, but those people regretted it and have since kept bugging her for whatever else she’s got.

“I say, I’m not going to call you unless I need you again and you know when I make that call it’ll be something worthy of your time,” Spencer said with a smile.

She’s got a lot on her plate right now. She’s jet-lagged, for one, having just gotten off a plane from London where she’s filming the remake of “The Witches.” She’s also teamed up with LeBron James to produce and star in a Netflix series about entrepreneur Madam C.J. Walker, as well as an AppleTV+ crime drama “Truth Be Told.”

Her company, ORIT Entertainment, doesn’t really have a mission statement (“I know people are supposed to have them,” she laughed) but she knows what she’s looking for.

“The truth is that I want to tell stories that allow for escapism. I want to tell stories that educate, that entertain, that hopefully inspire,” she said. “There are people going through a lot of things and that two hours in the movie theater should be some type of enjoyment.”

The name ORIT actually harkens back to a time when people didn’t know her name. It was her first day as an intern in casting director Francine Maisler’s office and she kept hearing Maisler call “Orit! Orit!”

“I was just sitting by the phone and finally mid-day one of the assistants in the office says, ‘I think you’re Orit,’” Spencer said.

She said loves Maisler, by the way, who was embarrassed about the “Devil Wears Prada” moment. And “Orit” kind of became her alter-ego. Besides, Spencer is worlds away from that time of anonymity now.

“At this point in my life, I will be heard,” she said.

Arkansas newspaper drops print for iPad edition in fight to stay alive

As more print media goes under, fighting to stay alive requires changing with the times and the Arkansas Democrat-Gazette is choosing to make that change. Rather than lose money on their print edition, the publication is offering iPads with their customer’s subscriptions, and it’s working, so far.

Even online news sites are struggling as Google has strangled display ads so that news divisions at places like BuzzFeed and Vice are getting slashed. Sponsored content seemed to be a life raft for some, but now companies like Blog Meets Brand aren’t able to pay their writers if the client doesn’t pay them on time. BMB used to pay writers whether the client was late or not, but now they’ve stopped that policy showing that the sponsored content life raft is a short term solution until web publishers discover a whole new model. We’ve heard from several people who left them for Izea which has become the official monopoly when it comes to sponsored content. As Izea has bought up many companies working as intermediaries for social media influencers, prices continue dropping on what can be made.

eBay even tried the social media influencer route with content writers for four years, but that ended abruptly in 2017 as they tried another tactic that insiders have said is failing even worse. As rates have fallen for sponsored content due to a plethora of web sites and social media influencers, it’s a buyers market. Three years ago getting $5 thousand for a 600-word article was a common thing, now that price has dropped to $300 – $500.

Thus, it’s now a change or die world in the news publishing world.

Changing With The Digital Age

Over a lunch of hamburger steaks, mashed potatoes and green beans, Walter Hussman delivered his pitch to the dozen or so attendees of the Hope, Arkansas, Rotary Club meeting. He promised that if they keep paying their current rate of $36 a month for subscription to the Arkansas Democrat-Gazette newspaper, even though it will no longer be printed daily or delivered to their door, they’ll get a free iPad to view a digital version.

The daily digital replica of the state’s largest newspaper will be accessed with an easy-to-use app they can download on the tablet that the newspaper is distributing to subscribers.

Hussman, the newspaper’s publisher, said Wednesday that by the end of the year, only the Sunday edition of the paper will be printed.

It’s a gamble Hussman feels compelled to take to sustain his newsroom of 106 employees and turn a profit, which the paper hasn’t done since 2017.

arkansas democrat gazette goes ipad of print edition 2019

In March 2018, the paper began the experiment in Blytheville, a town of about 14,000 in the northeast corner of the state 155 miles (249 kilometers) from Little Rock, where the paper publishes. Each of the paper’s 200 subscribers was offered the iPad at the current print delivery rate, plus a personal training session to explain how to use the tablet, and print delivery stopped about two months later.

More than 70% of the Blytheville subscribers converted to the digital version, a figure that, if replicated statewide, is enough for the paper to turn a profit, which Hussman expects will be in 2020. Including distribution of the Northwest Arkansas Democrat-Gazette, which is not converting to iPad, the paper’s daily circulation was about 80,000 before the transition, said Larry Graham, vice president of circulation.

Hussman has said he’s willing to spend $12 million on the tablets, or about 36,400 iPads, which retail for $329. At the current lowest subscription rate of $34 a month, that would generate about $14.8 million in revenue per year, which Hussman said would turn a profit after expenses.

Rick Edmonds, media business analyst at Poynter, said two publications have tried similar experiments. In 2011, the Philadelphia Inquirer sold Android tablets for $100 if users signed up for a two-year, $9.99 monthly subscription, a program which Edmonds said was “very unsuccessful.” In 2013, the Montreal-based La Presse launched a free tablet app and discontinued daily printed editions three years later, though they’ve since become a non-profit.

To sell the Democrat-Gazette’s plan, Hussman is traveling the state speaking to civic clubs. He explains how advertising revenue for newspapers has dropped precipitously since its peak in 2006, and how digital advertising isn’t as profitable as media outlets originally predicted.

After the Rotary meeting, 65-year-old Steve Harris, a subscriber since the early 1980s, said he’s been using his iPad for about a month. There are “pros and cons” to the iPad, but he likes the photo galleries available on the digital replica, as well as its ease of access when he’s traveling.

But Bill Loe, 87, said he doesn’t know if he’ll keep subscribing.

“I’m not sure. If I can run that gadget, I will,” he said.

In Hussman’s experience, skepticism is the initial reaction from subscribers of the newspaper, who tend to skew older, but eventually, most tell him they prefer it to print.

The digital replica looks just like the printed paper and is intuitive to navigate within the app. Clicking on the jump takes the user to the continuing story. The text can be enlarged. All pictures are in color; some also reveal videos.

This isn’t Hussman’s first controversial move to keep his newspaper profitable. In the mid-2000s, he thought papers publishing online content for free was short-sighted and the Democrat-Gazette’s website established a paywall earlier than most media organizations.

The tablets are essentially a long-term loan and subscribers keep them for as long as they pay for the paper. They’re also responsible for repairing or replacing the tablets, which come with Apple’s one-year warranty. Hussman said the newspaper doesn’t monitor usage or track users in any way. When it’s returned, it’s wiped clean and can be re-distributed.

Hussman isn’t sure whether the digital replica will appeal to younger generations, but enough people are converting for now.

Penny Muse Abernathy, who teaches digital media economics and behavior at University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, said whether people will continue to pay depends on what the reader experience is like and if the news is still vital to readers.

“I think it’s a very smart move. It’s a very farsighted one,” she said.

The Arkansas Democrat-Gazette, which turns 200 this year, won two Pulitzers in 1958 as the Gazette before two papers merged, for its coverage of the integration of Little Rock’s Central High School.

“I wish we didn’t have to do this,” Hussman said of scrapping print, but to sell the newspaper would be a “dereliction of our responsibility.”

Cutting print delivery hasn’t disappointed everyone, though. Dolly Henley, 61, decided to subscribe at the Rotary Club meeting. She and her husband haven’t had the Democrat-Gazette delivered to their home in the 25 years they’ve lived in the tiny town of Washington, Arkansas. Now, with the digital replica accessible by iPad, she’s excited to get daily “delivery” again.

“Getting it to the digital world is just where it’s at right now,” she said. “Change is good.”

China raises stakes in US trade war dangling Beijing plus Nancy Pelosi hits Facebook

Donald Trump keeps stating that the U.S. – China trade war is going to take awhile, but China wants to shorten things up. They’re using Beijing as a threat to electric cars and mobile phone technology. We’re seeing a steady slide as the stock market is on track for its first monthly loss of 2019.

Currently, investors are dropping health care, tech, and most high-risk stocks for the safety of bonds. The market is on track for its fourth consecutive weekly loss and firstly monthly drop. China knows that Trump lives and dies by the stock market so they are wisely going after things that can keep it in a perpetual downfall.

Facing new trade sanctions and a U.S. clampdown on its top telecommunications company, China issued a pointed reminder Wednesday that it has yet to unleash all its weapons in its trade war with the Trump administration.

Chinese state media warned that Beijing could cut America off from exotic minerals that are widely used in electric cars and mobile phones. The threat to use China’s rich supply of so-called rare earths as leverage in the conflict has contributed to sharp losses in U.S. stocks and sliding long-term bond yields.

For months, the world’s two biggest economies have been locked in a standoff over allegations that China deploys predatory tactics — including stealing trade secrets and forcing foreign companies to hand over technology — in a drive to supplant U.S. technological dominance.

The Trump administration has imposed 25% tariffs on $250 billion in Chinese imports and is planning to tax the $300 billion in imports that have so far been spared. And it escalated the stakes this month by putting the Chinese telecom giant Huawei on a blacklist that effectively bars U.S. companies from supplying it with computer chips, software and other components without government approval.

The U.S. claims Huawei is legally beholden to China’s ruling Communist Party, which could order it to spy on their behalf. Washington has offered no evidence that the Huawei has done that, however.

Huawei is trying to beat back one punitive U.S. measure in federal court. In a motion filed late Tuesday in eastern Texas, the company argued that a 2018 law that bars it from selling telecom gear to U.S. government agencies and contractors should be struck down as unconstitutional. The move for summary judgment in a case filed against the U.S. government in March says the law violates a constitutional prohibition against “trial by legislature” of individual entities. Congress thus acted unconstitutionally when it “adjudicated Huawei’s guilt and blacklisted it,” the motion argues.

An attorney representing Huawei in the U.S. case, Glen Nager of Jones Day, asserts that Congress alone cannot constitutionally impose punishment on an individual company — which the punitive law does in singling out Huawei by name.

The law “is intended to drive Huawei out of the U.S. — i.e., to banish it,” Nager argued. It “stigmatizes Huawei as a tool of the Chinese government” with no right to a fair hearing, he added.

Steven Schwinn, a professor at John Marshall Law School in Chicago, suggested that Huawei’s arguments fall short constitutionally, and “given that this relates to national security, we can expect the courts to be fairly deferential to the government.”

The nationalistic Chinese newspaper Global Times warned that China has plenty of ways to retaliate against the United States, including the threat of cutting off supplies of rare earths. China last year produced 78% of the world’s rare earths, according to researchers at Bank of America Merrill Lynch.

If the U.S. fails to exercise restraint, it will see that “China is far from running out of cards, and we have the will and determination to fight the U.S. to the end,” the paper’s editorial said. An official of China’s top economic planning agency did not rule out using rare earths as a countermeasure against “the U.S.’s unwarranted suppression.”

President Xi Jinping visited rare earth-related businesses in southeastern Jiangxi province earlier this month. He called rare earths “an important strategic resource” while stressing the importance of owning independent core technologies, the state-run China Daily reported.

China has used rare earths as a cudgel before. Five years ago, the World Trade Organization slapped down China’s attempt to restrict the export of rare earths, rejecting its claim that it just wanted to protect the environment and conserve supplies. Instead, the move appeared to be aimed at hurting Japan with which Beijing was having a diplomatic tiff.

Scott Kennedy, director of the project on the Chinese economy at the Center for Strategic and International Studies, said the Chinese might benefit even less if they try to weaponize rare earths again.

“It’s not the threat that it was … when the Chinese threatened to cut off the Japanese,” he said.

First, users of rare earths have stockpiled the minerals for a “rainy day.” Second, they also have figured out how to “use less rare earth to achieve the same results” in such products as lasers and magnets. And third, different minerals and chemicals are increasingly being used as rare earth substitutes.

Kennedy predicts that once investors have “realized the threat wasn’t as dire, markets would bounce back.”

Still, he isn’t optimistic about the U.S.-China trade negotiations, which broke off May 10 after an 11th round of talks failed to produce an agreement. U.S. officials accused the Chinese of reneging on agreements they’d made in earlier rounds.

“The Chinese first are going to have to signal they will talk,” he said. Then they will have to go back to where they stood before they backpedaled on earlier concessions. “I don’t see any body language from the Chinese that they’re about to do that,” Kennedy said.

nancy pelosi strikes back at facebook leaving slur video

Nancy Pelosi Hits Back On Facebook

House Speaker Nancy Pelosi is slamming Facebook for not removing a doctored video that has spread widely on the social network in which she appears to slur her words.

The altered video had been slowed down, giving the false appearance that Pelosi was drunk, ill or otherwise impaired. Facebook did not respond to messages seeking comment Wednesday.

In an interview last week with CNN’s Anderson Cooper, Facebook executive Monika Bickert defended the company’s decision, noting that users are being told that the video is false when they view or share it.

Pelosi says she is no longer giving Facebook the benefit of doubt that it is “unwittingly” spreading false information. She said in San Francisco Wednesday that Facebook is serving an accomplice and enabler of “false information.”