Home Blog Page 84

Movavi Video Editor 14 keeps movie making budgets low without losing quality

Editing films has become a much easier process thanks to the multitude of movie editor software out there, but not all are created equally. While it might seem smart to buy a cheap one and hope for the best, you wind up paying much more money in the end. Movie editor software ranges in price and quality, but you do get what you pay for. You can go pie in the sky with Adobe but luckily for all you filmmakers and up and coming filmmakers, there’s Movavi Video Editor 14 (plus so much more in their software suite) that will give you the most bang for your buck.

We create a huge amount of videos here at Movie TV Tech Geeks since we also have a full production house so finding the perfect movie editing software is of utmost importance. Also finding one with an easy learning curve for our interns is a must as some of the high-end software require taking a special class which only adds more to their cost.

What Is Movavi Video Editor 14?

Movavi is a very simple to use movie editor targeted for both the most casual to advanced editors. We’ve actually tested it for professional projects, and the results were shockingly good. For a software that is under $80, you wouldn’t expect to get so much but with Movavi Video Editor 14, it delivers more than you can imagine.

We actually tested it on one of our award winning documentaries to see how it compared with ease of use, and we actually could have used it if Movavi had been around at that time. That says a lot as we expect a lot from our editing software. We were able to quickly import video from our Panasonic HC-X1000 4K Ultra HD 60p/50p Professional Camcorder, 20x Optical Zoom with no probem. We also worked with a few of our Sony video cameras in the production studio with no issues.

movie movie editor feature plus

Video Editor 14 is extremely easy to use with a very intuitive design. We had three of our new interns test it out who had absolutely no experience with it to see how they fared. Their claim of a short learning curve with only 20 minutes to master was found to be wrong. It only took on average 15 minutes for all 3 of the interns to grasp how it worked and were creating new YouTube videos in minutes. That’s how impressive it is.

movavi video editor lack of clutter

User Interface

The lack of clutter was a great relief as many film editing software loves to show everything it has making it feel more overwhelming. Things are spaced out and put where you would naturally assume them to be and adding files is simple with either a drag and drop style or the “Add Media Files” option to add the media timeline. If you have a large group of clips Movavi will line them up as you drop them saving you a few steps.

The timeline is quite simple to use and you are able to shrink it or blow it up with a simple slider. Users of Final Cut Pro will be reminded of that timeline for its intuitive nature. As you can see in the above image, you can remove an audio track or just mute it and add another one if needed.

more movavi video edtior features

Features

A great feature is being able to record your audio directly into the timeline rather than having to final an audio software to record, fine tune and then add to this one. Movavi takes all the work out and keeps things simple and easy for users on any editing level. It also makes creators of video tutorials pump them out super fast.

Another huge plus is being able to change the video resolution (including 4K) and frame rate in your project settings. Oftentimes, you can spend so much time searching for this, but in Movavi it’s just a couple clicks and changes are made. You won’t have to go through and adjust each and every clip when you do this. Whatever is on your timeline will be changed so if you’ve shot clips at differing frame rates, this will adjust everything for you automatically. If you love transitions, you’re going to love the ton of them in Movavi along with all of their effects.

Montage Wizard

For the person who takes a ton of videos on vacation, Movavi Video Editor 14 has a Montage Wizard which will take all the work out of it for you by editing the footage to create an instant movie. You can the choose what music to go with it. Now that’s a nice change of having to go through all the vids to find those perfect moments.

One last big plus that along with video tutorials, Movavi has included step-by-step guides for any questions you might have. This is huge as sometimes I like the step-by-step process rather than having to pause and go back in a video.

movavi video editor vs 14 plus

Overall Impressions

Having used so many video editor softwares, we’ve gotten used to overblown claims so it’s been a great surprise that Movavi Video Editor 14 lives up to all of their claims and goes beyond our own high expectations.

Diversity rules box office with ‘Crazy Rich Asians’ pushing ‘Meg’ down

With a slow building but strong marketing buzz, “Crazy Rich Asians” pushed last week’s box office ruler “The Meg” down one spot. Stellar reviews helped power the rare Hollywood film led by Asian stars. This was the first Hollywood studio film to feature an all-Asian cast in 25 years with the last one being Disney’s “Joy Luck Club” in 1993.

So it’s no surprise that “Crazy Rich Asians” is being seen a big moment by Asian-Americans much like how African-Americans felt with the release of Marvel’s “Black Panther” in February.

Glitz won over guns as the gilded romance “Crazy Rich Asians” debuted at No. 1 in North American theaters this weekend, surpassing industry expectations and beating out action-packed fare like “Mile 22.”

Warner Bros. estimates that the film earned $25.2 million over the weekend and $34 million since its opening Wednesday. It’s a surefire win for the film, which cost $30 million to produce and went into the weekend with months of buzz and a 93 percent “fresh” rating on Rotten Tomatoes.

It was the best result for a PG-13 romantic comedy in six years — since “Think Like a Man,” which featured an all-black primary cast and collected $33 million over its first three days. Among all nonsequel comedies, “Crazy Rich Asians” (Warner Bros.) posted the biggest turnout since the R-rated “Girls Trip,” which was released last summer and focused on four black women, a rarity.

“This shows — once again, with emphasis — that true diversity matters,” Brad Simpson, a “Crazy Rich Asians” producer, wrote in an email on Sunday. “Audiences are tired of seeing the same stories with the same characters. And we have to give people a reason to get off their couch or devices. We have to give them something different.”

Breakout star Henry Golding told media outlets on Sunday that the film’s performance is a “testament to the people who are turning up.”

“It’s not just the Asians who are coming. It’s people of all colors from all walks of life who are enjoying this cinematic experience,” Golding said. “It’s a real shift in Hollywood.”

Adapted from Kevin Kwan’s best-seller, “Crazy Rich Asians” stars Constance Wu as an American woman who gets a culture shock meeting her boyfriend’s obscenely wealthy family in Singapore. The studio strategically bumped up the film’s opening to a Wednesday earlier in the summer.

About 38 percent of ticket buyers for “Crazy Rich Asians” were Asian, according to Jeff Goldstein, Warner’s president of domestic distribution. Asian moviegoers typically make up less than 10 percent of the opening-weekend audience for a film. About 68 percent of the audience was female.

“We knew we’d get avids who read the book and a large Asian following,” Goldstein. “We figured OK, we get good reviews, open on Wednesday, word of mouth will spread and really propel the movie into the weekend, and that’s exactly what happened.”

As recently as July 26, box office experts were predicting that the film would open to at least $18 million over its first five days, but no one expected a launch of over $30 million.

“I think the audience isn’t an obvious audience,” Goldstein said. “When you get a culturally important event like this movie, I think it just takes off like wildfire.”

The stakes were high for the first studio-produced movie led by Asian-Americans in 25 years. The filmmakers even turned down a big offer from Netflix to give the historically significant film a theatrical platform. Cast members and fans started using the hashtag #GoldOpen to try to encourage more opening weekend support.

The movie business has changed dramatically in the last decade, however, making the turnout for “Crazy Rich Asians” all the more impressive. As living room entertainment services like Netflix and Amazon have grown in popularity, filling seats in theaters has become much harder. To compete, studios have moved to the extremes: horror movies made on shoestring budgets, and lavishly expensive franchise films aimed at the broadest possible audience.

In turn, studios have largely abandoned mid-market movies like romantic comedies and uplifting sports dramas.

Netflix almost beat out Warner Bros. for the film rights to “Crazy Rich Asians,” which was directed by Jon M. Chu and based on Kevin Kwan’s best-selling book. But Mr. Chu and Mr. Kwan decided at the final minute to forego the Netflix offer, which included generous upfront payments and the guarantee of a “Crazy Rich Asians” trilogy. The men decided that it was important for their film be seen on big screens and backed by a thundering studio marketing campaign.

Director Jon M. Chu tweeted his appreciation Sunday and asked audiences to keep spreading the word.

“We still have a long run to go, but our message to the world has been heard. We have arrived,” Chu wrote. “Now let’s go tell more of our stories! We have a lot more to say. And I don’t want to wait another 25 years to see them. This is only the beginning.”

Despite the success of “Crazy Rich Asians,” other films still found audiences this weekend, including Warner Bros. shark movie “The Meg,” which fell only 53 percent in its second weekend, adding $21.2 million. The Jason Statham-led film has now grossed over $300 million worldwide.

Mark Wahlberg’s action-packed “Mile 22,” his fourth collaboration with director Peter Berg, debuted in third place with an estimated $13.6 million. The STX film had a $35 million production budget.

Launching with $10.5 million, “Alpha,” an Ice Age-set adventure tale, tied for fourth place in its opening weekend with “Mission: Impossible — Fallout.”

In limited release, Sony Pictures Classics’ “The Wife” opened with $111,137, and Roadside Attractions’ “Juliet, Naked” debuted with $60,922. Both films opened in four theaters.

One film that did not find much of an audience was Kevin Spacey’s “Billionaire Boys Club,” which Vertical Entertainment released in ten theaters this weekend after making it available for purchase on Video on Demand last month.

This was a not surprising humiliating result that cements Mr. Spacey’s status as a Hollywood pariah. Last year, more than a dozen men accused Mr. Spacey of sexually harassing, groping or assaulting them; he denied some of the accusations against him while also saying he would seek unspecified “treatment.”

Official earnings were not reported to comScore, but industry trade publication The Hollywood Reporter said Sunday that the film earned a dismal $425.

“Billionaire Boys Club,” which was already available as a video-on-demand release, is about affluent high school boys in Los Angeles who get involved in a Ponzi scheme. Filming was completed before accusations against Mr. Spacey surfaced in October. The film’s distributor, Vertical Entertainment, justified the release by saying the rest of the cast should not be penalized.

Hollywood’s winning streak continues with the summer season up 12.4 percent from last year and the year overall up 8.9 percent.

“The box office is on a roll,” said comScore senior media analyst Paul Dergarabedian, noting the diverse genre offerings in cinemas this summer. “The line-up basically looks like a streaming service. That’s what people have become accustomed to, and the movie theater is delivering it in a big way this summer.”

Estimated ticket sales for Friday through Sunday at U.S. and Canadian theaters, according to comScore. Where available, the latest international numbers for Friday through Sunday are also included. Final domestic figures will be released Monday.

Crazy Rich Asians’ Paces Strong ($30M+ 5-Day); ‘The Meg’ Adds $20M+; ‘Mile 22’ Modest ($14M+); ‘Alpha’ Eyes $9M+
  1. “Crazy Rich Asians,” $25.2 million ($730,000 international).

2. “The Meg,” $21.2 million ($67 million international).

3. “Mile 22,” $13.6 million ($538,000 international).

4. “Alpha,” $10.5 million.

4. (tie) “Mission: Impossible — Fallout,” $10.5 million ($20.5 million international).

5. “Christopher Robin,” $8.9 million ($7.9 million international).

6. “BlacKkKlansman,” $7 million ($1.2 million international).

7. “Slender Man,” $5 million.

8. “Hotel Transylvania 3,” $3.7 million ($28.3 million international).

9. “Mamma Mia! Here We Go Again,” $3.4 million ($15.3 million international).

Estimated ticket sales for Friday through Sunday at international theaters (excluding the U.S. and Canada), according to comScore:

  1. “The Meg,” $67 million.
  2. “The Island,” $38.7 million.
  3. “Hotel Transylvania 3,” $28.3 million.
  4. “Mission: Impossible — Fallout,” $20.5 million.
  5. “Europe Raiders,” $19.5 million.
  6. “Go Brother!,” $17.7 million.
  7. “The Equalizer 2,” $17.5 million.
  8. “Mamma Mia! Here We Go Again,” $15.3 million.
  9. “Oolong Courtyard: Kung Fu School,” $14.8 million.
  10. “Incredibles 2,” $8.9 million.

Top 5 Shows that Could Use a Netflix Reboot

The great thing about Netflix is that it’s not afraid to experiment with old and new concepts. Besides, the company needs all the ideas and original content it can get especially with its providers threatening to pull out content or increasing licensing fees.

I’ve been watching the Voltron reboot for a while now, and the show has been pretty stellar. No longer is it the one-dimensional super robot show it used to be in the 80s. Well, it was simple-minded and sometimes horrific fun that quite dated by now. And then there’s the upcoming She-Ra reboot. Does that mean He-Man is in the works? But there are other cool shows that Netflix can take into its stable which they can reboot. These include:

Captain Power and the Soldiers of the Future netflix reboot
Captain Power and the Soldiers of the Future

Captain Power and the Soldiers of the Future

Before the internet boom and social media frenzy, there was of course the personal and home computer revolution. Computers are just starting to become popular in American homes when the revolutionary TV show Captain Power and the Soldiers of the Future aired. Everything back then was about computers and video games. Captain Power was about a dystopian future where computers and machines have taken over the Earth much like in the Terminator franchise.

It was actually revolutionary in many ways. Before Power Rangers, Captain Power and the Soldiers of the Future was the first (correct me if I’m wrong) live-action transforming team. The show was expensive to produce because of widespread usage of computer generated effects for its Bio-dreads and those seizure inducing flashing chests of the enemy’s robotic soldiers. And lastly, its toys interacted with the TV screen. Why would it make a great reboot? Because if written properly, the show discusses the seemingly chaotic concept of freedom versus the extreme socialist concept of total order should the world be ruled by an artificial intelligence. Besides, with today’s technology, Sauron, Blastaar and Lord Dread should look badass. The toys were cool too. Netflix could capitalize on that.

reboot show heading to netflix
Reboot

Reboot

What would happen if you took Wreck-It-Ralph a byte more seriously? We get Reboot. If during Captain Power, computers were just starting to take American over homes, Reboot was aired when computers have become part of everyday lives thanks to multimedia technology and a fledgling internet. SO we get a CGI show about computers and the stuff that’s happening in them. For those not in the know, Reboot is set in a computer known as Mainframe. The characters are personified apps, viruses, game sprites and even individual binary signals. The main character is a guardian program named Bob, which in the modern sense, is a personified anti-malware program that protects Mainframe against viruses and damaging games that the ‘user’ loads into Mainframe.

The story by now is quite dated but can be updated and remastered for the modern audience making use of modern computer concepts including the internet just as well as Wreck-It-Ralph 2 has the potential to do. Let’s just hope it doesn’t turn into an Emoji movie. It actually was updated in the re-conceptualized iReboot: The Guardian Code that started airing last March 2018 (also on Netflix), but the response was overwhelmingly negative as it strayed very far from the original. Reboot could use a proper reboot. Just like Michael Bay’s Transformers. There’s no need for stinking humans. Reboot: The Guardian Code is actually more similar to the Superhuman Samurai Cyber Squad which could use its own reboot, or even a film because Power Rangers this, Power Rangers that. It’s time for someone else.

Roughnecks Starship Troopers Chronicles netflix reboot
Roughnecks Starship Troopers Chronicles

Roughnecks: Starship Troopers Chronicles

Now, this show actually doesn’t need a reboot. More like a remastered version and a continuation of its last arc. The success of Paul Verhoeven’s film spawned this excellent series which expanded on the film that took us to other planets other than Klendathu. The CG was amazing for the time, and the stories and character development were top notch. It’s a shame the series ended in a cliffhanger and wasn’t given a proper ending. Netflix can either re-master or re-do the CG and properly end the show or expand on it. The cheapest they can probably do is just bring the show back and commission a hi-res two-hour special to finish the Homefront campaign.

Jayce and the Wheeled Warriors netflix reboot
Jayce and the Wheeled Warriors

Jayce and the Wheeled Warriors

Jayce and the Wheeled Warriors has probably the best musical intro in cartoon history. Its concept, story, and characters are cool too but not handled as well as they should be. The toys didn’t do so well either, but they looked awesome. Just like Voltron: Legendary Defender, Netflix could probably do a better job in the story and animation department. But please, keep the intro.

Jayce and the Wheeled Warriors is about a young man travelling the Galaxy with his friends, in search for his father on a quest to bring together pieces of a magic root, to end the tyranny of evil sentient plants called Monster Minds who transform into menacing vehicles. No, I’m not crazy. Someone else could probably do a better synopsis, but that’s the concept.

Inhumanoids netflix reboot show
Inhumanoids

Inhumanoids

Inhumanoids is one of the more unique animated offerings during the late 80s. It’s something you’d never think studios could get away with. Inhumanoids is a short-lived series that came from the same people that gave us GI Joe and Transformers, but gave us concepts and scenes that continue to make it memorable for 80s kids. Who could forget a beautiful animated woman transforming into a grotesque fifty-foot undead zombie? We’re getting ahead of ourselves.

Inhumanoids is about a small group of gigantic primal creatures that formerly ruled the Earth and have made a comeback. It’s up to four muscle-bound scientists to stop them. The show lasted for only one season but was enough to give young kids nightmares. The show was created to sell toys like most 80s fare but with many features today being story driven, the concepts in Inhumanoids are tales worth telling.

Donald Trump’s reality showdown with Omarosa just getting started

Put two expert reality star titans into a clash with the White House, and two things are guaranteed. One will a book will have a bestseller and the media will be all over it as former White House advisor Omarosa Manigault Newman’s book Unhinged: An Insider’s Account of the Trump White House has hit and looks to get Donald Trump rather unhinged.

Rather than just remain quiet on the subject, Trump is showing his newest Twitter obsession is with Omarosa as he shot off 7 tweets attacking his former aide. Naturally, he used words like “dog,” “deranged, and “lowlife” which only pushes her book up the bestseller charts like Michael Wolff’s Fire and Fury. His reaction shows that there is something there with her book, and it’s scaring him as more people turn on him as run to Robert Mueller.

Trump has kicked his character assassination effort into high gear on Omarosa over the last 24 hours because he knows what she’s capable of — and how dangerous she can be. He knows this because he knows what he is capable of and how dangerous he can be. Omarosa — and her allegations — pose a threat to Trump even while a decent chunk of them have already been rebutted. And he knows it.

Omarosa is, in some ways, the greatest creation of the Trump reality TV era. She is just like him, which is why he understands her and knows the damage she is capable of inflicting. It’s an absolutely fascinating bit of psychodrama that would make for a terrific twist in a reality TV series.

Unfortunately for all of us, this isn’t “The Apprentice.” It’s real life.

donald trump whispering to omarosa

President Donald Trump and former aide Omarosa Manigault Newman faced off Monday in a messy clash that involved an explosive tell-all book, secret recordings, an ethnic slur and plenty of insults — reviving their roles as reality show boss and villain.

Late Monday, Trump tackled Manigault Newman’s claim that she had heard an audiotape of him using the N-word.

He tweeted that he had received a call from the producer of “The Apprentice” assuring him “there are NO TAPES of the Apprentice where I used such a terrible and disgusting word as attributed by Wacky and Deranged Omarosa.”

Trump insisted, “I don’t have that word in my vocabulary, and never have.” He said Manigault Newman had called him “a true Champion of Civil Rights” until she was fired.

Making matters somewhat worse was when White House press secretary Sarah Huckabee stated on Tuesday that she couldn’t guarantee that the people would never hear President Trump saying the n-word on audio.

Manigault Newman, the former White House liaison to black voters, writes in her new memoir that she’d heard such tapes existed. She said Sunday that she had listened to one after the book closed.

Earlier, Trump accused Manigault Newman as “wacky” and “not smart” after his former co-star revealed her recording of a phone conversation with the president.

Beyond their war of words, the row touched on several sensitive issues in Trump’s White House, including a lack of racial diversity among senior officials, security in the executive mansion, a culture that some there feel borders on paranoia and the extraordinary measures used to keep ex-employees quiet.

In an unusual admission, Trump acknowledged that the public sparring was perhaps beneath a person in his position, tweeting that he knew it was “not presidential” to take on “a lowlife like Omarosa.” But he added: “This is a modern day form of communication, and I know the Fake News Media will be working overtime to make even Wacky Omarosa look legitimate as possible. Sorry!”

The dispute has been building for days as Manigault Newman promotes her memoir “Unhinged,” which comes out officially Tuesday. The book paints a damning picture of Trump, including her claim that he used racial slurs on the set of his reality show “The Apprentice.”

In a series of interviews on NBC, Manigault Newman also revealed two audio recordings from her time at the White House, including portions of a recording of her firing by chief of staff John Kelly, which she says occurred in the high-security Situation Room, and a phone call with Trump after she was fired.

Manigault Newman says she has more recordings. Asked on MSNBC’s “Hardball” if special counsel Robert Mueller — investigating possible coordination between the Trump campaign and Russia — would be interested in any of them, she said, “If his office calls again, anything they want, I’ll share.”

Trump officials and a number of outside critics denounced the recordings as a serious breach of ethics and security — and White House aides worried about what else Manigault Newman may have captured in the West Wing.

The latest tape recording appears to show Trump expressing surprise about her firing, saying “nobody even told me about it.” But Manigault Newman said he “probably instructed General Kelly to do it.”

On Twitter, Trump declared Monday that she had been “fired for the last time,” a reference to her appearances on his reality TV show. He said Kelly had called her a “loser & nothing but problems,” but he himself had tried to save her job — because he liked her public comments about him.

“I told him to try working it out, if possible, because she only said GREAT things about me – until she got fired!” Trump tweeted.

Responding on NBC, Manigault Newman said, “I think it’s sad that with all the things that’s going on in the country that he would take time out to insult me and to insult my intelligence.”

She added, “This is his pattern with African-Americans.”

First lady Melania Trump, meanwhile, is disappointed that Manigault Newman “is lashing out and retaliating in such a self-serving way, especially after all the opportunities given to her by the President,” said White House spokeswoman Stephanie Grisham.

Manigault Newman’s exit does highlight the lack of diversity among Trump’s top aides. She was the highest-ranking African-American on the White House staff. She said on NBC that in her absence “they’re making decisions about us without us.”

Trump’s battle with his former top black aide underscores the racial tensions that have defined his presidency. He notably blamed “both sides” for violent clashes between white supremacists and counterprotesters in Charlottesville, Virginia, a year ago and has questioned the intelligence of other prominent black figures including California Rep. Maxine Waters, basketball star LeBron James and TV journalist Don Lemon. He also has targeted black NFL players for kneeling in social protest during the national anthem.

Manigault Newman also alleges that Trump allies tried to buy her silence after she left the White House, offering her $15,000 a month to accept a “senior position” on his 2020 re-election campaign along with a stringent nondisclosure agreement.

The offer a slew of new questions about the ways that White House aides are being offered safe landing spots after they leave. For example, Trump’s former personal aide John McEntee, who was removed from his job in April, went to the campaign.

Trump tweeted Monday that Manigault Newman has a “fully signed Non-Disclosure Agreement!”

It was not clear exactly what he was referring to. White House Counselor Kellyanne Conway said Sunday on ABC that there are “confidentiality agreements” in the West Wing. And Trump’s campaign said that in the 2016 race she “signed the exact same NDA that everyone else on the campaign signed, which is still enforceable.”

Meanwhile, Trump’s attorney, Rudy Giuliani, said on “Fox and Friends” Monday that Manigault Newman may have broken the law by recording private conversations inside the White House.

“She’s certainly violating national security regulations, which I think have the force of law,” Giuliani said.

But experts in national security and clearance law said that, while she seriously violated rules — and would likely be barred from ever being granted a security clearance — she probably didn’t break any law unless the conversations she recorded were classified.

“None of us have been able to identify that it would be illegal if unclassified,” said Mark Zaid, a Washington attorney, who has focused on national security law.

In the recording with Kelly, which Manigault Newman quotes extensively in her new book, Kelly can be heard saying that he wants to talk with her about leaving the White House.

“It’s come to my attention over the last few months that there’s been some pretty, in my opinion, significant integrity issues related to you,” Kelly is heard saying, before adding that if she makes it a “friendly departure” then she can “go on without any type of difficulty in the future relative to your reputation.”

Manigault Newman said she viewed the conversation as a “threat” and defended her decision to covertly record it and other White House conversations, saying otherwise “no one” would believe her.

She may not be finished talking.

Manigault Newman said, “There’s a lot of very corrupt things happening in the White House, and I am going to blow the whistle on a lot of them.”

Facebook, Instagram political ads still subverting US elections

When President Donald Trump refuses to secure the upcoming elections in November, it should come as no surprise that political ads attempting to subvert them are still cropping up. While Facebook, Instagram Google, and Twitter are trying to control them, things are only speeding up and getting smarter.

The latest efforts to disrupt the U.S. midterm elections through Facebook manipulation seem to be following a persuasion playbook refined by legitimate companies and organizations — but with a twist.

The aim of these possibly Russia-linked perpetrators appears to be to draw in as many people as possible with emotional appeals and then spur them to action. In this case, though, the action is public protest rather than affinity marketing, and the goal is to sow dissension rather than to build brand awareness.

“They’re almost functioning like social media editors, figuring out what the trending topics are in the U.S. and figuring out where they can insert themselves,” said Jennifer Grygiel, a communications professor at Syracuse University.

The idea, experts say, is to widen the rifts in the U.S. population via propaganda that is less about winning hearts and minds and much more about setting Americans against one another.

The removed pages share “moralistic language” and appeal to emotions, said Jay Van Bavel, a New York University psychology professor who studies group identity. “The conflict already existed but they’re stirring it up, picking at a scab.”

David Stewart, a marketing and business law professor at Loyola Marymount University, said those behind the scheme are trying to create an “us versus them” mentality, without which Facebook users might not be so polarized.

Groups tied to the Russian government have been trying to meddle in U.S. politics since at least the 2016 elections. In February, the Justice Department charged 13 Russians and three companies with plotting to aid Donald Trump’s presidential campaign through fake Facebook posts, ads, and groups.

More recently, Facebook said it had removed 32 fake accounts and pages on Facebook and Instagram created by “bad actors” involved in what Facebook calls inauthentic political behavior ahead of the U.S. midterms. Although Facebook didn’t specifically say Russians were behind the latest efforts, the reported activity shared many similarities with Russian influence campaigns during the 2016 presidential election.

facebook ads used to subvert us elections

It isn’t clear how well the efforts worked or if they have swayed the outcome of elections, either in 2016 or this time around. Sowing discord, however, could prompt people to stay home instead of voting — or to vote for more extreme candidates who support their view, experts say. Discord could also lead to real-world violence and conflict.

During the 2016 elections, Russian agents bought a slew of issue-based ads to push arguments for and against immigration, gun rights, and other issues. Many of them attempted to stoke racial divisions by mentioning police brutality or disparaging the Black Lives Matter movement.

Russian agents took advantage of the same tools available to businesses and groups to target messages with precision. One video parodying Trump was targeted at blacks who also were interested in BlackNews.com, HuffPost Politics or HuffPost Black Voices, for instance.

This time around, the efforts seem more focused on calling people to participate in protests and take action, at least based on the limited information provided by Facebook so far.

The removed accounts appear designed “to trigger standoffs between genuine Americans, bringing the risk of real-life violence from false stories,” wrote the Digital Forensic Research Lab of the Atlantic Council, which has been working with Facebook to study misinformation and foreign interference on its services.

Those behind the accounts aren’t spending a lot of time creating original posts. Instead, they do what many other people do on social media to get likes and clicks: They steal or reshare other people’s posts.

From there, legitimate organizations sometimes spread the messages further.

“Americans thus became the unwitting amplifiers of Russian information operations,” the Atlantic Council researchers wrote.

One indication that these efforts are working is that legitimate activist groups seem to have gotten swept up in some of the event listings created by these purportedly fake groups. For instance, several anti-racism groups attached themselves to a Washington protest called “No Unite the Right 2.”

Though April Goggans, an organizer of Black Lives Matter DC, said the protest was organized by real people in the U.S., the event listing on Facebook was created by a left-leaning account that Facebook identified as fake. Facebook cancelled the account — and the listing — less than two weeks before it was to take place.

Overall, the 32 accounts Facebook deleted recently tried to organize about 25 events. About half took place, even though the unknown agents behind them had no one on the ground and had to coerce people into attending the events purely through Facebook.

Van Bavel said that suggests the agents behind this “have a fairly sophisticated understanding of what our weak spots are psychologically as Americans.”

ScreenX latest theater fight with Netflix plus social media growing pains

Even though ScreenX has been around since 2012, theaters in London and the United States are finally implementing them. They are claiming that it’s part of their fight to get people back as home theaters have become better than many theaters.

At our main Movie TV Tech Geeks office, we’ve been using this for movie reviews along with our relaxation room. No, we don’t have the ScreenX, but we’ve added enormous screens that cover three of the room’s walls to give us a completely 270-degree immersive experience. I do believe that my stress levels have dropped due to a daily 20 minute stop in the relaxation room with a video showing the waves washing up on a mountainside retreat. With the sounds and video surrounding you, any tension washes away with each wave like no sound machine could come close to.

three screen theater opening in london screen x
ScreenX screen

I am (but not really) surprised that it’s taken theaters this long to try this. It’s expensive, but so much of the time the team here will comment on how bad theater screens (all over America) are when compared to what we have in our office. With prices dropping on large 4K televisions, it’s no wonder why most people would rather sit at home watching a film rather than on an inferior screen.

Sit at the back of the movie theater, and it’s possible to see the appeal of ScreenX, the latest attempt to drag film lovers off the sofa and away from Netflix.

Instead of one screen, there are three – one at the front, and two on the sides – to add to the immersive experience you can’t get from the home TV.

First adopted in South Korea in 2012, the system is being launched in the U.K. and theater chain Cineworld plans to add over 100 new screens to the worldwide count of 151.

The technology is the latest attempt by cinema operators to attract film viewers amid the growing popularity of online subscription services like Netflix and Amazon Prime. They’ve ranged from 3D screens launched almost a decade ago to ultra-high resolution IMAX projectors and 4DX – which features moving chairs and real-life special effects like snow falling on the audience.

The focus on innovation has helped in the past. Since 3D was popularized at big cinema theaters in 2009 with the release of films like James Cameron’s “Avatar,” revenue has grown. Global box office revenue has increased by $14.4 billion in the past decade to $40.6 billion, according to Motion Picture Association of America.

But that growth seems to be fading, and movie theaters are being overtaken by internet video. Revenue from internet video like Netflix is forecast to be the fastest growing part of the entertainment and media industry through 2021, according to consultancy PwC. Its estimated annual growth of 6 percent compares with a projected annual drop in cinema of 1.2 percent.

It’s unclear whether this latest innovation will help or stand out.

Cineworld says the idea is “it makes you feel like you’re sitting in the action.”

Robert Mitchell, a film journalist for Variety magazine, notes that was the point of 3D in the first place.

“In 2009, when films like ‘Ice Age’ and ‘Avatar’ were coming out, it was the great new thing,” he says. “That lasted for a couple of years until people started to realize that some films were being made that didn’t really use the enhancements well. And it started to put people off going.”

Love it or hate it, the number of cinemas that offer these new types of experiences grows globally every year.

“We’re really confident that by offering customers as much choice as possible that it’s going to bring people into the cinemas,” says Kelly Drew, an operations director at Cineworld.

Regal will be installing 100 theaters will ScreenX with the first one opening on Friday at the Irvine Spectrum Center.

mark zuckerberg jack dorsey facing social media problems

Who knew connecting the world could get so complicated? Perhaps some of technology’s brightest minds should have seen that coming.

Social media bans of conspiracy theorist Alex Jones have thrust Facebook, YouTube, Twitter and others into a role they never wanted — as gatekeepers of discourse on their platforms, deciding what should and shouldn’t be allowed and often angering almost everyone in the process. Jones, a right-wing provocateur, suddenly found himself banned from most major social platforms this week, after years in which he was free to use them to promulgate a variety of false claims.

Twitter, which one of its executives once called the “free speech wing of the free speech party,” remains a lonely holdout on Jones. The resulting backlash suggests that no matter what the tech companies do, “there is no way they can please everyone,” as Scott Shackelford, a business law and ethics professor at Indiana University, observed.

Facebook’s Mark Zuckerberg, Twitter’s Jack Dorsey and crew, and Google’s stewards of YouTube gave little thought to such consequences as they built their empires with lofty goals to connect the world and democratize discourse. At the time, they were the rebels aiming to bypass the stodgy old gatekeepers — newspaper editors, television programmers and other establishment types — and let people talk directly to one another.

“If you go back a decade or so, the whole idea of speech on social media was seen as highly positive light,” said Tim Cigelske, who teaches social media at Marquette University in Wisconsin. There was the Arab Spring. There were stories of gay, lesbian and transgender teens from small towns finding support online.

At the same time, of course, the companies were racing to build the largest audiences possible, slice and dice their user data and make big profits by turning that information into lucrative targeted advertisements.

The dark side of untrammeled discourse, the thinking went, would sort itself out as online communities moderated themselves, aided by fast-evolving computer algorithms and, eventually, artificial intelligence.

“They scaled, they built, they wanted to drive revenue as well as user base,” said technology analyst Tim Bajarin, president of consultancy Creative Strategies. “That was priority one and controlling content was priority two. It should have been the other way around.”

That all got dicier once the election of President Donald Trump focused new attention on fake news and organized misinformation campaigns — not to mention the fact that some of the people grabbing these new social-media megaphones were wild conspiracy theorists who falsely call mass shootings hoaxes, white nationalists who organize violent rallies and men who threaten women with rape and murder.

While the platforms may not have anticipated the influx of hate speech and meddling from foreign powers like Russia, North Korea and China, Bajarin said, they should have acted more quickly once they found it. “The fact is we’re dealing with a brave new world that they’ve allowed to happen, and they need to take more control to keep it from spreading,” he said.

That’s easier said than done, of course. But it’s particularly difficult for huge tech companies to balance public goods such free speech with the need to protect their users from harassment, abuse, fake news and manipulation. Especially given that their business models require them to alienate as few of their users as possible, lest they put the flood of advertising money at risk.

“Trying to piece together a framework for speech that works for everyone — and making sure we effectively enforce that framework — is challenging,” wrote Richard Allan, Facebook’s vice president of policy, in a blog post Thursday. “Every policy we have is grounded in three core principles: giving people a voice, keeping people safe, and treating people equitably. The frustrations we hear about our policies — outside and internally as well — come from the inevitable tension between these three principles.”

Such tensions force some of the largest corporations in the world to decide, for instance, if banning Nazis also means banning white nationalists — and to figure out how to tell them apart if not. Or whether kicking off Jones means they need to ban all purveyors of false conspiracy theories. Or whether racist comments should be allowed if they are posted, to make a point, by the people who received them.

“I don’t think the platforms in their heart of hearts would like to keep Alex Jones on,” said Nathaniel Persily, a professor at Stanford Law School. “But it’s difficult to come up with a principle to say why Alex Jones and not others would be removed.”

While most companies have policies against “hate speech,” defining what constitutes hate speech can be difficult, he added. Even governments have trouble with it. One country’s free speech is another country’s hate speech, punishable by jail time.

Facebook, Twitter, Google, Reddit and others face these questions millions of times a day, as human moderators and algorithms decide which posts, which people, which photos or videos to allow, to kick off or simply make less visible and harder to find. If they allow too much harmful content, they risk losing users and advertisers. If they go too far and remove too much, they face charges of censorship and ideological bias.

“My sense is that they are throwing everything at the wall and seeing what sticks,” Persily said. “It’s a whack-a-mole problem. It’s not the same threats that are continuing, and they have to be nimble enough to deal with new problems.”

Donald Trump’s US job and economic growth facts not so accurate

As the Washington Post has created an evergrowing graph of Donald Trump’s nearly 4,500 false or misleading claims since taking office, it comes as no surprise that his latest claims about America’s economic growth along with job growth aren’t quite accurate.

This week has found the president distorting the truth on U.S. economic growth and jobs, pointing to record-breaking figures that don’t exist and not telling the full story on black unemployment.

He cites the highest-ever gross domestic product for the U.S. that’s not there and predicts a spectacular 5 percent annual growth rate in the current quarter that hardly any economist sees. On black joblessness, he boasts of a “new” record low, but the numbers, in fact, have recently ticked upward, with greater declines seen during the Obama administration.

The statements marked a week of fiction in which Trump also made erroneous claims about the California wildfires and the Russia investigation and falsely declared that his tariffs on foreign goods would help erase $21 trillion in national debt.

Meanwhile, Sen. Bernie Sanders skimmed over the facts in asserting that his “Medicare for all” plan would reduce U.S. health spending by $2 trillion.

A look at the claims:

ECONOMY AND JOBS

TRUMP: “One new and great FACT — African American unemployment is the lowest ever recorded in the history of our Country. So honored by this.” — tweet Friday.

TRUMP: “I am proud to have fought for and secured the LOWEST African American and Hispanic unemployment rates in history.” — tweet Saturday.

THE FACTS: Not exactly. He omits important caveats.

Black unemployment did reach a record low, 5.9 percent, in May. That rate has since risen to 6.6 percent in July.

Despite some recent progress, the black unemployment rate is now nearly double that of whites, which is 3.4 percent. The most dramatic drop in black unemployment came under President Barack Obama when it fell from a recession high of 16.8 percent in March 2010 to 7.8 percent in January 2017.

TRUMP: “Economic growth, last quarter, hit the 4.1. We anticipate this next quarter to be — this is just an estimate, but already they’re saying it could be in the fives … I think we’re going to be very shortly in the fives.” — remarks Tuesday before a group of business executives.

TRUMP: “As you know, we’re doing record and close-to-record GDP.” — remarks Tuesday.

THE FACTS: No. These are the latest in a string of exaggerated claims that Trump has made about the U.S. economy.

While economists are generally optimistic about growth, very few anticipate the economy will expand at a 5 percent annual rate in the July-September quarter the president referred to. Macroeconomic Advisers, a consulting firm in St. Louis, forecasts 3.2 percent growth in the third quarter. JPMorgan Chase economists have penciled in 3.5 percent. The Federal Reserve Bank of Atlanta pegs it at 4.3 percent.

Whatever the final number turns out to be, none of these figures represents record or close-to-record growth for gross domestic product, the broadest measure of the nation’s output. The 4.1 percent growth in the second quarter was simply the most since 2014.

TRUMP: “We’ve created 3.9 million more jobs since Election Day — so almost 4 million jobs — which is unthinkable.” — remarks Thursday at prison reform event in Bedminster, N.J.

THE FACTS: It’s not that unthinkable since more jobs were created in the same period before the November 2016 election than afterward.

It’s true that in the 20 months since Trump’s election, the economy has generated 3.9 million jobs. In the 20 months before his election, however, employers added 4.3 million jobs.

TRUMP: “Great financial numbers being announced on an almost daily basis. Economy has never been better, jobs at best point in history.” — tweet Aug. 6.

THE FACTS: He’s exaggerating. The economy is healthy now, but it has been in better shape at many times in the past.

Growth reached 4.1 percent at an annual rate in the second quarter, which Trump highlighted late last month with remarks at the White House. But it’s only the best in the past four years. So far, the economy is expanding at a modest rate compared with previous economic expansions. In the late 1990s, growth topped 4 percent for four straight years, from 1997 through 2000. And in the 1980s expansion, growth even reached 7.2 percent in 1984.

It’s not clear what Trump specifically means when he declares that jobs are at the “best point in history,” but based on several indicators, he’s off the mark.

The unemployment rate of 3.9 percent is not at the best point ever — it is actually near the lowest in 18 years. The all-time low came in 1953, when unemployment fell to 2.5 percent during the Korean War. And while economists have been surprised to see employers add 215,000 jobs a month this year, a healthy increase, employers in fact added jobs at a faster pace in 2014 and 2015. A greater percentage of Americans held jobs in 2000 than now.

Trump didn’t mention probably the most important measure of economic health for Americans — wages. While paychecks are slowly grinding higher, inflation is now canceling out the gains. Lifted by higher gasoline prices, consumer prices increased 2.9 percent in June from a year earlier, the most in six years.

RUSSIA INVESTIGATION

TRUMP: “‘Bob Mueller, isn’t your whole investigation premised on a Fake Dossier, paid for by Hillary, created by a man who hates Donald Trump, & used to con a FISA Court Judge. Bob, I really think it’s time for you to give up your phony investigation.’ No Collusion!” — tweet Sunday, citing Fox News Channel host Jeanine Pirro.

THE FACTS: Trump quotes in part Pirro to falsely claim that special counsel Robert Mueller’s Russia probe is based on a “fake dossier.” In fact, the FBI’s investigation began months before it received a dossier of anti-Trump research financed by the Democratic Party and Hillary Clinton’s campaign. The FBI probe’s origins were based on other evidence — not the existence of the dossier.

The Republican-controlled House Intelligence Committee found the Russia probe was initiated after the FBI received information related to Trump campaign foreign policy adviser George Papadopoulos, not the dossier. The committee’s final report was praised by Trump.

TARIFFS AND THE DEFICIT

TRUMP: “Because of Tariffs we will be able to start paying down large amounts of the $21 Trillion in debt that has been accumulated, much by the Obama Administration, while at the same time reducing taxes for our people.” — tweet Aug. 5.

THE FACTS: This isn’t going to happen.

The Treasury Department estimates that all tariffs currently in place will raise about $40 billion in revenue in the 2018 budget year, which ends Sept. 30. Even with the recent tariff increases Trump has implemented or threatened to put in place, it clearly wouldn’t be enough to reduce the $21 trillion national debt. It’s just 5 percent of what the president would need to eliminate the annual budget deficit of $804 billion that the Congressional Budget Office predicts for this year. The national debt represents the accumulation of all the annual deficits.

The president seems to believe that foreigners pay tariffs, but they are import taxes paid for by American businesses and consumers. They may make it harder for other countries to sell things in the United States, but they are just another form of tax and do not result in lower taxes for the American people overall.

FOOD STAMPS

TRUMP: “Almost 3.9 million Americans have been lifted off food stamps — that’s since the election. … That’s some number. That’s a big number.” — Ohio rally on Aug. 4.

TRUMP: “More than 3.5 million Americans have been lifted off food stamps — something that you haven’t seen in decades.” — remarks at White House on July 27.

WHITE HOUSE: “More than 2.8 million have stopped participating in the Supplemental Nutritional Assistance Program (SNAP) — commonly known as food stamps — since Trump’s first full month in office.” — information sheet released Tuesday, citing Fox Business report.

THE FACTS: Trump and the White House omit important context and overstate his role in reducing the number of people on food stamps. Nor is it accurate that recent declines are the biggest in decades. It’s true, as the White House conveys, that more than 2.8 million people stopped participating in the program during the 15-month period from February 2017, Trump’s first full month in office, to May 2018, the latest Agriculture Department data available. But this decline is consistent with a longer-term downward trend in food stamp usage because of an improving economy. Currently, there are 39.3 million people in the program; food stamp usage peaked in 2013 at around 47.6 million, following the recession.

For instance, in the 15-month period before Trump’s first full month in office, food stamps declined by 3.3 million — larger than the 2.8 million that dropped off under Trump’s watch.

MEDICARE

SEN. BERNIE SANDERS: “Medicare for All will lead to a $2 TRILLION REDUCTION in national health expenditures over 10 years.” — tweet July 30.

THE FACTS: Sanders’ tweet and YouTube video are being widely echoed by supporters of a government-run national health system. But the Vermont independent mischaracterizes a study from a libertarian policy institute that found his legislation would lead to a massive boost in federal spending and taxation.

The study from the Mercatus Center at George Mason University in Virginia also concluded that Medicare for all is unlikely to produce a dividend for U.S. society in the form of lower total health care spending. To get that result would require paying hospitals and doctors much less than they get now and risk putting some out of business.

The study found that if hospitals and doctors were willing to accept Medicare-based payments of 40 percent less for patients who currently have private insurance, then projected U.S. health care spending would decline by about 3 percent from 2022 to 2031, or $2.05 trillion. It’s a big asterisk, and one that Sanders fails to disclose.

That’s the number Sanders is celebrating.

But the study also said if medical providers continue to be paid about the same as now, U.S. health care spending would increase by $3.25 trillion over 10 years under Medicare for all. It works out to about 5 percent more.

That’s far different from Sanders’ assurance that his plan “will lead” to huge spending reductions.

WILDFIRES AND WATER

TRUMP: “California wildfires are being magnified & made so much worse by the bad environmental laws which aren’t allowing massive amounts of readily available water to be properly utilized. It is being diverted into the Pacific Ocean.” — tweet Aug. 6.

THE FACTS: That’s not what state experts say.

“We have plenty of water” for battling the massive blazes burning in hills north of San Francisco, said Scott McLean, a spokesman for the California Department of Forestry and Fire Protection. The current spate of wildfires happens to be within range of large Northern California lakes and the state’s biggest river, McLean said.

Nor is having enough water a problem in battling California wildfires in general. Firefighting aircraft can dip in and out of cattle ponds or other small bodies of water to scoop up water for dropping and spraying on flames. When fires burn in an area that happens to be without ponds, lakes or rivers, state officials typically call in more planes to ferry in water, McLean said.

California’s battles over divvying up water in the arid state are unending, but a battle between firefighters and the Pacific Ocean hasn’t been one of them, according to Jay Lund, a civil and environmental engineering professor at the University of California, Davis, and a longtime analyst of the state’s water wars.

Trump’s claim “is so physically impossible, you don’t even really want to respond,” Lund said.

For one thing, the wildfires are in the hills, far from the Pacific Ocean and from the man-made storage and distribution system that carries water from California’s wetter north to the drier, more populated south.

TRUMP: “Governor Jerry Brown must allow the Free Flow of the vast amounts of water coming from the North and foolishly being diverted into the Pacific Ocean. Can be used for fires, farming and everything else. Think of California with plenty of Water – Nice! Fast Federal govt. approvals.” — tweet Aug. 6.

THE FACTS: Trump is raising an old dispute in California, the country’s top farm state: the competition for water between agricultural and environmental groups, fishermen and others who want more water for wildlife and habitat. But the dispute has little to do with firefighting.

Republican lawmakers in California’s agriculture-rich Central Valley complain the state and federal governments allow too much of the state’s rainfall and snow melt to flow naturally through rivers and into the Pacific Ocean, instead of being diverted for irrigation.

VETERANS

TRUMP: “The Democrats are obstructionists. The only thing they do well, they’re lousy politicians, they have horrible, stupid policies. You know, let’s get rid of law enforcement, let’s get rid of our military, let’s not take care of our vets — all of these things. … They’ll do anything they can really to obstruct or resist.” — remarks Aug. 4 at Ohio rally.

THE FACTS: On the contrary, in regards to veterans’ issues, every major bill signed into law by Trump has passed with strong support from both Republicans and Democrats. In one case, House Democrats did block an emergency funding bill for the Veterans Choice private-sector program after veterans groups complained that it focused on too much private care instead of core VA programs. The Democrats’ dissent resulted in additional funding for both private care and VA programs in the revised bill.

More recently, Robert Wilkie was confirmed by the Senate to serve as VA secretary on an 86-9 vote. It was a moment of strong bipartisan display compared to the partisan discord over other Trump nominees.

M. Night Shyamalan talks meshing ‘Unbreakable,’ ‘Split’ with ‘Glass’

I enjoyed every panel I was lucky enough to attend at Comic-Con this year, but there were a few that I was more excited about than the others. One was for my favorite show, Supernatural. The other was for the upcoming film Glass, which will be released on January 18, 2019.  I’ve known M. Night Shyamalan since before the days of The Sixth Sense, both of us calling Philly our hometown, so following his career and witnessing its twists and turns has been an emotional rollercoaster at times.

m night shyamalan with movie tv tech geeks lynn zubernis

Unbreakable has always been one of my favorites of Night’s films (and not just because my daughter was in it – as an extra who ended up on the cutting room floor). I remember back then when he said he was going to make a comic book movie – I was probably more excited than most people he knew, because I was a genre fan and a passionate fangirl and what could be cooler than that? I remember watching a rough cut of the film and how blown away I was by the premise and by Samuel L. Jackson’s and Bruce Willis’s incredible performances.

I was going to Comic-Con long before Night made his way there, so he’s heard about it for a long time and read about it in my books – it was fun to see him introduced to the insanity while there for Wayward Pines and later to premiere The Visit. This year, after the tremendously successful film Split turned out to be a sequel of sorts to Unbreakable, Night was back at Comic-Con for Glass – in the gigantic Hall H!

Yvette Nicole Brown moderated a panel which included Night along with stars Samuel L. Jackson, Bruce Willis, Anya Taylor-Joy and Sarah Paulson.  Shyamalan was boyishly excited about being in Hall H, saying he had dreamt about being in this hall forever.

Photos by Lynn Zubernis aka FangasmSPN

Night: I live in Philly, so I just hear about “Hall H, Hall H.” This is the Mecca right here.

(I feel like that might have been partly me going on and on about Hall H, but hey, it IS sort of Mecca!)

He talked a bit about the long history of the Unbreakable-Split-Glass films, remembering that when Unbreakable came out, there was a mixed reaction to the film. People were expecting a sequel to The Sixth Sense since it was Night and Bruce Willis again, and so that mixed reaction was disheartening a little.

I can testify to how excited he was about making Unbreakable – and at the time, how unusual it was to want to make a “comic book movie.”

Night: As we were talking about marketing the movie, I was on a conference call with the studio, and I remember they said ‘we can’t mention the words superhero or comic book, because it’s too fringe – it’s those people who go to those conventions.’ That was literally a quote.

The audience groaned, and Shyamalan reflected on his own confusion at the time, because that’s precisely what the movie was. And he definitely knew more than one person who ‘went to those conventions’!

In hindsight, Unbreakable was a bit ahead of its time.

Fast forward to the present, and Night remembering that he had put aside an idea he’d had long ago – the Kevin Wendell Crumb character from Split was actually in the script of Unbreakable. It was too unwieldy at the time, so he took those pages out, but when he was doing The Visit and came to Comic-Con to show it, he thought maybe he could revisit the character – which became the film Split.

Night: I asked Disney if we could maybe do something special at the end of Split, and Disney was gracious and let me do that. It’s really the most unusual thing you could imagine, with two studios, with two different IP’s, it just doesn’t happen.

Night has always had the guts to attempt unusual things, and this time it paid off.

Shyamalan had lots of love and gratitude for the gathered fans, and a clear fondness for Comic-Con and what it encompasses.

Night: I have such gratitude for you guys, at every level. Even for Unbreakable, it’s you guys who embraced it and understood it, and then everyone else caught up to you guys. And Split as well, so I’m incredibly happy to be here.

He also told an amusing story about coming to Comic-Con for The Visit a few years ago. He had already written Split, but he didn’t know who could possibly play the demanding part of the lead character.

Night: I was at a party and James McAvoy walks by me, and I grabbed him and said “hey, I love your stuff” and he said “hey, I love your stuff!” He had just finished X Men and his hair was like ¾ inch long – and I was like, this is the guy, and this is how he should look in the movie. So really, Split was created right here at Comic-Con, which is just how it should be.

McAvoy was ill and unable to attend the panel, unfortunately. Anya Taylor Joy and new cast member Sarah Paulson were on the panel, and then Night introduced Bruce Willis with genuine emotion.

Night: This was very special to me because he’s basically my big brother – the first guy who believed in me and gave me a chance on The Sixth Sense – Bruce Willis.

Willis got a huge ovation from the giant Hall H crowd, as did Samuel L. Jackson, who returns as Mr. Glass in the new film.

Jackson said that he loved the complexity of Elijah, that he’s a strong character with a fragile body but a strong mind, and loves that he has a belief that’s stronger than anything anyone can take from him.

m night shyamalan samuel jackson and bruce willis for glass movie

Jackson: See, I don’t actually play the same mutherfucker all the time!

The moderator asked Bruce Willis how Night enticed him to join Split at the end?

Willis was cagey, saying that there are a lot of secrets in this movie that haven’t been exposed.

Night: But basically I just called him and asked him, and he said yes. It was super gracious of him, he came and did it for nothing. I realize that everything I’m saying is not realistic, but he’s always been my big brother.

Sarah said they filmed in the coldest place she’s ever been in this cavernous abandoned mental hospital, but the cold actually worked for her character.

Anya had lots of kudos for James McAvoy, saying that it seemed like she was working with a different person every time he was a different personality.

Anya:  It was such a pleasure to come back and tell the continuation of my character’s story.

Night had some heartfelt words for all the cast.

Night: I just wanna say, to do movies the way I try to do them, shooting them at home and very small – these guys could do any movie they want, and we do films very intimately, like she mentioned the cold… it’s almost like film school, and that requires incredible commitment. It’s hard to give yourself over to a storyteller and make yourself that vulnerable. All of them, and James… I get emotional just talking about it, so thank you all so much.

We were also treated to a viewing of the trailer for Glass — a world premiere.

Night: We had the ability to put this trailer with some of the big Marvel movies, but I felt very strongly that you guys were the ones who should see it first. It was always meant for you guys, this whole series.

The screaming went on for a long time afterwards, because the trailer is freaking amazing and I cannot wait to see the whole film!

There were lots of shout outs to my hometown of Philly, where Night makes all his films. He was hard pressed to fit his films into a single category.

Night: I’m trying to do these intimate character-driven movies but I balance that with the pressure of the ride. My wife always says why don’t you pick one or the other, but the movies I fell in love with like ET had a bit of everything.

Essentially it’s a comic book movie and a thriller slammed together.

The moderator asked, what’s different about Glass? Why should people want to see it?

Night: The reason to come see the movie is the performances of the people up here and from James McAvoy. I think you’ll agree when you see it, the performances are jaw dropping, and I’m very very lucky.  Right now in the editing room, James does 21 personalities.

Whoa.

Night has never wanted to play things safe – he essentially made Split into a sequel to Unbreakable without letting anyone know that it was a sequel, which is exactly the way most franchises sell their sequels.  He didn’t have any idea that it would work out, and in fact, it’s unprecedented that two studios cooperated and helped each other out by letting Bruce Willis’ character appear in the end of Split.

Having seen the trailer and knowing how excited Night and the cast are about Glass, I fully expect this film to be just as unique and just as surprising.

Back in Philly, I asked Night what was his favorite thing about Glass, after the long long journey to get to this place.

Night: Glass represents an entire section of my filmmaking life. It’s characters from two previous films and now characters from a third all together. I know these characters so deeply that everything they say and do feels personal to me.

Night’s films have always created characters that are unique and memorable – and yes, feel personal.

Night: Glass represents that continual struggle of wanting to entertain and at the same time do something personal. Film has given so much to me. I want to treat every moment of the making of it with respect. I’ve tried to do that with Glass.

From what I’ve seen and heard so far, I think he’s succeeded. Be sure to catch the premiere of Glass on January 18, 2019!

Hottest Pool Toys and Games to Pleasure Every Family Member

Researching swimming pool toys and games is hard work my friend. So, I made sure to relax a bit with a couple of beers, a float, and a waterproof notepad to outline this article.

Don’t worry, I mixed in some sunscreen.

We all know that playing in the water is fun even with no toys. But the fun gets a 10x feel when you add some items to the mix. Why do you think boats and skis were invented for lakes?

The same holds true for smaller bodies of water that are set in your backyard and financed via a home equity loan. You and your family can enjoy swimming and cooling off all day long with no accessories. But to go to the next level you should add some toys and games to the wet mix.

How about we start with some games to play in the pool:

  • Golf
  • Volleyball
  • Jousting
  • Polo (no horses)

Those are just a few ideas and here are the accessories to make it happen. Playing chicken is still cool, but add some variety to those swimming pool parties.

pool bastketball with girl and two boys playing

Basketball

You will never be the MJ of H2O, but you can make your son whine like LeBron when you crush him on the basketball water court. Sports play has come a long way from games of the past made for pools. You could actually get up a neighborhood tournament with this high-quality setup.

Calling your own fouls is weak so let a fair-minded grandparent be the ref. Keep in mind they probably like the grandkids more than you. Sorry.

pool ping pong man woman playing

Ping Pong

The good thing about ping pong? You don’t need to exert yourself too much.

Also, this is a more chill game than basketball so emotions can stay in check. If you lose, so what.

Take a break back at the pool steps and have another frozen drink while your uncle gets those burgers going on the grill. You can find the perfect one right here.

pool golfing green

Golf

You thought I was kidding about swimming pool golf huh? No way, man.

This is for real. What better way to work on your tan and golf game at the same time? The person who created this game has to be the smartest cat on the planet. Or the one with the most free time to think up such leisure activities.

You do have to provide your own golf club. That’s no issue. If you don’t already have your own clubs why would you purchase this pool game?

BTW, you can buy clubs at thrift stores at rock bottom prices if you are new to the swimming pool golfing craze.

floating beer pong table

Beer Pong

No longer is beer pong relegated to land lovers. Get your party drink on while staying cool under the sun with this contraption. I take back my genius label for the pool golf inventor.

The pool beer pong inventor is now my super genius hero.

Why get out of the water to play the best drinking game ever when you can chill in the shallow end and destroy your friends as they get less and less lucid with each miss?

Do stay safe folks. Water and alcohol is a great combo only with some clear-headed thinkers around to corral the knuckleheads who go too far. Check out the great ones here.

Australia Vs Italy pool water polo

No Horses Needed

Water polo is for humans only as the old joke goes. And some of the greatest athletes in the world take part in water polo if you have never viewed it during the Olympics. That is not your goal however. You just focus on having fun with this inexpensive setup, which looks like a fun floating seesaw rocker.

And remember to let your kids win every once in a while. You have about 3 feet on them and shouldn’t be going for a 4-game sweep. It is a game people. Find the best assortment here.

floating volleyball net images

Best Pool Sport

What’s the best sport to play in the pool? Got to be volleyball, right?

It can get a little competitive if you don’t watch out, but most folks know how to have fun with it. It’s a natural fit. Water and a floating volleyball net. No running on hot sand like at the beach either.

Just chill in the cool pool water while the action goes on and on.

I don’t suggest any spiking unless you want to get chewed out by Robert De Niro for going too hard. That’s a “Goodfellas” reference for you non-movie geeks.

You can find combo volleyball and badminton pool sets here.

pool jousting set images with kids

Chicken 2.0

Here’s a new take on an old pool game. No more riding the shoulders of guys and grappling in hand-to-hand combat in the shallow end of the pool. This inflatable game seems a bit less dangerous than the original version of chicken. Lots of fingers to the eyes in the old school version.

With a fun jousting set you can wail away at your opponent and never worry about a concussion or eye poke. Here’s some great ones here.

You might want to have some rules in place still:

  1. No hair pulling
  2. No fish-hooking
  3. No pepper spray

two women men playing in swimming pooltwo women men playing in swimming pool

Click here to find a wide range of pool toys and games as their summer sale prices have really kicked in.

SyFy Wire’s Cher Martinetti on Fangrrls, diversity and toxic masculinity

One of the things I love about Comic-Con is the chance to meet and talk with some of the people who are instrumental in shaping the current conversation about fandom and popular culture. Cher Martinetti, managing editor of Syfy Wire’s popular Fangrrls vertical and host of the Strong Female Characters podcast, is one of those people. As a psychologist whose main line of research is fandom, I’ve written quite a bit about the impact of media on identity – how do the characters we fall in love with onscreen or in books or in bands shape how we define ourselves? How do we relate to our favorite characters and how does the range of characters we have to choose from make a difference? Or does it? I’m in the midst of writing a new book about my own favorite show, Supernatural, and those subjects were on my mind the entire time I was at Comic-Con, so I couldn’t wait to speak to Cher. Our schedules never meshed while we were both ridiculously busy in San Diego in spite of Herculean efforts on both our parts, but as soon as I got back, we connected by phone.

I knew we were going to get along within about ten seconds.

Lynn: I hope you can hear me, I’m putting you on speaker.

Cher: (laughing) I have a pretty big mouth, so…

Lynn: Me too (more laughing). So, ready to roll?

Cher: So ready it’s not even funny.

Lynn: Me too! So tell me why SyFy Wire thought it was important to have Fangrrls  – or maybe why you personally thought it was important..

Cher: I started Fangrrrls when I was still freelancing when we were still Blastr. It actually started as a smaller thing; it was going to be like a once a month google hangout with other professional geek women where we had a conversation, almost like a podcast format. Then I realized that it needed to be more than that because the readership for the site skewed male. And whenever I went to other geek entertainment sites, I kinda felt like they weren’t really speaking my language.

Lynn: (nodding vigorously on the phone) Mm hmm.

Cher: I just didn’t feel very represented there, and a lot of my friends felt the same way. So I wanted to create a destination where women or non-binary people could feel a part of the conversation, and so that we could discuss things in science fiction and fantasy and horror the way audiences actually tend to talk about the things that they like. Sometimes that means being funny, sometimes being very cerebral and serious about the things that we’re watching and reading and listening to.

Lynn: That totally makes sense. And yes, fandom is about all those things – it’s not one singular way of reacting to whatever it is we love. Let me explain briefly, my background is as a psychologist and university professor, and I research and write books about fandom, so my questions might be a little unusual…

Cher: Totally fine, I need a visit to a psychologist, so…

Lynn: Perfect (laughing). So people talk about the emphasis on ‘strong’ female characters or kickass or badass female characters. And I think it’s necessary to show women being all those things, because that’s not the stereotype of females, unfortunately. But is it all about being strong? Does that allow space for women to be weak sometimes or to feel comfortable saying I’m not strong enough to do this on my own and reaching out for help? How do you find the balance?

Cher: I love this question so much.

Lynn: Good!

Cher: One of the reasons why I wanted to do the podcast on strong female characters is that, for me, I wanted to reclaim that term. A lot of people, especially recently, have started putting a negative connotation on it, and for me, that’s not the case. I think being able to be vulnerable requires an enormous amount of strength and to be able to ask for help, that is not an easy thing to do. I think the way we’ve labeled that as weakness is inaccurate – to show weakness is also an incredibly brave, strong thing to do. So I personally feel that we have to reframe our thoughts and look at ‘strong’ from a different perspective. Instead of strength being oh be like Vin Diesel – maybe that’s part of it, but there are so many different types of strength. I think that fully fleshed out characters inhabit all those areas and that’s kind of what makes women so wonderful and powerful and unique is we can be emotionally strong, we can be vulnerable, we can be physically strong, we can be determined. There’s so many different ways to be strong, and that’s why I wanted the podcast called that, to celebrate every representation of a ‘strong woman’ however she chooses to be strong and to show her power or just really to be a fascinating person.

Lynn:  It’s almost like we need to redefine the term ‘strong’ from the stereotype of that word, because it’s not just physical. But we need fully fleshed out characters in order to do that. And if we have more of those, maybe this is even an area in which women can lead the way, because this is something men need to do as well, to redefine strength in terms of being able to show vulnerability as well.

Cher: Absolutely. Think about what toxic masculinity is. All that testosterone, that alpha male thing – and that’s bullshit, right? That’s not a real thing. Usually people that hide behind something like that, they’re usually scared, there’s something about them that they’re afraid for people to find out. Or when it comes down to having to get through life, usually they’re the first people to fall.

Lynn: That’s true, it’s not really a strength at all.

Cher: So I think our entire concept of what constitutes strength needs to be challenged. And I think women – I can only speak for the women I’ve known in my lifetime – but the women I’m drawn to exhibit this quiet strength. They have the ability to persevere and to keep going, even when it seems like things aren’t going your way. I think that’s a very powerful thing and I don’t think we shine enough of a light on that or appreciate that enough. So to me, a strong female character, it’s literally anyone.

Lynn: That makes sense, because you know what? If you’re surviving – you’ve got some kind of strength.

Cher: Exactly. Sometimes just getting up in the morning is being strong.

Lynn: Damn right. (both laughing)  There’s a lot of conversation now about inclusivity and diversity and representation – and there’s some agreement that it’s important but not a lot of discussion about why it’s important or even about what representation really means. Can you talk a little about that?

Cher: I think one of the most important traits and facets to being a human being is empathy.

Lynn: So true.

Cher: And I don’t think that you can really know how to have empathy for other people if you’re not exposed to other viewpoints and lifestyles and individuals. Speaking personally, I grew up right outside New York City, and when I was younger I used to go out clubbing. The club scene in New York let me hang out with people I never would have hung out with if I didn’t have that experience. A lot of trans women, a lot of the LGBT community from that scene, people from different backgrounds – and to be in a space where you’re all sharing something you love together, in this case that type of music, you bond with and connect with people in a way that you would never have the opportunity to otherwise.

Lynn: One of the powerful things about fan communities as well.

Cher: And that experience allowed me to be more understanding and empathetic to individuals who were different from me. I think it’s the same in other areas – if you allow yourself to experience a different viewpoint from people who are in your life – who don’t live in your neighborhood or work in your office — that allows you to become a better version of yourself because you’re able to feel empathy for another person. And it makes everything better because you’re coming at things from a commonality, you like the same stuff. It’s not about your sexual orientation or your religion or the color of your skin; you just get to enjoy each other as people. I think that’s what we need – these other categories are all things that humans created. So whatever opportunity we have to connect to each other, and maybe people who are on the outside from where we are, that makes us better human beings.

Lynn: It does. We know from research that what breaks down prejudice and stereotypes and stigma is exactly that, interacting with those “others” and understanding in a direct experiential way that they are human just like us. I think that’s very important, looking at representation as a way of being with other people and a way of experiencing people unlike yourself. Is it also important for individual identity development? To see yourself represented, to also see people who are like you, that also seems important.

Cher: Yes, absolutely. It’s important to see it. There may be some little girl, or some trans kid, or some queer kid who is still trying to figure themselves out. And the media that we ingest, the stuff that we read and the stuff that we watch, often that helps us through whatever situation we’re going through, right?

Lynn: Yes! That’s the message of many of my books on fandom.

Cher: It can help you persevere through that, and identify with something or someone so you can understand yourself better. And I think when you see someone like you, it opens up this whole world, this opportunity that maybe you never considered otherwise. Some little girl believes she can be a Jedi because Rey is a Jedi. Or she can be the head of a studio who’s making these movies. She can see something that’s going to light the fire to be whatever it is she wants to be.

Lynn: Yes, you make such a good point – it’s about validation for who you are, the real you, the genuine you, but it’s also about your aspirations and where you set your sights because of what you think is possible. So it’s about both current identity and future identity.

Cher: Absolutely. We relate to characters and their stories because there’s something in us that when we see them, we either recognize, or that we aspire to be. And that’s why it’s so important to see characters who look like the world that we live in, because you never know when a boy or a girl or a non-binary kid is watching them that’s helping them with something that’s happening in their life. And on the flip side, it can open up a whole world of opportunity that maybe they can do something for a living that they never would have known they could have done if they hadn’t seen it.

the magicians images

Lynn: Yes, absolutely. One of the things I’ve been looking at recently is the evolution of female characters and queer characters in genre programming and in television in general. I just got back from Comic-Con, and I’m not just saying this because you’re SyFy Wire, but The Magicians does a great job in terms of the representation we’ve been talking about. What are some shows you think are doing a really good job?

Cher: This is gonna sound like such….but you mentioned The Magicians, and they’re doing such a great job with that, with LGBT representation. They deserve that appreciation because they consciously make it a point, you know? Wynonna Earp….OMG other shows – there are so many, do you want something on now or ever?

Lynn: Either. I’m just really interested in shows which do a good job of accurately reflecting society, or maybe not just reflecting what’s now but even pushing society forward.

Cher: One of my favorite shows ever, and it’s not just because it’s on SyFy, is Battlestar Galactica.

battlestar gallactica does the last supper images

Lynn: (laughing) Oh yes.

Cher: You have a character like Starbuck, who I stan so hard, and that character is not playing into any type of gender norms or expectations. The show was really good about that, women and men are pretty equal, and I think that’s important. You don’t see that often. OMG, now I’m thinking of so many shows! (laughing)

Lynn: Okay, let’s limit it. How about television?

Cher: Now that you asked, every single thing I watch just fell out of my head!

We both ended up laughing, and of course, I defaulted to talking about the show I could talk about until the end of the world, because of course I did.

Lynn: Okay, here’s a more specific question. I write a lot about the television show Supernatural, which kind of started out with some problematic portrayals of female and queer characters, but has evolved quite a bit, in my opinion, because it’s had 13 seasons to do that. How does that sort of slow evolution compare to a show like you mentioned, Wynonna Earp, which really started out way ahead in terms of its representation? Is there a big difference in the experience of fans sort of walking along with a show over that journey, versus jumping into one that’s already there in a lot of ways?

Cher: I mean, you’re talking about a show that started fourteen years ago versus a show that started three years ago. If Supernatural had started three years ago, it may never have had those issues, right? I think it’s really important that when we view older stuff, you can’t always view that from where we are right now.

Lynn: Mm hmm.

Cher: It’s not the reality of how the world works, and you know what? Sometimes things do need to evolve. The problem is not if they have to evolve, the problem is if they don’t evolve. If Supernatural was still doing all those same things that were problematic and treating those characters the same way now, yeah that’s a problem. But the show has been on for fourteen years – fourteen years ago, it was a very different world. Five years ago was a very different world. So I think it’s really important, we have to manage our expectations, but we also have to allow people the space to evolve and to get better.

Lynn: I really love what you just said. That’s a very realistic way of looking at it. You sound very optimistic about the future of media, so last question – give me a reason for your optimism. Sometimes it’s hard to hang onto when there are what feel like setbacks or when you want something very badly from the shows and characters you love, and you don’t have it.

Cher: Well, what’s the choice? I’m not really young so I’ve seen in my lifetime the difference from my twenties until now, and it’s kinda corny but like Obama said and Princess Leia said, you have to have hope. Hope is what sustains you. And you have to keep that hope, because that’s what keeps pushing you forward. It’s not always gonna be a straight line, it’s sometimes going to ebb and flow, but you have to keep that hope. Otherwise, if you give up, then it’s definitely not going to work! Right?

Lynn: As a psychologist, I totally agree, hope is essential. Also I lied, that wasn’t my last question

Cher: (laughing)

Lynn: Last question for real. Tell me about something that’s coming up on the podcast that you’re excited about.

Cher: So we’re on hiatus until after labor day, until September. It’s funny that you asked me that question because we just had an email chain going around planning around our first few episodes. One thing that I’m excited for – a little exclusive for you – we’ve started thinking about stuff from New York Comic Con.

Lynn: Ooooh

Cher: So I’m thinking of something really cool to do around that, so hopefully fingers crossed it will happen because it will be so awesome.

Lynn: That’s a nice teaser – my fingers are crossed for you too! Anything else you wanted to add in that I didn’t ask about?

Cher: Not that I can think of, these were great questions. Thanks for making the time to talk to me.

Lynn: I knew it would be a great conversation and it was! Thanks for taking the time to chat.

Check out SyFyWire’s Fangrrls for lots of great content and tune into the Strong Female Characters Podcast when it returns in September!

Spike Lee talks ‘BlacKkKlansman’ not being his comeback movie

When you’ve been in the movie industry for decades, your career will see its share of ups and downs, and Spike Lee will heartily attest to that. No one is immune to a bad movie or two, but the outspoken Lee has one word he hates; comeback.

Spike Lee heard the whispers.

Just a few years ago, some were suggesting that Lee was no longer the essential filmmaker he had once been. There had been critical and box-office disappointments. He was hunting for funding on Kickstarter. His remake of the Korean classic “Oldboy” was re-edited against his wishes.

As Lee readies his latest “BlacKkKlansman,” his incendiary satire of white supremacy, those whispers are long gone. If it ever didn’t, the phrase “a Spike Lee joint” again carries with it something urgent and vital.

“What’s the famous Mark Twain quote? My demise has been greatly exaggerated? A couple (people) had written me off: I’m done. Over! Not relevant!” said Lee in a recent interview, with a prolonged cackle. “But you know what? They don’t know! Count me out if you want to! Come on, I’m in Brooklyn! We go hard!”

At the suggestion that the change has been less his than America’s — some have said the culture caught up to him, rather than vice versa — Lee reaches a still higher pitch.

spike lee directing adam driver for blackkklansman
Spike Lee directing Adam Driver in BlacKkKlansman

“Well, I got another hundred yards!” exclaims the 61-year-old filmmaker, roaring with laughter at the discovery of one of his favorite things: a good sports metaphor. “I got me another Usain Bolt hundred yards!”

Lee was introduced to the story of “BlacKkKlansman” by Jordan Peele (“Get Out”) who called up Lee with the true-life tale of African-American police detective Ron Stallworth, who in 1979 infiltrated a Colorado Springs, Colorado, cell of the Ku Klux Klan. There was already a script, but Lee reworked it with Kevin Willmott to add what he calls “more flavor.”

And while the crew is peopled by longtime collaborators of Lee’s, the cast is full of, as Lee says, “new blood.” John David Washington, the eldest son of Lee’s go-to leading man, Denzel Washington, stars as Stallworth. (“You can’t write that stuff!” says Lee of his second-generation Washington star.) The other top roles are also Spike Lee joint newbies: Adam Driver plays a fellow detective; Topher Grace plays former KKK leader David Duke.

It all adds up to the year’s most explosive, rip-roaring commentary on race in America — and as Lee insists, around the globe — drawing a straight line from yesterday’s Klan to today’s White House. While much of “BlacKkKlansman” has a part comic vibe, reveling in the KKK’s dimwitted absurdity, it concludes in a searing present-day coda. Lee ends the movie with footage of the white nationalists march in Charlottesville, Virginia, which turned violent in clashes with counter-protesters. Anti-racism activist Heather Heyer was run over and killed. President Donald Trump afterward said there were good people “on both sides.”

“I believe that what happened in Charlottesville was a pivotal moment in American history where an American president had a chance to denounce hate groups like the Klan, the KKK, neo-Nazis, the alt-right, and chose not to do so,” says Lee. “The stories will write that this guy in the White House was on the Wrong side of History, with a capital W for ‘Wrong’ and a capital “H″ for ‘history.’ Wrong. And I believe this film is on the right side of history.”

Lee traces the rise in white supremacy and more blatant expressions of racism today directly to Trump’s rhetoric — though he refuses to use the president’s name.

“It’s the guy in the White House,” he says. “It’s not even dog whistles. They’re not even doing it on the sneak! They’re not even doing it on the low-low. This is blatant. This is like yelled through a megaphone. They’re not even trying to be coy or sneaky about it.”

Focus Features will release “BlacKkKlansman” nationwide Friday, a year after Charlottesville. Lee was prepping the film to shoot in the fall when he saw the images from Charlottesville on the news at his Martha’s Vineyard house. Lee doesn’t play golf, but his house is on the 18th hole of a golf course, where President Barack Obama happened to be playing that day. (“You know when he’s playing golf because all the Secret Service are in the trees!“) It was Lee, meeting Obama on the fairway, who gave him the news.

Lee quickly resolved that the Charlottesville marchers, Trump and Duke had “written themselves into the movie.” ″They took the past, and they brought it back to the present,” says Willmott. Lee later sought and received permission from Heyer’s mother to use the video.

“It’s a testament to his movies, which are always historically unpredictable. Even how he directs on set. He’s very much about impulses — following your impulses, trusting them,” says Driver. “He’s worked with all the same people since ‘Do the Right Thing’ so there’s a shorthand. That’s what I like about his films: They’re filmed with an energy where you never know what’s going to happen.”

To a remarkable degree, that energy has remained at a boiling point for Lee’s entire career. Lee has been arguably at his best, at his most passionate when outraged, when fueled to depict and deconstruct racial injustice, whether on the streets of Bed-Stuy (“Do the Right Thing”), New Orleans (“When the Levees Broke: A Requiem in Four Acts”) or Chicago (“Chi-Raq”). But those films, like “BlacKkKlansman,” are as much laced with comedy and sorrow and love as they are with fury.

“It may seem like I’m in a constant rage of anger. People define me. Now they’re going to add ‘BlacKkKlansman’ to ‘Do the Right Thing’ and ’Malcolm X,’” says Lee. “But I’m going into my fourth decade as a filmmaker. If you look at the whole body of work, not all the films are about anger. If you look at my semi-autobiographical film ‘Crooklyn’ and other films. They put the moniker on me over the years: ‘Angry black man.’ ‘Angry black filmmaker.’ They put that on me a million years.”

Since its prize-winning premiere at the Cannes Film Festival, “BlacKkKlansman,” has been hailed as an apotheosis encapsulating everything singular about Lee as a filmmaker. It has his trademark dolly shots and his long-held obsessions. It weaves in a commentary on the Hollywood imagery of racism, with cameos of both the confederate dead of “Gone with the Wind” and the Klansmen of “The Birth of a Nation.” Since his film student days at New York University, where Lee made a short about a black filmmaker hired to remake D.W. Griffith’s 1915 film, he says, “It’s haunted me.”

But his current outlook is forward. Lee recently finished shooting the second season of Netflix’s “She’s Gotta Have It,” an update of his 1986 debut. Everything runs through his Brooklyn-based production company, 40 Acres & a Mule. He still hopes to make the Joe Lewis epic he wrote years ago with Budd Schulberg, the legendary screenwriter of “On the Waterfront.”

Soon he’ll be off and running again, trailblazing his own path through today’s cinema and through America. But before he goes, Lee has one request:

“You gotta put in that Usain Bolt line.”

Our Favorite Top 10 Spike Lee Films

10. Jungle Fever (1991)

Call it a double feature mashup within a single movie, and you won’t be far off the mark. There really are two storylines vying for attention in this sometimes amusing, sometimes angry and always enthralling drama — and while the transitions between the two aren’t always smooth, the bumps seldom impede the pace of the wild ride. One thread deals with the interracial affair between a married African-American architect (Wesley Snipes) and an Italian-American temp secretary (Annabella Sciorra), a doomed relationship that Lee hints may be driven more by curiosity than passion. The other thread focuses on the architect’s drug-addicted brother (played, brilliantly, by Samuel L. Jackson), whose downward spiral takes him to an inner-city inferno described, not imprecisely, as “the Trump Tower of crack dens.”

9. Crooklyn (1994)

At once street smart and sweetly sentimental, this warmly nostalgic coming-of-age drama could be described as a Spike Lee movie for people who normally dislike Spike Lee movies. Set in the Brooklyn neighborhood of Bedford-Stuyvesant during the summer of 1973, it’s an episodic semi-autobiographical drama — Lee co-scripted with his bother Cinque Lee and sister Joie Lee — filled with scenes that have the unmistakable feel of incidents that, for better or worse, are deeply felt and vividly remembered. (The‘70s golden-oldies soundtrack pleasingly enhances the period atmosphere.)

Alfre Woodard (as a dedicated schoolteacher) and Delroy Lindo (as a struggling musician) appear as the parents of the four young children who propel most of the interconnected plotlines. Their experiences and misadventures are all the more touching when you consider that, just five years earlier, Lee offered a far less rosy (and much bleaker) view of life in their neighborhood (“Do the Right Thing”) 16 years after the events of this film. As novelist L.P. Hartley once noted: The past is a foreign country. They do things differently there.

8. 4 Little Girls (1997)

Lee received a much-deserved Oscar nomination for this outstanding documentary, a richly detailed and profoundly moving account of a horrendous tragedy that proved to be a watershed moment in the history of the American civil rights movement. On the morning of Sept. 15, 1963, a bomb exploded in the basement of the 16th Street Baptist Church in Birmingham, Ala.

This was a hate crime, designed by militant racists to intimidate black churchgoers who were active in Birmingham’s racial equality campaign. But instead of short-circuiting the civil-rights protests, this cowardly act of terrorism had a galvanizing effect, largely because the explosion claimed four young victims: Carol Denise McNair, 11, and Addie Mae Collins, Cynthia Wesley and Carole Rosamond Robertson, all 14.

7. Inside Man (2006)

Spike Lee goes mainstream. A corking good caper-thriller with an abundance of memorable characters and clever plot twists, along with the tangy New York flavor that is Lee’s trademark special sauce. But wait, there’s more: An all-star lineup that includes Denzel Washington as an NYPD hostage negotiator dealing with gunmen who have taken control of a Manhattan bank; Clive Owen as the heist mastermind who turns out to be the title character in more ways than one; Christopher Plummer as the bank founder who has some dirty little secrets tucked away in the vault; and Jodie Foster as an aggressively glam and sensationally self-assured “fixer” who clashes with the negotiator while trying to protect the bank founder’s interests. Fun fact: “Inside Man” is the biggest box-office hit of Lee’s career. So far.

6. He Got Game (1998)

Lee rarely gets the respect he deserves as a director of not only individual actors but acting ensembles in his films. To fully appreciate his talent in this regard, take a look as this cumulatively affecting yet chronically underrated drama, in which Denzel Washington plays Jake Shuttlesworth, a convicted felon who gets a week off from prison — where he’s serving time for killing his wife — on the order of the governor, who wants Jake to convince his son Jesus (NBA star Ray Allen), the top-ranked college basketball prospect in the country, to attend the governor’s alma mater. (If Jake succeeds, well, there may be a permanent early release in his future.) The father-and-son reunion doesn’t go smoothly (for a long time, it doesn’t go anywhere) and the dramatic tension is enhanced by Lee’s skillful balance of heartfelt performances by a seasoned pro (Washington) and a first-time moonlighter (Allen). And don’t overlook the fine supporting turn by Milla Jovovich, whose role as a put-upon prostitute in need of Jake’s help gives her more opportunities to demonstrate her acting chops than she’s had in all the “Resident Evil” flicks combined.

5. Malcolm X (1992)

After enduring the long months of pre-production controversy — some of it, but by no means all of it, generated by Lee himself — many critics approached this African-American epic with an attitude of, “OK, put up or shut up!” Lee responded by putting his movie where his mouth was, delivering the goods with a rich, rivetingly detailed character study of the man who sought to rebuild black pride “by any means necessary.” Neither a “Hoffa”-style deification nor a “JFK” -style expose, this is an audaciously old-fashioned, impressively multifaceted biographical drama. And lest we forget: In the title role, Denzel Washington firmly established himself as one of the leading actors — if not the leading actor — of his generation.

4. Clockers (1995)

The title refers to low-level drug dealers, but Lee’s film (an artful and intelligent compression of Richard Price’s lengthy novel) stands far apart from conventional dramas about cops, criminals, and inner-city life and death. There are four central characters: a hard-bitten cop (Harvey Keitel) who wants to do the right thing, anything, before retirement; an avuncular drug lord (Delroy Lindo) who manipulates young “clockers” in his neighborhood with equal doses of charm and menace; and two brothers — an ambitious clocker (Mekhi Phifer) and a respectable family man (Isaiah Washington) — whose lives have taken radically different paths. Each man starts out firmly believing he’s the man of his fate. But in the course of “Clockers,” each must face the full extent of his self-delusion. How they come by this hard-won knowledge, and how they respond to it, is what gives this potent movie the stunning impact of a modern-day morality play.

3. BlacKkKlansman (2018)

It’s doubtful that even a filmmaker as audacious as Spike Lee would dare to invent the real-life story of Ron Stallworth, an Colorado Springs, Col. undercover cop who managed in the early 1970s to infiltrate a local branch of the Ku Klux Klan, despite his being very seriously African-American. But Lee gives his own unmistakable stamp to Stallworth’s stranger-than-fiction story in a gobsmackingly entertaining movie that ranks among his all-time finest.

In addition to showcasing most of his distinctive visual flourishes, “BlacKkKlansman” gives Lee the opportunity to demonstrate his ability to be rigorously specific about time (the ‘70s period flavor is well-nigh intoxicating) and brutally persuasive about the timeliness of past events that maybe aren’t really so past at all. At the heart of it all are two beautifully synched performances: John David Washington (son of Lee’s frequent collaborator, Denzel Washington) as Stallworth, who forges a connection with KKK recruiters (and Topher Grace’s David Duke) over the phone, and Adam Driver as Flip Zimmerman, Stallworth’s partner, who pretends to be Stallworth during real-world interactions with the racist (and anti-Semitic) lowlifes.

2. 25th Hour (2002)

Lee’s furiously melancholy drama about life and dread in post-9/11 New York City details the final hours of freedom afforded Monty (Edward Norton), a once-promising young man who’s set to start serving a prison sentence for drug dealing the morning after he completes a series of farewell interactions with his anxious lover (Rosario Dawson), two old friends (Philip Seymour Hoffman, Barry Pepper) — who, truth to tell, aren’t entirely surprised that their feckless buddy is facing hard time — and his guilt-racked father (Brian Cox, who has one of the greatest final lines in all of film history).

Monty is smart enough to acknowledge that he’s done some dumb and reckless things; for a long time, however, he wants to blame everyone (including, during one remarkable monologue, just about every demographic group in NYC) for his fate. Lee’s film, which hit theaters scarcely 15 month after the collapse of the Twin Towers, takes us back into a New York where memories of the 9/11 tragedy, and the paranoia it inspired, still hangs heavy in the air like a poisonous gas, subtly (and, sometimes, not-so-subtly) influencing people even as they go about their blinkered, self-absorbed lives. It takes a lot to wake some people up. Just ask Monty.

1. Do the Right Thing (1989)

To give you some idea of the megaton impact “Do the Right Thing” had back in the day: At the press conference immediately following its first screening at the 1989 Cannes Film Festival, Lee found himself fielding questions from skittish white journalists about whether such an incendiary movie might inflame U.S. racial tensions to the point of causing riots. Weeks later, more than a few critics and columnists echoed similar concerns as the film rolled out in North American theatrical release. (Spoiler alert: The riots didn’t happen.)

Ironically — tragically — the most unsettling thing about Lee’s masterwork now is how relevant it remains, how immediate it feels, as bickering escalates into ugly confrontations, and long-simmering resentments reach the boiling point, during 24 fateful hours in the Brooklyn neighborhood of Bedford-Stuyvesant. And yes, it’s still a jolt to experience how the exuberant high spirits of the early scenes gradually give way to escalating dread as the movie darkens, then explodes. Nearly three decades after it first raised a ruckus, “Do the Right Thing” is still the real thing.

Honorable Mention:

Girl 6 (1996)

While many slammed this film, there was something I personally found intriguing about his look at a young black woman getting sucked into the world of fantasy.

A robot movie phenomenon is coming

It’s time to break the superhero trend, and what could be the next best thing to superheroes than giant robots? Transformers films aside, Pacific Rim and Pacific Rim: Uprising were good hits and a good start for the super robot genre.

There are three upcoming films in this genre, and all the franchises they’re based on point to the heart of the geek population.

Robotech

I absolutely loved Robotech as a child. It’s great how Harmony Gold managed to cobble together three different franchises like Super Dimension Fortress Macross, Super Dimension Cavalry Southern Cross and Genesis Climber Mospeada into one story. Though the premise of the Earth falling victim to three successive alien invasions is so far out. The Earth just can’t seem to get a break.

That makes the Power Rangers a bit wacky as there’s a new alien menace every season. Anyway, Robotech is currently under development with director Andy Muschietti (Mama) at the helm and is written by Wonder Woman writer (Jason Fuchs). Since Macross is branded as Robotech in the US, I’m wondering if they’ll make a live-action adaptation of Macross first. But I also loved the third chapter Genesis Climber Mospeada. IMHO, the best “Robotech” movie is still 1984’s Macross: Do You Remember Love.

voltron movie coming

Voltron  

Another super robot franchise greatly anticipated by US audiences is Voltron. The US first mainstream Japanese combining super robot. Voltron, based on the Japanese Beast King Go Lion series has been rebooted several times, the latest being Voltron: Legendary Defender on Netflix. And here I am still waiting for Tosho Daimos and Chodenshi Machine Voltes V reboots after seeing their awesome remastered transformation/combination sequences on Super Robot Wars for the PlayStation. But the question is, would the Voltron live action film live up to the great story in Voltron: Legendary Defender? Yes, I like the new one better. I liked Sven as a Voltron force member back then and I like Shiro as Voltron’s leader now. The changes they made are all positive except for wacky Koran. The film is also in development at Universal and is written by X-Men and X2 screenwriter David Hayter.

gundam movie coming soon

Gundam

Finally, one of the most iconic and influential super robot franchises will be getting a live-action adaptation. Gundam popularized the concept where piloted giant robots are tools of war and not as gigantic fantastical saviors from alien invaders which makes Gundam sort of an ancestor to Robotech. In Gundam, robots are depicted as high-tech versions of tanks and sometimes take the role of fighter planes in times of war. Like Power Rangers, the franchise still continues to this day under various concepts.

One of the latest concepts however differs vastly from Gundams being tools of war to the collectible toys they currently are in Gundam Build Fighters. The most intriguing concept was G-Gundam which technically eliminates bloody warfare by pitting the world’s nations in Olympics-type death matches where the remaining nation rules the world for six years. If only that were truly possible in the present day. The possibility of a live-action Gundam film or even as a true weapon of war is impressed upon us by the Japanese Kuratas robot that recently had a duel with the US Megabot. Honestly, being more agile, Kuratas has better chances in the field. As for the film, Legendary will be producing it in collaboration with Japanese Sunrise studios. Below is the premise of the story.

“The original Gundam series is set in the Universal Century, an era in which humanity’s growing population has led people to emigrate to space colonies. Eventually, the people living in the colonies seek their autonomy, and launch a war of independence against the people living on Earth. Through the tragedies and discord arising from this human conflict, not only the maturation of the main character, but also the intentions of enemies and the surrounding people are sensitively depicted.”

The superhero craze is still Hollywood’s prime cash cow for the foreseeable future but it would be nice to have some distractions now and then.