Home Blog Page 87

A Marvel-less Comic-Con 2018 could beam spotlight on others

Studios are scrambling to grab the spotlight normally reserved for the superheroes of the Marvel Cinematic Universe, HBO’s “Game of Thrones” and “Westworld or even “Star Wars” since they won’t be showing at Comic-Con 2018. This year’s biggest question was “who isn’t showing to San Diego?” rather than “who’s going to blow us away this year?”

The 49-year old Comic-Con has turned into a four-day fest filled with panels, parties, screenings, and of course, those money making autograph sessions for celebrities. To have all three of the majors not showing up (not one single Marvel superhero), it will give other studios a chance to grab some attention though. This could be a good thing for fans as it will expose them to newer franchises and wannabes.

HBO cited production demands for their two shows, but Disney yanked “Star Wars” and everything Marvel from Comic-Con for the D23 Expo (at Anaheim Convention Center 100 miles to the south), which is a biennial fan heavy get together they’ve relied on before to announce plans for “Star Wars” attractions at its theme parks. Disney has never pretended to be loyal to diehard fans, and this more than proves that. Marvel has skipped out on Comic-Con before in 2015. August 2019 will see everything Disney hitting the D23 panels instead of Hall H.

Over 130,000 pop culture devotees are descending on San Diego’s Gaslamp District on Wednesday for the annual four-day comic book convention Comic-Con, the big, bright and very heavily branded confab of costumed superfans and the corporate sponsors vying for their attention — and dollars.

Interested in dining at a working replica of the “Demolition Man” Taco Bell for the movie’s 25th anniversary? Or witness a mock court-martial of Star Wars’ Poe Dameron for leading a mutiny in “Star Wars: The Last Jedi”? How about a wine and beer tasting with Neil deGrasse Tyson? Or a “Ready Player One” experience with retro gaming stations and recreation of Room 237 from “The Shining”? If you like pop culture, it’s highly likely there is something tailor-made for you at Comic-Con 2018.

What started as a 300-person event in 1970 has evolved into a massive operation with events year-round. But San Diego Comic-Con is the marquee occasion. Tickets for four-day access plus preview night can set attendees back $276, before hotel, travel costs, food and any souvenirs. And attendees have come to expect exclusive merchandise on the convention center floor, newsy announcements from some of Hollywood’s biggest studios, and screenings of anticipated films and television shows.

This year Warner Bros. is coming armed with stars and footage from “Aquaman,” ″Shazam!,” ″Fantastic Beasts: The Crimes of Grindelwald” and “The LEGO Movie 2”; Sony is hyping its Spider-Man spinoff “Venom”; and Universal Pictures will be teasing “Halloween” and M. Night Shyamalan’s “Glass.” On the television side, fans will get a glimpse of new “Doctor Who” star Jodie Whittaker and have a chance to check out “Star Trek: Discovery” and “Riverdale.” And streaming services like Netflix and Hulu will be back with properties like Marvel’s “Iron Fist” and the new J.J. Abrams-produced “Castle Rock,” based on Stephen King stories.

But a few of the major players are conspicuously absent from Hall H, the 6,500-seat room in the San Diego Convention Center that boasts the highest-profile presentations and often attracts an enthusiastic fan base willing to camp out overnight in line to secure a coveted seat. Those skipping this year include Marvel Studios, HBO (“Game of Thrones”) and Star Wars.

comic con fans ready for 2018

“It’s a huge deal when major properties like Marvel, Star Wars or HBO don’t show up,” says Germain Lussier, an entertainment reporter for io9/Gizmodo who has been attending the convention for 15 years. “For the past decade, Marvel Studios panels have consistently been the No. 1 most anticipated thing for movie fans at Comic-Con. Their panels never failed to disappoint with exclusive footage, huge news, and big surprises.”

Production schedules are more to blame than anything else, however. Lussier notes that each of the absent brands has a big (and intensely secretive) installment coming in 2019, including “Avengers 4,” ″Star Wars: Episode IX” and the final season of “Game of Thrones.”

“Instead of showing up and disappointing fans, they’re simply bowing out to not bolster expectations,” he says.

Also, other brands and properties could benefit from an unusually open runway.

“Every year, there’s always one or two things everyone is talking about. And if it’s not ’Avengers 4’or ‘Star Wars,’ what’s it going to be?” says Lussier. “I think this is a huge opportunity for Warner Bros. to steal every headline with major news and exciting footage.”

Warner Bros. has booked Hall H to spotlight the CW’s teen favorite “Riverdale,” and projects from its DC Films stable including “Aquaman,” the Zachary Levi-led “Shazam!” and a glimpse of the next Wonder Woman film, “Wonder Woman 1984,” with a likely assist from star Gal Gadot (who’s been a hit at Comic-Con for the last three years). The studio’s arsenal also includes Wizarding World’s next installment, “Fantastic Beasts: The Crimes of Grindelwald,” the kaiju film “Godzilla: King of the Monsters,” and “The Lego Movie 2: The Second Part.”

Universal will host panels on M. Night Shyamalan’s “Unbreakable” sequel, “Glass,” along with the latest installment of the horror warhorse “Halloween,” headed by co-writer Danny McBride and director David Gordon Green.

Sidestepping Disney’s control over much of the Marvel Universe, Sony Pictures will also present a Hall H panel on “Venom,” a Spider-Man spinoff that features Tom Hardy. 20th Century Fox will preview “The Predator,” an extension of the 1987 action franchise, and offer up a victory lap for its Marvel hit “Deadpool 2.”

Paramount has booked the massive room to introduce “Bumblebee,” a spinoff to the “Transformers” franchise. An avowed comic fan, the Wu-Tang Clan’s RZA will unveil “Cut Throat City,” a heist movie he directed.

“You’re either rallying your base to have more of a connection with you and then go out and spread the gospel, or you’re introducing your property to new fans,” Rachel Walker said in an interview last year. She has worked in marketing independent films and genre at multiple installments of Comic-Con.

As in previous years, television also puts a major footprint on Comic-Con. Major Hall H presentations include a session for “Star Trek: Discovery” and salutes to the 10th anniversaries of AMC’s “Breaking Bad” (tied to the screening for the season premiere of prequel “Better Call Saul”) and Joss Whedon’s cult favorite, “Dr. Horrible’s Sing-Along Blog.”

Genre fixtures like “Doctor Who” (and its first female doctor, Jodie Whittaker) and “The Walking Dead” occupy Hall H alongside its spinoff “Fear the Walking Dead.” “Talking Dead” host Chris Hardwick, who usually moderates those panels, has been sidelined due to recent abuse allegations from ex-girlfriend Chloe Dykstra. Filling in for both panels — as well as “Talking Dead” on an interim basis — will be Yvette Nicole Brown of “Community” fame.

Comic-Con also continues to provide a promotional lift for shows well beyond the zombie or superhero realms. NBC will present panels for comedies “The Good Place” and “Brooklyn Nine-Nine,” the latter of which was recently picked up by the network after it was dropped by Fox.

This year will mark the exit of Bud Plant, a comics distributor who has exhibited at every Comic-Con since its inception. “After 48 consecutive years of exhibiting at Comic-Con, I am not going to set up this year,” Plant said in a Facebook post about the decision. “It’s nothing against the show itself. The attendees these days are, in general, not our customers or they are not looking for books.”

Marvel’s ‘Cloak and Dagger:’ Finally Superheroes Emerge on Freeform

When one gains superpowers or special abilities, it doesn’t automatically make one a hero or villain unless he/she acts accordingly. In Cloak and Dagger, we see the pair struggle or at least try to adapt to life having their light and dark abilities. Tyrone uses his powers or, his powers often lead him to a path in solving his brother’s murder while Tandy uses hers to clear her father’s name in the Roxxon rig incident. But now, in the latest episode Lotus Eaters, we finally see the pair actually do something truly heroic for others which really has this viewer stoked.

The pair do get involved in some small heroics beforehand before actually saving someone’s life. Let’s first discuss how the divine pair got to where they are now. In the previous two episodes, after a painful parting, Tandy decides to patch things with Tyrone and meets him in school. We later see Tyrone accidentally teleport to the shop of Billy’s friend Duane after seeing his brother’s childhood photo. There, he discovers a link between Duane and Connors.

Tandy, meanwhile, sorts through the files of the now deceased Greg in order to find out more clues to the Roxxon incident which leads her to infiltrate a Roxxon Gala. At the gala, she drinks in the hopes of the people in the files. Tyrone meanwhile is busy with his school’s basketball championship where he chokes on everyone’s fears during the crucial game. Tyrone’s powers get triggered by the stress of the ref’s clear racial prejudice against members of the other team and blames it on Tandy’s use of her powers when he accidentally teleports to the gala.

Detective O-Reilly meanwhile is busy digging into Connors dealings and bonds with him by snorting some of the drugs in the evidence room. Connors fears she’s digging in too deeply and sets up an assassination. Tyrone intentionally loses his game to give the other team some hope and fortunately doesn’t get any backlash. Tandy makes friends with a girl named Mina Hess who she has something in common with. Tandy’s hope drinking is not all rosy as she finds out the hope of her main target. The hope to gain as much money without regard for human life.

cloak and dagger superhero light hits

Tyrone continues to dig into Duane’s operations by trying to become a member in order to get to Connors. He decides to confront one of Duane’s associates but gets assaulted. Here we see Tyrone using his titular comic book powers of trapping people in their fears. He traps his opponent in the Darkforce Dimension and bars his exit while the opponent is frozen in fear of his own boogeyman. For Cloak and Dagger fans, the scene is awesome and is just as awesome when seen from a non-fan perspective. Tyrone later stumbles into the assassination which results in the killing of Duane instead of O-Reilly.

While Tyrone was busy with Duane, Tandy has befriended and visits Mina Hess whose father Ivan Hess an executive and a survivor of the rig. Tandy discovers that Roxxon wasn’t drilling for oil but instead was drilling for an unidentified type of energy which is more valuable and powerful presumably the same type of energy previously seen in Season 2 of Agent Carter. It’s pretty strange that many stuff in Marvel TV series are located underground such as the dragon remains in Defenders (which The Hand presumably uses to resurrect people) and in The Runaways where we have an inkling of a living entity deep within the hole The Pride was digging. Could they all be related to one another in the TV side of the MCU? That would make for a great crossover. Anyway, Tandy manages to see a catatonic Ivan Hess. She sees through his mind a door locked by darkforce energy. Mina, unfortunately, deduces Tandy’s real identity as the son of Nathan Bowen. Connors meanwhile chases Tyrone after his botched assassination of O-Reilly and Tyrone escapes.

In Lotus Eaters, the pair meet up at the church where they discuss their experiences. Tandy asks Tyrone for help with the darkforce and the both visit Ivan Hess and enters his mind. They manage to open the door and end up inside the locked mind of Ivan situated within the final moments of the rig incident. This is where the series finally become fantastical and shows the pair’s superheroic potential. Hess no longer remembers himself after being trapped for so long. He does describe the sequence of events until the explosion and how to stop it. Tandy and Tyrone try to do so but can’t. There, they encounter the other rig workers seemingly becoming zombies after coming in contact with the rig’s strange energy. The pair finds that it’s easier to use their powers in the strange world of Ivan’s mind and fight against the zombified workers. They fail and get trapped in the repeating sequence of events. Tandy realizes that it’s her dad on the other end of a ringing phone and her longing for her dad results in her getting stuck herself.

ty cloak and dagger on stage

Tyrone convinces Tandy that it’s not real and the pair manage to snap Ivan Hess out of his trance and makes him realize he has a daughter waiting. The three of them succeed in getting out of Ivan’s locked mind. So in this episode, we see that they actually manage to save someone’s life which would also drive Tandy’s investigation of Roxxon’s activities forward. We see the pair use their powers like superheroes. It’s amazing seeing Tandy throw or actually shoot her daggers from her hands and Tyrone use his teleportation powers to avoid attacks and correctly position himself.

One thing I hope to see here is that Cloak actually looks like, and has a cloak instead of simply a kid in black and teleporting places. Olivia Holt as Tandy has grown on me and doesn’t even need a costume yet seeing how awesome her dagger throws are. This is turning out to be a good series and with three more episodes to go, the momentum hopefully doesn’t stop.

Dwayne Johnson’s ‘Skyscraper’ can’t hold top box office spot vs ‘Hotel Transylvania 3’

Dwayne Johnson might be able to save people from death, but fighting off a cartoon vampire is a whole different story as his “Skyscraper” was no match for Adam Sandler’s “Hotel Transylvania 3: Summer Vacation.”

“Hotel Transylvania 3: Summer Vacation” has checked into the No. 1 spot at the box office in its opening weekend and left the Dwayne Johnson action thriller, “Skyscraper,” in the dust.

Sony Pictures estimated Sunday that the animated family movie earned $44.1 million from North American theaters. As the first in the franchise to open in the summer, it’s just slightly under the previous installment’s $48.5 million debut in September 2015.

Worldwide, “Hotel Transylvania 3” has already earned more than $100 million.

“It’s really terrific,” said Adrian Smith, Sony’s head of domestic distribution. “We’re positioned to take advantage of the valuable summer weekdays, and there are six weeks of summer left.”

The successful series has grossed over $900 million worldwide to date.

Going into the weekend, experts expected a three-way race to the top between “Hotel Transylvania 3,” ″Skyscraper” and “Ant-Man and the Wasp,” but the family film won by a large margin.

“There haven’t been a lot of options for families this summer,” said comScore senior media analyst Paul Dergarabedian. “They become instant hits.”

This is the third victory in a row for Sony’s “Hotel Transylvania” franchise, which follows the family life and small-business endeavors of Count Dracula, voiced by Adam Sandler. Each of the three films has cleared $40 million on its opening weekend and broken $100 million total. While the first two succeeded in the Halloween seasons of 2012 and 2015, this one was marketed as a summer film, with the count and his family boarding a cruise ship; the film was released in the only month in which all schools across the country are on summer vacation. Children and their parents made up 60 percent of the audience, according to exit surveys.

While audiences aren’t yet sick of the count, they do seem to be tiring of Mr. Johnson, whose action vehicle “Skyscraper” arrived in third place with $25.5 million, according to comScore, which compiles box office data. That’s a big drop-off compared to other recent films in which he saves the world, including “San Andreas” ($54.6 million in 2015) and this year’s “Rampage” ($35.7 million). With that film, “Jumanji: Welcome to the Jungle” and a new season of “Ballers” all released in the last year, it’s possible we’ve reached the point of Rock oversaturation.

But while the domestic numbers are discouraging so far, Legendary Pictures and Universal Pictures will be banking on big returns from China, where Mr. Johnson is a megastar. “Skyscraper” is even set in China, so it’s possible that by the time the film opens there next week, the weak domestic returns will be beside the point. The film’s production budget was about $125 million.

Johnson’s “Skyscraper,” a rare original summer blockbuster, remained earthbound in its first weekend in North America. The Universal Pictures film brought in only $25.5 million domestically. “Skyscraper” cost a reported $125 million to produce, not accounting for marketing costs.

Johnson has been a consistent presence in movie theaters this year with both “Jumanji: Welcome to the Jungle” and “Rampage” prior to “Skyscraper.” Both previous films opened in the $35 million range, and while “Jumanji” went on to be a worldwide box office juggernaut, “Rampage” petered out domestically just under $100 million. As with “Rampage,” however, the studio is expecting the majority of “Skyscraper” profits to come from international audiences.

“‘Skyscraper’ is really engineered for a global release, and it got a terrific start,” said Jim Orr, Universal’s president of domestic distribution. “We have great faith in a more than terrific run at the domestic box office going forward.”

Internationally, “Skyscraper” grossed $40.4 million from 57 territories for a global total of $65.9 million.

Second place went to Disney and Marvel’s “Ant-Man and the Wasp,” which brought in an additional $28.8 million in its second weekend, down 62 percent from last week. It’s one of the steeper second week falls in the Marvel Cinematic Universe. The first “Ant-Man” fell 53 percent.

“Incredibles 2” took fourth place with $16.2 million and “Jurassic World: Fallen Kingdom” rounded out the top five with $15.5 million.

A handful of smaller releases made notable splashes this weekend including Annapurna’s buzzy dystopian satire “Sorry to Bother You,” which opened in limited release last week and added 789 locations this weekend totaling 805. It earned $4.3 million in its expansion for spot No. 7 on the charts.

The coming of age film “Eighth Grade” also scored top marks, and the highest per theater average of the year, with $252,284 from four theaters. The well-reviewed pic will expand nationwide in the coming weeks.

And documentaries continue to perform well too, including the Fred Rogers doc “Won’t You Be My Neighbor?” which added $1.9 million from 868 theaters, and “Three Identical Strangers” which expanded to 167 theaters and grossed $1.2 million.

Estimated ticket sales are for Friday through Sunday at U.S. and Canadian theaters, according to comScore. Where available, the latest international numbers for Friday through Sunday are also included. Final domestic figures will be released Monday.

skyscraper vs hotel transylvania 3 at box office fight

  1. “Hotel Transylvania 3: Summer Vacation,” $44.1 million ($46.4 million international).
  2. “Ant-Man and the Wasp,” $28.8 million ($35.3 million international).
  3. “Skyscraper,” $25.5 million ($40.4 million international).
  4. “Incredibles 2,” $16.2 million ($33.3 million international).
  5. “Jurassic World: Fallen Kingdom,” $15.5 million ($26.7 million international).
  6. “The First Purge,” $9.1 million ($6.2 million international).
  7. “Sorry to Bother You,” $4.3 million.
  8. “Sicario: Day of the Soldado,” $3.9 million ($1.7 million international).
  9. “Uncle Drew,” $3.2 million ($70,000 international).
  10. “Ocean’s 8,” $2.9 million ($4.3 million international).

Estimated ticket sales for Friday through Sunday at international theaters (excluding the U.S. and Canada), according to comScore:

  1. “Dying to Survive,” $66.6 million.
  2. “Hotel Transylvania 3: Summer Vacation,” $46.4 million.
  3. “Hidden Man,” $44.8 million.
  4. “Skyscraper,” $40.4 million.
  5. “Ant-Man and the Wasp,” $35.3 million.
  6. “Incredibles 2,” $33.3 million.
  7. “Jurassic World: Fallen Kingdom,” $26.7 million.
  8. “Asura,” $6.6 million.
  9. “The First Purge,” $6.2 million.
  10. “Ocean’s 8,” $4.3 million.

Donald Trump continues getting facts wrong on NATO and trade

In what was meant to be a simple photo op, President Donald Trump shocked everyone by going after Germany in Brussels on Wednesday morning. Both John Kelly and Mike Pompeo had a moment of looking stunned before going into their staring straight ahead while their boss went off on a tirade stating that Germany was under the control of Russia. Yes, that’s very ironic.

He is continuing to falsely suggest that members of the alliance owe money to the U.S. and the mutual-defense organization.

Meeting with NATO Secretary General Jens Stoltenberg on Wednesday, Trump said: “Many countries are not paying what they should. And, frankly, many countries owe us a tremendous amount of money for many years back, where they’re delinquent, as far as I’m concerned, because the United States has had to pay for them. So if you go back 10 or 20 years, you’ll just add it all up. It’s massive amounts of money is owed.”

His comments followed a Tuesday tweet: “Many countries in NATO, which we are expected to defend, are not only short of their current commitment of 2% (which is low), but are also delinquent for many years in payments that have not been made. Will they reimburse the U.S.?”

THE FACTS: There is no such debt to the U.S. or to NATO. Therefore, no delinquency or question of payment.

In 2014, before Trump was president, NATO members agreed to stop cutting their military budgets and set a goal of moving “toward” spending 2 percent of their gross domestic product on their own defense — by 2024. It was not a “commitment,” not a direct contribution to NATO, not a payment owed to the U.S., and not something that alliance members pledged to achieve immediately.

Trump is right that most NATO members are spending less than 2 percent of their GDP on their defense budget, though more are moving in that direction.

Trump has assailed NATO members such as Germany for lagging on their military budgets while he has simultaneously taken credit for progress on that front. He has repeatedly claimed that because of his pressure, “billions and billions of dollars are pouring in,” which is also not true, because there is no such fund for money to pour into.

It’s true the U.S. is “expected to defend” fellow NATO members when they are threatened. It’s equally the case that NATO partners are expected to defend the U.S. if threatened. Article 5, the collective defense portion of the North Atlantic Treaty has been invoked just once — following the attacks of September 11, 2001.

U.S. spending constitutes well over a majority of the alliance’s overall spending on defense, which NATO acknowledges results in an “over-reliance” on the U.S. for capabilities like intelligence and aerial refueling. Previous U.S. leaders have also called on NATO members to boost their defense spending to minimize the imbalance.

NATO does have a shared budget to which each member makes contributions based on the size of its economy. The United States, with the biggest economy, pays the biggest share — 22.1 percent. Four European members — Germany, France, Britain, and Italy — combined pay 43.8 percent of the total. The smaller countries pay smaller shares. The funds, totaling about $3 billion this year, are used to run NATO’s headquarters and to pay certain other civilian and military costs. No member is known to be in arrears.

donald trump takes hostility out on germany nato

President Donald Trump is using some goosey numbers to rationalize his aggressive rhetoric on trade, disregarding strong points in U.S. competitiveness to paint a dark portrait of a world taking advantage of his country.

Conversely, he’s glossing over aspects of the economy that don’t support his faulty contention that it’s the best it’s ever been. The complexities of health care for veterans are also set aside as he hails a new era in the Department of Veterans Affairs’ system.

A look at some of his statements over the past week and the reality behind them:

TRUMP: “Last year, they lost 800 — we as a nation, over the years — but the latest number is $817 billion on trade. That’s ridiculous, and it’s unacceptable. And everybody was told that.” — news conference Saturday at the Group of Seven summit in Canada.

THE FACTS: Trump’s bottom-line number in his dispute with trading partners is wrong. The U.S. ran a trade deficit last year of $568.4 billion, says his administration’s Census Bureau and Bureau of Economic Analysis, not $817 billion.

Trump refers only to the deficit in goods. Last year, the U.S. bought $811 billion more in goods from other countries than other countries bought from the U.S. But the U.S. had a surplus in trade in services, which brought the actual trade deficit down.

He made a similar error in a tweet Thursday, saying “The EU trade surplus with the U.S. is $151 Billion.” It was $101 billion.

The U.S. is more competitive in services than in goods overall, and services are a big part of the trade equation. Trump glosses over that aspect of trade.

TRUMP: “Why isn’t the European Union and Canada informing the public that for years they have used massive Trade Tariffs and non-monetary Trade Barriers against the U.S. Totally unfair to our farmers, workers & companies. Take down your tariffs & barriers or we will more than match you!” — tweet Thursday.

TRUMP: “Farmers have not been doing well for 15 years. Mexico, Canada, China and others have treated them unfairly. By the time I finish trade talks, that will change. Big trade barriers against U.S. farmers, and other businesses, will finally be broken. Massive trade deficits no longer!′ — tweet Monday.

THE FACTS: Whatever his beef with farm trade with specific countries, he’s wrong in suggesting U.S. agriculture runs a trade deficit. The U.S. exports more food products than it imports, running a $17.4 billion surplus last year. It’s long been a bright spot in the trade picture, and it’s why many U.S. farmers are worried about losing markets as Trump retreats from, renegotiates or disparages trade deals.

U.S. farmers do brisk business with the three countries he complains about in the tweet, two of them under the umbrella of the North American Free Trade Agreement, which Trump is threatening to leave if it’s not recast to give the U.S. greater advantage. The U.S. exported $20.5 billion in agricultural products last year to Canada, the largest market for U.S. farmers. That made for a modest deficit of $1.8 billion. The U.S. exported $18.6 billion in farm goods to Mexico, running a deficit of $6 billion.

The U.S. has a lopsided advantage with China on farm goods, in contrast to manufactured products. It sold $21 billion in agricultural products to China in 2016, for a surplus of $16.7 billion.

The Agriculture Department says exports of food products have grown “steadily over the last two decades.”

Trump’s unrelievedly negative view of the EU may be grounded in a substantial trade deficit with the continent, but his administration’s trade office takes a longer and more benevolent view of the relationship.

“Two-way U.S.-EU trade has been roughly balanced over time,” says the U.S. Trade Representative’s Office, “and the very high levels of foreign investment accounted for by each in the other’s markets means that the transatlantic economy is arguably the most integrated on Earth.”

TRUMP: “We have the strongest economy that we’ve ever had in the United States — in the history of the United States. We have the best unemployment numbers.” — news conference Saturday.

TRUMP: “Best Economy & Jobs EVER, and much more.” — tweet Monday referring to achievement in his first 500 days in office.

THE FACTS: May’s unemployment rate of 3.8 percent is not the best ever. And the economy has seen many periods of stronger growth.

The lowest unemployment rate since World War II was reached in 1953, when it averaged 2.9 percent, almost a full point lower than today. The job market is certainly strong, with unemployment at an 18-year low, and if it drops another tenth of a point, it’ll be the lowest since 1969.

Yet the jobless rate was at or below 4 percent for four straight years back then, from 1966 through 1969, and wages were rising more quickly. The cost of items such as college and health care was much lower then.

Overall the economy has yet to show it can sustain growth in excess of 3 percent, as Trump has promised.

In the 1990s boom, still the longest on record, the U.S. economy expanded at an average annual pace of 4.3 percent for five years, from 1996 through 2000. In the 1980s, growth averaged 4.6 percent annually from 1983 through 1987. While the economy has picked up from 2016, its best showing since Trump took office was 3.2 percent in last year’s third quarter.

TRUMP: “Separating families at the Border is the fault of bad legislation passed by the Democrats. Border Security laws should be changed but the Dems can’t get their act together! Started the Wall.” — tweet Tuesday.

THE FACTS: No law mandates that parents must be separated from their children at the border, and it’s not a policy Democrats have pushed or can change alone as the minority in Congress. Children are probably being separated from the parents at the border at an accelerated rate because of a new “zero tolerance policy” being put in place by Trump’s own administration. Announced April 6 by Attorney General Jeff Sessions, the policy directs authorities to prosecute all instances of illegal border crossings, even against people with few or no previous offenses.

Administration officials are quick to note that Sessions’ policy makes no mention of separating families. That is correct. But under U.S. protocol, if parents are jailed, their children are separated from them because the children aren’t charged with a crime.

So while separating families might not be official U.S. policy, it is a direct consequence of Sessions’ zero-tolerance approach.

According to U.S. Customs and Border Protection, more than 650 children were separated from parents at the border during a two-week period in May.

TRUMP: “I have to tell you, the Coast Guard saved 16,000 people. … Saved 16,000 people, many of them in Texas, for whatever reason that is. People went out in their boats to watch the hurricane. That didn’t work out too well. That didn’t work out too well.” — hurricane preparation briefing Wednesday.

THE FACTS: There is no indication the Coast Guard was busy saving the lives of foolhardy hurricane gawkers drifting off the Texas coast. Texas officials are baffled at Trump’s words and the Coast Guard does not back them up. Some of the most powerful images from Hurricane Harvey were of flooded Houston streets swarming with volunteer boaters who answered the call of overwhelmed first responders and used their personal watercraft to rescue families from their homes.

Coast Guard Petty Officer Edward Wargo of Houston said the service didn’t take note of how or why people got stranded during Harvey, but said most rescues appeared to occur within city limits and neighborhoods. Republican Gov. Greg Abbott said he had “no information one way or the other” about Trump’s claim that people were on the water to watch Harvey. But the outgoing speaker of the Texas House, Republican Joe Straus, rejected the idea.

“The people who took their boats into the water during Harvey were not storm-watchers,” Straus tweeted. “They were heroes who went toward danger to rescue friends, neighbors, strangers. Texans helping Texans in a time of desperate need.”

TRUMP: “In the campaign, I also promised that we would fight for Veterans Choice. … It seemed like if they’re waiting on line for nine days and they can’t see a doctor, why aren’t they going outside to see a doctor and take care of themselves, and we pay the bill? It’s less expensive for us, it works out much better, and it’s immediate care. And that’s what we’re doing.” — remarks Wednesday during the signing of a bill intended to give veterans more access to private health care as an alternative to the VA system.

THE FACTS: The care provided under the Choice private-sector program is not as immediate as Trump suggests, nor does it always work out much better. Currently, only veterans who endure waits of at least 30 days — not nine days — for an appointment at a VA facility are eligible to receive care from private doctors at government expense. Under a newly expanded Choice program that will take at least a year to implement, veterans will still have to meet certain criteria before they can see a private physician, such as when a local VA facility does not offer the services required or veterans face an “unusual or excessive burden” to getting the care they need.

Waits for a private doctor are not always shorter. The VA has said its medical facilities are “often 40 percent better in terms of wait times” compared with the private sector.

There also is little evidence that providing private care to veterans compared with treatment at one of VA’s 1,300 clinics and hospitals will be “less expensive.” Experts generally agree that VA care is less costly due to economies of scale. A congressional commission in 2016 determined that giving veterans more flexibility to see doctors outside the VA system would probably increase costs, due in part to growing demand from veterans who are drawn by the idea of picking their own doctor.

TRUMP: “This bill speeds up the claims process, increases the health services, expands access to walk-in clinics, and fights opioid addiction.”

THE FACTS: It’s not clear whether a newly expanded Choice program will speed up the claims process.

A Government Accountability Office report released this past week found that despite the Choice program’s guarantee of providing an appointment within 30 days, veterans waited an average of 51 to 64 days; the process took as long as 70 days. Investigators faulted bureaucratic inefficiency and understaffing at VA, which contributed to delays in making referrals and scheduling appointments. They warned of continuing problems of long waits under a newly expanded Choice program until the VA is able to more easily exchange veterans’ medical records with outside physicians; the VA has said achieving that could take years.

Pointing to faulty data, government investigators said the VA “cannot determine whether the Choice program has helped to achieve the goal of alleviating veterans’ wait times for care.”

TRUMP, on expanding the Choice program: “This has been for years; for 30, 40 years, they’ve been trying to get this done, and they haven’t been able to. And we got it done.”

THE FACTS: It’s not done. Trump signed into law a bill that would loosen restrictions for veterans seeking medical care outside the VA system, but it’ll take at least a year to implement and its actual scope in expanding choice to veterans will depend on the next VA secretary, who has yet to be confirmed by the Senate. A successful expansion of private care will also depend on an overhaul of electronic health records at VA to allow for a seamless sharing of records with private physicians. That overhaul will take at least 10 years to be complete.

Limited money for the program could also hamper its effectiveness. A group of senators is seeking to pay for the law by adding new money to cover the VA private care program, but the White House has been quietly working to block that plan, saying it is “anathema to responsible spending.” The White House is insisting that added costs of the newly expanded private care program be paid for by cutting spending elsewhere at the VA, something that major veterans groups generally oppose.

‘Ant-Man and the Wasp’ continues Marvel box office winning streak

Marvel has proven to be the king of superheroes at the box office as Paul Rudd’s “Ant-Man and the Wasp” topped the weekend with the company’s 20th film to top the charts in a row. $76 million might be a little on the low side to what Marvel usually collects in tickets, it shined brighter than any other films including “The First Purge.”

Despite its heroes’ diminutive size, “Ant-Man and the Wasp” opened with typical Marvel might at the box office, with an estimated $76 million in ticket sales.

According to studio estimates Sunday, the “Ant-Man” sequel easily surpassed the $57 million debut of the 2015 original in North America. The 20th film in the Marvel Cinematic Universe — and the 20th to debut no. 1 at the box office — “Ant-Man and the Wasp” comes on the heels of two mammoth Marvel successes this year: “Black Panther” and “Avengers: Infinity War.”

While the first “Ant-Man,” starring Paul Rudd and Evangeline Lilly (interview here), had a rocky road to release due to a late director change, the rollout of the sequel, directed by Peyton Reed, was smoother. Cathleen Taff, head of distribution for Disney, credited a marketing campaign that played up the film as a more modest, funny and light-hearted change-of-pace for Marvel following the grandiosity of “Infinity War.”

“It came in at the high end of our range and definitely sized-up the sequel,” said Taff.

“Ant-Man and the Wasp,” with a reported production budget of about $160 million, may have performed well enough to firmly establish its place among Marvel’s more main-line superheroes. Reviews were good (86 percent fresh on Rotten Tomatoes) and audiences gave it an A-minus CinemaScore. Ticket sales overseas added another $85 million.

Befitting the summer season, the weekend’s top five films were all sequels. The weekend’s other new wide release was Blumhouse Productions’ “The First Purge,” the fourth film in the low-budget horror franchise about an annual 12-hour period of lawlessness. With July 4th falling on a Wednesday and thus depriving Hollywood of a holiday weekend, Universal opted to release “The First Purge” on Wednesday, while “Ant-Man” waited for the customary Thursday night previews.

“The First Purge” debuted with $32 million over the five-day frame, and $18.5 million for the weekend. Particularly following 2016′s “The Purge: Election Year,” the franchise has made satirical jabs at social commentary. “First Purge,” a Staten Island-set prequel, focuses on the ritual’s origins as a method of culling minorities. The five-day box office returns for the film marked a drop-off from the preceding “Purge” installment, which collected $40.1 million over its first five days.

“Blumhouse just continues to overdeliver for us,” said Jim Orr, distribution chief for Blumhouse’s distribution partner, Universal. “The Purge franchise continually comments on issues that are current in society, obviously through a kind of dark and distorted lens. Tying it to the July Fourth holiday made a lot of sense.”

Some Los Angeles theaters overperformed, executives said, likely due to those seeking air conditioning during the Southern California heat wave. But whether due to travel- or weather-related reasons, nationwide ticket sales were unexpectedly soft on Saturday. The weekend was about 10 percent off the pace of the same weekend last year, when “Spider-Man: Homecoming” opened, according to comScore. But the summer box office overall, up 13.5 percent from last year, remains robust.

The film, which cost at least $300 million to make and market worldwide, is the 20th in an astonishing string of No. 1 hits for Marvel, which has dominated box offices since “Iron Man” was released in 2008. The fact that even Ant-Man, a fairly peripheral character in the Marvel universe, could front an instant box-office smash is a testament to the studio’s lasting appeal. The film also did well overseas, bringing in $161 million total.

The films that trailed “Ant-Man” hit their own milestones. Disney’s “Incredibles 2″ passed “Finding Dory” to become Pixar’s top-grossing film domestically, not accounting for inflation. It earned $29 million in its fourth weekend, bringing its domestic total to $504 million and its worldwide haul to $773 million.

With $28.6 million in its third weekend, Universal’s “Jurassic World: Fallen Kingdom” crossed $1 billion worldwide. It’s done especially well internationally, which has made up 69 percent of the dinosaur sequel’s global footprint.

As a clear alternative to the multiplex offerings, the “Mister Rogers” documentary “Won’t You Be My Neighbor” continued to perform as an art-house sensation. Ranking ninth for the weekend (in between “Tag” and “Deadpool 2″), the Focus Features release earned $2.6 million in 893 theaters over the weekend. With $12.4 million in five weeks, it’s the year’s top documentary at the box office, edging out the Ruth Bader Ginsburg doc “RBG.”

Boots Riley’s surreal satire “Sorry to Bother You,” starring Lakeith Stanfield and Tessa Thompson, made one of the year’s best debuts, per-screen. The acclaimed Annapurna Pictures release opened with $717,302 on 16 screens, good for a per-screen average of $44,831. The directorial debut of the hip-hop pioneer Riley, “Sorry to Bother You” is about a black telemarketer who’s catapulted into success after he adopts a “white voice.”

Movie theaters in China were packed by a based-on-a-true-story black comedy about a man who becomes a savior to leukemia patients by smuggling cheaper generic drugs from India. The Chinese film “Dying to Survive,” which has drawn comparisons to the AIDS drama “Dallas Buyers Club,” opened with $146 million in the world’s second largest movie market.

Estimated ticket sales for Friday through Sunday at U.S. and Canadian theaters, according to comScore. Where available, the latest international numbers for Friday through Sunday also are included. Final domestic figures will be released Monday.

ant man and the wasp vs first purge box office weekend

  1. “Ant-Man and the Wasp,” $76 million ($85 million international).
  2. “Incredibles 2,” $29 million ($35.7 million international).
  3. “Jurassic World: Fallen Kingdom,” $28.6 million ($27.6 million international).
  4. “The First Purge,” $17.2 million ($10.9 million international).
  5. “Sicario: Day of the Soldado,” $7.3 million ($3 million international).
  6. “Uncle Drew,” $6.6 million.
  7. “Ocean’s 8,” $5.3 million ($7.7 million international).
  8. “Tag,” $3.1 million ($2.9 million international).
  9. “Won’t You Be My Neighbor,” $2.6 million.
  10. “Deadpool 2,” $1.7 million.

Estimated ticket sales for Friday through Sunday at international theaters (excluding the U.S. and Canada), according to comScore:

  1. “Dying to Survive,” $146 million.
  2. “Ant-Man and the Wasp,” $85 million.
  3. “Incredibles 2,” $35.7 million.
  4. “Jurassic World: Fallen Kingdom,” $27.6 million.
  5. “Sanju,” $12.2 million.
  6. “The First Purge,” $10.9 million.
  7. “Happy Dad and Son 3: Adventure in Russia,” $10 million.
  8. “Animal World,” $8.5 million.
  9. “Ocean’s 8,” $7.7 million.
  10. “Witch,” $4.1 million.

Keya Morgan hit with restraining order protecting Stan Lee

People around Stan Lee are determined not to let his final years be peaceful as the Marvel icon had to go to court again on Friday.

The private struggle over the care and legacy of Marvel mastermind Stan Lee played out in public Friday in a Los Angeles courtroom as attorneys working with his daughter shoved aside a previous lawyer and reasserted that they represent the 95-year-old Lee.

They were granted an elder-abuse restraining order against a former manager of Lee, just as the previous attorney had done, but only after a judge heard arguments about who should speak for Lee.

In the tiny courtroom packed with current and former attorneys and associates of Lee, lawyer Tom Lallas asked for a 30-day extension of the temporary restraining order he had received against Lee’s former manager Keya Morgan. Lallas has said in legal documents and news releases in recent weeks that he was representing Lee.

Superior Court Judge Pro Tem Ruth Kleman refused to consider the motion, saying it appeared Lallas was not employed by Lee.

“I’m only concerned who has authority to represent Mr. Lee,” Kleman said.

Lee’s daughter and only child, J.C. Lee, sat in court and smiled at her attorneys when the judge refused to recognize Lallas. Attorneys working with her had provided a signed declaration from Stan Lee denouncing Lallas.

The hearing came on the anniversary of the death of Joan Lee, Stan Lee’s wife of nearly 70 years, whose absence left a void that has resulted in a struggle between would-be friends, attorneys, advisers and managers of the man whose co-creations include Spider-Man, the Incredible Hulk and the rest of the Avengers.

The latest Marvel film featuring his characters, “Ant-Man and The Wasp,” was released Friday and is expected to top the weekend box office.

The new restraining order was filed Thursday by attorney Stephen Crump. In the application, Crump alleges that Morgan made malicious and false remarks about Lee’s daughter to Lee, and prevented Lee’s financial advisers from seeing him. The order bars Morgan from coming within 100 yards of Lee, his daughter, or his brother, Larry Lieber.

Stan Lee is currently recovering from the severe physical and emotional injuries caused by Keya Morgan during the period of time Keya Morgan controlled each and every one of Stan Lee’s acts or omissions, and separated Stan Lee from his family, friends and close advisers,” the document states.

The request for the order alleges that Morgan has attempted to interfere with Lee’s ability to contact caregivers, doctors, and family members, has attempted to alienate Lee from his daughter, and is embezzling or misappropriating $5 million worth of Lee’s assets.

Lee’s new lawyers said they would also work with police and prosecutors in an elder-abuse investigation involving Morgan.

According to the allegations, Morgan’s last interaction with Lee was when he and his mother “abducted” Lee out of his house and took him to an apartment, in a “last-ditch effort to complete (sic) cut Stan Lee off from any meaningful communication with anyone other than himself and those he could control.”

Crump alleges that Morgan is now placing harassing phone calls to J.C. Lee and Larry Lieber, in an effort to pressure them psychologically and to regain control of Lee’s affairs.

“If Keya Morgan is allowed contact with Stan Lee, it is feared he will again attempt to remove Stan Lee to unknown location(s) to further his past attempts to control and manipulate Stan Lee, and alienate him from his daughter, and sole heir, J.C. Lee,” the attorney alleges.

The new application was initially denied, and then granted Friday pending a hearing on July 26.

Morgan told media outlets in a text message that he was in New York working on a film. He declined to comment further on the advice of his lawyer but has previously denied abusing Lee in any way.

“For over 10 years I have shown nothing but love, respect & kindness to Stan Lee, & his wife, a fact he has repeated countless times,” Morgan stated. “This is a witchhunt by his daughter and her lawyer against me because she cannot stand the fact Stan likes me so much. I will 100% prove beyond a shadow of a doubt that the allegations against me are false. The truth will come out.”

Morgan is facing two misdemeanor counts for allegedly placing two bogus 911 calls in late May. In the first instance, he reported that intruders had come to Lee’s house, when in fact police had come to check on Lee’s welfare following an elder abuse report. In the second instance, he allegedly claimed an assault with a deadly weapon against a security guard who had refused to sign a non-disclosure agreement.

Morgan’s lawyer Alex Kessel did not immediately reply to a request for comment on the allegations in the new order.

Stan Lee’s declaration said he had fired Lallas in February and had no desire to be further represented by him. It also said Morgan had likely committed malpractice by disclosing to media and others his opinions about Lee’s health and personal life. It said that he had no desire for Lallas to file for a restraining order in his name. In the new docs, Lee’s attorneys claim Morgan’s mishandled more than $5 million of Stan’s money, and he’s suffered severe physical and emotional injuries because of Morgan. The docs also claim Keya’s tried to isolate Stan from his family and moved him to an undisclosed location last month.

“Mr. Lallas has done enough damage already,” the document says. “Hopefully, he will just stop.” The document includes Lee’s original request that Lallas be fired, signed, “Excelsior! Stan Lee.”

Lallas said outside court that he stood by his assertion that he could act on Lee’s behalf, but he was glad at least that Lee’s other attorneys were moving to keep Morgan away from him.

Kirk Schenck, a legal rep for Lee told media outlets, “The Lee Family is conducting its own investigation, and working with the Los Angeles County District Attorney’s Office and the LAPD, in various investigations into Keya Morgan’s and others’ who may have taken advantage of the Lee Family.  We will not comment further on the ongoing investigations for witness and evidentiary protection.”

RIP: Steve Ditko dead at 90: Marvel’s Unsung Hero

What many outside the comic book universe probably don’t know is that Stan Lee isn’t the sole center of the Marvel Universe. While we currently worry about Stan Lee’s well-being amidst allegations of elder abuse towards him, Spider-Man and Doctor Strange’s co-creator Steve Ditko lies silent amidst Stan Lee’s spotlights. That time is over as Steve Ditko, the artist behind Spider-Man and the one behind the trippy visuals of the Doctor Strange film, has passed at the age 90. The cause of death has yet to be announced, but the New York Police Department stated that he may have died days earlier.

Steve Ditko was the co-creator of Spider-Man, Doctor Strange, The Incredible Hulk and other popular Marvel characters along with writer Stan Lee and artist Jack Kirby. Ditko was behind the trippy psychedelic art that made the book popular in the 60s and influenced the visuals of the Doctor Strange film. Steve Ditko was essential to the creation of Spider-Man as we’ve known him for so long, managing to translate Stan Lee’s vision of the character to the printed page which Jack Kirby, unfortunately, failed to realize.

“The Spider-Man pages Stan showed me were nothing like the published character. In fact, the only drawings of Spider-Man were on the splash, and at the end, Kirby had the guy leaping at you with a web gun… Anyway, the first five pages took place in the home, and the kid finds a ring and turns into Spider-Man…. One of the first things I did was to work up a costume. A vital, visual part of the character. I had to know how he looked … before I did any breakdowns. For example: A clinging power so he wouldn’t have hard shoes or boots, a hidden wrist-shooter versus a web gun and holster, etc. … I wasn’t sure Stan would like the idea of covering the character’s face, but I did it because it hid an obviously boyish face. It would also add mystery to the character….”

— Jack Kirby

“Steve Ditko squeezes every ounce of anguish out of Spider-Man’s predicament, complete with visions of the uncle he failed and the aunt he has sworn to save… After his origin, this two-page sequence from Amazing Spider-Man #33 is perhaps the best-loved sequence from the Stan Lee/Steve Ditko era.”

— Peter David, novelist

Ditko left Marvel due to disagreements with Stan Lee, the details of which remain vague until now. We may never know. But the popular version is that their disagreements stem from character credit rights to which Lee had been busy taking. We could probably say that Stan Lee is the Steve Jobs of Marvel comics, more interested in marketing and self-promotion than Marvel or the craft itself. Lee and Ditko have never been on speaking terms since until the both met at the New York Marvel office last 2007.

“Quite a few years ago I met him up at the Marvel offices when I was last in New York. And we spoke; he’s a hell of a nice guy and it was very pleasant. … I haven’t heard from him since that meeting.”

— Stan Lee

Ditko went on to work for other comic book publishers like DC, Charlton Comics and Dark Horse. He went back to Marvel and created the now popular Squirrel Girl. Despite Ditko’s influence on Doctor Strange, he wasn’t approached by director Scott Derrickson due to his reclusive nature.

spider-man doctor strange by steve ditko stan lee

Ditko’s other comic book creations include:

  • Doctor Octopus (Marvel)
  • Sandman (Marvel)
  • Electro (Marvel)
  • Green Goblin (Marvel)
  • The Lizard (Marvel)
  • Eternity (Marvel)
  • Speedball (Marvel)
  • Squirrel Girl (Marvel)
  • Blue Beetle (DC)
  • The Question (DC)
  • Captain Atom (DC)
  • Creeper (DC)
  • Hawk and Dove (DC)
  • Static (Eclipse Comics)

‘Ant-Man and the Wasp’ delivers all the right punches for Paul Rudd, Evangeline Lilly

Paul Rudd returns to his favorite hilarious shrinking hero with “Ant-Man and the Wasp” bringing warmth and good humor along with Evangeline Lilly’s The Wasp in an elevated heartfelt action story. While it may lack the scale of the latest Marvel films, it’s a well-rounded sequel sure to please fans.

Not since Animal, against the advice of Dr. Bunsen Honeydew and Beaker, ingested Insta-Growth pills has a movie had as much fun with scale as “Ant-Man and The Wasp.”

Among the greatest threats to the shape-shifting heroes of the Marvel sequel are windshield wipers, salt shakers, and seagulls. This is surely the first movie to weaponize that most fearsome of terrors: a giant Hello Kitty Pez dispenser. In one of the film’s finest moments, a loud, careening chase culminates in a dramatic fall into the ocean sounded not with an explosive splash but with a tiny ripple and a “Plink!”

In both scale and ambition, “Ant-Man and The Wasp” is an altogether more modest affair, and it’s so much the better for it. Most Marvel movies strenuously insist on how much they matter — how much a carefully stitched together comic-book apparatus hangs in the balance — with only an occasional aside to acknowledge their inherent silliness. But slapstick is in the DNA of “Ant-Man and The Wasp.”

For some Marvel devotees, “Ant-Man and The Wasp” will be a clever enough diversion in between the more main-event releases. But it’s pretty much exactly what I’d want in a superhero movie: a funny cast, zippy action scenes and not an infinity stone in sight.

The Marvel product has, it should be noted, grown more dynamic and varied in recent years. But if you’re not going to reach the mythic heights of “Black Panther,” the light-hearted antics of “Ant-Man and The Wasp” are your next-best bet. As different as they are, the two films have one crucial thing in common: No outer space.

Just as “Black Panther” styled itself after a spy thriller, “Ant-Man” takes from the heist movie. The first installment in 2015 was a somewhat muddled franchise debut, thanks to a late director shuffle. Peyton Reed, who took over production on the first one, is back here, and he has carved out a real identity for Paul Rudd’s character, among the most self-contained in Marvel’s “cinematic universe.”

And more than its predecessor, “Ant-Man and The Wasp” has adopted the goofball charm of its leading man. Coming a few years after “Ant-Man,” Rudd’s Scott Lang is now under house arrest for his involvement in the Berlin showdown of “Captain America: Civil War.” When his 10-year-old daughter Cassie (Abby Ryder Fortson) isn’t around, he passes the time playing drums and learning magic tricks. With just days to go before Randall Park’s S.H.I.E.L.D. agent is to remove Lang’s monitoring device, he’s summoned by the brains behind their last adventure: Dr. Hank Pym (a sometimes in-the-way Michael Douglas) and Pym’s daughter Hope van Dyne (Evangeline Lilly), whose winged Ant-Man-like suit has earned her the Wasp moniker.

Pym believes his wife, Janet (Michelle Pfeiffer) has for the last 30 years been locked away in the “quantum realm,” a mind- and matter-bending subatomic limbo that, it turns out, has predictably done curiously little damage to the indestructible Pfeiffer. A Technicolor blur of floating blobs, the quantum realm looks like a lava lamp’s dream of heaven.

To send someone into the realm on a rescue mission, Pym and Van Dyne have built a sophisticated laboratory many stories high that, with a click of a remote, they can shrink down to carry-on size. Their plans bring them into contact with a black-market dealer (Walton Goggins) and an old academic colleague of Pym’s (Laurence Fishburne). It also attracts the interest of the film’s villain, Ghost (Hannah John-Kamen), whose tragic backstory has left her burning (figuratively) and blurry (literally) with anger for being robbed of a bodily existence.

The storyline is fine but the bulk of the pleasures of “Ant-Man and The Wasp” come from its digressions. And no one better breaks down the molecular structure of a Marvel movie than Michael Pena. Every time he takes the screen, he threatens to destabilize it with his chatterbox excitement. When Pena’s Luis (Lang’s friend and business partner at X-Con Security) is given a truth serum, you pray for the movie to just let him keep talking until the end credits roll. Just as good is Park, who steals his scenes with a quieter deadpan.

There are more gags, too. A malfunctioning Ant-Man suit turns Rudd enormous or embarrassingly child-sized. A Hot Wheels-riff on the “Bullitt” car chase tumbles down the hills of San Francisco. None of this is earth-shattering stuff, but that’s part of the fun of it. Here, for once, is a Marvel movie about saving one life, not a billion.

“Ant-Man and the Wasp,” a Walt Disney Studios release, is rated PG-13 by the Motion Picture Association of America for “some sci-fi action violence.” Running time: 118 minutes. Three stars out of four.

‘Ant-Man’s’ Evangeline Lilly talks The Wasp and stepping up on movie sets

President Donald Trump may have begun making jabs at the #MeToo movement and women empowerment, but that’s not keeping actresses like Evangeline Lilly from remaining silent on the movie set. In fact, she made a concentrated effort to make sure to do that.

The “Ant-Man” sequel may be about tiny superheroes, but the film is making a big statement about female empowerment by featuring Evangeline Lilly’s The Wasp not only in the title but giving her a larger stake in Marvel’s sprawling movie franchise.

“Ant-Man and The Wasp,” the 20th film in the Marvel cinematic universe that includes “Black Panther,” ″Iron Man” and “Avengers: Infinity War,” is the first one in the series to include a female character in a title role. The prominence of The Wasp, a character who has major roles in the “Ant-Man” and “Avengers” comic books, comes after years of fan anticipation for a female Marvel superhero to get her own film. Scarlett Johansson has expressed her desire to see her character, Black Widow, get a standalone film, but Marvel Studios has kept her primarily in its marquee “Avengers” films.

“You know, I’ve asked myself the same question: Are we making a mountain out of a molehill?” Lilly said during a recent interview when asked about being featured in a Marvel film’s title. She said after considering it more closely, “‘No, actually, this is kind of a big deal, and this is about time.’” The film is the sequel to 2015′s “Ant-Man,” which introduced Paul Rudd as a thief enlisted by Michael Douglas’ Hank Pym to become a do-gooder. The original earned more than $180 million in North America and $500 million at the global box office. The sequel is the third Marvel Films release this year, but it largely steers clear of the developments in the blockbuster “Avengers: Infinity War.”

The Wasp was a comic book favorite of director Peyton Reed, who teased her appearance in future Marvel films with a cameo of her supersuit at the end of “Ant-Man.”

He said it was important that The Wasp be a fully-formed hero and not bound by stereotypes.

“I worked really closely with Evangeline, and we talked about, ‘Now we’re going to have a chance to make a fully formed hero, and we want her to be as dimensional as possible. And we don’t want her to be a hero who is always glammed up with hair and makeup. We wanted her to be a little sweaty. And we want her, like, when that helmet comes off, her hair is in a ponytail, because that’s the practical thing you would do,’” Reed said.

“I wanted her to have a signature style that little girls, like I was when I was a feminine, girly little girl, would be able to fall in love with,” the actress says of her character, the first in the Marvel Cinematic Universe to get equal billing with a man.

Lilly’s role isn’t the only prominent female character in the film. Hannah John-Kamen plays Ghost, a villain bent on sowing discord among powerful institutions, in a role that was initially written for a man.

“It’s amazing, as a female, to play such a strong character … so that people can look up to that and see that, ‘Yeah, this is a progression,’” said John-Kamen, who is in her biggest role yet after starring in the Canadian sci-fi series “Killjoys” and having small roles in “Ready Player One” and “Tomb Raider.”

“There is so much more going on in this film that represents female energy, that represents female stories, that represents female struggle and that represents female power,” Lilly said. “In this film, I’m very proud to say I recognize authentic female power in that it’s powerful to be vulnerable, it’s powerful to be elegant, it’s powerful to be graceful and nurturing and kind and forgiving and compassionate and generous … things that tend to be typically categorized as weaknesses.”

Marvel’s first film based solely on a female superhero will be the 1990s’ set “Captain Marvel,” which stars Brie Larson in the title role and is slated for release next year.

“Ant-Man and The Wasp” is the first Marvel film to be released after April’s “Infinity War,” which upended the franchise and set up a fourth “Avengers” film that will be released next summer.

The “Ant-Man and The Wasp” cast are keeping any secrets about that film closely guarded. During a recent interview, Rudd started to answer a question about his character’s role going forward in Marvels films. “A funny story, because, you know, in ‘Avengers 4,’” he said, before pretending to be hit in the neck with a dart and falling out of his chair.

Douglas said before his first Comic-Con panel about the original “Ant-Man,” he underwent secrecy tests — and thought he might have to give blood — to prove that he could keep from spoiling that film’s secrets. While he thought it was a bit much at the time, Douglas said he’s grown to appreciate what Marvel Films has done and the care they take to avoid spoilers for fans.

“Marvel has done this amazing job of creating buzz just for people not knowing what exactly is going to happen,” Douglas said.

“We do not want to spoil things for people. There are people out there hired to try and find things out,” Rudd said. “It’s an amazing, intense thing to be a part of.”                                                                                                                                     Marvel fans have been calling for a female superhero film for years. At what point in your casting did you know that you would actually be getting in the suit and fighting?

When they cast me in the first Ant-Man, I knew that if the first film was a box-office success, then that would mean I would get to put on a suit. So there was probably no one more invested in the box-office numbers of Ant-Man than me. Once the film was successful enough to warrant a second, and I knew that that was going, I still didn’t know that Wasp would be getting equal billing with Ant-Man. So that came as a surprise later: I got a surprise email with nothing but a JPEG of the title card. And that was how they told me. Pretty cool.

You’ve said before that you don’t think female power in entertainment comes from “embracing or copying violent men.” How did you bring that perspective to this film?

Even for the first film, it was very important to me that Hope be an extremely empathetic and compassionate person. And I still did that while having that stereotypical or archetypical [quality] of femininity of being nurturing, compassionate, empathetic. Men can, of course, be compassionate or feminine, but femininity is at the core of what is disrespected in the patriarchy, so it was important to me to always push for feminine qualities to be apparent when she is dealing with situations — how she emotionally reacts to them, [for instance].

In her fight scenes, as trivial as it might seem, I really pushed and fought for her to fight with elegance, grace and femininity. She moves differently than a man. I wanted her to have a signature style that little girls, like I was when I was a feminine, girly little girl, would be able to fall in love with, emulate and relate to in their own movements.

When we did Ant-Man, I had to study a little bit of Muay Thai and MMA-style fighting. And MMA-style fighting is distinctly masculine, it’s got a very masculine posture and a very masculine attack, and that was so difficult for me because I don’t move that way naturally. I really wanted to change that in this film. I wanted to move the way my body wants to move, as a more graceful, feminine woman.

There was an interview with you that went viral in which you talked about your costume being more comfortable than men had led you to believe.

That got so viral that it was sent back to me by people I know. I have friends, agents, everyone’s sending me that interview.

Were there other times on set where you felt you had to offer a perspective of your gender that hadn’t been offered as much before?

I always tried to offer a perspective of my gender that maybe wasn’t offered as much because I live in worlds that are boys’ clubs. In the sci-fi/fantasy space of Hollywood, it’s even more predominately male than in some of the other dramatic spaces, so I’m used to trying to be that voice in the room.

But also, admittedly, something that I really challenged myself with is that it’s very easy for me to say to myself, “You know what, let the boys be boys, let them tell their stories, let them play with their toys, don’t get in the way with your perspective, because you’re just being irritating.” Because I think there is an unconscious message for little girls and women that when you challenge men in the midst of doing something juvenile or fun, then you’re a heavy, a killjoy, a ball and chain. And all my life I grew up thinking, “I swear I won’t be that way, I’ll be cool, I’ll be fun, I’m going to be the chick that can hang with the guys.” And I really challenged myself on this film to shut out all of those critical voices, and the male pressures to conform and to really stand up and be a female voice in this world. And I wasn’t always successful. I still feel that fear of being of being this irritatingly school-marm type of thing.

But one of the things that I did see when I watched the film is that they really, really heard me and honored my requests. Because I didn’t want Hope to be that in the movie. It would be so easy with her nature, personality and drive to get her mother for her to become the motherly figure that’s constantly scolding the juvenile boys, saying, “Now boys, let’s focus, let’s stop goofing around.” I was just was terrified of the idea of this female superhero who’s meant to represent a modern woman being some kind of horrible stereotype of “mommy.” So I really voiced that a lot, and every scene where there was any potential for that, I would push up against that and say, “Let’s pay attention to this. Let’s make sure we represent a woman who can also smile and have a little fun, can understand that there can be levity in moment of severity, that gets a joke, that isn’t a heavy.” Because you often see female characters — especially in the superhero world — being super-serious characters, and the boys get to have all the fun. And I really felt heard, and I feel like when you see the movie, you’re going to see that. And I think it’s really fresh and really fun to see a woman who knows how to take a joke and roll with things, but also can get the job done.

evangline lilly in lost series

Viewers haven’t seen you in a ton of leading roles like this since Lost, although you’ve been in several movies. What kind of parts were you offered after the show — because that show had such a huge cultural shadow to it — and how did they work with your professional goals?

I don’t know if you’re familiar with my journey with acting, but it’s been a unique one, it’s not your typical story. Basically, by accident, my first speaking role in film or television was Lost, and so I was instantly launched into international stardom, and that was really uncomfortable for me. I instantly balked, didn’t know how to deal with it and felt very uncomfortable after that situation. I ended up deciding to retire after I finished Lost. I did a film called Real Steel with Hugh Jackman and then I walked away. I said, “I’m done, I’m never doing this again.” I had a baby, I was writing scripts, I had a quiet little life, and two years later — and I mean, throughout those two years, I had no contact with Hollywood at all — I got a covert call from Peter Jackson, who I knew through my relationship with Dom[inic Monaghan] back in the day, and he said, “Nobody in Hollywood seems to be able to reach Evangeline, but we want to get a hold of her because we want to cast her in this film.” And I was so torn because I had genuinely retired, I thought I was done, but I really wanted to do the movie. The little 13-year-old girl in me was like “I get to be a woodland elf? What?”

evangeline lilly hobbit saved her career

I made a decision and I decided to go do the film. I had a wonderful time making that movie: One of the highlights in my life was living in New Zealand for that year and being a part of that family. That helped opened my eyes to the fact that, OK, this job can be a joy, it’s just a matter of how you approach it, and what you do with it, how much I put myself out there, and to a certain degree, how much I work. And so as I was finishing press for The Hobbit, that’s when I got the call from Marvel, and I thought, “I just need to either draw a very firm line in the sand and say I’m done, or I need to just make my peace with the thing, find a way to be happy and do it in a way that makes me feel comfortable and satisfied.” So that’s what I ended up deciding. I just thought, “Well, I’m a smart lady. I can figure this out. I’m going to figure out a way to do this and be happy.” And I am, I’m very happy, I’ve had a wonderful time promoting this movie, and I’ve had a wonderful time talking to people about things I care about because this movie brings up so many cool issues.

It’s hard to find many other women who leave to have children and then can break back into the industry even if they want to. Is that something you feel you can speak to at this point?

First of all, I just want to be very open and honest about how difficult it is for me to strike that balance. I don’t think it’s easy for any mother who works. And I’ve grappled with this a lot: Is it harder for women to work and be a mother than it is for fathers to work and be fathers? I don’t know, but it certainly seems that way in my observation. I don’t know if that’s because we gestate children for nine months and have a maternal bond, I don’t know if that’s because we are socialized to be the primary caregiver, or [something else], but it’s hard. I make no claims that it’s easy.

And then it’s hard to get work after children. Honestly, I don’t know why I am so fortunate and I just count my blessings and I thank my lucky stars and I also constantly have in the back of my mind the notion that I’m 40 next year. I mean, roles are going to become less and less available to me. I am no longer going to be able to do the roles that are traditionally done, and potentially my career’s going to look very different or slow down. But I’m OK with that, I’m really comfortable. I don’t need to work for my identity, it’s not my source of joy. I work to live, I don’t live to work.

Have you heard anything about a potential Ant-Man 3 yet, and whether you’ll be in it, or anything at this point?

At this point, my understanding is that we need to get butts in the theater seats again if we’re going to have another film. So if everyone gets out and watches it, then I would assume we’ll have another one. I hope we’ll have another one, because I really want to do it again, but I don’t know right now.

Where do you want to go next with your career?

My first passion is writing. And I began publishing a children’s book series that I’m re-launching right now: I published a prequel series to see how that would be received. That was well-received, so now I’m launching the full series.

But I have had this TV show up my sleeve for a long, long time that I’m interested in producing and maybe working as a writer on and performing in, and I think that’s going to be the next thing that I really dedicate a lot of time to. I have a film project that’s in the works right now and we’re just waiting on financing, so I can’t really say what it is until it’s real, but I’ll be working with wonderful and talented people, and that means a lot to me.

One of the reasons why I have such a peace with my age and where I’m at in my career is that what I really want to do is create my own content. I have a lot of stuff that I want to say. I was that little girl that daydreamed my life away, and I still live in imaginary worlds in my mind all the time. The first thing I asked my manager when I hired him seven years ago was, “How do I get these worlds out of my head and put them on paper or on the screen?” That’s what I want to do.

Will Lakers trade mean more LeBron James on the big screen?

Now that LeBron James has signed a mind-boggling $154 million contract to join the Los Angeles Lakers, will we see him back on the big screen? Many think this was a strategic career move for the NBA legend to kickstart film projects in the works.

So could LeBron fans expect to “Space Jam 2″ coming soon to a theater near you or even a whole new “House Party” franchise?

With the leadership of LeBron James, anything is possible.

As James comes from Cleveland to Los Angeles looking to take the Lakers to more championships with a blockbuster $154 million contract announced this week, he could also push those two 1990s properties closer to reality and go from part-time presence to major player in Hollywood.

James hasn’t yet spoken about his plans for Los Angeles. But if he wants to, he’s already shown he can act, and not just in that good-for-an-athlete way.

His one real film role, playing himself in the 2015 Amy Schumer film “Trainwreck,” directed by Judd Apatow, won big raves.

Film critics called him “a comedic revelation.” Ann Hornaday of The Washington Post said he showed “expert, deadpan timing.”

James’ co-stars agreed.

“He was really good. Like everything with him it was very effortless,” said Bill Hader, who played the movie’s male lead with James as his sidekick and previously acted with James when he hosted “Saturday Night Live.” ″He’s always listening. I know actors that don’t listen, they’re just waiting to say their line. He listened.”

Hader said there was frequent improvisation on “Trainwreck,” and LeBron easily kept up with the sketch comedy pros like Hader.

“You’ll never believe this, but he was super confident,” Hader told media outlets with a laugh by phone from the Toronto set of the film “It 2.”

“But not cocky,” Hader added.

“I remember Chris Rock was on set and rattled off a line suggestion really fast for LeBron, and LeBron said it back during the scene verbatim,” Hader said. “I remember thinking, “I can’t do that.”

He wouldn’t be the first Laker to try acting. Kareem Abdul-Jabbar and Shaquille O’Neal had their share of famous, and infamous roles. And Kobe Bryant ended up with an unlikely Academy Award for an animated short based on a poem he wrote about basketball.

Whether or not he appears on screen, James has already begun a major media career that can only get a boost from LA.

Gone are the days when athletes had to be in a major market to make it in film and television, as James himself has shown through his years building his brand in Cleveland.

But there’s nothing like face-time for becoming a force in Hollywood.

James and his business partner Maverick Carter have a production company, SpringHill Entertainment, that has a deal with Warner Bros. and office space on the legendary movie company’s lot, where he could become a regular.

“Certainly the proximity will make it easier for LeBron personally to be part of future projects,” said David Schwab, an executive vice president at Octagon, a global sports and entertainment marketing and management firm. “The advantage of a market like New York, Los Angeles, and Golden State is the ability to have coffee, lunch or dinner daily” with key decision makers. “In a smaller market you don’t get those consistent opportunities,” he said.

Schwab said James’ partners at Warner Bros. and elsewhere are most likely “excited that he’s in Los Angeles as they could possibly use LeBron personally to close business deals with future partners of their own.”

James, via SpringHill and his digital film company Uninterrupted has already brought some projects to big and small screens, with many more in the works. Here are some highlights:

— “Space Jam 2.” The idea of James reviving the 1996 movie starring another candidate for greatest basketball player of all time, Michael Jordan, has been in circulation for several years. The movie with Jordan battling animated aliens alongside Bugs Bunny and his Warner Bros. cartoon buddies brought mixed reviews and eyerolls at the time, but has become a cult classic. Justin Lin of the “Fast & Furious” films has been attached as director.

— “House Party.” Stephen Glover and Jamal Olori of “Atlanta” are writing a script that James and SpringHill hope will revive the franchise that starred Kid n’ Play and spawned three big-screen sequels from 1990 to 1994.

— “Smallfoot.” James will have another chance to show off his comic chops as the voice of a skeptical yeti in Warner Bros’ animated film.

— “Now We’re Talking.” A digital comedy series on Uninterrupted that features two rival professional football quarterbacks who become broadcasters and frequent pro athlete cameos is about to enter its second season.

— SpringHill is also producing several more television projects including the game shows “The Wall” and “Do or Dare” and “Rise Up,” a documentary about the civil rights movement for the History Channel.

Los Angeles Rams Destined For Memorable 2018/19 NFL Season?

It was a case of close but no cigar for the Los Angeles Rams in 2017. Supporters would have settled for a first NFC West title in 14 years at the start of the campaign, but the 26-13 defeat to the Atlanta Falcons in the Wild Card playoff game was a real disappointment. However, it was still a season to remember, and 2018 could be even better. With the NFL’s Coach of the Year, Defensive Player of the Year and Offensive Player of the Year on the roster, anything could happen.

Todd Gurley was the face of Los Angeles’ offense last season, while Aaron Donald is easily the most dominant defensive player in the NFL. The Rams are fortunate enough to have both men on their roster, and it wouldn’t be a huge surprise to see Los Angeles go close in their pursuit of Super Bowl glory. The NFC West champions are primed to lay down a serious challenge to their conference rivals, and fans will be expecting big things this year after impressing in 2017.

The Rams productive in offense

Betting on the NFL this year? Look no further than points when it comes to the Rams. Sean McVay’s side ended the regular season with the league’s most productive offense – scoring 478 points in 16 games. Los Angeles failed to top the 20-point mark just three times all year, and one of those was an in dead rubber affair with starters rested. Bettors should check out the various over/under lines ahead of Rams matches – backing overs is usually the best bet.

The Rams crumbled in the postseason last year but fans are optimistic ahead of what could be a successful campaign. Jared Goff has another year of experience under his belt, and it wouldn’t be a huge surprise to see him challenge for the regular season MVP. At +200.00 to win the NFL’s coveted individual award, Goff is well worth backing given LA’s standing in the NFC West. Another divisional title is on the cards and Goff should shine in the regular season.

More than just the moneyline

Most punters betting on the NFL will know about moneyline markets, but there are plenty of handy football betting strategy guides to help those who aren’t quite as clued up. As an example, the Rams are -115.00 to cover a -3 spread in their opening fixture against the Oakland Raiders. Los Angeles must win by at least four points for the selection to win – this landed in 10 of their 11 victories in the 2017 campaign. McVay’s men should have enough offensive talent to breeze past a hit-and-miss Raiders team.

Los Angeles Rams Todd Gurley with Jared Goff
Los Angeles Rams Todd Gurley with Jared Goff

McVay is the youngest head coach in modern NFL history, but the Rams benefited directly from his aggressive approach last year. Hungry to succeed at the highest level, he can be Los Angeles’ difference maker. With Jared Goff and Todd Gurley carrying the offense, the Rams defense, now blessed with quality in the secondary as well as on the defensive line, could step up in 2018. Watch this space, Los Angeles look set for a HUGE year.

Jerry Seinfeld talks ‘Comedians in Cars’ and getting sued by friends

It’s hard to believe that Jerry Seinfeld’s “Comedians in Cars Getting Coffee” is hitting the ten-year mark continuing his trend of longevity in the industry. With that, he also realizes that with great success also comes the potential for lawsuits.

He experienced it with the “Seinfeld” television series, his animated turn in “Bee Movie,” and now with his latest show. It’s worse when it comes from people you consider to be friends as it feels more personal.

His recent lawsuit comes from Christian Charles, who claims he developed the concept and is, therefore, the owner of the project. Charles alleges that the idea for this show was his. The plaintiff contends he has a long history of working with Seinfeld and that he registered copyrights on a treatment and script for a pilot episode. Charles further says he conducted meetings and had email conversations with Seinfeld’s reps and that after working on the pilot and demanding backend compensation, Seinfeld began to use his creativity without his involvement. He directed the first episode of the series.

Seinfeld says he’s not worried, though he’s a little hurt that the lawsuit comes from a friend.

Earlier in the week, the comedian sat down to talk his favorite moments from “Comedians in Cars Getting Coffee” (the new season debuts July 6 on Netflix), whether it’s open season on comedians after politically polarizing incidents involving stars ranging from Samantha Bee to Kathy Griffin, and why you won’t hear about his political views.

jerry seinfeld with kathy griffin

Does it feel like comedians have come under attack now?

Seinfeld: Not really, because there’s so many voices that they are kind of canceling each other out. It seems to me that every single person everywhere is under attack in their comments section of whatever they think or whatever they said. … To me it has no impact because there’s too many, too much noise. It’s all just noise that just drowns – everybody drowns each other out.

Remember when comedy was an escape?

Seinfeld: It can still be that. My show, I don’t do any political humor, only because I’m not good at it, and I just do stuff that I think is funny. And so, you have no idea what my politics are and I kind of like to be pure, that it’s just about what I think is funny.

You mentioned recently that ABC firing Roseanne Barr was a bit extreme.

Seinfeld: I don’t even know why they had to do that. It seemed like, you don’t need to murder someone that’s committing suicide. I thought the firing was overkill. She’s already dead.

Do you think Roseanne should have been allowed to continue on the show?

Seinfeld: I don’t really watch that kind of TV, so I don’t know much about it. I don’t love that trend. I’m not a fan of going back. I like to go forward. Make up something new. I don’t like retreads, I don’t like sequels, I don’t like Throwback Thursday. I like to look at old pictures, but other than that, let’s move on.

Can you talk about the lawsuit recently filed against you?

Seinfeld: I don’t know if you remember my TV series; a friend of mine sued me for $100 million that I took the whole idea from him. It’s a guy who lives in Queens. … When we did “Bee Movie,” there was guy who said, “I was going to do a movie about bees, so you owe us everything.” It’s unfortunate when it’s a …friend, and they decide to go for the money instead … That’s not the nicest moment, but I’m used to it.

How did the idea for the show originate?

Seinfeld: It really started when I was doing the show called “The Marriage Ref,” which we came up with about 10, 11 years ago and it was celebrities trying to help regular people with their marriage. And so, we were shooting these things and we made a few of them. And I found that I could edit the conversation to make it funnier, that I could go into an edit and I could take 20 minutes of conversation and make it 20 minutes that was just OK and make it 10 minutes that was really funny.

It’s more about the comedians than the coffee and cars?

Seinfeld: Yes. It was really talking to comedians and having them not feel like they have to get a laugh because they have a lot of interesting thoughts. Comedians have very strange minds. That’s how they become comedians. And whenever there’s an audience, our instinct is to play to that audience. But if you get them away from the audience, they come out with other things that are interesting, that I thought people would like to hear.

Can I assume your favorite episode was — with then-President Barack Obama?

Seinfeld: That was. Being outside the Oval office and knocking on the window, and like he’s just some loser single guy, and I’m another loser single guy. It’s like a Jerry and George scene where I’m going, “What’s going on? I thought we were hanging out. Come on let’s go.” That was one of the most amazing moments of my life (and) he and the Secret Service allowed me to do that.

What was your second favorite episode?

Seinfeld: Having the last interview with Jerry Lewis before he passed and getting to talk to him about how he writes and, and … how him and Stan Laurel worked together on a lot of his scripts. And, you know, to a comedy geek like me that’s the ultimate, to talk to somebody like that.

jerry seinfeld in car with julia louis dreyfuss

What about the episode with Julia Louis-Dreyfus?

Seinfeld: It was incredible, you know. … I would never want to do like a conventional reunion-type episode. But for us to just sit together and talk, I think it’s nicer for the public to see that than something that’s really produced and performed.